Core Viewpoint - The report evaluates the ongoing risks associated with the financial transactions between Chongqing Taiji Industrial (Group) Co., Ltd. and China National Pharmaceutical Group Financial Co., Ltd., confirming the latter's compliance with regulatory requirements and sound risk management practices [1][9]. Group 1: Basic Information of China National Pharmaceutical Group Financial Co., Ltd. - Established in February 2012, the company is a non-bank financial institution approved by the former China Banking Regulatory Commission [1]. - The registered capital is RMB 2.2 billion, with 100% ownership by its shareholders [1]. - The business scope includes accepting deposits, providing loans, bill discounting, and various financial advisory services [1]. Group 2: Internal Control and Risk Management - The company has established a comprehensive internal control system, including a governance structure with a board of directors and various committees [2][3]. - A risk management department and an internal audit department are in place to oversee business activities and ensure compliance with established procedures [2][3]. - The internal control system includes specific guidelines for settlement and credit operations, ensuring effective risk management [3][4]. Group 3: Operational and Financial Performance - As of June 30, 2025, the total assets of the company amounted to RMB 41.867 billion, with a loan balance of RMB 17.319 billion and an operating income of RMB 372 million [6][7]. - The company has maintained stable operations and steady growth across its various business lines since its inception [6][7]. Group 4: Regulatory Compliance - As of June 30, 2025, all regulatory indicators of the company met the required standards, including a loan-to-deposit ratio of 43.41% [8]. - The company has not encountered any significant deficiencies in its risk control systems related to financial reporting and management [7][9]. Group 5: Risk Assessment Conclusion - The company possesses valid financial licenses and has adhered to the regulations set forth in the Enterprise Group Financial Company Management Measures [9]. - The risk management practices of the company are deemed effective, with no major flaws identified in its operations [9].

Investment Rating - The industry investment rating is "Outperform the Market" [9] Core Insights - The report highlights significant improvements in the performance of the insurance, banking, and technology sectors, with ZhongAn's 25H1 profit showing a substantial increase [4][5] - The insurance segment reported a net profit of 6.73 billion yuan, reflecting a year-on-year increase of 387.7% [5] - The health ecosystem is rapidly developing, with commercial health insurance premiums reaching 6.275 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 38.3% [6] - The digital life segment saw total premiums decrease to 6.209 billion yuan, primarily due to a decline in e-commerce related policies, while innovative business premiums increased by 40% [6] - The automotive ecosystem capitalized on the industry's online growth, with total premiums of 1.478 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 34.2% [7] Summary by Sections Insurance Performance - Total premiums for ZhongAn in 25H1 reached 16.661 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 9.3%, with a net profit of 668 million yuan, up 1103.5% [4] - The underwriting combined ratio improved to 95.6%, with a claims ratio of 54.7% and an expense ratio of 40.9% [5] Health Ecosystem - The health insurance segment's total premiums were 6.275 billion yuan, with a combined ratio of 92.9% and a claims ratio of 42.5% [6] Digital Life - The digital life segment's total premiums decreased to 6.209 billion yuan, with a combined ratio of approximately 99.9% and a claims ratio of 62.9% [6] Consumer Finance - Consumer finance premiums totaled 2.699 billion yuan, with an underwriting balance of 27.732 billion yuan, reflecting a year-on-year increase of 14.6% [6] Automotive Ecosystem - The automotive segment's total premiums reached 1.478 billion yuan, with a claims ratio of 65.1% and a combined ratio of 91.2% [7]

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Buy" rating for the company, expecting a stock price increase of over 15% relative to the industry index in the next six months [5][18]. Core Views - The company's performance is supported by its securities business, with a strong outlook for growth driven by AI empowerment [1][9]. - The capital market is expected to continue its reform, boosting market confidence, and the company's market share in core businesses like brokerage and margin trading is anticipated to maintain an upward trend [9]. Financial Performance Summary - For 2023A, the company reported total revenue of 11,081.44 million yuan, with a year-on-year decline of 11.25%. However, revenue is projected to grow to 19,007.71 million yuan by 2027E, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 8.01% [1][11]. - The net profit attributable to shareholders for 2023A was 8,193.47 million yuan, with a projected increase to 15,597.02 million yuan by 2027E, reflecting a CAGR of about 8.88% [1][11]. - The company's return on equity (ROE) is expected to remain stable, with values of 17.25% in 2023A and 15.62% in 2027E [1][11]. Business Segment Performance - In the first half of 2025, the company's securities business revenue increased by 32.99%, while the net profit for the same segment rose by 35.82% [2][3]. - The company’s margin trading market share was 3.15% in the first half of 2025, showing a year-on-year increase of 0.21 percentage points [3]. - The company’s self-operated investment income decreased by 14.66% year-on-year in the first half of 2025, primarily due to fluctuations in the bond market [3]. Cost and Efficiency - The total cost-to-revenue ratio improved to 31.04% in the first half of 2025, down from 37.07% in 2024, indicating enhanced operational efficiency [4]. - The company’s total operating costs increased by 2.72% year-on-year in the first half of 2025, while sales expenses decreased by 7.19% [4]. Market Position and Future Outlook - The company is expected to continue benefiting from AI capabilities, which are integrated across its product lines, enhancing its competitive position in the wealth management ecosystem [9]. - The report suggests that the current valuation of the company compared to other A-share fintech companies presents an attractive strategic allocation opportunity [9].

Macro Economic Overview - The report indicates that the next important time point may be in the late third quarter of 2025, with a suggested asset allocation order of stocks > commodities > bonds > currency [2][4] - In the first half of 2025, China's actual GDP grew by 5.3% year-on-year, laying a good foundation for achieving the annual target of 5.0% [2][4] - Economic data from July shows signs of growth pressure, including weakened external demand due to increased tariffs from the US and sluggish domestic consumption [2][4] Asset Performance - The A-share market saw an increase, with the CSI 300 index rising by 2.37% and the CSI 300 stock index futures up by 2.83% [11][12] - Commodity futures showed mixed results, with coking coal futures up by 0.33% and iron ore down by 1.65% [11][12] - The yield on ten-year government bonds rose by 6 basis points to 1.75%, while active ten-year government bond futures fell by 0.26% [11][12] Policy Insights - The report emphasizes the importance of expanding domestic demand in the second half of the year, suggesting that policies should be implemented to enhance efficiency and release domestic demand [2][4] - It is noted that the fiscal policy may have room for further adjustments within the year, particularly in light of external pressures easing due to potential interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve [2][4] Sector Performance - The report highlights that the TMT sector has shown significant growth, with the ChiNext index leading with an 8.58% increase, followed by the Shenzhen Component Index at 4.55% [35][36] - The report also notes that the banking sector has faced declines, with a drop of 3.22% [35][36] Financial Data - In July, new social financing amounted to 1.13 trillion yuan, while new RMB loans decreased by 500 million yuan, indicating weak financing demand in the real economy [4][17] - The M2 money supply grew by 8.8% year-on-year, reflecting a relatively strong liquidity environment despite weak economic indicators [4][17]

数据显示，南向资金正加速流入港股，8月15日，南向资金净流入358.76亿港元，刷新历史最高单日净 流入纪录。截至8月15日，今年以来南向资金累计净流入9389.21亿港元，已远超去年全年的8078.69亿港 元。 国金证券指出，25Q2险资股票配置规模较Q1再增2500亿，权益表现较好利差压力减弱。截至25H1，保 险行业资金运用总规模达36.23万亿元，较上年末增长8.9%，较25Q1增长3.7%，延续稳健增长态势。 行业动态方面，平安举牌太保、国寿H股，从业内投资视角印证保险经营趋势正在改善，持续推荐保险 板块。申万宏源研究指出，中国平安近期连续举牌中国太保H股和中国人寿H股，这是自2019年以来首 次出现险资举牌保险股，释放出行业基本面筑底向好的积极信号。此举不仅体现了险资对保险板块投资 价值的认可，也反映出在低利率环境下，保险股的高股息属性和资产端改善趋势正吸引长期资金关注。 港股通非银ETF(513750)：市场首只且唯一一只跟踪港股非银指数的ETF，不受QDII额度限制；其中牛 市"第二旗手"保险占比超6成。从港股通证券范围中选取符合非银行金融主题的不超过50家上市公司证 券作为指数样本，以反映 ...

Group 1: Core Views - The report evaluates the ongoing risks associated with China Electronics Technology Finance Co., Ltd. and confirms that the company's internal control systems are effective and regulatory indicators meet requirements [9][7][8]. Group 2: Company Overview - China Electronics Technology Finance Co., Ltd. is a non-bank financial institution approved by the National Financial Supervision Administration, with a registered capital of 580 million RMB and established on December 14, 2012 [1]. - The company operates under a comprehensive range of financial services, including deposit acceptance, loan processing, and financial consulting for its member units [1]. Group 3: Internal Control and Risk Management - The company has established a robust internal control system with 13 categories and 191 regulations to ensure effective management and compliance [6]. - Risk management is structured with a clear division of responsibilities across departments, allowing for effective risk identification, assessment, and control [2][3]. Group 4: Financial Performance - As of June 30, 2025, the total assets of the finance company reached 89.495 billion RMB, with liabilities of 78.103 billion RMB and equity of 11.392 billion RMB [7]. - The company reported a revenue of 0.951 billion RMB and a net profit of 0.597 billion RMB for the first half of 2025 [7]. Group 5: Regulatory Compliance - The finance company meets all regulatory requirements, including a capital adequacy ratio of 21.81%, significantly above the minimum requirement of 10% [8]. - Other compliance indicators, such as liquidity ratio and loan-to-deposit ratio, also align with regulatory standards [8].

Core Viewpoint - The report evaluates the financial risks associated with the relationship between Sinopec Petroleum Engineering Technology Service Co., Ltd. and Sinopec Finance Co., Ltd., highlighting the latter's solid financial performance and risk management practices [1][7]. Company Overview - Sinopec Finance Co., Ltd. was established on July 8, 1988, as a non-bank financial institution approved by the People's Bank of China, with a registered capital of RMB 18 billion [2]. - The company is primarily engaged in providing financial services to its member units, including deposit acceptance, loan processing, and financial consulting [2]. Risk Management and Internal Control - The company has established a comprehensive risk management structure, including a board of directors, supervisory board, and various committees to ensure effective governance [3]. - Risk management focuses on internal control mechanisms, employee training, and a robust internal audit system to mitigate financial risks [3][5]. - Credit risk management is emphasized, with a structured process for credit rating, unified credit granting, and loan approval [4]. Operational and Financial Performance - As of June 30, 2025, Sinopec Finance Co., Ltd. reported monetary funds of RMB 41.163 billion and a net profit of RMB 1.117 billion [5]. - The company has maintained a stable operational status, adhering to regulatory requirements and demonstrating strong financial health [6]. Loan and Deposit Situation - As of June 30, 2025, Sinopec Petroleum Engineering Technology Service Co., Ltd. had deposits of RMB 105 million and loans totaling RMB 23.479 billion from Sinopec Finance Co., Ltd., indicating good liquidity and safety of deposits [6]. Risk Assessment Opinion - The evaluation concludes that Sinopec Finance Co., Ltd. operates within legal frameworks and has no significant risk management deficiencies, ensuring that financial transactions with Sinopec Petroleum Engineering Technology Service Co., Ltd. are secure [7].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - Active equity fund positions have reached the highest level of the year, with continuous increases in the communication industry position. The market's broad - based indices generally rose last week, with the Shanghai Composite Index breaking through 3700 points. TMT industries performed strongly, while dividend - related industries such as banking and coal were weak. [4][12] - Active equity public funds have been continuously increasing their positions, and the overall position has reached the highest level of the year. Even relatively cautious "fixed - income +" funds have been continuously raising their positions. In terms of style, public funds have focused on the growth sector and shifted towards small - cap stocks. [4][12] - Public funds are optimistic about the communication industry, which has seen the most significant position increase in the past three months. The proportion in the consumer sector has decreased, and the allocation ratio of the food and beverage industry has reached a multi - year low. It is recommended to shift the allocation towards the growth sector. [4][12] 3. Summary According to the Table of Contents 3.1 Last Week's Market Review - **Broad - based Index Performance**: Last week (2025/8/11 - 2025/8/15), A - share broad - based indices generally rose, with the ChiNext Index rising significantly. As of 2025/8/15, the Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3696.77 points, up about 1.70% week - on - week; the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 11634.67 points, up about 4.55%; the ChiNext Index closed at 2534.22 points, up about 8.58%; and the CSI 300 closed at 4202.35 points, up about 2.37%. [13] - **Industry Index Performance**: TMT and non - banking industries performed well last week. The top - performing industries in terms of weekly returns were communication, comprehensive finance, non - bank finance, electronics, and computer, with returns of 7.11%, 7.07%, 6.57%, 6.44%, and 6.31% respectively. The bottom - performing industries included banking, steel, textile and apparel, coal, and construction, with returns of - 3.22%, - 2.00%, - 1.36%, - 0.77%, and - 0.59% respectively. [16] 3.2 Public Funds - **Net Value Performance**: The average net value change of active partial - stock funds last week was 3.47%. Among the 4468 funds, 3990 rose, accounting for 89.30%. The top five funds in terms of net value performance were Yongying Digital Economy Smart Selection Hybrid A, SDIC UBS Jinbao Flexible Allocation Hybrid, SDIC UBS Advanced Manufacturing Hybrid, SDIC UBS New Energy Hybrid A, and SDIC UBS Industry Trend Hybrid A, with weekly net value changes of 18.81%, 17.88%, 17.34%, 17.29%, and 17.01% respectively. [4][18] - **Position Calculation**: As of 2025/8/15, the average position of active equity funds was about 89.14%. Among them, the average position of common stock funds was about 91.41% (up 0.86 pct from the previous week), the average position of partial - stock hybrid funds was about 88.93% (up 1.90 pct), the average position of allocation funds was about 88.23% (up 2.61 pct), and the average position of "fixed - income +" funds was about 23.48%, up 0.43 pct from the previous week. [2][22] - **Style Trends**: Recently, public funds have mainly been allocated to the small - cap growth style. As of 2025/8/15, the positions of active partial - stock funds in large - cap growth, large - cap value, mid - cap growth, mid - cap value, small - cap growth, and small - cap value were 27.52% (up 0.19 pct from the previous week), 9.4% (down 0.69 pct), 9.51% (down 0.37 pct), 5.96% (up 0.3 pct), 43% (up 1.06 pct), and 4.62% (down 0.5 pct) respectively. [3][29] - **Industry Trends**: From the perspective of the weighted average of stock - holding market value, the industries with a significant increase in the allocation ratio of active equity funds last week were communication (about 6.19%, up 0.86 pct from the previous week), non - ferrous metals (about 4.31%, up 0.42 pct), petroleum and petrochemicals (about 1.17%, up 0.33 pct), comprehensive (about 0.52%, up 0.30 pct), and real estate (about 1.03%, up 0.24 pct). The industries with a significant decrease were food and beverage (about 3.96%, down 0.62 pct), electronics (about 15.99%, down 0.54 pct), national defense and military industry (about 5.05%, down 0.52 pct), banking (about 3.57%, down 0.43 pct), and textile and apparel (about 1.09%, down 0.32 pct). [4][32] - **ETF Market Tracking**: Last week (2025/8/11 - 2025/8/15), domestic stock ETFs had a net outflow of about 23.799 billion yuan, cross - border ETFs had a net inflow of about 16.335 billion yuan, bond ETFs had a net inflow of about 12.633 billion yuan, and commodity ETFs had a net outflow of about 1.719 billion yuan. [39] - **Newly Established Funds**: This year, 171 active equity funds have been newly issued, with a total scale of about 68.102 billion yuan, about 130.65% of the same period in 2024; 356 passive equity funds have been newly issued, with a total scale of 184.103 billion yuan, about 320.38% of the same period in 2024. [44] 3.3 Main/Active Capital Flows - **Main Capital Flow**: Last week, the main capital flowed into non - bank and electronics sectors and flowed out of national defense and military industry and machinery sectors. [5][56] - **Active Capital Flow**: The net main - buying amount last week was about - 1016.139 billion yuan. Active capital flowed into non - bank and electronics sectors. The industries with the highest net main - buying amounts were non - bank finance, electronics, computer, communication, and non - ferrous metals; the industries with significant outflows were machinery, national defense and military industry, banking, power and public utilities, and medicine. [5][56]

- Model Name: Diffusion Index Model; Construction Idea: The model is based on the observation of industry diffusion indices to capture industry trends; Construction Process: The model tracks the weekly and monthly changes in diffusion indices for various industries, ranking them based on their diffusion index values. The formula used is not explicitly mentioned, but the ranking is based on the diffusion index values observed; Evaluation: The model has shown varying performance over the years, with notable returns in some years and significant drawdowns in others[4][24][25] - Model Name: GRU Factor Model; Construction Idea: The model utilizes GRU (Gated Recurrent Unit) neural networks to process minute-level volume and price data to generate industry factors; Construction Process: The model ranks industries based on GRU-generated factors, which are derived from deep learning on historical volume and price data. The specific formula is not provided, but the ranking is based on the GRU factor values; Evaluation: The model has shown strong performance in short cycles but struggles in longer cycles and extreme market conditions[5][30][31] Model Backtest Results - Diffusion Index Model, Average Weekly Return: 3.95%, Excess Return over Equal-weighted Index: 1.94%, August Excess Return: 1.51%, Year-to-date Excess Return: 1.75%[28] - GRU Factor Model, Average Weekly Return: -0.06%, Excess Return over Equal-weighted Index: -2.07%, August Excess Return: -1.78%, Year-to-date Excess Return: -6.66%[33] Factor Construction and Evaluation - Factor Name: Diffusion Index; Construction Idea: The factor is constructed by observing the weekly and monthly changes in industry diffusion indices; Construction Process: The factor ranks industries based on their diffusion index values, with higher values indicating stronger trends. The specific formula is not provided, but the ranking is based on the observed diffusion index values; Evaluation: The factor has shown varying performance, capturing industry trends effectively in some periods while underperforming in others[4][24][25] - Factor Name: GRU Industry Factor; Construction Idea: The factor is generated using GRU neural networks to process minute-level volume and price data; Construction Process: The factor ranks industries based on GRU-generated values, which are derived from deep learning on historical data. The specific formula is not provided, but the ranking is based on the GRU factor values; Evaluation: The factor performs well in short cycles but faces challenges in longer cycles and extreme market conditions[5][30][31] Factor Backtest Results - Diffusion Index Factor, Top Industries: Comprehensive Finance (1.0), Steel (1.0), Non-bank Finance (0.999), Comprehensive (0.998), Non-ferrous Metals (0.997), Communication (0.997)[25] - GRU Industry Factor, Top Industries: Non-ferrous Metals (5.67), Non-bank Finance (4.65), Building Materials (4.14), Real Estate (4.08), Steel (3.64), Basic Chemicals (2.71)[31][13]

Core Insights - The report highlights the current industry allocation positions of the Bank of China’s multi-strategy system, with significant weights in non-bank financials (8.9%), comprehensive (8.5%), and telecommunications (7.7%) sectors [1] - The average weekly return for the CITIC primary industries is reported at 0.8%, with the telecommunications sector leading at 6.5% and banking lagging at -2.1% [3][10] - The report indicates that the composite strategy has achieved a cumulative return of 17.5% year-to-date, outperforming the CITIC primary industry equal-weight benchmark by 2.1% [3] Industry Performance Review - The top three performing industries for the week are telecommunications (6.5%), comprehensive financials (6.0%), and electric equipment & new energy (3.3%), while the worst performers are banking (-2.1%), national defense & military (-1.7%), and textiles & apparel (-1.7%) [3][10] - The report provides a detailed breakdown of weekly and monthly returns across various industries, indicating a strong performance in sectors like telecommunications and comprehensive financials [11] Valuation Risk Warning - The report employs a valuation warning system based on the PB ratio over the past six years, identifying industries with high valuation risks. Currently, the retail trade, national defense & military, media, and computer industries are flagged for high valuations, exceeding the 95% percentile [12][13] - The methodology for the valuation warning system involves excluding the top 10% of PB ratios to ensure robust estimates [12] Strategy Performance - The report outlines various strategies and their performance, with the highest excess return from the long-term reversal strategy (6.3%) and the lowest from the funds flow strategy (-2.0%) [3] - The current top three industries based on the high prosperity industry rotation strategy are non-bank financials, telecommunications, and non-ferrous metals [15][16] Macro Style Rotation - The macro style rotation strategy identifies the top six industries based on macroeconomic indicators, which include comprehensive financials, computers, media, national defense & military, comprehensive, and non-bank financials [21][23] - The report emphasizes the importance of macroeconomic indicators in predicting industry performance and the methodology used to rank industries based on their exposure to various styles [22] Emotional Momentum Tracking - The emotional momentum tracking strategy identifies the top three industries based on implied market sentiment, which are machinery, telecommunications, and light industry manufacturing [18][20] - This strategy focuses on capturing market sentiment before earnings expectations are published, utilizing daily return and turnover rate data [19]