路透调查：14位受访经济学家均预计以色列央行将在下周一的货币政策会议上将基准利率维持在4.5% 不变。 ...

战略数据研究丨深度报告 [Table_Title] 大小盘、成长价值维度看，海外主动基金能 否跑赢基准？ %% %% %% %% research.95579.com 1 丨证券研究报告丨 报告要点 [Table_Summary] 短期看，公募业绩考核一旦实施，或从边际资金定价上对低配行业有增量资金支撑效果，但是 中长期来看，考核结果是超额表现，挖掘个股板块机会仍是主动权益核心目标及跑赢基准的关 键。近阶段如今年 5 月 7 日至 16 日区间防御性风格向好，背后也有对贸易政策不确定性、新 兴产业缺乏新的催化剂等因素影响，无明确产业趋势和景气投资逻辑下，配置"不确定环境中 的相对安全性"或是短期共识。 分析师及联系人 [Table_Author] 陈洁敏 SAC：S0490518120005 SFC：BUT348 请阅读最后评级说明和重要声明 2 / 23 %% %% 2 [Table_Title 大小盘、成长价值维度看，海外主动基金能否跑 2] 赢基准？ [Table_Summary2] 理性对待锚定业绩基准考核的市场影响：不放大短期影响，不轻视长期效用 短期看，公募业绩考核一旦实施，或从边际资金定价上对低 ...

安哥拉央行将基准贷款利率维持在19.50%不变。 ...

近期，银行股屡创新高之下，市场上有一个猜测：基金经理向基准调仓了。 其逻辑是，5月7日发布的《推动公募基金高质量发展行动方案》（下称《行动方案》），要求基金经理 薪酬与业绩挂钩，强化了业绩比较基准的约束作用。主动权益基金通常会选取沪深300等代表性宽基指 数作为业绩基准，由于以往基金经理普遍低配其中权重较大的银行、非银、公用事业等行业。因此，为 了不让净值与业绩比较基准偏离太多，基金在加速回补低配的行业，近期金融板块的抢货潮也被指与此 有关。 事实真的是这样吗？21世纪经济报道记者采访调查显示，公募并没有明显向业绩比较基准调仓的迹象。 事实上，在面临着"调仓"还是"调基准"的选择时，大多数主动权益基金经理更倾向调整业绩比较基准。 业绩与基准的困境 5月7日，《行动方案》公布。《行动方案》显示，对三年以上产品业绩低于业绩比较基准超过10个百分 点的基金经理，要求其绩效薪酬应当明显下降；对三年以上产品业绩显著超过业绩比较基准的基金经 理，可以合理适度提高其绩效薪酬。 这一条规定将影响很多基金经理的薪酬。 国泰海通证券统计显示，2017年至2025年4月末期间，全市场公募基金3年累计跑输业绩比较基准10%以 上的平 ...

行 业 比 较 证券分析师 林丽梅 A0230513090001 linlm@swsresearch.com 刘雅婧 A0230521080001 liuyj@swsresearch.com 郝丹阳 A0230523120002 haody@swsresearch.com 王胜 A0230511060001 wangsheng@swsresearch.com 研究支持 冯彧 A0230123080001 fengyu@swsresearch.com 联系人 冯彧 (8621)23297818× fengyu@swsresearch.com 2025 年 05 月 21 日 2024 年主动基金产品全部持股的行业 偏离度分析：显著低配金融和红利资产 本期投资提示： 本研究报告仅通过邮件提供给 中庚基金 使用。1 请务必仔细阅读正文之后的各项信息披露与声明 业 比 较 行 证 券 研 究 报 告 ⚫ 事件：2025 年 5 月 7 日，证监会印发《推动公募基金高质量发展行动方案》。吴清主席总 结公募基金改革的要点是"四个突出"，其中两项涉及业绩基准：一是突出强化与投资者 的利益绑定，把业绩是否跑赢基准、投资者盈亏 ...

华夏时报（www.chinatimes.net.cn）记者 卢梦雪 见习记者 张萌 北京报道 近期，理财产品业绩比较基准迎来密集下调。 据不完全统计，进入5月以来，已有上百只银行理财产品陆续下调了业绩比较基准，有理财产品调整后业绩比较基 准下限已跌破1%，低于同期限存款产品的利率水平。 多家银行和理财机构在调整公告中表示，此次调整受当前市场利率走势及市场环境变化等因素影响。 "从当前经济增长面临的外部冲击、提振内需的难度以及债务风险化解的现实需要看，宏观调控政策只能加码，难 以逆转。以此判断，理财产品业绩基准下调具有必然性，且下一阶段理财产品业绩比较基准继续下行的压力仍比 较大。"北京财富管理行业协会特约研究员杨海平在接受《华夏时报》记者采访时表示。 上百只理财产品下调业绩比较基准 5月以来，已有上百只理财产品业绩比较基准区间集中下调。 此前，中银理财亦连续发布公告，对23只理财产品份额业绩比较基准进行调整。其中，8只产品调整自5月6日起生 效，另有15只产品调整自5月9日起生效。这些产品均为固定收益类理财产品，大部分主要投资于债券、货币市场 工具等固定收益类资产，并适度参与以对冲为目的的金融衍生品交易，另有 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles indicates that Canada's inflation rate has slowed down, with the Consumer Price Index (CPI) rising by 1.7% year-on-year in April, down from 2.3% in March, primarily due to a decrease in energy prices [1] - The significant drop in gasoline prices, which fell over 18% year-on-year in April, is attributed to the cancellation of the consumer carbon tax by Prime Minister Carney, alongside a reduction in crude oil prices [1] - Retail food prices in Canada increased by 3.8% year-on-year in April, surpassing the overall CPI growth for three consecutive months, with fresh vegetables and beef prices rising by 3.7% and over 16% respectively [1] Group 2 - The Bank of Canada considers the inflation rate as a crucial reference for interest rate adjustments, having maintained the benchmark rate after seven consecutive cuts since June of the previous year [2] - The next policy interest rate decision by the Bank of Canada is scheduled for June 4 [2]

Core Viewpoint - The China Securities Regulatory Commission has released an action plan to promote high-quality development of public funds, emphasizing the importance of performance benchmarks and their impact on fund managers' evaluations and compensation [2][8]. Group 1: Fund Performance and Benchmarking - The action plan requires fund performance deviations from benchmarks to be included in the evaluation and reward systems for fund companies and managers [2]. - Three funds, namely the Jiashi Intelligent Automotive Stock Fund, Jinying Multi-Strategy Mixed A Fund, and Tianzhi New Consumption Mixed Fund, have underperformed their benchmarks by over 60 percentage points in the past three years, highlighting significant deviations [2][6][7]. - Jiashi Intelligent Automotive Stock Fund has underperformed its benchmark by 81.83 percentage points, primarily due to a misalignment in investment strategy focusing heavily on upstream lithium battery materials while neglecting downstream automotive sectors [3][4]. Group 2: Fund Manager Strategies and Changes - The Jiashi Intelligent Automotive Fund's manager has maintained a concentrated position in lithium battery stocks despite market shifts towards vehicle intelligence and optimization, resulting in significant losses [3][4]. - The Jinying Multi-Strategy Mixed A Fund has changed managers six times in nine years, leading to inconsistent investment strategies and a 71.14 percentage point underperformance against its benchmark [6]. - The Tianzhi New Consumption Mixed Fund has struggled with a heavy allocation in the pig farming sector amid a slow consumer recovery, resulting in a 61.45 percentage point underperformance [7]. Group 3: Regulatory Impact and Industry Trends - The new regulatory framework aims to enhance the stability and consistency of fund investment strategies by linking fund manager compensation to performance benchmarks [8]. - The emphasis on performance benchmarks is expected to lead to a more transparent investment environment, reducing the difficulty for investors in selecting funds and increasing trust in public funds [8]. - The industry may see a shift towards more conservative investment styles as fund managers align their strategies with mainstream broad-based indices [8].

Core Viewpoint - The April wealth management market saw a slight decline in the number of newly issued products, but the issuance of rights-containing wealth management products accelerated again, indicating a shift in investor preference towards mixed and equity products as fixed-income yields continue to decline [1][3][5]. Group 1: Market Performance - In April, the number of newly issued mixed products increased by 42% month-on-month, totaling 81 products [1]. - The total scale of bank wealth management rose by 2.1 trillion yuan to 31.3 trillion yuan, marking a month-on-month increase of 7.35% and a year-on-year increase of 6.83% [5][6]. - The annualized yield of closed fixed-income products rose by 1.94 percentage points to 3.69% over the past month [1][6]. Group 2: Product Issuance - In April, 4,605 new RMB wealth management products were issued, a slight decrease of 143 products from March [2]. - Fixed-income products accounted for over 96% of the newly issued products, with 4,507 products primarily investing in interbank certificates of deposit, bank deposits, and bonds [2]. - The issuance of mixed wealth management products continued to rise, with 81 new products launched, an increase of 24 products month-on-month [2]. Group 3: Performance Metrics - The average performance benchmark for newly issued open-ended wealth management products was 2.11%, down 0.03 percentage points month-on-month, while closed products averaged 2.66%, down 0.1 percentage points [3][4]. - The average performance benchmark for closed mixed and equity products rose to 2.77% and 6.00%, respectively, with increases of 0.11 and 2.16 percentage points [4]. Group 4: Market Drivers - The increase in wealth management scale is attributed to seasonal factors, with April being a traditional peak season for wealth management, and a recovery in the bond market leading to improved fixed-income product yields [5][6]. - The decline in deposit rates has made wealth management products more attractive, potentially driving further growth in the sector [7].

Core Viewpoint - The public fund industry is experiencing a wave of adjustments regarding performance benchmarks, with nearly 80 funds changing their benchmarks since the beginning of the year to better reflect risk-return characteristics and improve comparability with performance benchmarks [1][3][4]. Group 1: Adjustments in Performance Benchmarks - As of May 20, 2023, around 80 public funds have changed their performance benchmarks, significantly higher than in previous years [3]. - Fund companies are adjusting benchmarks to scientifically and reasonably evaluate fund performance [4]. - The adjustments mainly fall into three categories: 1. Significant changes in the weight of indices within the benchmark [6]. 2. Updating the main weights in thematic fund benchmarks [6]. 3. Complete overhaul of the performance benchmark [6]. Group 2: Regulatory Environment - The regulatory framework is evolving, with plans to establish a "benchmark library" to standardize the setting of performance benchmarks [9][12]. - The "Action Plan for Promoting High-Quality Development of Public Funds" emphasizes the constraint role of performance benchmarks, indicating that more funds will actively adjust their benchmarks [7][10]. - Regulatory measures will include strict oversight of the establishment, modification, disclosure, and ongoing evaluation of performance benchmarks [11]. Group 3: Challenges and Future Directions - Fund companies face challenges in selecting appropriate benchmarks that accurately reflect their investment strategies and styles [14][15]. - There are concerns that standardizing performance benchmarks may limit innovation in fund products [13]. - Future adjustments will require fund companies to manage benchmarks more effectively and establish regular evaluation mechanisms to ensure alignment with actual investment strategies [14].