华夏银行股份有限公司 2024 年年度股东大会会议文件 二〇二五年五月十三日 文件目录 华夏银行股份有限公司 2024 年年度股东大会会议议程......................... -01- 华夏银行股份有限公司 2024 年年度股东大会会议须知......................... -03- 审议事项： | 1．华夏银行董事会 2024 年度工作报告 -06- | | --- | | 2．华夏银行监事会 2024 年度工作报告 -16- | | 3．华夏银行 年度财务决算报告 -25- 2024 | | 4．华夏银行 2024 年度利润分配预案 -30- | | 5．华夏银行 2025 年度财务预算报告 -32- | | 6．关于聘请 2025 年度会计师事务所及其报酬的议案 -38- | | 7．华夏银行 年度关联交易管理制度执行情况及关联交易情况报告.. 2024 | | -43- | | 8．关于申请关联方日常关联交易额度的议案 -56- | | 9．关于华夏银行贷款减免审批权限的议案 -94- | | 10．关于撤销华夏银行监事会的议案 -97- | | 11．关于修订《华夏 ...

Core Viewpoint - The performance of listed banks in the first quarter of 2025 shows significant divergence, with many large and medium-sized banks experiencing declines in both revenue and net profit, while some smaller banks report stable growth [2][5][6]. Group 1: Performance Trends - A total of 42 listed banks have reported their Q1 2025 results, with 16 banks showing negative revenue growth and 12 banks experiencing a decline in net profit. Among these, 10 banks reported declines in both metrics [5]. - Notably, large state-owned banks and joint-stock banks have seen a slowdown in profitability indicators, with three major state-owned banks among those with declining revenue and net profit [5][6]. - In contrast, some city and rural commercial banks have achieved significant growth in net profit, with banks like Hangzhou Bank and Qilu Bank reporting increases of 17.30% and 16.47%, respectively [6]. Group 2: Income Composition and Variability - The divergence in performance is primarily attributed to differences in net interest income and significant fluctuations in non-interest income. Over 60% of listed banks reported negative year-on-year growth in net interest income [8]. - Among state-owned banks, five reported declines in net interest income ranging from 2.74% to 5.21%, while some smaller banks like Chongqing Bank and Jiangsu Bank saw increases of 28.08% and 21.94%, respectively [9]. - Non-interest income also showed a stark contrast, with 21 banks reporting negative growth in fee and commission income, while some smaller banks experienced increases ranging from 135.53% to 495.23% [9]. Group 3: Net Interest Margin Trends - The overall net interest margin (NIM) for commercial banks continues to face pressure, with only Minsheng Bank reporting a year-on-year increase of 3 basis points to 1.41% [10]. - The largest declines in NIM were observed in Zhangjiagang Bank, which saw a drop of 32 basis points to 1.43%. State-owned banks like Postal Savings Bank and Construction Bank also reported declines [10]. - Many banks indicated that the NIM will continue to be influenced by factors such as LPR adjustments and the repricing of existing loans, although the rate of decline is expected to slow compared to 2024 [10][11]. Group 4: Loan Growth and Deposit Stability - Listed banks have increased loan disbursements while maintaining stable deposit growth. For instance, city commercial banks like Ningbo Bank reported a deposit growth of 18.95% compared to the beginning of the year [12]. - Several banks have improved their deposit costs, with Shanghai Bank reporting a decrease in interest rates for both corporate and personal deposits [12]. - Banks are focusing on enhancing control over liabilities and optimizing asset structures, with an emphasis on increasing low-cost deposits and reducing high-cost liabilities [12][13]. Group 5: Focus on Key Sectors - Banks are intensifying their loan support in key sectors such as technology, green finance, and inclusive finance, with significant growth in these areas. For example, green loans and technology loans at Postal Savings Bank increased by 6.01% and 9.90%, respectively [13]. - The strategy of "volume compensating for price" is being employed to mitigate the impact of declining NIM, with banks like Industrial Bank emphasizing support for green and technology sectors [13].

Market Overview - The Shanghai Composite Index fell by 0.23% on April 30, with 21 out of the 28 sectors experiencing gains, led by the computer and automotive sectors, which rose by 2.33% and 1.59% respectively [2] - The banking sector had the largest decline, dropping by 2.09%, followed by the steel sector with a decrease of 1.35% [2] Fund Flow Analysis - The net outflow of capital from the two markets was 1.431 billion yuan, with 13 sectors seeing net inflows [2] - The computer sector had the highest net inflow of capital, amounting to 2.428 billion yuan, while the automotive sector followed with a net inflow of 2.231 billion yuan [2] - The banking sector experienced the largest net outflow, totaling 2.011 billion yuan, followed by the non-ferrous metals sector with a net outflow of 1.450 billion yuan [2] Banking Sector Performance - Within the banking sector, 42 stocks were tracked, with only 4 stocks rising and 37 stocks declining [3] - The top three banks with the highest net outflows were Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, Agricultural Bank of China, and China Construction Bank, with outflows of 558 million yuan, 341 million yuan, and 235 million yuan respectively [3][4] - Notable individual stock performances included Ningbo Bank with a net inflow of 52.64 million yuan, and Huaxia Bank with a significant outflow of 855 million yuan [4]

Market Overview - A-shares exhibited mixed performance with the Shanghai Composite Index experiencing slight fluctuations while the ChiNext and STAR Market indices surged [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed down 0.23% at 3279.03 points, while the Shenzhen Component Index rose 0.51% to 9899.82 points, and the ChiNext Index increased by 0.83% to 1948.03 points [1] - The total trading volume across the Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Beijing markets reached 11,933 billion yuan, an increase of over 1,500 billion yuan compared to the previous day [1] Banking Sector Performance - The banking sector faced significant declines, with Huaxia Bank dropping 8.55%, and other major banks like Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, China Construction Bank, and Agricultural Bank of China falling over 3% [2][3] - The first quarter financial results of 42 listed banks showed a total operating income of 1.45 trillion yuan, a year-on-year decrease of 1.72%, and a net profit attributable to shareholders of 563.98 billion yuan, down 1.2% [5] - Huaxia Bank reported a total profit of 6.73 billion yuan for the first quarter, a decline of 15.11% year-on-year, while Xiamen Bank's operating income fell by 18.42% [5] Automotive Industry - The automotive supply chain stocks saw significant gains, with companies like Lingdian Electric Control and Jingjin Electric reaching the daily limit of 20% increase, and others like Slin Group rising over 13% [10] - The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology recently released key points for automotive standardization, emphasizing the need for enhanced standards for intelligent connected vehicles, particularly in driver assistance and autonomous driving [10][12] - The regulatory clarity regarding L2 and L3 levels of autonomous driving is expected to lead to increased resource allocation and investment in the automotive intelligence sector [12] AI Applications - The AI application sector showed strong activity, with stocks like Chuangyi Information and Zhejiang Wenhe rising significantly, and several companies hitting the daily limit [7] - Alibaba's Tongyi Qianwen released a new series of models, showcasing competitive performance against leading models in the industry, indicating a robust development in China's large model industry [8]

A股今日走势分化，沪指窄幅震荡，创业板指、科创50指数等强势拉升；港股午后走高，恒生科技指数涨逾1%。 具体来看，沪指盘中延续震荡整理走势，深证成指、创业板指强势上扬，北证50指数大幅拉升。截至收盘，沪指跌0.23%报 3279.03点，深证成指涨0.51%报9899.82点，创业板指涨0.83%报1948.03点，北证50指数涨2.96%，沪深北三市合计成交11933 亿元，较昨日增加逾1500亿元。 场内超3400股飘红，汽车产业链股强势，菱电电控、精进电动20%涨停，斯菱股份涨超13%；人形机器人概念再度活跃，南京 化纤、祥鑫科技、新兴装备等涨停；AI眼镜概念崛起，乐创技术涨超10%，瑞芯微、中光学、瀛通通讯等涨停，博士眼镜涨约 9%；银行、保险板块回落，华夏银行跌超8%，工商银行、建设银行、农业银行等跌超3%；电力板块再度下挫，华银电力跌 停。 港股方面，截至收盘，恒生指数涨0.51%，恒生科技指数涨1.35%。科技股多数走强，金蝶国际、金山软件涨约7%，小米集团 涨超5%；中资银行股走弱，招商银行跌近5%，工商银行、建设银行跌近3%。 银行板块跳水 银行板块今日大幅回调，截至收盘，华夏银行跌8.55 ...

Market Overview - The market experienced fluctuations with mixed performance across major indices, where the Shanghai Composite Index fell by 0.23%, while the Shenzhen Component and ChiNext Index rose by 0.51% and 0.83% respectively [1] - Over 3,400 stocks in the market saw gains, with total trading volume reaching 1.17 trillion yuan, an increase of 147.2 billion yuan compared to the previous trading day [1] - There was a notable shift in market sentiment as investors began to allocate funds towards favored sectors ahead of the holiday, particularly in technology stocks, while defensive assets like banks and utilities continued to adjust [1][11] Sector Performance - Technology-related sectors such as Huawei Ascend, humanoid robots, AI glasses, and computing power saw significant gains, while sectors like banking, electricity, steel, and ports faced declines [1] - The banking sector experienced a notable decline, with the overall banking index dropping by 1.75%, marking the second-largest drop of the month after April 7 [4][10] - Several bank ETFs were among the top decliners, reflecting the broader weakness in the banking sector [6][7] Earnings Reports - Recent earnings reports from major banks indicated a decline in net profits for Q1 2025, with notable decreases such as: - Huaxia Bank: 5.063 billion yuan, down 14.04% - Construction Bank: 83.35 billion yuan, down 3.99% - Industrial and Commercial Bank: 84.16 billion yuan, down 3.99% - Bank of China: 54.36 billion yuan, down 2.90% - China Merchants Bank: 37.28 billion yuan, down 2.08% - Postal Savings Bank: 25.24 billion yuan, down 2.62% [10] Future Outlook - The recent strength in technology stocks raises questions about whether this trend will continue post-holiday, as the market has shown a tendency for sector rotation between defensive and growth-oriented stocks [3][11] - Analysts suggest that the current trading volume is insufficient for a decisive breakout, predicting continued market fluctuations with potential rotations among consumption, technology, and dividend sectors [14] - The political bureau meeting emphasized the need for proactive macro policies to support high-quality development, which may bolster domestic demand and provide a relative advantage for A-shares compared to overseas markets [15]

Group 1 - The overall performance of the nine A-share listed joint-stock banks in the first quarter is generally unsatisfactory, with four banks experiencing a decline in both revenue and net profit, while only Shanghai Pudong Development Bank achieved growth in both metrics [1][2][3] - Among the banks with declining performance, Huaxia Bank reported the largest drop in both revenue and net profit, with declines of 17.73% and 14.04% respectively, contrasting sharply with its previous year's growth [2][3][4] - The decline in Huaxia Bank's performance is attributed to a significant drop in other non-interest income, which fell by 78.9% due to the bond market's downturn and a high base from the previous year [4] Group 2 - In terms of interest income, six banks reported a year-on-year increase, while Huaxia Bank, Ping An Bank, and Everbright Bank saw declines in net interest income [7] - The net interest margin and net interest spread continued to narrow, further compressing profit margins, although some banks managed to maintain positive growth in interest income through increased credit issuance and cost control [7] - Fee and commission income showed significant variation, with some banks like Huaxia Bank experiencing an increase of 11.45%, while others like Zheshang Bank saw a decline of 13.15% [8] Group 3 - Asset quality remained resilient, with most banks reporting a stable or declining non-performing loan (NPL) ratio compared to the end of the previous year, except for Huaxia Bank and Industrial Bank, which saw slight increases [9] - Huaxia Bank had the highest NPL ratio among the nine banks at 1.61%, exceeding the 1.5% threshold [9] - The provision coverage ratio decreased for seven banks, with Ping An Bank experiencing the largest drop of 14.18 percentage points, indicating potential adjustments in provisioning strategies [10]

Core Viewpoint - The banking sector in both Hong Kong and A-shares has experienced a collective decline after reaching continuous highs, with significant drops in major banks' stock prices and disappointing first-quarter earnings reports for 2025 [1][4][5]. Group 1: Stock Performance - The A-share banking sector index fell by 1.69%, with notable declines including Huaxia Bank down over 8%, and other banks like Beijing Bank, Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, and Agricultural Bank of China dropping more than 3% [1][2]. - In the Hong Kong market, Shengjing Bank fell over 5%, while China Merchants Bank, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, and Postal Savings Bank of China dropped more than 4% [1][3]. Group 2: Earnings Reports - Multiple banks reported disappointing earnings for the first quarter of 2025, with Huaxia Bank's net profit at 5.063 billion yuan, a year-on-year decrease of 14.04% [6][8]. - Other banks such as Guizhou Bank, Construction Bank, Industrial and Commercial Bank, and China Bank also reported declines in net profit, with decreases ranging from 2.90% to 14.04% [6][8]. Group 3: Market Sentiment and Future Outlook - Analysts noted that the reduction in the Loan Prime Rate (LPR) in 2024 suggests that banks may face pressure on asset yields in 2025, with expectations of further interest rate cuts and reserve requirement ratio reductions [9]. - Despite some banks showing profit growth, the overall performance did not meet market expectations, leading to diminished investor confidence [8]. - Passive funds have increased their holdings in bank stocks, while active funds have reduced their exposure, indicating a shift in investment strategy [10][12].

上天天基金APP搜索【777】领 98 元券包 ，优选基金10元起投！限量发放！先到先得！ "五一"假期前的最后一个交易日，市场再度活跃，资金从前期热门的银行、PEEK材料等板块撤出，重 新流回算力等科技板块。 A股上证指数小幅低开，在地产股和消费股的反弹中，又快速翻红，随后在银行股的重挫下，再度走 低。深证成指和创业板指数则快速拉升，市场氛围活跃。 截至发稿，上证指数跌0.17%，深证成指涨0.59%，创业板指数涨近1%。全市场超3800只个股上涨，两 市成交额较前一交易日放大超900亿元。 （图片来源：东方财富APP，统计截至2025/4/30，不作投资推荐） AI又火了 多股直线拉涨停 4月30日早盘，算力概念股再度走强。其中，鸿博股份4连板。 鸿博股份(002229) ( 交易中 04-30 09:56:51 通 融 15.88 额 16.28亿 股本4.96亿 市盈-42.9 万得 盘口 +1.44 +9.97% 换 21.34% 市值178.8亿 市净 5.89 分时 五日 日K 周K 月K 更多 [0] 叠加 设均线 MA 5:13.25↑ 10:11.97↑ 20:11.45↑ 前复权 | 1 ...

Core Viewpoint - The announcement from major Chinese banks regarding the abolition or non-establishment of supervisory boards indicates a significant transformation in the governance structure of the banking sector [1][3]. Group 1: Changes in Governance Structure - Major banks including Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, Agricultural Bank of China, Bank of China, China Construction Bank, and Bank of Communications have announced the removal or non-establishment of supervisory boards [1]. - The new Company Law of the People's Republic of China, effective July 2024, allows companies to establish an audit committee within the board of directors, which can perform the functions of a supervisory board [1][3]. - The supervisory board, previously responsible for overseeing financial activities and ensuring compliance, is now optional, with the decision left to the shareholders' meeting [1][3]. Group 2: Implications for Leadership Roles - The cancellation of the supervisory board has led to vacancies in roles traditionally held by the supervisory board chair, often a deputy secretary of the party committee [3]. - Some banks have appointed dedicated deputy secretaries to focus on party-building work, indicating a shift in leadership structure [3]. - The recent resignation of Liu Jin from his position as Vice President of Bank of China, who will now serve as the party committee deputy secretary, reflects these changes [4]. Group 3: Industry Perspectives - There has been considerable discussion within the industry regarding the potential weakening of the supervisory board, with opinions suggesting that the dual system of independent directors and supervisory boards has led to overlapping responsibilities and increased personnel costs [3]. - The National Financial Supervision Administration has clarified that financial institutions can choose to establish an audit committee instead of a supervisory board, further emphasizing the shift in governance practices [3].