避险情绪波动 贵金属涨势暂缓 研究员：王露晨 CFA 期货从业证号：F03110758 投资咨询资格证号：Z0021675 目录 第一章 综合分析及交易策略 2 | | | 第三章 贵金属基本面数据追踪 13 伦敦金、伦敦银日线 沪金、沪银日线 逻辑分析 GALAXY FUTURES 1 综合分析 GALAXY FUTURES 2 ◼ 周内，美元指数延续磨底走势，间或小幅反弹。贵金属涨势暂缓，在高位陷入震荡。 ➢ 伦敦金交投于3340-3450美元区间，周跌幅1.9%；伦敦银交投于35.5-37.3美元区间，周跌幅0.9%。受外盘驱动和汇率因素影响， 沪金交投于777-800元区间，周跌幅1.99%；沪银交投与8638-9075区间，周跌幅1.44%。 ➢ 美元指数从97.6附近反弹，周内一度回到99之上，但未能站稳，最终收于98.7，周涨幅0.53%。10年美债收益率高位波动至4.38% 附近。 ◼ 本周市场的交易主线在于美联储的货币政策路径预期和中东地缘冲突。美联储方面，6月会议结果和市场预期一致，并且持续传达了关 税可能在未来引发通胀的担忧，观望仍是当前的主要基调，令贵金属整体有所承压。中东方面，伊朗、 ...

贵金属日报 2025-06-20 钟俊轩 贵金属研究员 从业资格号：F03112694 交易咨询号：Z0022090 电话：0755-23375141 邮箱： zhongjunxuan@wkqh.cn 贵金属 沪金跌 0.11 %，报 784.06 元/克，沪银跌 1.11 %，报 8814.00 元/千克；COMEX 金跌 0.08 %， 报 3384.70 美元/盎司，COMEX 银涨 0.04 %，报 36.38 美元/盎司； 美国 10 年期国债收益率 报 4.38%，美元指数报 98.67 ； 下半年美债将存在较大的发行压力，若政策利率维持在高位，则美债利息的支出压力则会显著 上升，这也是特朗普多次对鲍威尔所领导的美联储货币政策表示不满的原因，当前美国劳动力 市场数据未明显转弱，且通胀仍存在上行风险，需继续关注鲍威尔后续表态转向的节点，贵金 属策略上建议暂时观望，沪金主力合约参考运行区间 768-836 元/克，沪银主力合约参考运行 区间 8659-9300 元/千克。 市场展望： | | 单位 | 收盘价 | 前交易日 | 日度变化 | 环比 | | 单位 | 收盘价 | 前交易日 | 日度变化 ...

文 ： 华创证券研究所副所长 、首席宏观分析师 张瑜（执业证号：S0360518090001） 联系人：付春生 （18482259975） 报告摘要 6 月FOMC会议：符合预期，市场反应平淡 1、不降息，将联邦基金目标利率保持在4.25-4.5%，符合预期。 会议声明删除了5月份的"高失业率和更高通胀的风险已经上升"的判断，将经济前景的不确定性 从"进一步增加（increased further）"修改为"已经减少但依然较高（has diminished but remains elevated）"。 2、继续下调增长预测、上调失业率和通胀预测 （今年3月相比去年12月已下调增长预测、上调通胀和失业率预测）。将2025年4季度的实际GDP同比预测从1.7% 下调至1.4%，失业率预测从4.4%上调至4.5%，核心PCE价格指数同比从2.8%上调至3.1%，PCE价格指数同比从2.7%上调至3.0%。 3、点阵图维持今年2次降息不变，但预测值的分布上移表明，边际仍倾向少降息 。在19位FOMC成员中，有7人预测今年不降息（3月为4人），有2人预测降息1次 （3月为4人），有8人预测降息2次（3月为9人），有2 ...

大宗商品研究所 贵金属研发报告 贵金属衍生品日报 2025 年 6 月 19 日 研究所副所长：车红云 期货从业证号：F03088215 投资咨询号：Z0017510 研究员：王露晨 CFA 期货从业证号：F03110758 投资咨询号：Z0021675 联系方式： 上海：021-65789219 北京：010-68569781 邮箱： wangluchen_qh@chinastock.co m.cn 贵金属衍生品日报 【市场回顾】 1 / 8 大宗商品研究所 贵金属研发报告 1.贵金属市场：今天白天，受昨日议息会议影响，贵金属继续小幅回调，伦敦 金当前交投于 3369 美元附近，伦敦银当前交投于 36.4 美元附近。受外盘驱动， 沪金主力合约收跌 0.49%，报 781.24 元/克，沪银主力合约收跌 1.91%，报 8819 元/千克。 2.美元指数：美元指数持续反弹，当前交投于 98.9 附近。 3.美债收益率：休市。 4.人民币汇率：人民币兑美元汇率高位盘整，当前交投于 7.187 附近。 【重要资讯】 1.美联储 6 月议息会议：①连续第四次维持利率不变，②点阵图显示今年降息 两次，但预计今年不降息 ...

Macroeconomic Group - The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) decided to maintain the federal funds rate at 4.25% - 4.50%, marking a pause in the rate cut cycle that began in September of the previous year, aligning with market expectations [3] - The FOMC's statement was revised to indicate that uncertainty has diminished but remains high, and it reiterated that net export fluctuations affect data while the economy continues to expand steadily [3] - The dot plot indicates that the median FOMC members expect two rate cuts in 2025, totaling 50 basis points, with the median rate forecast for 2025 at 3.9% [4][5] Industry Comprehensive Group - The price of DDR4 memory products has surged nearly 100% since January 2025, with current prices exceeding the June 2024 peak, while DDR5 prices have also increased significantly [9] - The rapid price increase in the storage market has led to substantial growth in the performance of domestic storage module manufacturers and distributors, particularly benefiting companies with high inventory levels such as Jiangbolong and Demingli [9] Advanced Manufacturing Group - Powin, a major battery storage system integrator in the U.S., filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, affecting several Chinese companies, including CATL and Qingdao CIMC Puwei [11] - The bankruptcy was attributed to soaring tariff costs and a weak business model lacking vertical integration, leading to significant debt risks for Chinese firms [11] - The U.S. energy storage market is expected to experience a short-term freeze, with Fluence reducing its annual revenue guidance by 27% [11] Consumption Group - The combined GMV of beauty products on Tmall and Douyin reached 29.96 billion yuan in May 2025, showing a slight year-on-year increase of 1.3%, with a notable divergence in performance between high-end and mass-market brands [14] - High-end domestic brands like Mao Ge Ping and Ke Li Jin saw significant sales growth, while mass-market brands like Proya and Winona faced declines [15] - The beauty consumption trend is shifting towards high-end, efficacy-driven products, with Douyin emerging as a new growth engine for high-end brands [15]

证券研究报告 宏观 研究员 易峘 evayi@htsc.com 研究员 胡李鹏，PhD SAC No. S0570525010001 SFC No. BWA860 hulipeng@htsc.com +(86) 10 6321 1166 联系人 赵文瑄 SAC No. S0570124030017 zhaowenxuan@htsc.com +(86) 10 6321 1166 虽然中东地缘政治冲突推高油价，但联储主要关注国内就业市场和通胀走 势，预计 6 月会议大概率维持利率不变。中东地缘政治冲突一度显著推高 原油价格，近期已有所回落，对美国经济和通胀影响较为有限。5 月联储会 议以来，美国就业和通胀数据指示联储大概率维持利率不变。一方面，5 月 会议以来，中美关税降级，市场对美国经济衰退的担忧下降，美国就业市场 有序降温：4-5 月新增非农人数连续超预期，但 3 个月移动均值整体下行； 周度首申、续申人数也显示就业市场放缓，但未大规模裁员。另一方面，5 月 CPI、PPI 通胀整体不及预期，关税对通胀的推升暂不明显，但高频数据 前瞻指引方面，预计鲍威尔继续强调未来政策利率路径依赖于数据；预计 联储将下调 2 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that the U.S. economy is likely to experience a systematic and gradual weakening rather than a clear segmentation of inflation followed by stagnation, with increasing risks of non-farm payroll declines [1][8][37] - Recent economic data changes in the U.S. are not keeping pace with asset price fluctuations and macro narratives, indicating a divergence between hard and soft data [3][5] - The negative impacts of various non-tariff policies are becoming increasingly evident, contributing to the suppression of U.S. economic growth [5][8] Group 2 - The rate and potential magnitude of inflation are declining, with the U.S. CPI readings falling short of expectations for four consecutive months [9][11] - There is no significant inflation in tariff-sensitive sectors, and the demand-side weakness is likely to impose stronger price constraints [11][13] - Concerns about stagnation are rising as labor market data shows signs of weakening, despite stable non-farm employment figures [16][21] Group 3 - Service consumption is expected to be the first to reflect the weakening of the U.S. economy, with signs of declining consumer willingness [27][28] - The structure of disposable income growth is unhealthy, with a significant portion coming from government welfare rather than labor income [29][33] - The overall consumption willingness is decreasing, which will further suppress service consumption levels [37]

Economic Overview - Recent economic data in the U.S. shows marginal changes that do not match the volatility in asset prices and macro narratives, indicating a potential economic slowdown[3] - Tariff inflation has not materialized as expected, and the divergence between hard and soft data is beginning to correct, but this does not imply a weakening economy[3] Inflation and Tariff Impact - The probability of tariff inflation being lower than expected is increasing, with oil prices becoming a highly volatile variable affecting this outlook[3] - The U.S. effective tariff rate has significantly increased, but the transmission mechanism to the real economy remains unclear[12] Employment and Consumption Trends - The baseline scenario suggests a systematic weakening of the U.S. economy rather than a clear fracture in any specific sector, with service consumption and employment showing signs of caution[4] - Non-farm payroll risks are increasing, with potential monthly growth dropping to around 50,000 or even negative levels[4] Risks and Uncertainties - Increased uncertainty in the Middle East could significantly raise oil prices, leading to higher inflation in the U.S.[5] - Trump's domestic policies face greater resistance, which may lead to increased fiscal stimulus and unexpected monetary easing from the Federal Reserve[5] Labor Market Dynamics - The U.S. labor market is showing signs of decoupling, with rising unemployment rates despite stable non-farm payroll data, indicating a potential shift in labor supply dynamics[27] - Permanent unemployment numbers are approaching 2 million, reflecting a concerning upward trend in the labor market[35] Consumer Behavior - Consumer sentiment is declining, as evidenced by a significant drop in auto sales and rising savings rates, indicating a cautious approach to spending[44] - The contribution of government social benefits to disposable income growth is concerning, as it suggests increased reliance on social safety nets rather than labor income[46]

每日晨报 2025年6月 13 日 银河观点集萃 责任编辑 周颖 ☎：010-80927635 网:zhouying_yj@chinastock.com.cn 分析师登记编码：S0130511090001 要闻 美国 5 月 PPI 环比上涨 0.1% www.chinastock.com.cn 证券研究报告 请务必阅读正文最后的中国银河证券股份有限公司免责声明 ● 宏观:等待美国通胀温和上行,注意企业也承担了部分涨价--5 月美国 CPI 数据。全年来看,关税下的美国价格走势可能有以下几点特征:(1)从短期 的 CPI 和 PCE 价格数据来看,关税造成的涨价尚不明显,但我们认为这更多 是统计抽样和部分抢进口形成的库存所导致的涨价滞后,高频数据显示涨价已 经发生。(2)尽管通胀将在 2025下半年显现,但我们认为考虑关税的情况下 CPI 的年均同比增速将由 2.4%提升至 3.1%左右,高点可能为 3.4%, 2026 年 中开始可能回落至2.5%左右的范围,其"暂时性"并不阻碍美联储在年内考 虑降息。(3)从对企业的调查来看,企业也将负担部分关税成本,这一方面 意味着消费者价格上行压力缓和,另一方面企业利 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that the US Consumer Price Index (CPI) for May fell slightly below expectations, with year-on-year CPI rising from 2.3% to 2.4%, while core CPI remained steady at 2.8% [1] - The month-on-month CPI increased by 0.1%, lower than both the expected and previous value of 0.2%, and core CPI also rose by 0.1%, below the expected 0.3% and previous 0.2% [1] - Factors contributing to the CPI's lower-than-expected performance include a decline in energy prices, a continued drop in automobile prices, and a slowdown in rent and super core services price increases [1] Group 2 - Market expectations for interest rate cuts have increased, with the futures market pricing in an average of 1.97 rate cuts for the year, and the probability of a first cut in September rising from 50.9% to 61.3% [2] - The effective tariff rate in the US has decreased to 7.07%, significantly lower than the estimated 13-20% by overseas institutions, potentially due to tax avoidance measures [3] - The first sale rule allows importers to calculate tariffs based on the first sale price, which may mitigate the impact of increased tariffs [3] Group 3 - Concerns about inflation due to tariffs remain, with the potential for upward inflation risks unless tariffs are continuously suspended or canceled [5] - Consumer inflation expectations in the US have surged, with one-year and five-year expectations at near 45-year and 25-year highs, respectively [5] - Despite a significant number of brands and retail executives anticipating negative consumer reactions to price increases, a majority still plan to raise prices [6]