食品安全
Search documents
上海市金山区市场监督管理局2025年7月食品安全监督抽检情况通报
Zhong Guo Zhi Liang Xin Wen Wang· 2025-08-07 09:20
Core Viewpoint - The Shanghai Jinshan District Market Supervision Administration reported on food safety supervision and sampling results for July 2025, indicating a high compliance rate with 154 out of 157 samples passing inspection, highlighting the effectiveness of food safety regulations in the region [2]. Group 1: Food Safety Supervision Results - A total of 157 food samples were tested, with 154 deemed compliant, resulting in a compliance rate of approximately 98.1% [2]. - The inspection covered five major categories of food: edible agricultural products, catering food, frozen food, starch and starch products, and grain processing products [2]. Group 2: Non-compliant Products - Specific non-compliant products included items such as "荷兰豆" (Dutch beans) and "生姜" (ginger), which were found to contain harmful substances like "烯酰吗啉" (acrylamide) and "噻虫胺" (thiamethoxam) [2]. - The report encourages consumers to report any non-compliant products to the food safety complaint hotline 12315 [2]. Group 3: Compliant Products - The report also lists compliant products, including "猪五花肉" (pork belly), "香蕉" (bananas), and "鸡蛋" (eggs), which passed inspection without issues [2]. - The compliance of these products reflects the ongoing efforts to maintain food safety standards in the market [2].
山东省淄博市沂源县食品安全抽检信息通告(2025年第10期)
Zhong Guo Zhi Liang Xin Wen Wang· 2025-08-07 08:47
Core Viewpoint - The Yiyuan County Market Supervision Administration conducted a food safety inspection, revealing one batch of chili pepper from Yiyuan Hongbaolong Trading Co., Ltd. that exceeded the pesticide residue limit, prompting a recall and investigation [1]. Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 65 food samples were tested, with one batch failing due to pesticide residue [1]. - The detected pesticide, Thiamethoxam, was found at 0.070 mg/kg, exceeding the legal limit of 0.05 mg/kg [1]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions - The Yiyuan County Market Supervision Administration has ordered the producer to trace the product's distribution, recall, and remove the non-compliant products from the market [1]. - An investigation has been initiated to analyze the cause of the violation and implement corrective measures [1]. Group 3: Consumer Advisory - Consumers are advised to report any instances of the non-compliant products found in the market by calling the hotline 12315 [1].
黑龙江省大庆市市场监督管理局食品安全监督抽检信息通告(2025年第1期)
Zhong Guo Zhi Liang Xin Wen Wang· 2025-08-07 08:34
Core Points - Daqing Market Supervision Administration conducted a food safety inspection, testing 858 batches of food products, with 834 passing and 24 failing [2] Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 858 food samples were tested, with 834 deemed qualified, resulting in a pass rate of approximately 97.2% [2] - 24 samples were found to be non-compliant, prompting actions for recall and risk control [2] Group 2: Non-compliant Products - Specific non-compliant products included various vegetables with pesticide residues exceeding allowable limits, such as: - Green peppers with a residue of 1.22 mg/kg of thiamethoxam, exceeding the limit of 0.2 mg/kg [2] - Other samples of green peppers showed residues of 0.076 mg/kg, 0.13 mg/kg, and 0.098 mg/kg, all above the permissible level of 0.05 mg/kg [2] - The inspection identified multiple vendors with non-compliant products, necessitating corrective actions [2]
“每拆一包都担心发霉”,打工人最爱的速食集体塌房了
Hu Xiu· 2025-08-07 06:16
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a food safety issue involving the popular brand "Ma Liu Ji" and its product "Sour and Spicy Noodles," which were found to be moldy, leading to a widespread recall and consumer complaints [3][4][6]. Group 1: Incident Overview - Consumers reported finding moldy "Ma Liu Ji" Sour and Spicy Noodles purchased from Costco, prompting a complete withdrawal of the product from multiple stores [3]. - The production factory, Bai Jia A Kuan, acknowledged that insufficient sanitation during production led to bacterial contamination, resulting in shortened shelf life and mold growth [4][49]. - The incident has shifted consumer sentiment from curiosity to serious concern, marking a significant reputational blow for the brand [7]. Group 2: Consumer Reactions - Many consumers shared their experiences on social media, showcasing various degrees of product spoilage, which has led to a wave of negative publicity for the brand [8][30]. - Some consumers reported adverse health effects after consuming the contaminated products, highlighting the potential risks associated with food safety failures [32][76]. - The compensation offered to affected consumers has been inconsistent, with many only receiving refunds or replacements rather than adequate compensation for their health risks [34][36]. Group 3: Industry Implications - The incident raises concerns about the safety of wet noodles, which have become popular in the instant food market, as they require stricter quality control compared to traditional dry noodles [40][46]. - The article notes that the existing food safety standards are outdated and do not adequately address the unique challenges posed by wet noodle products [52][53]. - The widespread use of contract manufacturing in the instant food industry has contributed to the frequency of such safety issues, as seen with multiple brands experiencing similar problems [57][60]. Group 4: Market Trends - The demand for instant food products, particularly those perceived as healthier or more gourmet, has been rising, leading to higher prices and increased consumer expectations [66][68]. - Despite the higher price points, consumers are often unaware of the potential safety risks associated with these premium products, which can lead to significant health hazards [64][78]. - The article emphasizes the need for improved safety measures and consumer awareness in the rapidly evolving instant food market to prevent future incidents [73][74].
山西省临汾市吉县市场监督管理局2025年食品安全监督抽检信息通告(第1期)
Zhong Guo Zhi Liang Xin Wen Wang· 2025-08-07 03:46
Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint - The announcement details the results of a food safety inspection conducted by the Jixian Market Supervision Administration, revealing that out of 202 batches tested, 193 were compliant while 9 were found to be non-compliant, indicating a compliance rate of approximately 95.5% [2]. Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 202 batches of various food products were inspected, covering 26 categories including edible agricultural products, snacks, condiments, canned foods, and beverages [2]. - Out of the 202 batches, 193 were deemed compliant, resulting in a compliance rate of 95.5% [2]. - The 9 non-compliant samples have been addressed according to relevant laws and regulations [2]. Group 2: Consumer Action - Consumers are encouraged to report any non-compliant food products they encounter in the market by calling the complaint hotline 12315 [2]. Group 3: Product Details - The inspection included a variety of food items such as cucumbers, pork, and various vegetables, with specific details on compliant products listed in an attached document [2]. - The inspection results also highlight the importance of food safety standards in maintaining consumer trust and product quality in the market [2].
西安市阎良区关于2025年第六期食品安全“你点我检”专题抽检情况的通告(2025年第7号)
Zhong Guo Zhi Liang Xin Wen Wang· 2025-08-06 09:05
Core Viewpoint - The Xi'an Yanliang District Market Supervision Administration conducted a food safety inspection, revealing that out of 21 batches of food products tested, 18 were compliant while 3 were found to be non-compliant [3][4]. Summary by Category Overall Situation - A total of 21 batches were tested, including 14 batches of edible agricultural products, 4 batches of catering food, 2 batches of dairy products, and 1 batch of grain processing products. Among these, 18 batches passed the inspection while 3 batches failed [3]. Non-compliant Products - The non-compliant products identified include: 1. Long cowpea from Xinxing Xinyuan Dried Vegetable Store with a detected value of 0.73 mg/kg for thiamethoxam, exceeding the standard of ≤0.3 mg/kg [3]. 2. Lychee sugar from Fresh Taste Vegetable and Fruit Supermarket with a detected value of 0.50 mg/kg for pyraclostrobin, exceeding the standard of ≤0.1 mg/kg [3]. 3. Chopsticks from Jiayue Spinach Noodle Restaurant with a detected value of 0.056 mg/100cm² for anionic synthetic detergent (calculated as sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate), which should not be detected [3]. Regulatory Actions - The Market Supervision Administration is taking action against the production and operation units of the non-compliant products in accordance with the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, with further details to be published after the investigation and rectification are completed [4].
2025年广东省肇庆市广宁县食品安全监督抽检信息(第6期)
Zhong Guo Zhi Liang Xin Wen Wang· 2025-08-06 08:48
广宁县市场监督管理局近期组织对全县范围内生产经营的食品进行监督抽检工作,共抽检107批次。经深圳中检联检测有限公司检验,合格101批次样品,不 合格6批次,详细信息详见附件。 不合格食品被抽检单位所在地市场监督管理局已向有关生产经营单位送达了报告书并进行调查处理工作,责令有关单位查清产品流向,召回不合格产品,并 分析原因进行整改。查处情况可在各地人民政府网公开目录系统中市场监督管理局行政执法公示信息中查询。 食品安全消费提示:广宁县市场监督管理局提醒您,应当在正规可靠渠道购买所需食品并保存相应购物凭证,要看清外包装上的相关标识,如生产日期、保 质期、生产者名称和地址、成分或配料表、食品生产许可证编号等标识是否齐全;不要购买无厂名、厂址、生产日期和保质期的产品,不要购买超过保质期 的产品;不要购买公布的不合格产品。欢迎广大消费者积极参与食品安全监督工作,关注食品抽检信息公布,如发现危害社会公众的食品及其违法行为,请 及时拨打举报投诉电话12345。 特别声明:食品安全监督抽检是以发现问题为导向,以排查风险为目的,组织的食品抽样检验活动,不代表该类食品的整体质量安全状况,仅是对抽检批次 食品的监督行为;此通告目的 ...
湖北省赤壁市市场监督管理局食品安全监督抽检信息公告 (2025年第6期)
Zhong Guo Zhi Liang Xin Wen Wang· 2025-08-06 08:47
Core Points - The article discusses the recent food safety inspection conducted by the Chibi City Market Supervision Administration, which tested 192 batches of various food products, resulting in 189 compliant samples and 3 non-compliant samples [2][3]. Summary by Category Food Categories Inspected - The inspection covered 26 categories of food products, including grains, oils, seasonings, meat, dairy, beverages, snacks, canned goods, frozen foods, candies, tea, alcohol, vegetables, fruits, nuts, eggs, sugar, seafood, starch, pastries, soy products, honey, catering foods, food additives, and agricultural products [2]. Inspection Results - Out of 192 batches tested: - 58 batches of agricultural products were tested, with 3 non-compliant - 8 batches of grain products, 4 batches of oils, 2 batches of seasonings, 1 batch of meat, 11 batches of dairy, 11 batches of beverages, 6 batches of biscuits, 3 batches of canned goods, 2 batches of frozen foods, 1 batch of snacks, 5 batches of candies, 6 batches of tea, 3 batches of alcohol, 8 batches of vegetable products, 8 batches of fruit products, 5 batches of nuts, 1 batch of eggs, 5 batches of sugar, 1 batch of seafood, 5 batches of starch, 8 batches of pastries, 3 batches of soy products, 2 batches of honey, 23 batches of catering foods, and 2 batches of food additives were compliant [2][3]. Non-Compliant Samples - Specific non-compliant samples included: - Agricultural products with pesticide residues exceeding standards, such as: - Lychee with chlorpyrifos and high-efficiency chlorpyrifos at 0.26 mg/kg (standard ≤0.1 mg/kg) - Ginger with thiamethoxam at 0.93 mg/kg (standard ≤0.2 mg/kg) - Lychee with pyraclostrobin at 0.336 mg/kg (standard ≤0.1 mg/kg) [3].
湖北省赤壁市市场监督管理局食品安全监督抽检信息公告 (2025年第5期)
Zhong Guo Zhi Liang Xin Wen Wang· 2025-08-06 08:45
Core Insights - The article reports on a food safety inspection conducted by the Chibi City Market Supervision Administration, which tested 238 batches of various food products, revealing 231 compliant samples and 7 non-compliant samples [2]. Summary by Category Food Categories - **Total Samples Tested**: 238 batches across 22 food categories [2]. - **Compliant Samples**: 231 batches [2]. - **Non-Compliant Samples**: 7 batches, with specific breakdowns as follows: - **Catering Food**: 21 batches tested, 3 non-compliant [2]. - **Edible Agricultural Products**: 71 batches tested, 4 non-compliant [2]. - **Grain Processing Products**: 17 batches tested, all compliant [2]. - **Edible Oils and Fats**: 15 batches tested, all compliant [2]. - **Condiments**: 5 batches tested, all compliant [2]. - **Meat Products**: 6 batches tested, all compliant [2]. - **Dairy Products**: 15 batches tested, all compliant [2]. - **Beverages**: 9 batches tested, all compliant [2]. - **Convenience Foods**: 1 batch tested, all compliant [2]. - **Biscuits**: 3 batches tested, all compliant [2]. - **Canned Foods**: 2 batches tested, all compliant [2]. - **Tea and Related Products**: 9 batches tested, all compliant [2]. - **Alcoholic Beverages**: 6 batches tested, all compliant [2]. - **Vegetable Products**: 11 batches tested, all compliant [2]. - **Fruit Products**: 4 batches tested, all compliant [2]. - **Nuts and Snack Foods**: 2 batches tested, all compliant [2]. - **Egg Products**: 8 batches tested, all compliant [2]. - **Aquatic Products**: 4 batches tested, all compliant [2]. - **Starch and Starch Products**: 4 batches tested, all compliant [2]. - **Pastries**: 14 batches tested, all compliant [2]. - **Soy Products**: 10 batches tested, all compliant [2]. - **Food Additives**: 1 batch tested, all compliant [2]. Specific Non-Compliant Cases - **Non-Compliant Samples**: - Detected pesticides such as chlorpyrifos and high-efficiency chlorpyrifos in agricultural products, exceeding the standard limit [2]. - Specific instances include: - Sample from "Feizi Xiao Li" with a pesticide level of 0.34 mg/kg (standard ≤0.1) [2]. - Sample from "Youke Xian" with a pesticide level of 0.37 mg/kg (standard ≤0.1) [2]. - Sample from "Chen Xiansheng" with a pesticide level of 0.43 mg/kg (standard ≤0.1) [2]. - Other instances of non-compliance related to sweeteners and additives [2].
内蒙古赤峰市食品安全“雷霆行动”典型案例(第三期)
Zhong Guo Zhi Liang Xin Wen Wang· 2025-08-06 08:23
Group 1 - Case 1: A self-service restaurant in Arukorqin Banner was found using adulterated beef products containing duck-derived ingredients, leading to a penalty of 20,000 yuan and confiscation of illegal gains of 2,247.5 yuan [1] - Case 2: A noodle shop in Balinzuoqi was penalized for using sweeteners in fermented dough products, resulting in a fine of 5,000 yuan and confiscation of 0.38 kg of illegal food additives [2] - Case 3: A milk tea shop in Linxi County was fined 5,100 yuan for employing staff without health certificates to handle food, constituting a refusal to correct previous violations [3] Group 2 - Case 4: A company producing bottled drinking water was penalized for labeling violations, including inconsistent net content and lack of producer contact information, resulting in a fine of 3,000 yuan and confiscation of illegal gains of 1,718.8 yuan [4][5] - Case 5: A wholesale grocery store in Wengniuteqi was found selling counterfeit liquor and failing to display prices, leading to a penalty of 12,500 yuan and confiscation of infringing products [6]