Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the challenges faced by a German entrepreneur, Yecker, in hiring engineers from China due to visa issues, which may be influenced by political factors, potentially hindering economic opportunities in Germany [1][2]. Group 1: Economic Implications - Yecker's attempt to hire four Chinese engineers is seen as a missed opportunity for Germany to develop a renewable energy company that could contribute to tax revenue and job creation [1]. - The current economic situation in Germany, coupled with the government's focus on economic development, makes the inability to hire these engineers particularly regrettable [1]. Group 2: Political Context - The visa issues may stem from bureaucratic inefficiencies or the rise of far-right sentiments and anti-immigrant attitudes in Germany [2]. - There is speculation that the German authorities may be setting obstacles in visa applications to align with the "de-risking" narrative regarding China, although this remains unproven [2]. Group 3: EU-China Relations - Despite recent positive statements from the EU and its member states about improving relations with China, practical issues like visa applications have not seen significant improvement [2]. - The article emphasizes the need for the EU to translate positive rhetoric into concrete actions to facilitate exchanges with China [2]. Group 4: Strategic Autonomy - The article highlights the growing recognition in Europe of the importance of strategic autonomy, especially in light of external pressures such as the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict and U.S. economic influence [3]. - There is a call for the EU to adopt a more pragmatic approach towards China, moving away from politicizing economic and cultural exchanges [3][4]. Group 5: Cooperation Potential - The article notes that China views Europe as a key partner and supports European integration, emphasizing mutual benefits in trade and cooperation [3][4]. - The economic relationship between China and Europe is significant, with their combined economic output exceeding one-third of the global total and trade accounting for over a quarter of global trade [4].

这时，关键的转折点来了！根据内部消息，这笔飞机订单是否能够成行，关键在于欧洲敢不敢做出选 择：是要中国提供的真金白银？还是继续做美国的"提线木偶"？ 中国的这手双线操作更是绝妙。一方面，它给欧洲递出了橄榄枝；另一方面，它又对波音采取了宽容态 度，显然是在给美国施压：你看，我随时可以换家航空公司！然而，美国商务部却迅速反应，禁止了半 导体设计软件的出口，出尔反尔的速度，简直比川剧变脸还要快！ 家人们，原本大家都以为中美的关税战可能会逐渐平息，但就在此时，突然传来一个震撼消息——中国 可能要花大价钱购买几百架空客飞机！这背后究竟隐藏了怎样的玄机呢？让我们慢慢揭开这层迷雾。 首先，给大家抛出一个猛料：你知道吗？就在欧洲领导人准备前来中国庆祝中欧建交50周年的关键时 刻，这笔价值上千亿的大单竟可能成为他们见面的"见面礼"！然而，令人疑惑的是，刚传出这个消息， 紧接着中国就解除了对美国波音飞机的禁令。这一手看似左右开弓的操作，背后到底有什么深意呢？ 说起这笔交易，那可是波涛汹涌的背后有着复杂的暗流。如今美国依旧手握关税大棒，不停地对外挥 舞，而欧盟虽然表面上看似硬气，但心里其实相当不安。中国在这个时刻突然抛出空客订单， ...

欧洲各国政府正为与美国总统特朗普的高风险谈判做准备，这些谈判将把欧洲大陆的防务、经济和安全 置于严峻考验之中。 随着官员们努力在未来五周围绕乌克兰、跨大西洋贸易以及美国对北约的承诺进行关键谈判，以维持特 朗普的支持，建立"独立欧洲"的宏伟计划已被搁置。欧洲谈判代表越来越担心，特朗普将要求欧盟在一 个领域做出让步，以换取在另一个领域的支持，从而迫使欧盟牺牲其核心价值观或接受与华盛顿的彻底 决裂。 欧盟前首席外交官约瑟夫·博雷利（Josep Borrell）在去年11月卸任时表示："所有这些危机同时爆发，这 是一场完美风暴。他（特朗普）可能会试图挤压我们，并可能从这三个方向将我们逼入绝境。可能会告 诉我们：'如果你不给我一个好的贸易协议，那么我们将不支持乌克兰。'或者，'如果你逼我支持乌克 兰，那么我们将增加（我们要求你增加）你在北约的军事开支'。" 欧盟高级官员已讨论了这三个方面的最坏情况。其中包括美国完全暂停对乌克兰的支持，切断情报并阻 止欧洲国家提供美国购买的武器、一场对经济增长造成严重后果的全面贸易战、以及美国军队和军事能 力迅速撤出欧洲。 一位欧盟高级外交官表示，"我们认为（乌克兰、欧洲防务和贸易）是独 ...

Core Viewpoint - French President Macron calls for a new alliance between Asian countries and Europe to enhance trade, dialogue, and cooperation in defense and security, aiming to create a stable environment and uphold a rules-based international order [3][4] Group 1: Macron's Speech Highlights - Macron emphasizes the need for Europe and France to defend territorial integrity and sovereignty in the context of the Russia-Ukraine conflict and the Israel-Palestine issue, warning that failure to resolve these conflicts could damage their credibility in the Asia-Pacific region [4][5] - He identifies division as a major risk facing the international community, stating that countries forced to "choose sides" due to great power competition could undermine global order and international cooperation mechanisms established post-World War II [4][5] - Macron reiterates the importance of "strategic autonomy" for both Europe and Asia, advocating for a new positive alliance based on shared norms and principles to prevent countries from becoming collateral damage in superpower conflicts [5][6] Group 2: Strategic Initiatives - The concept of "providing a third way" is a recurring theme in Macron's visit, linking it to France's Indo-Pacific strategy, which aims to maintain an open environment and order in the region [6][7] - Macron asserts that France is a participant in the Indo-Pacific region and emphasizes the need for cooperation with countries like India and ASEAN, while also acknowledging the necessity of building new cooperative frameworks [6][7] - He stresses that the current divide between the U.S. and China represents a significant risk, advocating for a new alliance between Paris and Indo-Pacific partners to ensure that nations do not become victims of superpower choices [6][7]

德国联邦国防军参加军事演习。 5月中旬，德国总理默茨在联邦议院发表就任总理以来的首次讲话时表示，要把德国联邦国防军建 设成为欧洲最强大的常规军队，并重振德国经济，使德国再次成为欧洲经济增长的"火车头"。舆论普遍 认为，这两项目标密不可分，且最能代表默茨政府的施政规划，但对当前的德国来说存在明显相互矛 盾，实现前景充满不确定性。 分析认为，默茨政府公开提出打造欧洲最强大的常规军队，甚至要求财政优先用于防务需求，被视 为前任朔尔茨政府提出的"时代转折"理念的升级版。其意图通过让德国重返欧洲外交与防务舞台中心， 推进欧洲防务乃至战略自主进程，进而将欧盟从"经济共同体"升格为"地缘战略共同体"。这不仅是德国 自身战略定位的重大转变，也关乎欧洲安全架构的重塑。 自2022年俄乌冲突全面爆发以来，德国作为北约主要成员国逐步走向前台，已成为向乌克兰提供经 济和军事援助最多的欧洲国家之一。为确保德国军费开支持续大幅增加，继朔尔茨政府设立1000亿欧元 （约合1123亿美元）特别国防基金后，默茨继续对德国财政和防务政策进行改革调整。今年3月，欧盟 宣布实施"重新武装欧洲"计划，重点是使用欧盟掌握的财政杠杆帮助成员国快速大幅强化 ...

Domestic News - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) announced stronger support for high-quality unprofitable technology companies to go public [1] - The People's Bank of China conducted a 500 billion yuan MLF operation with a one-year term on May 23 [1] - The Financial Regulatory Administration is set to approve the third batch of long-term investment reform pilot projects for insurance funds, with a scale of 60 billion yuan [1] - The State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) is enhancing cross-border financial services for technology companies and steadily advancing the Qualified Foreign Limited Partner (QFLP) pilot [1] - Xiaomi launched the flagship processor "Xuanjie O1," claiming it has first-tier performance, and officially released the YU7 model, positioned as a "luxury high-performance SUV," with the price yet to be announced [1] International News - Japan's Minister of Economic Revitalization announced a visit to the U.S. for tariff negotiations from Friday to Sunday [2] - The U.S. government is considering the withdrawal of approximately 4,500 troops from South Korea [4] - Institutions reported that BYD's pure electric vehicle sales in Europe surpassed Tesla for the first time in April [4] - Apple, Tesla, and Nvidia stocks are set to be traded as tokens on the Kraken trading platform [4]

日前，欧盟委员会主席冯德莱恩提出一项新预算改革方案，从防务支出豁免、设立欧洲竞争力基金、预 算拨款方式改革以及联合借贷机制制度化等方面着手，试图推动欧盟迈向财政一体化，强化战略自主， 并以更灵活高效的财政机制应对全球地缘政治风险以及高科技竞争等。目前，欧盟内部分歧严重，但从 长远看，这项改革不仅是财政政策的调整，更是欧盟对自身定位和未来方向的重新定义。 日前，欧盟委员会主席冯德莱恩提出了一项雄心勃勃的预算改革方案，试图推动欧盟迈向财政一体化， 强化战略自主，并以更灵活高效的财政机制应对全球地缘政治风险以及高科技竞争等。当地媒体评论 称，新的预算改革法案不仅对欧盟传统财政体制提出了挑战，更是对欧盟政治、制度与国家间信任度的 全面考验。因此，该方案一经提出，欧盟27个成员国反响强烈。毕竟，欧盟中期预算改革方案关系到今 后10年的发展路径，一招不慎，有可能满盘皆输。 冯德莱恩为何要逆流而上，把新预算改革方案纳入施政纲领？其原因较为复杂，当前，欧盟不仅面临着 经济疲软不振、社会问题严重等多方面挑战，更遭遇欧盟何去何从的信心危机。 欧委会的预算改革设想虽然宏大，但能否行得通有待观察。目前，欧盟内部对此分歧严重：法国和意 ...

Group 1 - Europe is experiencing a crisis of identity, moving away from its previous labels of peace, prosperity, and multilateralism towards seeking greater strategic autonomy [3][8] - The recent U.S. "reciprocal tariff" policy has disrupted global financial markets, yet the euro has appreciated against the dollar, prompting renewed calls for the euro's status as a reserve currency [3][7] - The European Central Bank (ECB) has indicated that enhancing the euro's status as a reserve currency could increase Europe's strategic autonomy, especially in light of U.S. foreign policy unpredictability [7][8] Group 2 - There is a potential for the eurozone to expand, with countries that have not yet adopted the euro, such as Sweden, Czech Republic, and Poland, recognizing the benefits of joining [4][8] - The ECB's previous reluctance to promote the euro as a reserve currency may change due to geopolitical factors, leading to increased intra-EU trade and a stronger euro [8][9] - The need for euro-denominated bonds is emphasized to finance Europe's transformation, showcasing the EU's ability to raise funds collectively rather than through individual member states [8][9] Group 3 - The global financial order is in need of reconstruction, with calls to reform institutions like the IMF and World Bank to better reflect the current economic landscape [10][11] - The rise of emerging economies, particularly China, has not been adequately represented in global financial institutions, leading to a perceived monopoly by Western nations [12][13] - A more multipolar world necessitates new rules for global finance and trade, with independent international institutions playing a crucial role in gathering key participants [13]

"中欧建交50周年论坛"日前在中欧国际工商学院上海校区举行。据悉，本次论坛回顾了中国和欧盟半个 世纪携手同行的合作历程，探讨了中欧如何在全球贸易、投资、创新、数字化转型和气候行动等关键领 域和方面展开合作，旨在更好地构建未来五十年的友好合作关系。 中欧国际工商学院特聘教授夏尔.米歇尔(Charles Michel)表示，当前世界正处于一个关键十字路口，面 临着贸易保护主义、大数据与人工智能带来的机遇与风险、国家主权与安全等诸多挑战。欧盟的战略自 主是唯一前进道路。同时，他对未来双方关系发展提出了两点建议：一是欧盟与中国的关系应当基于自 身特点来考量，不受其他第三方的影响；二是必须以负责任的态度，秉持尊重、透明和真诚的原则管控 双方的分歧与差异，以增进相互理解。 上海交通大学校长、中国科学院院士、中欧国际工商学院理事长丁奎岭表示，两个原子保持稳定关系的 核心有两点，第一是彼此的距离要短(键长短)，第二是要能互补共享(电子配对)，中欧的合作也是如 此。首先要常来常往，缩短人和人、国家和国家的物理距离和情感距离；第二要优势互补，成果共享， 深化在教育科技人才各要素间比较优势上的互惠供应模式。大家共同努力推动中欧关系 ...

Core Viewpoint - The discussion around defense spending in Europe is intensifying, with many leaders claiming to have achieved NATO's target of 2% of GDP for defense spending, but this does not guarantee security without unified command, interoperability, and public support [1][4] Group 1: Current Defense Landscape - European military forces appear strong on the surface but may collapse under high-intensity conflict due to lack of preparedness and outdated infrastructure [1][2] - The reliance on the U.S. for comprehensive security, including airlift, intelligence, and nuclear deterrence, is becoming increasingly problematic as the U.S. shows reduced interest in European security [1][2] - The aging defense infrastructure, built during the Cold War, hampers rapid military deployment across Europe, with logistical challenges leading to significant delays in troop movements [1][2] Group 2: Challenges in Defense Coordination - Europe faces significant challenges in establishing its own intelligence and command systems, requiring substantial investment and long-term political commitment, which is currently lacking [2][4] - The fragmentation of military capabilities across European nations leads to inefficiencies, with numerous weapon systems complicating logistics and operational coordination [2][3] - Public support for defense is waning, with low willingness among citizens in countries like Spain, Germany, and Italy to fight in wartime, contrasting with Ukraine's strong national resolve [2][3] Group 3: National Defense Status - The UK has a reduced military size of approximately 72,000 personnel, the lowest in nearly two centuries, despite recent successful deployments [3] - France emphasizes strategic autonomy but still relies on U.S. intelligence support and faces leadership challenges within the EU [3] - Germany's military readiness is questionable, with key forces not expected to be fully operational until after 2027, and significant personnel shortages [3] - Poland is actively expanding its military budget to 4.7% of GDP and plans to increase troop numbers to 500,000, but faces integration challenges with diverse weapon systems [3] Group 4: Potential for Improvement - The core issue for Europe is not insufficient investment but ineffective investment, as existing forces lack the capability for rapid response and multinational cooperation [4] - Efforts are underway to upgrade critical military transport infrastructure, with over 500 key points being improved [5] - New defense cooperation frameworks between the UK and the EU aim to enhance joint deployments and mobilize approximately €150 billion in defense investments [5] - NATO and the EU are identifying critical capability gaps, indicating a potential strategic awakening, but deeper cultural, political, and financial consensus is needed for real change [5]