4月30日，记者从最高人民法院获悉，为进一步贯彻落实"支持和规范发展新就业形态"重大部署，回应 司法实践需求和社会关切，在"五一"国际劳动节到来之际，最高人民法院围绕网约货车领域新就业形态 劳动关系认定标准，聚焦新就业形态劳动者受到损害和致人损害责任承担规则，发布4个新就业形态劳 动者权益保障典型案例，依法妥善保护劳动者、受害者、企业等各方权益，促推平台企业、平台经济健 康有序发展。 据最高人民法院介绍，本批案例着力明晰以下内容： 第一，参照适用新就业形态劳动争议专题指导性案例认定标准，案例1"某运输公司诉杨某劳动争议 案"明确，企业与网约货车司机之间存在用工事实、构成支配性劳动管理的，应当认定存在劳动关系， 依法保障网约货车司机享受劳动权益。 第三，妥善审理劳动者执行工作任务受到损害案件，案例3"冯某诉某物业公司身体权纠纷案"，强调人 民法院在处理相关案件时应当充分考虑新就业形态人员职业伤害保障的制度功能，确保案件处理结果与 有关试点制度安排相向而行。依法支持劳动者关于第三人承担民事赔偿责任的请求，明确第三人的侵权 责任不因劳动者获得新就业形态人员职业伤害保障待遇而免除或者减轻，筑牢职业安全"防护网"。 第 ...

所谓新就业形态，是指互联网平台凭借大数据、人工智能、移动互联网等信息技术，进行劳动者与服务 消费需求大范围、大规模组织、调配、任务分派等活动，实现劳动者和消费者直接对接的就业形态，例 如外卖骑手解决老百姓日常生活需求难题，网约车平台组织夜晚接送医护人员车队等。作为经济社会发 展中崛起的新兴力量，新就业形态劳动者已深度融入生产生活的各个领域与层次。他们穿行在路上，工 作在云端，为满足人民群众多样化需求、推动经济发展作出积极贡献，是美好生活的创造者、守护者。 据相关统计，全国新就业群体总量已达8400万人。 不容忽视的是，这一群体也面临着诸多待解决的急难愁盼问题，在权益保障和服务关爱方面暴露出诸多 短板。从劳动关系层面看，他们与平台企业之间的关系模糊不清，缺乏明确的劳动关系界定标准，一旦 遭遇劳动纠纷，劳动者往往陷入维权困境，难以有效维护自身合法权益。在薪酬与社会保障领域，合理 的薪酬体系尚未全面建立，社会保障覆盖不足，劳动者基本权益保障还不充分。在工作环境方面，他们 常面临复杂和具有挑战的工作条件，如外卖骑手在车水马龙中穿梭，家政服务人员可能面对各种未知状 况等。这些问题在一定程度上影响了新就业形态劳动者的职业 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of algorithm regulation in the context of new employment forms, highlighting the need to protect workers' rights while promoting the healthy development of the platform economy [1][4][5]. Group 1: New Employment Forms - New employment forms have become a significant employment reservoir, with 84 million workers engaged in these roles, accounting for 21% of the total workforce in China [4][5]. - The Supreme People's Court is actively working to establish legal frameworks that recognize and protect the rights of workers in new employment forms, ensuring a balance between labor rights and platform economic growth [4][5][6]. Group 2: Algorithm Regulation - Algorithms are identified as a key technology in managing new employment, with their control level being a crucial factor in determining the legal relationship between platforms and workers [7][9]. - The Supreme People's Court has issued guidelines to ensure that algorithms used in labor management do not violate workers' rights, emphasizing the need for transparency and fairness in algorithmic decision-making [8][9]. Group 3: Legal Challenges and Solutions - The complexity of labor relations in new employment forms poses challenges in accurately determining the existence of labor relationships, which significantly impacts workers' rights [6][9]. - The court has introduced guiding cases to clarify the standards for recognizing labor relationships in new employment forms, aiming to unify the adjudication standards and protect workers' rights [5][6]. Group 4: Data Rights and Protection - The article discusses the increasing importance of data rights and judicial protection in the context of digital economy and artificial intelligence, highlighting the need for clear legal frameworks to address disputes arising from these technologies [12][13]. - The Supreme People's Court is committed to enhancing judicial protection of civil rights in the digital economy while supporting the development of new industries [13][14].