Group 1 - China has ceased purchasing U.S. soybeans and corn since mid-January, indicating a strong response to U.S. tariff policies [1][3] - In response to reduced imports from the U.S., China has increased agricultural purchases from Brazil, signing a contract for 2.4 million tons of soybeans to ensure domestic supply stability [3][5] - The U.S. soybean industry is urging the Trump administration to negotiate with China to protect American farmers' interests, as ongoing tariffs could severely harm U.S. agriculture [5] Group 2 - Japan is considering increasing its imports of U.S. soybeans to negotiate trade agreements with the U.S., despite already relying on U.S. soybeans for 65% of its total imports [5][6] - The refusal of the U.S. to issue visas to Chinese diplomats has been criticized by China, highlighting the political tensions and the impact on international relations [6][7] - The U.S. has a high rejection rate of visa applications from the Chinese UN delegation, which has affected China's participation in key discussions [6]

Group 1 - The U.S. Treasury Secretary is engaging with other countries to form agreements aimed at countering China, requiring them to reject the possibility of re-exporting Chinese products and to scrutinize Chinese investments [1] - The Trump administration is reportedly pressuring other nations to limit trade with China in exchange for U.S. tariff exemptions, which has been met with strong opposition from China [3][5] - China has publicly warned that any country sacrificing its interests for U.S. tariff exemptions will face reciprocal measures, emphasizing its determination to protect its rights [5][7] Group 2 - India has recently announced a temporary 12% tariff on certain imported steel products, marking a significant shift in its trade policy amid the ongoing trade tensions initiated by the Trump administration [7] - Historical evidence suggests that countries compromising long-term cooperation for short-term gains will ultimately face backlash, reinforcing the need for fair principles and international coordination [7]

Group 1 - The U.S. government is pressuring other countries to limit trade with China in exchange for tariff exemptions, indicating a strategy of unilateral bullying under the guise of "reciprocity" [1][3] - China has issued a rare public warning against sacrificing its interests for U.S. tariff exemptions, emphasizing its determination to take reciprocal measures if necessary [1][5] - The ongoing trade war has led China to increase tariffs on U.S. imports to 125%, while actively seeking alternative supply chains to mitigate the impact of U.S. tariffs [5][8] Group 2 - The strategy of uniting other countries against China is viewed as misguided, as previous attempts to isolate China have not succeeded, and the current geopolitical landscape may not support such a coalition [3][5] - The potential collapse of global trade due to escalating tariffs could have devastating effects on weaker economies, with the U.S. being held responsible for any resulting chaos [5][8] - There is a call for international solidarity to resist U.S. hegemonic behavior, with warnings that countries cooperating with the U.S. may face severe consequences in the future [8]

海关总署针对中美贸易局势最新回应 4月14日，国务院新闻办公室举行一季度有关经济数据例行新闻发布会，海关总署副署长王令浚介绍2025 年一季度进出口情况，并答记者问。 美国国际市场新闻社记者：近期中美贸易紧张局势不断升级，对中美贸易具体会产生多大影响？贸易领域 是否存在脱钩的可能？中国将如何应对？ 海关总署副署长王令浚：4月9日，中国政府发布《关于中美经贸关系若干问题的中方立场》白皮书，这个 文本想必您已经看过，这个白皮书以大量的事实和数据表明，中美经贸关系的本质是互利共赢，是经济规 律作用的结果，具有强大的内生动力。今年一季度，在美国政府滥施关税的干扰和冲击下，中美双边贸易 仍保持增长，进出口规模1.11万亿元，增长4%。 美国以各种借口宣布对包括中国在内的所有贸易伙伴滥施关税，前面讲了，这不可避免地对全球包括中美 在内的贸易造成负面影响。 美方所谓"对等关税"，颠覆现有国际经贸秩序，将美国利益凌驾于国际社会公利之上，是典型的关税霸凌 行为，严重违反世界贸易组织规则，严重损害以规则为基础的多边贸易体制，严重冲击全球经济秩序稳 定。 贸易战没有赢家，保护主义没有出路。美国政府所作所为已经引起全球普遍反对，中方 ...