比如说，浮动管理费模式要求基金公司具备更强的投研能力和风险管理能力，以适应新的收费机制。因为资源有限并且面对激烈的市场竞争，一些中小基金 公司很可能面临更大压力。 再比如，长期以来，渠道机构在公募基金代销中占据主导地位，只重规模、不顾盈亏的销售模式根深蒂固。《方案》对渠道机构的考核指标进行了调整，纳 入投资者盈亏、持有期限等指标，但要渠道机构彻底转变经营理念，需要时间，更需要决心。 即使如此，治沉疴需用猛药。《方案》突出强化与投资者的利益绑定，改革基金运营模式，督促行业回归为"为投资者创造价值"的本源，这是重大的利益格 局调整，也是一次"刀刃向内"的改革。 此前，公募基金行业过度依赖"造星效应"，通过包装基金经理人设、制造明星产品概念等吸引投资者。基金公司因为规模做大收取更多管理费，其高管和基 金经理人也因之获益，但是很多基民在营销攻势下盲目跟风，让真金白银沦为规模扩张的牺牲品。投资者的投资回报长期跑输预期，投资体验欠佳，则成为 行业痼疾。 针对这种现象，《方案》明确基金公司收入与产品收益挂钩。例如，建立与基金业绩挂钩的浮动管理费机制，若基金业绩不佳，管理费率将下调；如果业绩 出色，管理费率才可能上升。这将引 ...

Core Viewpoint - The newly released "Action Plan for Promoting High-Quality Development of Public Funds" aims to address the issue of "funds making money, but investors not benefiting" by implementing 25 measures that link fund performance to management fees and compensation for fund managers, marking a shift from a focus on scale to one on returns in the public fund industry [2][3][4] Group 1: Fee Structure Reform - The plan introduces a floating management fee model based on performance benchmarks, where funds that underperform will have lower fees, while those that exceed benchmarks will have higher fees [3][4] - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) emphasizes that fund companies must reduce management fees for poorly performing funds, addressing the criticism of the previous fixed fee model [3][4] - Major fund companies, including E Fund and GF Fund, are already adapting their fee structures to align with the new regulations, focusing on performance-based fees [4][5] Group 2: Performance-Based Compensation - The plan establishes that fund managers' compensation will be linked to their funds' performance relative to benchmarks, with significant penalties for underperformance and rewards for exceeding benchmarks [6][8] - Fund companies are required to implement long-term performance assessments, with at least 80% of the evaluation based on three-year performance metrics [6][8] - Companies like E Fund and GF Fund are already revising their performance evaluation systems to align with the new guidelines [6][8] Group 3: Shift to Buy-Side Advisory - The plan mandates a transition from a sales-driven approach to a client-focused advisory model, emphasizing the importance of investor returns over company profits [9][10] - Fund companies are encouraged to develop investment advisory services to better align with investor interests and improve overall client experience [9][10] - The Guangzhou Investment Advisory Academy is working on standardizing advisory services to enhance the quality and consistency of investment advice provided to clients [10]

Core Viewpoint - The newly released public fund reform plan emphasizes performance assessment for fund managers, linking their compensation to fund performance, which aims to improve long-term returns for investors [2][3][4]. Summary by Sections Fund Performance Issues - Over the past three years, more than 30% of mixed funds have underperformed their benchmarks by over 10%, and approximately 6.6% of equity funds have also lagged by the same margin [2][8]. - Notable underperformers include 52 mixed funds and 8 equity funds that have underperformed their benchmarks by over 50%, including products managed by renowned fund managers [2][8]. Reform Measures - The reform plan includes 25 measures, with a significant focus on linking fund manager compensation to performance metrics, where performance indicators must account for at least 80% of the assessment [3][4]. - Fund managers whose products underperform their benchmarks by over 10% for three years will see a significant reduction in their performance-based compensation, while those who exceed benchmarks may receive increased compensation [3][4]. Long-term Focus - The reform aims to shift the focus from scale to performance, encouraging fund managers and companies to prioritize long-term returns for investors [4][5]. - The introduction of metrics such as net asset growth rate and fund profit rate is expected to mitigate the industry's short-sighted focus on scale [5]. Performance Data - As of May 8, among 4,693 equity funds, 308 funds (approximately 6.6%) have underperformed their benchmarks by over 10%, while 418 funds (about 8.9%) have outperformed by the same margin [6]. - The worst-performing fund, Jia Shi Intelligent Automotive, has a return of -35.39%, significantly underperforming its benchmark by 81.88% over three years [7][8]. Mixed Fund Performance - In the mixed fund category, 2,660 out of 8,634 funds (30.8%) have underperformed their benchmarks by over 10%, with only 686 funds (7.9%) outperforming [8][9]. - The worst-performing mixed fund, Jin Ying Multi-Strategy, has a return of -60.58%, underperforming its benchmark by 69.26% [9][10].

Core Viewpoint - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has issued a comprehensive action plan aimed at promoting the high-quality development of public funds, which includes 25 reform measures focusing on optimizing fund operation models, enhancing performance evaluation systems, and strengthening regulatory enforcement to ensure investor interests are prioritized [1][2]. Group 1: Reform Measures - The action plan emphasizes the importance of binding investor returns to fund performance, introducing measures such as strengthening the constraints of performance benchmarks and establishing a floating management fee mechanism linked to fund performance [2][3]. - A significant highlight is the introduction of a regulatory guideline for performance benchmarks, which will clarify the setting, modification, disclosure, and evaluation of these benchmarks, thereby stabilizing market expectations and improving investor confidence [2][3]. - The plan aims to optimize the fee structure for funds, including reducing subscription fees and management fees, to lower investor costs and enhance industry competitiveness [3][4]. Group 2: Performance Evaluation and Incentives - The action plan seeks to reform the performance evaluation system of fund companies, shifting the focus from scale and short-term performance to long-term investment returns and investor profitability [5][7]. - Fund managers will be evaluated based on a long-term performance mechanism, with a minimum of 80% weight on three-year performance metrics, ensuring that their compensation is directly linked to investor returns [7][8]. - The plan encourages fund companies to increase the issuance and management of equity funds, which are crucial for providing long-term capital support to the real economy [7][9]. Group 3: Focus on Equity Funds - The action plan addresses the declining scale of actively managed equity funds, which have decreased by approximately 36.59% over the past three years, and aims to enhance the proportion of equity investments in public funds [10][13]. - It proposes various measures, including optimizing the registration process for equity funds and enhancing the evaluation criteria for fund sales institutions to promote equity fund growth [14][15]. - The emphasis on equity funds is intended to improve market stability and effectiveness, as well as to align with international financial market standards [15].

Core Viewpoint - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has issued the "Action Plan for Promoting the High-Quality Development of Public Funds," aiming to address long-standing issues in the public fund industry, such as the focus on scale over returns and the "guaranteed income" phenomenon [1][11]. Group 1: Key Measures of the Action Plan - The Action Plan outlines 25 reform measures across six areas, including optimizing fund operation models, improving assessment and evaluation systems, promoting equity funds, ensuring risk management, strengthening regulatory enforcement, and facilitating high-quality development [1][11]. - A significant focus is on aligning the interests of fund managers with those of investors, particularly through the introduction of a performance-based floating management fee model for actively managed equity funds [11][12]. Group 2: Industry Impact - The implementation of the Action Plan is expected to shift the industry from a focus on scale to a focus on returns, enhancing the quality of public funds and investor satisfaction [1][12]. - The plan mandates that at least 60% of newly registered actively managed equity funds adopt the floating fee structure within a year, which is anticipated to improve the performance accountability of fund managers [11][12]. Group 3: Addressing Fund Management Issues - The Action Plan aims to tackle issues such as "style drift" and misalignment of fund investments with their stated objectives, requiring clear performance benchmarks for each fund to ensure transparency and accountability [14]. - It emphasizes long-term performance assessments, with at least 80% of the evaluation weight given to three-year performance metrics, thereby discouraging short-term speculative trading by fund managers [12][14].

万众期待的公募基金改革方案终于来了！ 1、通过费率的改革，破除旱涝保收的商业模式，督促基金公司从重规模向重回报转变。接下来也会有 越来越多的小公司开始出清。 2、设定业绩比较基准，对三年以上产品业绩低于业绩比较基准超过10个百分点的基金经理，要求其绩 效薪酬应当明显下降；对三年以上产品业绩显著超过业绩比较基准的基金经理，可以合理适度提高其绩 效薪酬。在这一点上，我们可以通过数据先来观察偏股混合基金与沪深300偏离度。 3、考核指标中，基金产品业绩指标权重不得低于80%，且三年以上中长期收益考核占比需超80%。这 意味着"冠军基金"昙花一现的业绩不再构成薪酬保障，持续稳健的超额收益成为硬指标。 4、听到机构投资者直销服务平台，这个或会对以机构投资者为主的基金代销平台冲击较大。 昨日三部门开会，股民基民们最关注的当然是证监会，而酝酿了很久的《推动公募基金高质量发展行动 方案》也在5月7日下午挂网，而证监会领导也做了提前预告"吴清：业绩差的基金必须少收管理费！"也 为公募行业的改革指明了方向。 认真阅读《行动方案》，我们还是看到了在维护基民利益方面的明确性规定。 5、大幅提高股票基金及其它有一定比例股票仓位基金的注 ...

Core Viewpoint - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has officially released the "Action Plan for Promoting the High-Quality Development of Public Funds," marking a systematic reform in the public fund industry, which exceeds 30 trillion yuan, addressing the long-standing issue of "emphasizing scale over returns" [2] Group 1: Key Reforms - The reform targets 25 measures, including floating management fees and interest binding, aiming to link management fees to performance, ensuring that funds with poor performance will charge lower management fees [2][3] - A floating fee mechanism will end the "guaranteed income" model, requiring active management equity funds to implement performance-linked floating management fees, addressing investor dissatisfaction with the "charging regardless of profit or loss" model [3] Group 2: Performance Assessment Changes - The plan replaces short-term rankings with long-term assessments, incorporating performance benchmarks and fund profitability into the evaluation system, with a focus on three-year assessments [3] - Fund managers whose products underperform benchmarks by over 10 percentage points for more than three years will see a significant decrease in performance-related compensation, while those who exceed benchmarks can receive moderate increases [3] Group 3: Strengthening Accountability - The plan enhances the responsibility of fund company executives and managers by increasing their investment proportion and lock-up period, linking compensation to investment returns [4] - The reform aims to address issues where fund managers manage multiple products with poor performance, directly impacting their personal income [4] Group 4: Implementation Timeline - The CSRC aims to implement these policies over approximately three years, facilitating a substantial shift in the industry from "emphasizing scale" to "emphasizing returns" [4]

Investment Rating - The report maintains an "Overweight" rating for the multi-financial sector, indicating an expectation that the sector will outperform the benchmark index [7]. Core Insights - The report highlights the implementation of the "Action Plan for Promoting High-Quality Development of Public Funds," which aims to reform the public fund industry by enhancing governance, product issuance, investment operations, and assessment mechanisms [1]. - The plan emphasizes a shift from a focus on scale to prioritizing investor returns, with a target to achieve a high-quality development "turning point" within approximately three years [1]. - The industry is expected to undergo a transformation, moving from a "scale competition" model to one that values "performance," leading to increased concentration among leading firms and differentiated competition [1]. Summary by Sections Investment Fee Reform - The plan introduces a floating management fee mechanism linked to fund performance, aiming to reduce investor costs and enhance transparency in fee structures [2][11]. - It mandates that leading institutions issue at least 60% of their actively managed equity funds as floating fee products within the next year [2][11]. Long-Term Assessment and Incentive Mechanisms - The reform requires that performance indicators for fund managers and executives have significant weight in assessments, with long-term performance being a key focus [3][12]. - The plan aims to enhance the evaluation system by increasing the weight of long-term performance metrics and investor outcomes in the assessment criteria [3][12]. Equity Investment Growth - The report stresses the need to boost the scale and proportion of equity investments within public funds, promoting innovative products that align with performance and investor returns [4][19]. - It outlines plans for expedited registration processes for various equity fund types, including ETFs and actively managed funds [4][19]. Market Consolidation and Institutional Development - The plan supports market-driven mergers and acquisitions among fund companies, aiming to enhance the capabilities of leading institutions while fostering differentiated development for smaller firms [5][18]. - It emphasizes the establishment of a first-class investment institution through improved product development and research capabilities [5][18]. Investor Service Enhancement - The report highlights the importance of improving investor services, including the launch of a centralized platform for institutional investors to access public fund investments [17]. - It outlines regulatory measures to promote standardized investment advisory services tailored to investor needs [17]. Overall Industry Outlook - The report anticipates a significant restructuring of the public fund industry, with a focus on long-term performance and investor-centric strategies, which is expected to reshape the competitive landscape [1][18].

▲证监会印发的《推动公募基金高质量发展行动方案》，颇有看点。图/IC ohoto 5月7日，中国人民银行、国家金融监管总局、中国证监会三大金融管理部门负责人齐聚国新办发布会， 重磅推出一揽子金融政策。全方位发力稳市场、稳预期，为经济回升向好提供强有力的金融支撑。同 日，证监会印发了《推动公募基金高质量发展行动方案》（下称《行动方案》），颇有看点。 坦率地说，现在证券市场产品的数量和种类日趋繁多，金融交易工具也越来越多样化。普通投资者进行 直接投资的难度不断提高。"股民"变"基民"可谓一种大趋势。中国基金业协会发布的数据显示，截至 2024年底，我国境内公募基金资产净值合计32.83万亿元。 不过，"小基民"和"小股民"一样，小而散，面临着被基金管理人和公司管理人侵害的风险。证监会作为 证券市场的监督管理者，对此当然责无旁贷。 此次《行动方案》在宏观方向上反映了各界的诸多共识，比如推动市场发展，推出更多类型的产品，简 化审批程序，促进规则细化，加强基金产品业绩和费用的信息披露，鼓励基金公司进行治理优化、制度 建设和专业能力提升，对违法行为依法进行处罚等。而且，全文9次提及"引导"，体现了一定的谦抑性 而非强制性 ...

Core Viewpoint - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has released the "Action Plan for Promoting High-Quality Development of Public Funds," marking a new phase focused on investor returns and high-quality transformation in the public fund industry [2][3][4]. Summary by Sections Industry Background - The public fund industry in China has played a positive role in serving the real economy, promoting capital market stability, and meeting residents' wealth management needs, but it faces issues such as inadequate operational concepts and uneven development [4]. Key Measures of the Action Plan - The Action Plan consists of 25 measures organized around five core areas aimed at enhancing the public fund industry's quality [5]. 1. Optimize Fee Structures - Implement a floating management fee model linked to fund performance for actively managed equity funds, reducing fees when performance is below benchmarks [5][11]. 2. Strengthen Investor-Manager Alignment - Establish an evaluation system focused on investment returns, reducing the emphasis on management scale and profits, and increasing the proportion of fund managers' investments in their own products [5][6]. 3. Enhance Investor Services - Encourage fund companies to optimize research, product design, and risk management to better serve investors, including the introduction of investment advisory regulations [6][9]. 4. Increase Equity Investment Scale and Stability - Promote the development of more index funds and low-volatility products, and implement long-term performance assessments for funds [6][9]. 5. Strengthen Regulation and Risk Management - Improve regulatory frameworks and enhance governance standards within fund companies to ensure compliance and risk management [6][9]. Industry Expert Opinions - Experts believe the Action Plan will enhance investor confidence and attract long-term capital into the stock market, leading to a more stable investment environment [3][8][13]. Market Impact - The reforms are expected to improve the operational mechanisms of public funds, leading to a focus on long-term returns and a healthier market ecosystem [8][14].