欧洲央行副行长金多斯：额外的降息并不能帮助经济改善，我们需要的是确定性。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The A-share market experienced a rebound on June 3, with broad-based gains across indices, indicating a positive market response to domestic demand and policy support despite external trade tensions [2][7]. Market Dynamics - The market is characterized by "domestic demand-driven and policy-supported" dynamics, with financials, pharmaceuticals, and new consumption sectors attracting significant capital [2][10]. - Recent developments in U.S. tariff issues have heightened market risk aversion, leading to a surge in gold prices and declines in Hong Kong stocks, but the A-share market showed resilience by recovering losses [2][3]. Sector Performance - The consumer sector, particularly in beauty care, maternal and infant care, and pet products, has become a safe haven for funds due to policy support and consumption recovery [3][9]. - The banking sector is favored for its "high dividend and low volatility" characteristics, with several banks reaching historical highs amid increased institutional investment [7][10]. - The precious metals sector is gaining traction as a hedge against geopolitical conflicts and U.S. debt risks, becoming a core tool for mitigating uncertainty [3][9]. Structural Trends - The innovation drug sector is witnessing a fundamental reversal, driven by significant advancements showcased at international conferences, boosting industry confidence [4][9]. - Conversely, sectors like home appliances and steel are experiencing declines due to tariff impacts and reduced earnings certainty, reflecting a market strategy of "avoiding external demand and protecting internal demand" [5][10]. Outlook - Looking ahead to June, the marginal impact of tariff issues is expected to weaken, with domestic policies and industry fundamentals remaining focal points [6]. - In the absence of major catalysts, broad indices are likely to maintain a sideways trend, with structural opportunities emerging in new consumption, defensive sectors, and performance reversals in pharmaceuticals and beauty care [6][9].

点击关注【张瑜旬度纪要系列】 各位投资朋友好，本期旬度我们聚焦对当下投资框架的思考 —— 先否定一种常见框架，再阐述我们推荐的分析逻 辑。 一、什么是错的？预测出口指导投资，具有很大的脆弱性 首先，我们想否定的思路是 ：预测出口数据 → 推导宏观数据 → 预测企业盈利 → 投资决策。我们认为这一框架的地 基非常不扎实。主要原因在于出口数据预判难度极大，进而会大幅影响到对企业盈利与 GDP 的判断。基于历史经验 关系，出口误判 10 个百分点，可能将导致 PPI/ 工增 误判 2 个百分点左右。误判 PPI 2 个点可能会通过利润率渠道影 响企业利润 3-4 个百分点；误判工增 2 个百分点或导致 GDP 误判 0.4-0.5 个百分点。以 4 月出口数据为例，市场一致 预期为 0-2% ，我们在数据前瞻预计在 6% 左右，但实际增速达 8.1% ，市场误判将近 8 个百分点，由此可见，基于出 口数据预测的投资框架是非常脆弱的。 二、什么是合适的？关注美国可选消费行业状况 我们认为，判断出口的核心在于预测转港率 。从历史上看， 2018-2019 年我国对美出口转港率达六成，这导致虽然当 时关税对价格、利润形成 ...

美国财长贝森特：宣布贸易协议将带来确定性。 ...