中经记者吴清北京报道 在新一轮全球产业重构的浪潮中，供应链的韧性正成为国家与区域竞争力的关键支点。如今，亚太地区 正以一场深度协同的集体行动，将"韧性共识"从理念探索转化为具体路径。 近日，《中国经营报》记者从2025亚太纺织服装供应链高峰论坛获悉，本次论坛多维度解析了亚太纺织 服装供应链发展路径，阐述中国在"双循环"新格局下的产业优势与愿景，剖析了全球贸易新形势下的供 应链挑战与战略机遇，揭示区域产能合作与市场联通潜力，为亚太纺织服装供应链重构竞争逻辑提供战 略蓝图。 多位产业人士向记者表示，在全球经贸形式不确定性增加以及AI浪潮席卷而来的当下，通过各方合作 和区域协同，增强供应链韧性是大势所趋。纺织服装产业亚太地区的深化沟通合作，为全球各行业领域 提供了一个可资借鉴的产业链协同的新范式。 在夏令敏看来，未来纺织产业发展趋势将聚焦四大方向：科技创新成为核心驱动力，重点突破先进纺 织、绿色纺织等四大领域关键技术，智能车间、高端装备国产化率持续提升；绿色低碳转型全面提速， 印染行业通过源头减量、过程控制等路径推进低碳发展，循环经济理念深度融入产业链；数字化转型加 速落地，数智赋能生产、设计、物流全环节；品牌建设 ...

为什么在当下这个时间节点，美国开始选择投资非洲？这肯定不是一个巧合，而导致美国改变投资策略的，仍然还是稀土。 非洲蕴藏着丰富的关键矿产和金属，对于制造现代科技产品至关重要。从新能源汽车再到人工智能数据中心，从智能手机到军事武器，这些材料缺一不可。 而过去，我国一直都是全球关键矿产和金属市场的最大投资者。我国不仅国内拥有丰富的储量，在非洲的大规模投资，也能够保证我们获得来自海外的供 应。 除此之外，我国在全球供应链的加工环节也建立了主导地位。这些措施在美国加征关税的背景下，都变得更不确定性，这也促使美国开始加大在非洲的投 资。 美国重新投资非洲，背后又是谁在主导呢？ 答案显而易见。美国投资非洲背后，由美国国际发展金融公司主导。该公司非常年轻，成立于2019年，正值特朗普第一任期，这家公司也似乎没有掩饰，其 目的就是为了投资稀土。 这家公司的网站更是直接表示，其成立目的是为了遏制我国在战略地区的影响力。 这是自2012年以来，美国首次在投资非洲金额上，超越我国。 根据约翰霍普金斯大学获取的数据显示，2023年美国在非洲的投资额为78亿美元，而我国同年在非洲的投资额为40亿美元。 这是2012年以来，美国首次在非洲 ...

Core Viewpoint - The semiconductor dispute involving Nexperia has escalated into a significant geopolitical issue affecting the global automotive supply chain, with China and the Netherlands engaged in negotiations to resolve the crisis [5][6]. Group 1: Background of the Dispute - The conflict originated from a unilateral action by the Netherlands on September 30, 2025, which involved freezing Nexperia's global assets and operations for one year under the guise of national security [8]. - Following the Dutch government's actions, Nexperia's management faced immediate legal challenges, leading to a rapid court ruling that suspended the CEO and placed the company's shares under third-party control [8][9]. - The situation worsened when Nexperia announced a halt in supply to its Dongguan factory, impacting 70% of its production capacity and further straining the global automotive chip supply chain [11]. Group 2: Impact on the Automotive Industry - Major automotive manufacturers, including Volkswagen, BMW, and Mercedes, reported supply chain disruptions, with some factories nearing shutdown due to chip shortages [10]. - The European Automobile Manufacturers Association issued warnings about potential production halts if the semiconductor supply issue was not resolved promptly [10]. Group 3: Recent Developments - In early November, the Dutch government indicated a willingness to negotiate, leading to discussions in Beijing on November 18 and 19, where the Netherlands announced a suspension of its previous intervention measures [13][14]. - Despite the Dutch government's pause, Nexperia's control issues remain unresolved, with ongoing legal measures still in effect [14]. Group 4: Importance of Nexperia - Nexperia is a critical player in the automotive semiconductor market, supplying 40% of the global automotive power semiconductors and holding significant market shares in various semiconductor components [15]. - The company has established a robust supply chain in China, which has proven resilient despite the geopolitical tensions, with sufficient inventory to meet customer demands [15][17]. - Nexperia's history reflects its evolution from a Philips subsidiary to a key global semiconductor company, highlighting the complexities of international ownership and control in the semiconductor industry [16][17].

Core Viewpoint - The semiconductor dispute involving Nexperia has escalated into a significant geopolitical issue affecting the global automotive supply chain, with recent negotiations between China and the Netherlands indicating a potential path towards resolution, although substantial challenges remain [1][10][11]. Group 1: Background of the Dispute - The conflict originated from the Netherlands, where a ministerial order was issued on September 30, 2025, freezing Nexperia's global assets and operations for one year, which was perceived as a unilateral action [2][3]. - The rapid legal actions taken by Nexperia's foreign executives led to a court ruling that resulted in the forced third-party custody of shares held by its parent company, Wingtech Technology [5][6]. Group 2: Impact on the Automotive Industry - Nexperia is a critical player in the automotive semiconductor market, supplying 40% of automotive-grade power semiconductors and holding over 40% market share in small signal diodes and ESD protection devices [13][20]. - The disruption caused by the dispute has led to significant supply chain issues for major automotive manufacturers, with companies like Volkswagen, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz acknowledging supply shortages and potential production halts [7][8][9]. Group 3: Recent Developments - On November 5, 2025, Nexperia announced a suspension of supplies to its Dongguan factory, impacting 70% of its production capacity, which further exacerbated the global automotive chip supply chain crisis [8][9]. - Following negotiations on November 18 and 19, the Dutch government announced a suspension of its previous intervention measures, which was welcomed by China as a positive step, although the core issues remain unresolved [10][11]. Group 4: Nexperia's Strategic Position - Nexperia, originally part of Philips, has undergone significant changes since its acquisition by a Chinese consortium in 2017, which has positioned it as a key player in the semiconductor industry with a robust supply chain [16][19]. - The company has established a comprehensive production network across Europe and Asia, with annual shipments exceeding 110 billion devices and a customer base of over 25,000, predominantly in the automotive sector [20].

此举的紧迫性源于近期的供应链冲击。稀土元素对于国防和清洁技术等关键领域至关重要。 欧盟委员会已在去年10月表示，将紧急制定计划以实现关键矿产（包括锂和铜等常见金属）的供应多元 化。Séjourné提出的新计划，旨在将这一意向转化为具体的行动和机构，从而在根本上提升欧盟的经济 安全。 应对美国先行一步 欧盟官员认为，在确保关键矿产供应方面，欧洲已经落后。Stéphane Séjourné指出，与已经通过投资国 内矿商和与外国政府签订供应协议来布局的美国相比，欧盟建立类似工具的行动已经"迟到"。 "美国人有一个商业部门，在世界任何地方都比我们先一步购买关键材料库存，"Séjourné表示，"他们常 常在我们眼皮底下把货买走。" 为了追赶，Séjourné的计划中包括迅速与巴西、南非等国家签署合作伙伴关系协议以确保供应。他本人 也计划在未来几周访问这两个国家。 面对日益激烈的全球关键矿产争夺，欧盟正计划采取一项重大战略举措。为确保其工业和国防供应链的 安全，布鲁塞尔拟建立一个中央机构，用于协调关键矿产的采购与战略储备。 欧盟工业战略执行副主席Stéphane Séjourné在接受英国《金融时报》采访时透露了这一计 ...

Investment Rating - The report maintains an "Overweight" rating for the technology sector, indicating an expectation for the sector's stock index to outperform the benchmark [2]. Core Insights - Vietnam is poised to become the next semiconductor hub in Southeast Asia, driven by open industrial policies and significant foreign investments from companies like Samsung and Foxconn [4][5]. - The semiconductor packaging and testing sector is currently a hot investment area, with several factories already established by major players such as Intel and Amkor [6]. - The Vietnamese government is actively supporting the semiconductor industry, with plans for the first wafer foundry to be completed by 2027 [7]. Summary by Sections Section 1: Industrial Policy and Investment - Vietnam's open industrial policies have attracted various electronic manufacturing companies to set up operations, leading to a clustering effect in the industry [5]. - As of 2024, the average wage in Hanoi has reached 2,790 RMB/month, which, despite rising costs, continues to attract investment for supply chain resilience [5]. Section 2: Semiconductor Industry Development - The semiconductor industry in Vietnam is still in its early stages, focusing primarily on packaging and testing processes [6]. - Currently, there are eight semiconductor packaging and testing factories in Vietnam, with plans for local companies to establish their own facilities [6]. Section 3: Government Support and Future Plans - The Vietnamese government has outlined a strategic plan for the semiconductor industry, aiming to establish the first wafer foundry by 2030 and train 15,000 chip design engineers by 2050 [7]. - Viettel, the largest telecom operator in Vietnam, is responsible for the investment in this project, with government support of approximately $500 million [7]. Section 4: Apple's Supply Chain Diversification - Apple has been diversifying its supply chain since 2018, with Vietnam and India emerging as key production bases outside of China [9]. - By FY2025, Vietnam is expected to account for 10-15% of iPhone production, alongside significant contributions to iPad and Mac production [10][11].

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around China's halt in large-scale soybean purchases from the U.S., which contrasts with the U.S. government's expectations of a $120 billion procurement commitment [1] - China's agricultural imports have diversified, with private enterprises increasing their share, indicating that state-owned enterprises cannot fulfill the large orders anticipated by the U.S. [5] - The U.S. soybean industry is facing internal challenges, including surplus inventory and rising production costs, which complicate the market dynamics [3] Group 2 - The U.S. soybean import tariff of 13% significantly hampers competitiveness compared to Brazilian soybeans, which are 10% cheaper [1] - Brazil's soybean exports to China are projected to reach approximately 4 million tons by the end of 2025, providing China with leverage in negotiations [1] - The U.S. agricultural sector is concerned about the political volatility affecting trade agreements, as seen in the uncertainty faced by farmers regarding whether to store or sell their soybeans [3][5] Group 3 - China's procurement strategy appears to focus on risk diversification rather than reliance on a single source, reflecting a cautious approach in the face of geopolitical tensions [1] - The U.S. soybean association expresses hope that agricultural trade will not be politicized, highlighting the industry's frustration with the current trade environment [5] - China's response to the U.S. trade policies suggests that cooperation is contingent upon the removal of high tariffs, indicating a need for a more balanced trade relationship [5]

Core Viewpoint - The forced takeover of ASML by the Netherlands is framed as a response to "technology transfer risks," but it is essentially a political maneuver aligned with the Atlantic alliance's strategy to contain China technologically [1][3]. Group 1: Impact on Semiconductor Industry - The ASML incident has caused significant disruptions in the global automotive chip supply chain, prompting companies like Infineon and STMicroelectronics to accelerate production, while Japan invests heavily in domestic chip support [5]. - China's self-sufficiency in mature process chips has reached a 70% rate, with a 35% year-on-year increase in domestic automotive-grade chip shipments, indicating a growing capability to provide alternatives to European automakers [5][9]. Group 2: European Market Dynamics - Despite a 52% increase in Chinese electric vehicle exports to Europe, European automakers have seen a 42% decline in sales in China, highlighting a complex interdependence that complicates Europe's stance against China [3][11]. - The European Union's recent legislation, such as the Critical Raw Materials Act, has set the stage for more aggressive actions against companies like ASML, reflecting a broader strategy to align with U.S. policies [1][3]. Group 3: China's Strategic Response - China's response to the Netherlands' actions includes targeted measures like suspending certain high-tech export licenses, which directly impact the Netherlands without disrupting the entire market [5][9]. - Chinese companies are shifting their approach in Europe from mere market penetration to technology collaboration, as seen with CATL's commitment to share technology in Hungary, aiming to alleviate local concerns about Chinese influence [7]. Group 4: Broader Geopolitical Implications - The ASML incident serves as a litmus test for Europe's willingness to follow the U.S. in its containment strategy against China, with potential repercussions for its own industrial base [11]. - The ongoing geopolitical chess game between China and Europe is characterized by a delicate balance of interests, where Europe seeks to limit China while simultaneously relying on it, creating a precarious situation that cannot be sustained long-term [9][11].

Economic Outlook and CEO Confidence - 84% of CEOs in the energy and natural resources sector are optimistic about industry growth, up from 72% last year[12] - 78% of CEOs are confident about their own company's growth prospects, although this is a slight decrease from 82% in 2024[13] - 44% of CEOs expect a slight revenue increase (2.5%-4.99%) this year, compared to 30% last year[13] Artificial Intelligence and Innovation - 80% of CEOs recognize the disruptive potential of artificial intelligence (AI)[10] - 40% of CEOs are actively retraining employees affected by AI to enhance their skills[10] - 66% of CEOs expect to see returns on AI investments within 1-3 years, significantly higher than 15% in 2024[10] Mergers and Acquisitions - 55% of CEOs anticipate "moderate" M&A activity, a significant increase from 38% the previous year[16] - Only 36% of CEOs expect to engage in "major" M&A, down from 58% in 2024[16] ESG and Sustainability - 72% of CEOs have integrated sustainability into their corporate strategy, but only 38% have fully incorporated ESG into capital decisions[54] - 61% of CEOs acknowledge that public debates on sustainability hinder their focus on core tasks[54] Supply Chain Resilience - 34% of CEOs identify supply chain resilience as the primary factor influencing short-term decisions[22] - 61% of stakeholders in the renewable energy sector believe supply chain risks complicate the scaling of renewable projects[19]

Core Viewpoint - General Motors (GM) is increasingly dissatisfied with geopolitical disruptions affecting its operations and has requested thousands of suppliers to eliminate Chinese components from their supply chains [1][3]. Group 1: Supply Chain Strategy - GM executives have been instructing suppliers to seek alternative sources for raw materials and components outside of China, aiming for a complete supply chain shift by 2027 [3][4]. - The urgency of this initiative has intensified due to the escalation of the US-China trade war, which began affecting supplier directives as early as the end of 2024 [3][4]. - This move is part of a broader strategy to enhance supply chain resilience, with a preference for sourcing components from North American factories [4]. Group 2: Industry Context - The escalation of the US-China trade war in 2025 has prompted automotive companies to reassess their long-standing relationships with China, a key supplier of components and materials [4][5]. - Automotive manufacturers and suppliers have already begun shifting supply chains to avoid tariffs imposed during Trump's first term, with the situation becoming more complex as mutual tariffs were introduced in 2025 [5]. - The entrenched nature of China's component and raw material networks poses significant challenges for suppliers attempting to find alternatives, particularly in areas like lighting, electronics, and custom parts manufacturing [5].