Group 1 - The core objective of the tariff war initiated by Trump was to suppress China, but it backfired, damaging the U.S. industries instead [10] - The U.S. reliance on Chinese critical minerals for its clean energy sector was highlighted, showing that tariffs on these minerals harmed American industries [3][5] - The Biden administration's approach to tariffs was more targeted and effective compared to Trump's broad measures, which inadvertently hurt U.S. industries [5][7] Group 2 - The international response to U.S. tariff policies has been one of resistance, with calls for unity against U.S. trade bullying, emphasizing the need to maintain a multilateral trade system [1] - Trump's declining approval ratings and public dissatisfaction with his policies indicate a lack of support for his tariff strategies, which have created uncertainty in global trade [9][10] - The European economy is facing significant threats due to U.S. tariff policies, with officials expressing a desire for negotiations to resolve trade issues [10]

Group 1 - China has ceased purchasing U.S. soybeans and corn since mid-January, indicating a strong response to U.S. tariff policies [1][3] - In response to reduced imports from the U.S., China has increased agricultural purchases from Brazil, signing a contract for 2.4 million tons of soybeans to ensure domestic supply stability [3][5] - The U.S. soybean industry is urging the Trump administration to negotiate with China to protect American farmers' interests, as ongoing tariffs could severely harm U.S. agriculture [5] Group 2 - Japan is considering increasing its imports of U.S. soybeans to negotiate trade agreements with the U.S., despite already relying on U.S. soybeans for 65% of its total imports [5][6] - The refusal of the U.S. to issue visas to Chinese diplomats has been criticized by China, highlighting the political tensions and the impact on international relations [6][7] - The U.S. has a high rejection rate of visa applications from the Chinese UN delegation, which has affected China's participation in key discussions [6]

Group 1 - The U.S. Treasury Secretary is engaging with other countries to form agreements aimed at countering China, requiring them to reject the possibility of re-exporting Chinese products and to scrutinize Chinese investments [1] - The Trump administration is reportedly pressuring other nations to limit trade with China in exchange for U.S. tariff exemptions, which has been met with strong opposition from China [3][5] - China has publicly warned that any country sacrificing its interests for U.S. tariff exemptions will face reciprocal measures, emphasizing its determination to protect its rights [5][7] Group 2 - India has recently announced a temporary 12% tariff on certain imported steel products, marking a significant shift in its trade policy amid the ongoing trade tensions initiated by the Trump administration [7] - Historical evidence suggests that countries compromising long-term cooperation for short-term gains will ultimately face backlash, reinforcing the need for fair principles and international coordination [7]

Group 1 - The U.S. government is pressuring other countries to limit trade with China in exchange for tariff exemptions, indicating a strategy of unilateral bullying under the guise of "reciprocity" [1][3] - China has issued a rare public warning against sacrificing its interests for U.S. tariff exemptions, emphasizing its determination to take reciprocal measures if necessary [1][5] - The ongoing trade war has led China to increase tariffs on U.S. imports to 125%, while actively seeking alternative supply chains to mitigate the impact of U.S. tariffs [5][8] Group 2 - The strategy of uniting other countries against China is viewed as misguided, as previous attempts to isolate China have not succeeded, and the current geopolitical landscape may not support such a coalition [3][5] - The potential collapse of global trade due to escalating tariffs could have devastating effects on weaker economies, with the U.S. being held responsible for any resulting chaos [5][8] - There is a call for international solidarity to resist U.S. hegemonic behavior, with warnings that countries cooperating with the U.S. may face severe consequences in the future [8]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the current state of China-US trade relations, emphasizing that despite rising tensions and tariffs imposed by the US, bilateral trade between China and the US has continued to grow, highlighting the mutual benefits of their economic relationship [2][3]. Group 1: Trade Data and Growth - In the first quarter of 2025, the total import and export scale between China and the US reached 1.11 trillion yuan, representing a growth of 4% [2]. - The article indicates that the growth in trade occurred despite the US government's imposition of tariffs, which are described as detrimental to global trade [3]. Group 2: US Tariff Policies - The US has been accused of imposing tariffs on all trade partners, including China, under various pretexts, which is seen as a form of trade bullying that undermines international trade order [3]. - The article argues that such protectionist measures do not yield winners and calls for a correction of these policies through respectful dialogue [3]. Group 3: Response to Trade Tensions - China has taken resolute countermeasures against the US's tariff actions and is committed to opposing unilateral trade practices while defending the multilateral trade system [3]. - The Chinese government emphasizes the importance of mutual respect and equal dialogue in resolving trade disputes [3].