Group 1 - The market experienced fluctuations with the ChiNext Index leading the decline, and the CSI A500 Index fell by 0.59% as of the morning close [1] - Among the constituent stocks, Shanghai Electric rose over 6%, while other notable gainers included Jincheng Mining, Shenghong Technology, Aofei Entertainment, Haige Communication, Zhongjin Gold, and Kunlun Wanwei [1] - The A500 ETF (512050), which closely tracks the CSI A500 Index, decreased by 0.64% with a half-day trading volume exceeding 1.8 billion yuan, ranking second among similar products [1] Group 2 - In late May, major state-owned banks collectively lowered deposit rates, with one-year fixed deposits falling below 1% for the first time, and the current deposit rate at only 0.05% [2] - Over the past six months, the A500 ETF (512050) has seen its scale grow by over 5.5 billion yuan, ranking first among comparable funds, with a latest scale of 16.254 billion yuan as of May 23 [2] - According to a report from Guosheng Securities, the CSI A500 Index is expected to yield high returns, with a projected 22% return over the next year and a 10% annualized return over the next three years [2]

Core Insights - The trend of deposit replacement is emerging as interest rates decline significantly, leading to a shift in investment strategies among savers [1][6][9] Group 1: Interest Rate Changes - Major state-owned banks collectively lowered deposit rates, with one-year fixed deposit rates dropping below 1% for the first time, now at 0.95%, and savings account rates at 0.05% [2][3] - Several national joint-stock commercial banks followed suit, with one-year fixed deposit rates now averaging around 1.15% and two-year rates at 1.2% [2][3] - Smaller banks have also adjusted their rates, with many now offering one-year fixed deposit rates between 1.1% and 1.2% [2][3] Group 2: Decline of High-Interest Products - The once-popular large-denomination certificates of deposit (CDs) have seen a decline in demand, with rates dropping significantly; for example, the average one-year rate was 1.719% in March 2025 [4][5] - Many banks have removed two-year and longer-term CDs from sale, with current rates for shorter terms not exceeding 1.4% [4][5] - The attractiveness of large-denomination CDs has diminished compared to other investment products, leading to a decrease in discussions and interest among savers [5] Group 3: Shift to New Investment Strategies - With declining deposit rates and the fading popularity of large-denomination CDs, savers are increasingly seeking alternative investment options [6][9] - Young investors are gravitating towards a new investment strategy termed "new three golds," which includes money market funds, bond funds, and gold funds, as they seek to achieve higher returns and mitigate risks [8][9] - Data shows a significant number of younger investors are diversifying their portfolios, with many allocating a substantial portion of their income to bond funds, indicating a shift in financial behavior [9][10] Group 4: Impact on Banking Sector - The trend of deposit migration is becoming evident, with a reported decrease of 1.39 trillion yuan in household deposits in April, while non-bank deposits increased significantly [10] - Analysts suggest that this shift could impact the stability of bank liabilities and increase liquidity risk, as the absolute interest levels for one-year fixed deposits are now lower than cash management product yields [10]

盛夏的菜市场里，买菜大妈熟练地把鸡蛋分装在不同竹篮，这个动作藏着普通人最朴素的理财智慧。理财与基金的关系就像整筐鸡蛋与分装鸡蛋的容器，看 似相似实则各有门道。摊开银行APP，理财专区展示的收益率总是标着"预期"二字，基金页面却明晃晃挂着近三个月-8.7%的涨跌幅，这两种数字背后藏着 完全不同的底层逻辑。 储蓄罐式理财讲究稳稳的幸福，银行将储户资金投入债券、同业存单等低波动资产，好比把鸡蛋放在铺着海绵的保险柜里。基金则是把鸡蛋交给专业快递 员，穿越股票、期货等颠簸路段，途中可能碎几个蛋，也可能带回双倍鸡蛋。某股份制银行2023年数据显示，持有理财超过180天的客户中，87%实现预期 收益；同期偏股混合型基金投资者中，仅有36%跑赢定期存款。 风险控制是两者最显著的差异点。理财产品的资金池运作像防汛工程，通过资产期限错配平抑波动，但资管新规打破刚兑后，这种"安全垫"正在变薄。基金 则像透明玻璃缸，每日净值波动清晰可见，股票型基金单日涨跌超过3%并不稀奇。2022年债市调整期间，多家银行理财出现破净现象，而债券基金当日申 赎机制让投资者能即时止损。 操作门槛藏着不为人知的玄机。银行理财1元起投的亲民表象下，藏着业绩 ...

新发：固收+产品发行占主导，业绩基准延续下行。 4月理财公司新发产品规模环比回落，与3月 季末冲量窗口期形成的发行高峰形成鲜明对比。 产品谱系呈三大特征： 固收+产品、封闭式产 品、1-3年期产品占据主导地位。新发理财产品业绩基准多数延续下调趋势，凸显理财机构对利率 中枢长期低位运行预期的定价共识，后续或与存款利率调降形成联动，延续下行通道 。 到期：达标率74.75%，较3月环比增加7.05%。 4月全市场理财产品达标率为74.75%，较3月环 比增加7.05%。 分析师： 蔡梦苑 登记编号： S0890521120001 分析师：周佳卉 登记编码：S0890525040001 投资要点 监管政策及资管市场要闻解读：4月21日，中国银行间市场交易商协会发布《银行间债券市场债券 估值业务自律指引（试行）》： 再次明确"应规范开展产品净值计量，不得利用估值运用规则的差 异规避产品净值化要求"，或预示未来银行理财通过"估值技术"平滑收益、控制回撤的操作空间进 一步受限。 5月7日国新办新闻发布会，央行推出一揽子货币政策措施： 面对资产端利率中枢不断 下移、银行净息差持续承压，监管机构通过利率自律机制，引导商业银行 ...

Group 1 - The banking wealth management market is experiencing a recovery, with the total product scale exceeding 30 trillion yuan, reaching 31,358.279 billion yuan as of May 21, an increase of nearly 257.5 billion yuan since the end of April [1] - The average annualized return for the past year in the banking wealth management market is 2.4542% [1] - The number of newly issued wealth management products has increased, with 538 new products launched in the week of May 12, including 101 open-ended and 437 closed-end products [1] Group 2 - Zhejiang Yinhang Wealth Management has launched its first "common prosperity" themed product, "Congjian Fuchun No. 6," which is a closed-end net value type product with a risk level of R2 (medium-low risk) and an annualized performance benchmark of 2.15% [2] - The product primarily invests in fixed-income assets such as deposits and certificates of deposit, enhancing the stability of the product's net value and serving the purpose of wealth preservation and appreciation for residents [2] - The "common prosperity" theme is part of a special initiative where a portion of the product management fees is allocated for charitable purposes, focusing on rural education, poverty alleviation, and investor rights protection [2]

Core Viewpoint - The newly developed classification and regulatory rating method for wealth management companies has entered the trial rating phase, with results recently distributed to companies, indicating a shift towards prioritizing quality over scale in the banking wealth management sector [1][10]. Summary by Relevant Sections Rating Methodology - The rating method emphasizes "quality over scale," discouraging wealth management companies from merely pursuing growth in size. Key evaluation factors include corporate governance, asset management capability, risk management, information disclosure, investor rights protection, and information systems, with asset management capability carrying the highest weight [1]. - The rating results are categorized into six levels, with higher numbers indicating lower scores and greater need for attention. Companies rated 1 or 2 can pilot innovative business, while those rated 5 or 6 are considered high-risk [1]. Trial Rating Results - Initial trial ratings for leading companies were reportedly poor due to the scientific evaluation logic and detailed indicator settings, which resulted in small score differences across companies. Larger companies faced disadvantages due to their scale being used as a denominator in the calculations [2]. - Some industry insiders noted that leading companies performed poorly because they engaged in practices like high-yield cash products, which negatively impacted their quality indicators [2]. Key Pressure Points - The performance benchmark achievement rate is highlighted as a significant pressure point for wealth management companies, with the need for adjustments in product performance metrics to align with asset conditions [4]. - The regulatory focus on increasing the scale of mixed and equity products is evident, with a target of raising the proportion of these investments [5]. Investment Strategy Adjustments - Companies are required to reduce the scale of external investments, as lower external investment ratios lead to higher scores. Many companies currently rely on external managers for asset allocation, which is now being scrutinized [7]. - The inclusion of preferred stocks in equity investments raises questions about the true nature of equity holdings among wealth management companies, as some may not hold traditional stocks or equity [6]. Distribution Channel Evaluation - The management of distribution channels is a critical evaluation metric, particularly affecting companies that distribute through smaller banks. The complexity of evaluating various distribution systems poses challenges for compliance [8][9]. Regulatory Implications - The introduction of the rating method signifies a more stringent regulatory environment for the wealth management industry, aimed at addressing irregularities and promoting compliance among companies [10]. - While the rating method may raise the bar for new company approvals, it is unlikely to deter interest in obtaining licenses, as the demand for such licenses remains high [11].

向上滑动阅览 本文系转载自 深交所投教公众号。 本文不构成野村东方国际证券的任何投资建议、推介或宣传。野村东方国际证券没有独立核实过被转载文章的 内容，该文章中的任何观点不代表野村东方国际证券观点，野村东方国际证券不对投资者依赖本文的任何内容 而采取的行动承担任何责任。投资有风险，入市需谨慎。 本文转载自： 深交所投教 免责声明 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent reduction in bank deposit interest rates has led to a new wave of fee discounts on wealth management products, making them attractive to investors [1][6]. Summary by Sections Fee Reductions Announced - Several banks, including Bank of China Wealth Management, China Merchants Bank Wealth Management, and Everbright Wealth Management, have announced fee reductions for various wealth management products [1][5]. - Bank of China Wealth Management has reduced the sales service fee for its "Leisure Daily 10" product from 0.30% to 0.15% effective May 20, and the fixed management fee for "Enjoy Daily 86" from 0.30% to 0.05% from May 21 to June 21 [1]. - China Merchants Bank Wealth Management has lowered the fixed management fee for its "Stable Enjoy Dynamic 5" product from 0.20% to 0.05%, effective May 21 [2][4]. Competitive Landscape - Other banks, including China Everbright Bank and Xinyin Wealth Management, are also participating in the fee reduction trend, with Everbright reducing management fees from 0.15% to 0.07% and sales service fees from 0.20% to 0.08% for its "Sunshine Golden Abundant 198" product [5]. - Xinyin Wealth Management has announced significant fee cuts for its "Daily Profit 65" product, with management fees dropping from 0.30% to 0.01% and sales service fees from 0.30% to 0.20% starting May 23 [5]. Investor Sentiment - The reduction in fees is seen as a way to attract more clients, particularly small and medium-sized investors who are sensitive to costs [6][7]. - Some investors, however, remain skeptical, prioritizing past performance and stability over fee reductions when selecting wealth management products [7]. Long-term Considerations - Industry experts suggest that while fee reductions can enhance product competitiveness in the short term, they may not be sustainable long-term strategies [7]. - Recommendations include improving research capabilities and asset allocation to enhance returns rather than relying solely on fee reductions [7].

Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the banking wealth management industry Core Insights - The banking wealth management market experienced a significant seasonal rebound in April 2025, with a month-on-month increase of 7.58% to reach 31.09 trillion yuan, reflecting an 8.05% year-on-year growth [4][19] - The issuance of fixed income plus (固收+) products dominated the new product offerings, indicating a shift in investor preference towards products that balance liquidity and yield [5][35] - Regulatory changes are expected to limit the operational space for banks to smooth returns through valuation techniques, impacting future product offerings [12][10] Regulatory Policies and Asset Management Market News - On April 21, the China Interbank Market Dealers Association released self-regulatory guidelines for bond valuation, emphasizing the need for standardized net asset value measurement [10][11] - On May 7, the central bank introduced a series of monetary policy measures aimed at stabilizing market expectations, which may have a dual effect on the banking wealth management market [13][14] - The China Securities Regulatory Commission announced an action plan for the high-quality development of public funds, indicating a shift towards long-term performance evaluation and transparency [15][16] Market Performance - The total market for wealth management products saw a significant recovery in April, with cash management products experiencing a decline in yield, while fixed income products saw an increase [22][26] - The annualized yield for cash management products fell to 1.49%, while fixed income products rose to 2.74%, indicating a divergence in performance [22][26] - The market's overall performance is influenced by the ongoing low interest rate environment and regulatory changes affecting product structures [26][31] New Product Issuance - In April, the issuance of new wealth management products decreased compared to March, with fixed income plus products leading the market [35][36] - The new issuance of fixed income plus products amounted to 272.99 billion yuan, significantly higher than pure fixed income products [35][36] - The majority of new products were in the 1-3 year maturity range, reflecting a trend towards medium-term investments in a declining interest rate environment [35][36] Product Maturity and Compliance - The compliance rate for wealth management products reached 74.75% in April, an increase of 7.05% from March, attributed to the recovery in the bond market [44][48] - Short-term products maintained higher compliance rates due to their flexibility in adjusting performance benchmarks in response to market fluctuations [44][48]

Group 1 - The company will hold an online performance briefing for the year 2024 on May 28, 2025, from 15:00 to 16:00 [2][3] - Investors can submit questions before the meeting through a designated website [2][4] - The meeting aims to provide insights into the company's operational performance and development strategy [2][3] Group 2 - The company has approved the use of idle raised funds to purchase financial products, with a total limit of up to RMB 100 million [8][9] - The investment period for these financial products is valid for 12 months from the date of board approval [9] - The company has not used raised funds for financial products in the past twelve months, and the current investment will not affect the implementation of fundraising projects [13][14]