Core Viewpoint - The examination system in ancient China, known as the imperial examination or "keju," served as a means to select officials through public examinations, promoting social mobility and breaking the constraints of aristocratic lineage. Established during the Sui dynasty, it flourished through the Tang, Song, Ming, and Qing dynasties, ultimately ending in the late Qing dynasty, and significantly contributed to the education and development of Chinese society [1]. Group 1: Evolution of the Examination System - The tradition of valuing talent has been a hallmark of Chinese culture, transitioning from hereditary systems to merit-based selections, such as the "xiang ju li xuan" during the pre-Qin period, which allowed local recommendations for talented individuals to serve in government [2]. - The Zhou dynasty implemented a system where local gentry selected individuals based on virtue and talent, leading to formal recommendations for government positions after rigorous assessments [3]. - The Qin dynasty introduced a military meritocracy, breaking the hereditary system by appointing officials based on military achievements [4]. - The Han dynasty's "chajü" system became the mainstream method for selecting officials, with annual examinations assessing various virtues and talents [5]. Group 2: Development and Standardization - The Nine-Rank System during the Wei, Jin, and Northern and Southern dynasties categorized individuals based on family background, talent, and moral character, influencing the selection process [6]. - The Sui dynasty abolished the Nine-Rank System and established a more open examination system, allowing candidates to take exams without needing recommendations from officials [7]. - The Tang dynasty further developed the examination system, creating a two-tiered examination structure and emphasizing the importance of testing as the primary means of selecting talent [8]. Group 3: Impact and Legacy - The examination system was instrumental in breaking the monopoly of aristocratic families on government positions, allowing for a more equitable selection of officials based on merit [31]. - It fostered a culture of education and scholarship, leading to the establishment of various educational institutions and a societal emphasis on learning [32]. - The influence of the examination system extended beyond China, impacting the selection processes in neighboring countries and even Western nations, establishing a "civil service examination" tradition [33].

Core Insights - The article discusses the transformation of value sources and the restructuring of wealth distribution in the digital age, emphasizing the shift from traditional surplus value (M) to the control of data contribution coefficient (γ) as the new focal point of capital interests [1][11]. Theoretical Foundation - Marx's analysis of capital's profit essence provides a complete system from abstraction to specifics, covering production to distribution [2]. Digital Leap - The digital economy introduces data (D) as a crucial production factor, necessitating an expansion of classical economic formulas to include data's role in value creation and distribution [3]. Evolution of Surplus Value Formula - The surplus value formula evolves to M = α·K + β·L + γ·D, reflecting the significant role of data in enhancing production efficiency and resource allocation [4][6]. Reality of Competition - In the context of platform capitalism, there is a monopolization of the γ coefficient, leading to severe imbalances in profit distribution [7]. Deep-rooted Contradictions - The struggle for the γ coefficient represents a deeper conflict regarding the development path of digital civilization, highlighting economic interests at stake [8]. China's Practical Exploration - China is exploring ways to reconstruct data distribution relationships and promote shared benefits through innovative data property rights systems, such as the "three rights separation" model in Shenzhen [9][10]. Platform Private Ownership and Data Enclosure - Platforms utilize user agreements to claim ownership of user-generated data, leading to a "data enclosure movement" that undermines the rights of data producers [10]. Algorithmic Opacity and Value Transfer - The use of complex algorithms creates a lack of transparency in measuring the contribution of data, allowing platforms to obscure the true value derived from data [10]. Labor Identity Ambiguity - The digital economy blurs the lines between users as laborers and data producers, often resulting in users receiving compensation only for their labor while platforms monopolize data value [10]. Socialization of Production vs. Private Data Ownership - The contradiction between the social nature of data production and its private ownership by platforms leads to wealth concentration and social injustice [10]. Value Creation and Distribution Discrepancy - There is an increasing divergence between value creation (data production by users) and value distribution (platforms monopolizing profits), exacerbating social inequality [10]. Global "γ Colonialism" Risk - Developed countries exploit data resources from developing nations, creating a new center-periphery relationship characterized by "smart colonialism" [10]. Conclusion - The restructuring of capital profit essence in the digital age revolves around the pricing and distribution rights of data, with the struggle for the γ coefficient being central to understanding contemporary digital economic contradictions [11]. Technological Empowerment for Transparent Distribution - Utilizing blockchain and smart contract technologies can create traceable and measurable data value distribution mechanisms, ensuring fair sharing of data contributions [12]. Macro Governance to Guide Benefit Flow - Governments can use tax and industrial policies to redirect data revenue towards public services, promoting a virtuous cycle of development [12].

（原标题：增长模型失灵，耐克为何选择一位"零售派"高管接管中国） 北京时间 1 月 21 日，耐克公司宣布，其现任大中华区领导董炜（Angela Dong）女士将于 3 月 31 日正 式卸任。同时，耐克任命拥有 25 年以上资历的资深高管 Cathy Sparks 为新任耐克大中华区副总裁兼总 经理。这一人事调整，正值耐克试图扭转其在中国市场持续下滑的关键节点，被外界视为公司对大中华 区战略的一次重要"重置"。 从这一任命不难看出，耐克正试图通过更强的零售与消费者运营能力，回应中国市场的深层变化。相比 过去依赖规模扩张和渠道铺设的增长模式，如今的中国运动消费市场更强调产品差异化、文化认同以及 线下体验与数字触点的精细化运营。Cathy 所代表的，并非简单的"换人"，而是一种更偏向前端、执行 与体验导向的管理逻辑。 这同样与耐克集团层面的战略重心调整相呼应。自埃利奥特·希尔（Elliott Hill）履新耐克首席执行官以 来，公司已多次强调中国市场的重要性。去年 12 月，希尔明确表示，大中华区已被提升至耐克全球战 略优先级首位，并要求加快相关举措的落地节奏。此次在关键市场引入一位以零售转型和消费者增长见 长 ...

因为，包括台积电赴美建厂在内，台湾方面承诺的对美投资金额高达5000亿美元。卢特尼克还称，这只 是头期款，如果台湾不兑现，来自台湾的电子产品（芯片）将被课以重税。 在笔者看来，作为特朗普政府的内阁成员，卢特尼克有失风度。他上述言语中表现出的对台湾的轻视、 蔑视，深深地刺痛了岛内蓝营。连日来，蓝营高层和蓝营媒体纷纷发表看法和评论，批评赖清德当局出 卖台湾利益。 1月21日，台湾《联合报》发表社论，题目是《卢特尼克三个大巴掌，打在谁脸上？》。 该社论也认定卢特尼克的表现是"得意洋洋"，并指出"卢特尼克接受财经媒体CNBC专访，解读美台关 税谈判结果，得意洋洋道出血淋淋的谈判真相，结结实实打了赖政府三个大巴掌"。这三个巴掌分别 是：让特朗普开心、确认美国独赢、顺手搬走5000亿美元头期款和台积电四成先进产能。 岛内绿营，一方面对卢特尼克的言论装作听不见，一方面对台美协议进行粉饰。台湾行政部门负责人卓 荣泰说，台美达成共识，台湾谈判团队干得漂亮；民进党的"立委"们则表示，台美关税谈判是双赢、漂 亮的一仗。绿营最大的报纸《自由时报》甚至为此发表社论，题目是《对美关税谈判的重大胜利》。 （原标题：台海观澜 | 卢特尼克的 ...

Core Viewpoint - The "3551 Talent Recommendation System" aims to enhance talent acquisition and integration in Wuhan's East Lake High-tech Zone by decentralizing talent evaluation and fostering a more open and efficient selection mechanism [1][2]. Group 1: Policy Objectives - The core objective of the "3551 Talent Recommendation System" is to create a more open selection mechanism and a precise talent support system, ultimately achieving deeper integration of talent work with regional industrial development [1]. - The policy introduces a "three-dimensional coordination" approach to address existing pain points in talent evaluation, focusing on industry demand, diverse organizational needs, and the balance between industrial and service talents [1][2]. Group 2: Talent Recommendation Channels - The system features a multi-faceted recommendation structure comprising "Green Channel," "Fast Track," and "Special Channel" to cater to different talent acquisition needs [1][2]. - The "Green Channel" emphasizes existing talent incentives through a selection process involving industry department recommendations and ranking systems [2]. - The "Fast Track" targets high-growth companies and major innovation platforms, allowing for immediate talent recognition and support [2]. - The "Special Channel" focuses on public service sectors, selecting key personnel from education, health, and cultural industries to enhance both industrial and service capabilities [2]. Group 3: Support Mechanisms - The policy provides dual support for recommended talents, including financial assistance of 2 million yuan for leading talents and 1 million yuan for high-level talents [3]. - Comprehensive services such as housing support and medical check-ups are offered to ensure the effective integration of recommended talents [3]. - The initiative aims to address the core issue of "talent-industry matching," facilitating the growth of key industries like optoelectronics and life sciences towards trillion-level clusters [3].

（原标题：从符号炫耀到价值消费 老铺黄金引领中国高奢换轨） 2025年，长期被西方品牌垄断的中国高端消费市场格局被老铺黄金打破。 在全球奢侈品持续遭遇增长放缓压力时，本土品牌老铺黄金却上演着一幕截然相反的景象：在万象城、 SKP、恒隆等高端商业中心的门店外，排队等候的人群常年不断。 贝恩公司资深全球合伙人布鲁诺（Bruno Lannes）在2025年底发出的警示，或许能解释这一幕发生的原 因：奢侈品行业正站在十字路口，价格与价值失衡，品牌亟需以真诚重建信任。 与国际奢侈品牌过于依赖符号炫耀的叙事不同，老铺黄金用文化、工艺、审美以及真切的产品价值，正 开创全新的价值消费赛道，提升和满足了消费者成熟理性的新需求，也让奢侈品回归本质——时间和价 值。 奢侈品行业的岔路口 贝恩咨询《2025年全球奢侈品市场研究》显示，全球奢侈品市场进入关键调整期，中国市场持续收缩， 按固定汇率计算预计在3%至5%，活跃客户从2022年的4亿缩减至2025年3.3亿，消费转向本土品牌及体 验型品类。 下滑的数据被高净值人群的选择不断印证。近几年，奢侈品消费里的一个明显变化：真正有钱的人，越 来越不愿意"被看出来"，外露的LOGO似乎不 ...

（原标题：音律相和，以乐化人，缺少"宫"音会怎样？） 文博时空 作者 李冰 《拾遗录》记载，幽州一带，羽山北面，有一种善于鸣叫的飞禽。长着人面鸟嘴， 八只翅膀一只脚，毛色像野雉，行走时不踩地面，名叫鸐（dí） 。它的叫声像钟磬笙竽。《世说新 语》上说："青鸐鸣叫，则天下太平。"说的就是昌盛繁荣的时代，它在沼泽上鸣叫，叫声符合音律，只 飞而不行走。大禹治水之后，它便栖息在高山大川上。它们聚集的地方，一定有圣人出世。自从上古开 始铸造各种鼎器，都用鸟的形象做图案铸在鼎器上。 商 鸟纹石磬 中国国家博物馆藏 古人十分重视音乐与天象、社会的关系。《乐记》中有"声音之道与政通"的说法，说的是治世之音、乱 世之音、亡国之音各自匹配当时的政治情况。也就是说，国家想要安定，重视音乐，繁荣礼乐制度，保 持社会的秩序与规约，是应有的举措。古代人认为音乐可以上通鬼神，下达人伦，使得宗族团结、兄友 弟恭，音乐在古代有着团结和教化民众的效果。周公"制礼作乐"，奠定礼乐文明的基础。孔子提出"兴 于诗，立于礼，成于乐"的乐教思想，强调"以乐化人"。和谐的乐音不仅具有乐律学的意义，也具有音 乐心理学的意义，能够"使人心和而不乱"。 春秋战国 ...

Core Viewpoint - Beijing's 2026 land supply plan aims to enhance urban development by providing a structured approach to land supply, focusing on quality and efficiency in land use [1] Group 1: Land Supply Overview - The plan anticipates a total land supply of approximately 3,240 to 3,740 hectares for construction in 2026 [1] - An additional supply of 3,040 to 3,540 hectares is planned, with over 200 hectares allocated for the revitalization of inefficient industrial and commercial office land [1] Group 2: Implementation Directives - The plan emphasizes five key directives: reducing land supply while improving quality, activating existing land stock, ensuring precise support for new productive forces, aligning supply with the new real estate model, and enhancing public service guarantees [1] - Industrial land is allocated between 480 to 540 hectares, while residential land is set at 200 to 240 hectares, and land for affordable housing is designated at 350 hectares [1]

Core Viewpoint - The case of Jin Yongrong, a prominent financial influencer in China, highlights the regulatory crackdown on market manipulation, as he was penalized for manipulating stock prices through misleading stock recommendations and subsequent sell-offs [1][2][4]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The Zhejiang Securities Regulatory Bureau imposed a total fine of 83.2478 million yuan on Jin Yongrong for manipulating the securities market and banned him from the securities market for three years [1][2]. - Jin Yongrong's actions included publicly recommending 32 stocks while simultaneously executing large sell orders shortly after the recommendations, amounting to approximately 630 million yuan in trading volume [1][2]. Group 2: Market Influence and Manipulation - Jin Yongrong's account on the Xueqiu platform had over 107,000 followers, with an average reading of 1.3 million per post, indicating significant market influence [1][3]. - The investigation revealed that Jin controlled five securities accounts, executing coordinated trades that aligned closely with his stock recommendations, undermining claims of merely sharing investment insights [2][3]. Group 3: Defense and Rebuttal - Jin Yongrong attempted to defend his actions by claiming his posts were for self-expression and learning, and he did not intend to mislead investors [3][5]. - The regulatory body countered his defense by providing evidence of his substantial market influence and the timing of his trades, which were consistent with manipulative behavior [3][5]. Group 4: Broader Implications - The case reflects a growing trend of regulatory scrutiny over market manipulation, with the China Securities Regulatory Commission increasing its enforcement actions, having handled 63 and 71 cases of market manipulation in 2023 and 2024, respectively [5][6]. - The incident serves as a warning to potential violators, emphasizing that actions perceived as market manipulation will be met with strict penalties, reinforcing the message that regulatory oversight is intensifying [6].

Core Insights - The article emphasizes the profound impact of one's family of origin on individual development and emotional well-being, highlighting the importance of healing from childhood traumas to achieve personal happiness [1][2][3]. Group 1: Understanding Family of Origin - The family of origin is defined as the first home where individuals grow up, typically consisting of parents and possibly siblings, and it plays a crucial role in shaping one's relationships and emotional responses throughout life [3][4]. - Unconscious experiences from childhood, particularly those that are not remembered, often have a more significant impact on individuals than those that are consciously recalled [4][5]. - Individuals often replicate behaviors learned in their family of origin in adult life, either by mimicking or rebelling against those patterns [5][6]. Group 2: Inner Child Concept - The concept of the "inner child" refers to the emotional and psychological aspects of a person that are shaped by childhood experiences, including unmet needs for love, safety, and trust [7][8]. - Emotional responses such as joy, pain, and anger can be seen as expressions of the inner child, which may be wounded due to unmet childhood needs [7][8]. - The article discusses how individuals may unconsciously seek to fill emotional voids created by childhood experiences in their adult relationships [11][12]. Group 3: Parenting and Legacy - Current parents are encouraged to create a positive family culture and legacy, as unresolved issues from their own childhood can be passed down to their children [13][14]. - The importance of respecting both parents in front of children is emphasized, as negative comments about one parent can lead to emotional conflicts within the child [15][16][19]. - Providing positive reinforcement about a child's connection to both parents can help fulfill their deep-seated need for belonging and acceptance [17][18].