Core Viewpoint - The company firmly opposes the discriminatory decision made by the U.S. regarding the Section 301 investigation into China's maritime logistics and shipbuilding industries, arguing that it distorts fair competition and threatens the stability of global supply chains [1][2]. Group 1: Company Response - The company emphasizes its commitment to integrity, transparency, and compliance in international shipping and logistics services [1][2]. - It asserts that the U.S. measures will negatively impact the global shipping industry's normal operations and sustainable development [1][2]. - The company pledges to continue safeguarding client interests and providing reliable shipping and logistics solutions [1][2]. Group 2: Industry Impact - The company warns that the U.S. actions could undermine the security and resilience of global industrial and supply chains [1][2]. - It highlights the potential disruption to fair competition within the global shipping industry due to the U.S. decision [1][2].

Group 1 - The Chinese government urges the U.S. to respect facts and multilateral rules, and to immediately stop its erroneous practices regarding the proposed "port fees" on Chinese shipbuilding [1][3] - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce has stated that the U.S. imposition of Section 301 tariffs has been ruled as a violation of WTO rules, facing opposition from many WTO members [3] - The proposed port fees and other restrictive measures by the U.S. are seen as harmful, potentially increasing shipping costs and inflation in the U.S., while diminishing the global competitiveness of American goods [3] Group 2 - The Chinese side has repeatedly expressed its position on the U.S. Section 301 investigation, urging the U.S. to return to a rational and objective stance [3] - There is significant domestic opposition within the U.S. against the proposed measures, indicating a lack of support for the government's approach to the shipbuilding industry [3] - The Chinese government is prepared to take necessary measures to defend its legitimate rights and interests in response to U.S. actions [1][3]