市场监管总局相关负责人介绍，进一步依法强化反不正当竞争，有利于打破行业壁垒和市场准入限制， 有利于以良好市场秩序更好发挥市场机制作用，有利于营造更有活力的市场环境，保障各类经营主体平 等使用生产要素、公平获得交易机会。深入贯彻实施新修订的反不正当竞争法，能为纵深推进全国统一 大市场建设筑牢法治基础。 保护中小企业合法权益，推动公平参与市场竞争 10月15日起，新修订的反不正当竞争法正式施行。市场监管总局相关负责人介绍，修订反不正当竞争 法，进一步完善市场竞争规则，不断强化竞争政策基础地位，有利于优化营商环境，充分激发经营者内 生动力和创新活力，为加快建设高效规范、公平竞争、充分开放的全国统一大市场提供有力的制度支 撑。 新修订的反不正当竞争法有哪些亮点？记者采访了监管部门和有关专家。 靶向整治"内卷式"竞争，引导平台经济脱离低质竞争 公平竞争是市场之基、活力之源。我国发展基础和条件发生重大变化，正处于转变发展方式的关键时 期，我国的市场竞争形势正面临深刻变化。当制度供给不足、监管缺位时，市场容易陷入恶性竞争，当 前部分传统产业及平台经济领域出现的"内卷式"竞争，不仅扰乱行业生态，更会侵蚀高质量发展根基。 "新 ...

今年9月，国家市场监管总局组织起草的《外卖平台服务管理基本要求（征求意见稿）》明确指出，平 台、用工合作企业不应将扣款作为配送超时的主要处罚方式，涉及扣款的规则和扣款情况应充分征求工 会和配送员代表的意见并进行公示，这体现了从效率优先到以人为本的转变，为平台经济健康发展指明 了方向。 如今，不少外卖平台陆续推出试点，逐步取消"超时扣款"，改为"超时扣分"。这种积分机制，既保留了 必要的服务质量约束，又给予劳动者容错空间。管理方式的优化，有助于提升骑手的工作满意度，还能 在一定程度上保障他们的劳动权益，减少因不合理规则而引发的矛盾纠纷。此类创新有望推动行业形成 更科学的服务标准，驱动行业从价格竞争转向服务质量竞争。 近期，外卖平台密集试点取消骑手订单超时罚款，以正向激励替代传统经济处罚，长期受关注的"困在 系统里的外卖骑手"问题或将迎来转机。 对广大外卖骑手而言，取消超时罚款无疑是一个"减负"的好消息。长期以来，超时罚款是悬在骑手头上 的"达摩克利斯之剑"。为了躲避罚款，骑手不得不"与时间赛跑"，这增加了抢行、逆行等交通安全隐 患，也给自身带来巨大心理压力。今年愈演愈烈的外卖大战，在引发社会广泛关注的同时，也将 ...

Core Viewpoint - The draft "Basic Requirements for the Management of Delivery Platform Services" aims to regulate service management, enhance service quality, reduce merchant operational burdens, and guide orderly competition among delivery platforms [1] Group 1: Food Safety - The draft addresses issues like "ghost deliveries" and "order overload" by proposing systematic requirements for merchant entry and information verification to ensure food safety [2] - "Ghost deliveries" refer to merchants operating without valid licenses or permits, posing food safety risks; the draft mandates merchants to provide authentic documentation and undergo dynamic audits by platforms [2] - The "order overload" phenomenon, where merchants are overwhelmed during peak order times, is addressed by introducing a "order acceptance control prompt" mechanism to mitigate risks [2] Group 2: Pricing and Promotion Regulation - The draft focuses on regulating pricing and promotional behaviors of platforms and merchants to curb "bundled" competition and excessive price wars [3] - Platforms charging base fees must disclose applicable conditions, fee standards, and amounts; promotional costs should be borne by the platform, not passed onto merchants or delivery personnel [3] - Promotional activities must adhere to reasonable limits, ensuring that actual transaction prices do not drop to zero or negative, which would disrupt market order [3] - Transparency in platform fees is expected to improve, allowing clearer distribution of interests among consumers, merchants, delivery personnel, and platforms [3] Group 3: Delivery Personnel Rights - The draft emphasizes the protection of delivery personnel's rights regarding remuneration, working hours, and social security [4] - It proposes a remuneration distribution mechanism that aligns with the workload and intensity of delivery tasks [4] - Platforms should limit delivery personnel's working hours to prevent health and safety risks, with fatigue alerts for those working over four consecutive hours [4] - Reasonable caps on simultaneous and daily order volumes are recommended to manage delivery personnel's workload effectively [4]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint highlights the recent initiatives by major platform companies, such as Meituan's decision to eliminate overtime penalties for delivery riders by the end of 2025 and establish a points-based incentive system, and JD's commitment to pay full social insurance for full-time delivery riders, reflecting a growing emphasis on protecting the rights of new employment form workers [1] - The platform economy is thriving, with 84 million individuals employed through internet platforms as delivery riders, drivers, and couriers, indicating the significant role these workers play in societal development [1] - Strengthening the rights protection of new employment form workers is both a new challenge and a necessary task for economic and social development [1] Group 2 - New employment forms present complex challenges for labor rights protection due to their flexible employment methods and loose organizational structures, with over 80,000 civil cases related to new employment forms adjudicated in 2024, covering issues like social insurance disputes and traffic accident liabilities [2] - Some companies attempt to evade labor relations by signing contracts that misclassify workers, which undermines the protection of workers' rights and affects the healthy development of the platform economy [2] - Judicial rulings play a crucial role in guiding labor rights protection, with authoritative cases clarifying rules and establishing a framework for protecting workers' rights in new employment forms [2] Group 3 - To better protect the rights of new employment form workers, it is essential to enforce responsibilities across various sectors, including increased efforts by law enforcement to combat violations and providing accessible legal services for workers [3] - Platform companies must take on primary responsibility by optimizing platform rules and algorithms to ensure dignified labor for workers [3] - Community initiatives, such as warm stations set up in neighborhoods, aim to address urgent issues faced by new employment groups, facilitating better social governance [3]

Group 1 - The State Council emphasizes the need to strengthen fiscal and financial policy support, innovate consumption and investment scenarios, and optimize the consumption and investment environment to unleash domestic demand potential [1] - The National Development and Reform Commission is working on rules to regulate pricing behavior on internet platforms, aiming to promote transparency and protect the rights of both operators and consumers [2] - The China Photovoltaic Industry Association calls for enhanced industry self-discipline to maintain fair competition and resist malicious competition below cost [4] Group 2 - The Hang Seng Index Company announced the results of its quarterly review, adding China Telecom, JD Logistics, and Pop Mart to the index, increasing the number of constituent stocks to 88 [6] - The People's Bank of China will conduct a 600 billion yuan MLF operation with a one-year term [7] - Several express delivery companies in Guangdong and Zhejiang have raised prices for e-commerce customers, with price increases ranging from 0.3 to 0.7 yuan per item [9] Group 3 - Hengsheng Electronics reported a net profit of 261 million yuan for the first half of the year, a year-on-year increase of 772% [11] - Ganfeng Lithium reported a net loss of 531 million yuan for the first half of the year, an improvement from a loss of 760 million yuan in the same period last year [12] - Dongfeng Group plans to privatize and delist, while its subsidiary Lantu Automobile is set to list on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange [13] Group 4 - The Federal Reserve Chairman Powell indicated that rising employment market risks may lead to a rate cut in September, despite ongoing inflation concerns [17] - The U.S. government has acquired a 10% stake in Intel, investing approximately 8.9 billion USD [19] - President Trump announced a significant tariff investigation on furniture entering the U.S., with potential tariffs to be determined after a 50-day review [20]

Core Viewpoint - The introduction of the "Internet Platform Pricing Behavior Rules (Draft for Comments)" aims to promote healthy development in the platform economy by establishing clear pricing regulations and enhancing transparency in pricing practices [1][2][10] Group 1: Background and Objectives - The rapid development of the platform economy in China has positively impacted the real economy and consumer needs, necessitating clearer regulations on pricing behavior [2] - The rules are designed to balance development and regulatory compliance, ensuring a stable regulatory environment while promoting fair competition and protecting the rights of both operators and consumers [2][10] Group 2: Key Regulations - The rules focus on standardizing pricing behavior, including aspects like big data pricing, price subsidies, and pricing integrity, to foster a fair competitive market environment [3] - Transparency is emphasized, requiring platform operators to adhere to clear pricing standards and publicly disclose any changes in fees [3][6] - Collaboration among government departments, industry associations, and platform operators is encouraged to create a cooperative governance model [3] Group 3: Pricing Autonomy and Standards - The rules affirm the right of platform operators and internal operators to set their own prices, while also regulating the fees charged by platform operators to internal operators [4] - Operators are required to publicly disclose any changes to pricing structures and seek input from internal operators before implementing new fees [4] - Restrictions on platform operators are established to prevent unreasonable limitations on the pricing autonomy of internal operators [4][10] Group 4: Pricing Display and Competition - Clear pricing display requirements mandate that operators must transparently indicate prices and any additional fees associated with products or services [5][6] - The rules outline specific requirements for promotional pricing, ensuring that discounts and subsidies are accurately represented [6] - Regulations against unfair pricing practices, such as predatory pricing and price collusion, are detailed to maintain market order [7][8] Group 5: Consumer Protection and Market Impact - The rules aim to address common consumer grievances related to pricing practices, such as misleading discounts and hidden fees, thereby enhancing consumer trust [9] - By establishing clear pricing regulations, the rules are expected to create a more favorable environment for merchants operating on platforms, promoting healthy market competition [10]

Core Viewpoint - The National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) has released a draft of the "Internet Platform Pricing Behavior Rules" to promote healthy development in the platform economy and ensure compliance with pricing regulations [1][2]. Group 1: Background of the Rules - The rapid development of the platform economy in China has positively impacted the real economy and consumer needs, necessitating clearer regulations on pricing behavior [2]. - Existing laws such as the Price Law and the E-commerce Law provide general guidelines, but specific regulations for the platform economy are needed to enhance transparency and compliance [2]. Group 2: Overall Approach to Rule Formulation - The rules aim to balance development and regulatory compliance, focusing on price behavior regulation, transparency, and collaboration among stakeholders [3]. - Key objectives include standardizing pricing behavior, promoting transparency in pricing, and enhancing cooperation among government, industry associations, and platform operators [3]. Group 3: Applicability of the Rules - The rules apply to both platform operators and platform merchants, ensuring that all entities involved in the platform economy adhere to the pricing regulations [4]. Group 4: Guiding Autonomous Pricing - The rules affirm the right of platform operators and merchants to set prices autonomously while regulating the fees charged by platform operators [5][6]. - Operators must publicly disclose any changes to fee structures and seek input from merchants [5]. Group 5: Price Marking Requirements - The rules mandate clear price marking for goods and services, including detailed information on pricing methods and promotional activities [7][8]. - Operators must transparently communicate any subsidies and promotional rules to avoid misleading consumers [7]. Group 6: Regulation of Pricing Competition - The rules define standards for identifying unfair pricing practices such as predatory pricing and price collusion, aiming to maintain fair competition [9][10]. - Operators are prohibited from using deceptive pricing strategies and must ensure that pricing practices are transparent and fair [10]. Group 7: Collaborative Governance Mechanism - The rules emphasize the importance of inter-departmental collaboration in regulating pricing behavior within the platform economy [11][12]. - Platform operators are required to establish internal compliance systems and facilitate self-regulation within the industry [12]. Group 8: Implementation Timeline - The draft rules are open for public consultation for one month, after which feedback will be reviewed and incorporated before final issuance [13].

Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of Transport of China has initiated a governance program for platform fees in the transportation sector, focusing on protecting the rights of truck drivers through a self-regulatory agreement signed by major freight platforms [1][2] Group 1: Self-Regulatory Agreement - The self-regulatory agreement involves four major freight platforms: Manbang Group, Huolala, Didi Delivery, and Kuaigou [1] - The agreement includes ten public commitments aimed at safeguarding the legal rights of truck drivers [1][2] Group 2: Key Commitments - The commitments are categorized into three main areas: 1. Strict source verification and real-name system for shippers, with a mechanism to jointly resist dishonest shippers [2] 2. Continuous implementation of a "sunshine action" to lower excessive fees and establish a mechanism to prevent unreasonably low freight rates [2] 3. Assurance that platforms will not force truck drivers to participate in promotional activities or link performance metrics to freight withdrawal [2] Group 3: Future Oversight and Community Involvement - The Ministry of Transport will support the association in monitoring the compliance of platform companies with the commitments [2] - There is a call for the community and truck drivers to participate in supervising the fulfillment of these commitments to promote a more regulated market order [2]

Core Viewpoint - The National Market Supervision Administration has released a draft guideline to regulate the charging behaviors of online trading platforms, focusing on e-commerce platforms and aiming to promote healthy development in the platform economy [1][2]. Summary by Relevant Sections Unreasonable Charging Behaviors - The guideline identifies eight types of unreasonable charging behaviors that platforms cannot engage in, establishing clear boundaries for what is unacceptable [2]. - Specific behaviors include: - Duplicate charging [3] - Charging without providing services or providing minimal services [7] - Shifting costs that should be borne by the platform to merchants [7] - Charging merchants for basic operational data [7] - Forcing or coercing merchants to purchase services or participate in promotional activities [7] - Using unreasonable deposits to indirectly charge or raise fees [4] - Price discrimination among merchants under the same trading conditions [4] - Charging other unreasonable fees [4] Scope of Application - The guideline specifies that "platform operators" refer to merchants selling goods or providing services on online trading platforms, and outlines various forms of platform charges, including commissions, registration fees, and advertising fees [5]. Compliance Mechanisms - The guideline emphasizes the establishment of a reasonable charging mechanism, requiring platforms to implement risk identification and assessment mechanisms for unreasonable charging behaviors [9]. - Platforms are mandated to conduct internal reviews before modifying charging rules and to provide compliance training for employees regarding unreasonable charging behaviors [9]. Impact on Industries - The guideline's applicability to various industries is still under discussion, with potential implications for app stores and ride-hailing platforms, which may not fit the traditional definition of online trading platforms [6][8]. Reference for Enforcement - The guideline serves as a reference for enforcement, addressing issues of transparency and complexity in platform charges that have led to merchant grievances [11]. - It aims to assist regulatory bodies in understanding the nuances of existing laws like the E-commerce Law and Price Law, thereby promoting compliance and improving platform rules [13].