Core Viewpoint - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has issued an action plan to promote the high-quality development of public funds, focusing on shifting the industry from "scale" to "return" and fostering a turning point for high-quality development [1] Group 1: Investor-Centric Reforms - The reform plan emphasizes a significant overhaul of the public fund assessment mechanism, aiming to optimize fund operation models and align fund company revenues with investor returns [2] - Specific measures include establishing a floating management fee system based on performance benchmarks, enhancing the constraints of performance comparison benchmarks, and gradually reducing investor costs [2] - Starting from March 21, 2025, certain index funds managed by the company will have their index usage fees covered by the fund manager, reducing costs for investors [2] - The company plans to maintain a strong dividend distribution, having distributed over 3.6 billion yuan across 90 instances in 2024, to enhance investor satisfaction [2] Group 2: Product Innovation and Development - The rapid growth of index products has led to the emergence of over a thousand ETF products, prompting the CSRC to promote high-quality development in index investment [3] - The reform plan calls for increasing the scale and stability of public fund equity investments and introducing more on-market and off-market index funds [3] - The company is expanding its index product offerings, having launched several new funds in 2025, including the Zhongyin CSI 300 Index Fund and Zhongyin STAR Market 50 ETF [3] - Future plans include accelerating the development of passive equity products and enhancing the alignment with national strategies and thematic investment opportunities [3] Group 3: Risk Management and Compliance - The public fund industry in China is entering its 27th year, with the new "National Nine Articles" reflecting a strong emphasis on regulatory oversight and risk prevention [4] - The reform plan outlines clear requirements for maintaining risk management, including improving multi-level liquidity risk prevention mechanisms and guiding long-term investment behaviors [4] - The company is committed to enhancing risk management and compliance, focusing on a platform-based, team-oriented, and integrated investment research system [4] - Ongoing reforms will strengthen governance across various dimensions, including product and risk management, while continuing to prioritize investor interests [4]

首批26只新型浮动费率基金获批 最近，事关8亿多基民的公募基金改革正在落地。5月23日，首批26只新型浮动费率产品拿到了证监会的 上市"许可证"。这意味着，最快下周就有产品将上架开售。 除了浮动费率，本轮公募基金改革关键点还在于全面升级对基金公司和基金经理的考核"指挥棒"，引导 他们真正和基民"同甘共苦"。 浮动费率之后，管理费就要和每个基民的持有期限、持有期间基金有没有跑赢业绩比较基准、有没有给 基民挣到钱挂钩了。比如基民买了"小牛基金"，如果拿了不满一年就卖了，管理费还是1.2%。 如果拿满一年想卖，那管理费就要分三种情况了。先假设"小牛基金"锚定的业绩比较基准是沪深300。 情况一："小牛基金"赚钱了，年化收益率还比沪深300跑赢6%以上，相当于每年帮基民挣到了6%以上 的超额收益。基金公司最多可以收每年1.5%的管理费。 情况二："小牛基金"年化收益率比沪深300跑输3%或更多，基金公司最多只可以收每年0.6%的管理费。 基金表现明显跑输了市场，业绩差只能少收费。 情况三：除了以上情况，基金仍按每年1.2%收管理费。 在这种浮动费率下，基民同样买1000元基金，表现好的基金每年管理费可以收到15元，表 ...

Macro News - The People's Bank of China and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange have proposed a unified foreign currency management policy for funds raised by domestic companies through overseas listings, allowing for the repatriation of funds in either foreign currency or RMB [1] - Major state-owned banks have collectively lowered deposit rates, with one-year fixed deposit rates falling below 1% for the first time, prompting a shift in savings behavior among younger generations towards alternative investment options like money market funds, bond funds, and gold [1] Financial Sector - The China Securities Regulatory Commission has approved the first batch of 26 new floating-rate funds, reflecting a commitment to reform public funds and align fund company income with investor returns [5] - Hong Kong's new stock fundraising has exceeded HKD 76 billion this year, marking a more than sevenfold increase compared to the same period last year, indicating a robust IPO market [6] Company News - The "Fujian Times Zeyuan Equity Investment Fund Partnership" has completed its establishment with a total scale of CNY 10.128 billion, with the investment focus on new energy and high-end manufacturing sectors [12] - The State Administration for Market Regulation has drafted a guideline to regulate the charging behaviors of online trading platforms, aiming to protect the rights of platform operators and ensure fair practices [9] Regulatory Actions - The National Internet Information Office has closed several accounts and websites that disseminated false information about the capital market and engaged in illegal stock recommendations, highlighting ongoing efforts to maintain market integrity [10][11]

23日傍晚，首批新型浮动费率基金获得中国证监会批准注册，很快将向投资者发售。这批新型基金有哪些特点？将给基金投资者带来哪些新的体验？央视记 者专访了中国证监会相关部门负责人。 这次公募基金改革的总体目标和方向是什么？ 中国证监会证券基金机构监管司司长 申兵：公募基金行业这些年发展的情况来看，总体上还是保持一个稳定发展、稳健运营的态势。但是近些年也暴露出 来它的功能发挥不够，投资者回报不足。大家对公募基金未来的发展有更高的期待。这次改革的主要的目的还是要更加注重投资者回报，坚定地树立以投资 者为本的这种发展理念。它围绕进一步强化基金公司、基金经理和投资者回报的这种绑定机制，通过完善基金公司的绩效考核体系，优化产品运作的模式， 通过加强监管和执法等一系列的举措，来进一步体现这个行业和投资者利益的一致性。 浮动费率产品出来以后，会给基金投资者带来什么影响？ 中国证监会证券基金机构监管司司长 申兵：这次推出的新的浮动费率产品，对于持有一定周期的投资者采取分档收费的模式。对投资者持有期间的基金回 报比较高的、比较好的，可以适当多收费，但对于表现比较差的必须少收费。通过这种方式，从理念上进一步加强基金公司和投资者的共情。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent reform of public funds in China, affecting over 800 million investors, introduces new floating fee rate products and upgrades the assessment criteria for fund companies and managers, aiming to align their interests with those of investors [1][7]. Floating Fee Rate Structure - The first batch of 26 new floating fee rate products has received approval from the China Securities Regulatory Commission, with products expected to be available for sale soon [1]. - Under the new floating fee structure, management fees will be linked to the fund's performance relative to a benchmark, with fees varying based on the holding period and performance outcomes [2][4]. - For example, if a fund outperforms its benchmark by over 6%, the management fee can be as high as 1.5%, while underperformance by 3% or more can reduce the fee to 0.6% [2][3]. Assessment Criteria Upgrade - The reform includes a comprehensive upgrade of the assessment criteria for all actively managed equity funds, shifting focus from management scale and profit to investment returns [5][6]. - The new assessment framework emphasizes long-term performance, with at least 80% of the evaluation weight on returns over three years [5]. - Fund managers will face stricter penalties for underperformance, with significant reductions in performance-based compensation for those whose funds lag behind benchmarks by over 10 percentage points [5][6]. Industry Trust Restoration - The public fund industry has faced challenges, with actively managed funds underperforming compared to passive index funds, leading to a shift in investor preference [7]. - The reform aims to restore trust by ensuring that fund managers are incentivized to generate excess returns for investors, thereby justifying management fees [7][8]. - The introduction of floating fee rates is seen as a significant innovation in fee structures, allowing for a more personalized fee arrangement based on individual fund performance [8].

中国证监会批复首批26只新型浮动费率基金 金十数据5月23日讯，今天，中国证监会批复首批26只新型浮动费率基金，这批基金产品预计很快就会 向投资者发售。首批26只新型浮动费率基金5月16日申报后，5月19日均获受理，5月23日迅速获批。这 距离中国证监会印发《推动公募基金高质量发展行动方案》只有16天，体现了监管部门对落实公募基金 改革方案、构建基金公司收入报酬与投资者利益回报绑定机制的重视。首批产品均为全市场选股的基 金，业绩比较基准主要对标沪深300、中证A500、中证500或者中证800等主流宽基指数，并部分参与港 股和债券投资。 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the transformation of the public fund industry in China, focusing on a reform plan that prioritizes investor interests and aims to reshape the industry's core profit distribution mechanisms [2] - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) issued the "Public Fund High-Quality Development Action Plan," which includes 25 reform measures targeting various aspects such as fee structures, assessment systems, equity investment, and compliance management [2] - This reform marks a significant shift towards a system that emphasizes fiduciary responsibility, aiming to return to the essence of "entrusted management" in the public fund sector [2] Group 2 - The article discusses the potential impact of the reform on the investment experience for retail investors, suggesting that the changes may lead to a more equitable distribution of benefits between fund managers and investors [2] - The reform is seen as a response to the growing demand for transparency and accountability in the public fund industry, reflecting a broader trend towards investor-centric practices [2] - The article highlights that the implementation of these reforms could significantly alter the competitive landscape of the public fund industry, potentially benefiting those funds that align closely with investor interests [2]

Core Viewpoint - The "Action Plan for Promoting High-Quality Development of Public Funds" marks a systematic reform phase in the public fund industry, focusing on investor interests and returning to the essence of "entrusted management" [1] Fee Reform - The plan promotes a floating management fee mechanism for actively managed equity funds, linking fees to performance against benchmarks, addressing the issue of "funds making money while investors do not" [2][3] - The floating fee model aims to enhance the accountability of fund companies, compelling them to improve investment capabilities and focus on long-term value creation [2] Interest Binding - The core of the public fund reform is "interest binding," which strengthens the alignment of interests among fund companies, fund managers, and investors, marking a shift towards prioritizing "investor returns" [4][5] - The plan defines fund performance metrics and emphasizes long-term performance in fund manager evaluations, with at least 80% weight on product performance metrics [6] Future Outlook - The shift in evaluation focus from management scale to investor returns is expected to create a virtuous cycle of "increased returns—capital inflow—market stability," fostering a healthier and more vibrant capital market ecosystem [7]

中信证券：关于回归基准配置的几个误区和几个事实 我们认为市场对于公募考核新规以及回归基准行业配置的讨论存在一些误区。从海外经验来看，回归基准是通 过基准的行业配比向基金持仓配比演化而不是相反；产品投资策略向客户盈利导向回归，在长期视野下，这与 追求排名和绝对收益并不矛盾，反而是统一的；跑输基准的惩罚机制最终导致的是基金减少博弈性持仓，长期 来看最大的影响是活跃头寸的占比下降。 此外，用前瞻眼光去看，未来如果外资逐步回流，市场生态也会相较过去3年发生重大转变，不能用后视镜视 角静态去看行业配比，好公司和差公司之间的差异会远远超过所谓的"好行业"和"差行业"。 申万宏源：公募持仓向业绩比较基准靠拢未必是普遍趋势 《推动公募基金高质量发展行动方案》是长期改革，而其短期映射，成为结构性行情的主要线索。在我们看 来，主动公募产品调整业绩比较基准，是集中梳理产品策略的一次机遇。而持仓向业绩比较基准靠拢却未必是 普遍趋势。 如何去有效地设定基准是长期而言实现客户利益、赢得竞争并避免被被动型产品替代的最关键问题。对于主动 权益型产品而言，沪深300、中证800以及A500作为全市场基金基准都有较大的局限性，能够反映新质生产力 ...

Group 1: Core Insights - The report emphasizes the significance of the new public fund regulations, which aim to strengthen equity investment orientation and long-term performance evaluation, leading to a shift in the industry from a "new issuance-driven" model to a focus on "existing stock cultivation" [1][2][3] - The new regulations are expected to create a medium to long-term institutional dividend for the equity market, facilitating the inflow of long-term capital [1][2] Group 2: Public Fund Regulations - The reform highlights a "stock priority" approach, encouraging fund companies to focus on the sustained performance of existing products rather than just new issuances [2][14] - The introduction of a floating fee mechanism is designed to push products back to a "real alpha" orientation, enhancing benchmark constraints and reducing ineffective supply from high-scale, low-performance funds [2][15] - Smaller fund companies are advised to adopt a "boutique strategy" and focus on niche markets to build competitive advantages through efficient research and incentive mechanisms [2][16] - The report anticipates a surge in index products, particularly ETFs, driven by expedited registration and policy support for Smart Beta and enhanced strategies [2][17] - The classification evaluation mechanism will transform the business model of distribution agencies, shifting the focus from "selling quickly" to "holding long" [2][18] - Active equity funds will face pressure from regulatory constraints on performance deviation and style drift, leading to a faster exit of inefficient equity products [2][19] - The new regulations are likely to impact the industry allocation structure, with sectors such as banking and public utilities expected to see passive reallocation due to strengthened benchmark constraints [2][36] Group 3: Investment Recommendations - The report suggests a "4+1" investment strategy focusing on domestic consumption, technology growth, cost improvement, structural opportunities from international trade, and stable long-term holdings [3][40] - Specific sectors identified for potential investment include consumer goods, technology, military, and stable dividend stocks, with a particular emphasis on the automotive and healthcare sectors [3][40]