美国优先

Search documents
美媒:“美网”给美国外交上了一课
Huan Qiu Shi Bao· 2025-08-25 23:00
美国《纽约时报》 8 月 23 日文章,原题:美国网球公开赛能告诉我们关于美国的什么? 秉持全球视野的 进步派人士对"美国优先"这类表述颇为反感。在这个不平等的世界里,美国外交政策的目标应是增进全 人类的福祉。在奥运会、世界杯、近日开启的美国网球公开赛(美网)等国际体育赛事上,美国观众希 望美国人赢,这就意味着要击败外国选手。不过,为同胞加油的同时,也认可外国运动员的竞争价值并 非难事。 同理,美国人可以期盼本国经济取得成功,但与外国打交道时,也应支持公平合作、秉持同理心。尽管 研究表明,"非我即彼"的思维模式出自人类天性。当观众身披本国国旗观赛时,即便是那些谴责"美国 优先"主义的美国球迷,在球场上也会高呼"美国优先"。这种竞争意识通常会推动美国人希望本国在体 育之外的领域,包括科研、工业和艺术领域,也取得国家级别的成功。我们大多数人都更愿意置身于一 支成功的"队伍"中。 网球给我们上了一课:秉持全球视野与追求本国成就,二者完全可以并行不悖。体育最大的魅力在于所 有人共同参与、共同竞争。试想一下,如果美网只对美国运动员开放,比赛质量会下降,观众对赛事的 关注度也会降低。只有当规则公平公正时,球迷才会真正欣赏 ...
热点问答|韩国总统访日 双方谈了什么
Xin Hua She· 2025-08-24 13:23
据日本外务省消息,李在明与石破茂的会谈于当地时间23日16时55分开始。双方先进行了约60分钟 小范围会谈,随后又进行了55分钟的扩大会谈。会谈结束后,两国领导人举行联合记者会,两国政府根 据会谈结果公布联合新闻公报。 根据联合新闻公报,两国领导人一致同意稳步推进双边关系。在历史认识问题上,石破茂表示将整 体继承包括1998年《日韩共同宣言》在内的日本历代内阁立场。双方在加强领导人交流、产业领域拓展 合作和应对共同挑战、人文交流等方面达成一系列共识。两国领导人还就地区问题和国际合作等进行了 讨论。 日本共同社报道说,李在明此访是他6月就任韩国总统后首次访日,由此开启了日韩首脑互访的"穿 梭外交"。韩联社报道说,李在明在联合记者会上强调,此访秉持"打破惯例、践行以国家利益为主的实 用外交主义,从而推动面向未来的合作"这一信念,希望"穿梭外交"成为韩日外交新模式。 为何"先访日、后访美" 新华社东京8月24日电 热点问答|韩国总统访日 双方谈了什么 新华社记者陈泽安 韩国总统李在明23日至24日访问日本,与日本首相石破茂举行会谈,随后前往美国访问。两国领导 人会晤谈了什么?李在明"先访日、后访美"有何用意?韩日关 ...
48小时内三连击!特朗普“强人神话”开始坍塌,中国只需静候其变
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-20 16:47
Group 1 - The article discusses the recent setbacks faced by Trump, highlighting a shift in the trade war dynamics and the collapse of his "America First" narrative [3][22] - OPEC+ announced an increase in oil production by 548,000 barrels per day starting in September, undermining Trump's energy strategy [4][5] - Trump's approval ratings have plummeted, with only 37% of Americans supporting his economic policies, marking a new low in his presidency [8][9] Group 2 - The article notes that 62% of Americans oppose Trump's tariff policies, and 55% believe his overall economic strategy has failed [9][10] - Small businesses are struggling with rising production costs, leading to layoffs and halted expansion plans [9][10] - The U.S. job growth in July was reported as the worst since the pandemic, prompting Trump to fire the head of the Labor Department's statistics office [10][11] Group 3 - Trump's recent comments indicate a sudden softening of his stance towards China, suggesting a potential shift in strategy as he faces internal pressures [16][17] - The global response to Trump's new tariffs has been muted, with many countries observing China's next moves closely [20][21] - The article emphasizes that the internal contradictions of Trump's policies are leading to his decline, as he struggles to maintain domestic support [22][24]
“赢麻了”!特朗普透露“美乌矿产细节”,美国收益远超3500亿!
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-20 15:14
美国福克斯新闻网8月19日报道,特朗普爆料了"美乌矿产细节",通过矿产合作,美国收益巨大,远超 3500亿美元! 消息来自福克斯新闻网电话采访特朗普。 在采访时,特朗普直言不讳地说道:"我达成的协议所获取的稀土价值,远超拜登此前送去的3500亿美 元。" 之后,特朗普对前总统拜登一顿批评,他表示,前总统拜登非常愚蠢。不过,经过他的努力,和和乌克 兰达成了矿产协议。乌克兰拥有世界上最好的稀土资源之一。通过矿产协议和后期开发,我们得到的矿 产价值远超3500亿美元。 3500亿美元,相当于美国全年财政收入的十三分之一左右。相当于乌克兰两年的GDP之和。这不是个小 数字。 特朗普软硬兼施,将取得如此丰厚的收益,真是一个聚财好手。不愧为"商人总统"。 但是,特朗普通过和乌克兰签订矿产协议(4月30日签约),将获得超过3500亿美元的收入。 不得不说,一个"美乌矿产协议",看起来,就让特朗普赢麻了! 不过,这挣的是真正的乌克兰的"国难财",如果是平常,乌克兰人很难允许这种事情出现的。 这就是特朗普,为了美国的利益,根本不管乌克兰的死活。 那么,美国之前为乌克兰付出了多少呢? 二月份,乌克兰总统泽连斯基对外爆料,三年来, ...
美方开出300%芯片关税!特朗普:必须在美国建厂,否则免谈?
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-19 15:05
用咱们网友的话说,这家伙翻脸比翻书还快。前脚还在推特上跟你是"最好的朋友",后脚就能把你拉 黑。今天说的话,明天自己就能给忘了。 对乌克兰一会儿是"美国将全力支持",一会儿又拿着军援当胡萝卜,逼着泽连斯基拿矿产来换。很多人 都觉得,这人是不是有点精神分裂? 所谓的"美国优先",就是"我的利益优先"。这套玩法,其实特简单,就跟咱们小时候在胡同里跟人玩弹 珠一样——看人下菜碟。 撕开那层"不靠谱"的外衣,你会发现一个比谁都精明的"生意人"。在他的世界里,根本没有盟友和敌 人,只有两种东西:商品和价格。 你把整个世界想象成一个巨大的超市,特朗普就是那个推着购物车,眼里只有价签的顾客。 德国的汽车? 太便宜了,影响我自家生意,加25%的关税!沙特的石油? 好东西!来,签个千亿军火 单,咱们是好兄弟! 北约那帮老兄弟? 都用着我的安保服务,咋能不交钱?以后每年GDP的5%当保护费,少一分都不行! 他敢公开琢磨,把加拿大买下来,当美国的第51个州;他敢放话,要把巴拿马运河的控制权给抢回来; 他甚至看着饱受战火的加沙地带,琢磨着能不能开发成"海滨度假区"…… 在他眼里,国家主权、国际道义、历史承诺……这些东西,统统都可以上 ...
印度前总理顾问库尔卡尼接受《环球时报》专访:美国蔑视规则,会让更多国家质疑其理智
Huan Qiu Shi Bao· 2025-08-18 22:56
【环球时报报道 记者 白云怡】美国总统特朗普在第二任期开始后不久,印度总理莫迪就成为首批访问 华盛顿的外国领导人之一。当时两人互称"好朋友",并共同设定了到2030年将双边贸易额提升至5000亿 美元的宏伟目标。然而不到半年,美印关系急转直下:美国宣布对印度进口商品征收总计50%的关税, 并威胁将因印度是金砖国家成员而再加征10%的关税。此外,美国还在购买俄油、涉巴基斯坦等问题上 屡屡挑战印度的"红线"。"这标志着两国关系出现惊人逆转。"英国广播公司(BBC)评论称,接下来, 新德里如何回应将决定印美关系的未来走向。据印度媒体报道,莫迪或将于9月底与特朗普在美国进行 会晤,商讨贸易及关税问题。 印美关系是否已经处在"十字路口"?印美矛盾升级,是否会让未来华盛顿拉拢新德里遏制中国的计划更 加难以施行?就以上相关问题,《环球时报》记者日前对印度知名学者、前总理瓦杰帕伊顾问苏廷德拉 ·库尔卡尼进行了专访。 印度民众当下带着 " 苦涩 " 情绪看美国 环球时报: 我们注意到,印美关系近期因关税问题紧张升级。据您了解,现在印度民众如何看待美国的 打压举措和当前的印美关系? 库尔卡尼: 印度民众对美国的态度正变得更消极, ...
阿拉斯加阴影下:欧洲能否阻止特朗普用乌克兰换对俄和解?
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-18 16:54
Core Viewpoint - The meeting at the White House on August 18, 2025, is a pivotal moment in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, with European leaders uniting to address the potential shift in U.S. support under Trump's changing stance [1][3]. Group 1: European Strategy - European leaders have developed a "triple strategy" in response to Trump's unpredictable position, focusing on binding values and reconstructing security narratives [3]. - Macron emphasized that any peace agreement must include long-term security guarantees for Ukraine, framing it as an extension of European security architecture [3]. - The proposal for a collective defense mechanism similar to NATO's Article 5 aims to bind European security with Ukraine's fate, highlighting the importance of U.S. support for European strategic autonomy [3]. Group 2: Diplomatic Engagement - Finnish President Stubb plays a crucial role as a mediator, having established a personal rapport with Trump, which allows for informal communication regarding European positions [4]. - Stubb's "non-confrontational pressure" strategy aims to secure negotiation space without provoking Trump, emphasizing the need for a ceasefire before negotiations [4]. Group 3: Economic Considerations - German Chancellor Merz indicated that continued U.S. support for Ukraine could lead to substantial economic benefits for Europe in areas like energy cooperation and trade agreements [5]. - This approach aligns with Trump's transactional nature, potentially facilitating a compromise on the Ukraine issue while addressing U.S. interests in European defense markets [5]. Group 4: U.S. Political Dynamics - Trump's meeting serves as a test of his "America First" strategy, with a focus on short-term political gains ahead of the 2024 elections by promising to end the Ukraine war [7]. - His reluctance to make concessions is evident, as he publicly stated that Ukraine cannot reclaim Crimea, testing Europe's limits [7]. Group 5: Long-term Strategic Implications - The meeting reflects Trump's long-term strategy towards Russia, where he may consider recognizing Crimea as Russian territory in exchange for reduced U.S. military commitments [8]. - The U.S. administration's insistence on European alignment in defense spending and policies towards China further complicates transatlantic relations [9]. Group 6: Potential Outcomes - A compromise could stabilize the transatlantic alliance, providing Ukraine with a reprieve but potentially undermining European strategic autonomy [14]. - Conversely, if Trump maintains a hardline stance, Europe may accelerate defense integration, risking Ukraine's position in the geopolitical landscape [14].
IPP全球智库纵览|特朗普的“大而美法案”对拉丁美洲意味着什么?
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-17 17:59
Core Viewpoint - The "Big Beautiful Bill" proposed by Trump is set to reshape the economic, energy, and immigration policy landscape between the U.S. and Latin America, with significant implications for regional stability and U.S. relations with its long-term allies in the hemisphere [2][4]. Immigration Enforcement - The new legislation allocates $170 billion for immigration and border-related actions, including nearly $47 billion for border wall construction and funding for thousands of new immigration enforcement personnel and detention facilities [5]. - The bill aims to terminate the legal status of over one million individuals, significantly increasing the number of people eligible for deportation, which will place additional pressure on Central American countries to manage the return of their citizens [7]. Energy Policy and Key Minerals - The bill reverses tax incentives for clean energy technologies, contrasting sharply with the Biden administration's climate policies, which may hinder U.S. clean energy production and provide an opportunity for China to expand its influence in renewable energy sectors in Latin America [8]. - The cancellation of tax credits for critical minerals supply chains could impact global efforts to transition to renewable energy, while other regions continue to pursue energy transformation [8]. Remittance Taxation - The legislation imposes a federal tax on remittances, which could drive funds from formal channels to informal ones, negatively affecting the economies of Latin American countries reliant on remittances [11]. - The tax rate is set at 1%, lower than the initially proposed 5%, but could still lead to a decrease in remittance flows through formal channels due to tax avoidance strategies [11]. Economic Implications - The bill is projected to increase U.S. national debt by $3.3 trillion, potentially exacerbating the already fragile macroeconomic situation in the U.S. and negatively impacting regional economies in Latin America [15]. - The combination of reduced foreign aid, remittance taxation, and expanded immigration enforcement may lead to a long-term decoupling of Latin American economies from the U.S. if regional integration efforts are not strengthened [15].
特朗普关税再升级,或将升至300%,中国对此丝毫不担心!
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-17 04:32
Group 1 - The trade war initiated by former President Trump has led to ongoing turmoil in the global trade order, significantly impacting various industries and eliciting strong domestic opposition in the U.S. [1][3] - Trump's "America First" policy has resulted in multiple rounds of tariffs on goods from different countries, with a notable increase in tariffs on Chinese goods totaling 20% in early 2025, followed by further escalations affecting Japan, the EU, Switzerland, India, and Brazil [3][5] - The latest threat involves potential new tariffs on steel and chips, which could escalate to rates as high as 300%, causing panic among global enterprises, particularly in Southeast Asia [5][7] Group 2 - The semiconductor industry is under significant pressure, with the U.S. importing $46.3 billion worth of semiconductors in 2024, primarily from Malaysia, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam, while China accounts for only 3% [7] - The steel industry is also facing challenges, with the U.S. importing 28.86 million tons of steel in 2024, a 2.5% increase from 2023, with major suppliers including Canada, Brazil, Mexico, South Korea, and Vietnam [7] - Trump's tariffs have sparked strong backlash domestically, with a Pew Research Center survey indicating only 38% support for his policies, and 61% opposition, reflecting a decline in approval ratings [7][8] Group 3 - The interplay between Trump's tariff policies and the Federal Reserve's interest rate decisions complicates the economic landscape, as rising import costs from tariffs contribute to inflation, making it difficult for the Fed to lower rates [8]
美国骄傲宣布,特朗普创造了最大的谈判筹码!50多国无奈服软谈判
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-16 09:06
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant market turmoil following the Trump administration's announcement of "reciprocal tariffs," which led to a sharp decline in U.S. and global stock markets, highlighting the potential long-term economic implications of such trade policies [1][8][31]. Group 1: Market Reaction - U.S. stock markets experienced their largest single-day drop since 2020, with a total market value loss exceeding $6 trillion within two trading days [8][12]. - Major global markets, including Australia, South Korea, Japan, and Europe, faced severe declines, with Australia's S&P index plummeting by 6.4% and South Korea's index triggering a trading halt [12][13][21]. - The Singapore Strait Times index fell by 8.5% within 20 minutes, and European indices like Germany's DAX and the UK's FTSE saw declines exceeding 4% [13][21]. Group 2: Government Response - U.S. Treasury Secretary Mnuchin downplayed the market volatility, asserting that short-term fluctuations should not be a concern and emphasizing a focus on long-term prosperity [3][8]. - Mnuchin claimed that Trump's tariff strategy has created significant negotiation leverage, with over 50 countries reportedly seeking trade negotiations with the U.S. [5][15]. - Despite the optimistic rhetoric, there is skepticism regarding the actual progress of these negotiations, as specific details remain undisclosed [15][36]. Group 3: Economic Implications - The tariffs are expected to have a detrimental impact on global commodity demand, affecting various industries and leading to significant stock price drops for companies like SK Hynix and BHP [19][21]. - Analysts warn that the ongoing trade conflict could result in a 0.3% reduction in U.S. GDP and an increase in the unemployment rate to 5.3% [31]. - The article highlights the potential for economic isolation for the U.S. as other countries may resist accepting what they perceive as "unequal treaties" [40][43]. Group 4: Internal Discontent - There are indications of internal discord within the Trump administration regarding trade policies, with some officials expressing concerns about the long-term economic consequences of the tariffs [25][36]. - Mnuchin's public support for Trump's strategy contrasts with reports of his personal frustrations with the tariff calculations, suggesting a potential for resignation [25][36]. Group 5: Global Trade Dynamics - The article notes that the tariffs have prompted retaliatory measures from countries like China, which announced a 34% tariff on U.S. goods, directly impacting critical sectors such as semiconductors and defense [31][38]. - The global trade landscape is shifting, with countries like Australia and New Zealand expressing significant distress over the economic fallout from U.S. policies, leading to currency depreciation and market instability [34][43].