每经编辑｜何小桃 罗永浩与连锁餐饮集团西贝关于"预制菜"的争论仍在持续。事件由罗永浩9月10日发布的一条微博引发，他称和朋友吃了一顿西贝，但"几乎全部都是预制 菜"。随后，西贝创始人、CEO贾国龙表示，西贝门店没有一道是预制菜。 9月12日，贾国龙在接受采访时回应"预制菜风波"，称这件事对西贝的伤害已经显而易见了，一天收入减少两三百万，对于自己的处理方式，直言"生意宁 可不做是非必须得辩"，也再次强调一道预制菜都没有。 13日，罗永浩转发这段采访内容，配上一串省略号。 随后，他转发华与华营销咨询有限公司董事长华杉力挺西贝的微博内容回怼："这就是著名的华与华公司的老板，服务西贝的品牌战略公司的负责人…… 我隐隐地感觉到贾老板和贾老板的朋友们，是真心想把西贝搞死。" 值得注意的是，9月13日，胖东来集团创始人于东来删除了相关力挺西贝的抖音内容，并将个人账号设为私密状态。 于东来力挺西贝的抖音内容，目前已删除。 贾国龙：西贝客流断崖式减少 "生意可以不做，但是非必须说清楚" 据《中国企业家》报道，9月12日下午两点，在位于北京中粮祥云小镇的西贝店——就在罗永浩吃饭的那个包间里，记者见到了贾国龙，此时的他一身疲 惫， ...

Core Viewpoint - The dispute between Luo Yonghao and Xibei Restaurant centers around the use of pre-prepared dishes, with Luo advocating for transparency in the pre-prepared food industry to protect consumer rights [1][4][12] Group 1: Luo Yonghao's Position - Luo Yonghao does not oppose pre-prepared dishes but criticizes their sale at fresh dish prices, emphasizing the need for transparency [1][12] - He claims that Xibei's assertion of not using pre-prepared dishes is false, as there are no national standards to support such claims [1][4] - Luo highlights the use of additives in Xibei's food, questioning the freshness of ingredients like sea bass, which undergoes industrial processing [4] Group 2: Xibei's Response - Xibei's founder, Jia Guolong, refutes Luo's claims, asserting that the restaurant does not use pre-prepared dishes and threatens legal action against Luo [4][9] - In response to the controversy, Xibei has introduced a "Luo Yonghao Menu" and allows customers to observe the cooking process in their kitchens [9] - Xibei has committed to transparency by opening its kitchens and production facilities to the public, including its central kitchen and various sourcing locations [9]

罗永浩与西贝莜面村的舆论战持续发酵。 贾国龙强调西贝门店菜品均不是预制菜，中央厨房仅提供预加工原料，最终烹饪环节在门店完成。同 时，西贝宣布自9月12日起在全国门店推出"罗永浩菜单"，并承诺"不好吃不要钱""后厨开放参观"。 罗永浩则在微博发布10万元悬赏，征集西贝使用预制菜的"真凭实据"，并质疑西贝菜品存在"隔夜重 烤"味道，称现场反馈"挺好"仅为礼貌性客套。 截至9月12日，双方尚未进入法律程序，但舆论战仍在持续。9月12日下午，西贝莜面村在其官方账号发 布致全体合作伙伴和顾客的公开信，表示罗永浩在微博中对西贝的指责不实，针对所涉菜品在门店端的 实际制作方式，西贝莜面村将13道菜品具体制作过程的"作业指导书"正式向全社会公布。南都N视频记 者留意到，"作业指导书"还包括出品品相、切配等。 昨晚（9月12日），罗永浩在B站、抖音、微博等多个平台直播。罗永浩在直播间展示了媒体探访西贝 莜面村后厨直播的内容，包括冷冻的食材等。罗永浩表示，"西贝不仅卖预制菜，据我了解，他应该是 所有卖预制菜的餐厅里卖得最贵的。" 继续吐槽西贝之外，罗永浩还在直播间表示，餐饮店用预制菜是合法的，他以老乡鸡举例，老乡鸡在餐 厅标注了 ...

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing dispute between Xibei and Luo Yonghao centers around accusations of Xibei using pre-prepared dishes, with Luo claiming that Xibei's assertion of serving 100% fresh dishes is misleading [1][2][3] Group 1: Company Response - Xibei issued a public letter on September 12, denying Luo's accusations and asserting that the dishes he consumed do not fall under the category of pre-prepared food [1][2][15] - Xibei's CEO, Jia Guolong, stated that the company experienced a significant drop in daily revenue, with losses of 1 million yuan on September 10 and 11, and an expected loss of 2 to 3 million yuan on September 12 [2][15] - Xibei plans to open its kitchen to the public and provide transparency regarding the sourcing of its ingredients [18] Group 2: Luo Yonghao's Claims - Luo Yonghao criticized Xibei's pricing and quality, claiming that many dishes are pre-prepared and that the restaurant's prices are excessively high compared to other establishments [14][18] - During a live broadcast, Luo showcased various dishes from Xibei, highlighting their long shelf lives and questioning the freshness of the food served [5][8][14] - Luo emphasized the need for clearer regulations regarding pre-prepared food in restaurants, arguing that consumers deserve to know the preparation methods used [8][9] Group 3: Industry Context - The controversy has sparked widespread discussion on social media, with Luo's comments leading to significant public engagement, including nearly 100,000 viewers during his live stream [5][9] - According to a report by the China Chain Store & Franchise Association, over 80% of dishes in certain chain restaurants, including Xibei, are pre-prepared [9][11] - The lack of a formal national standard for defining pre-prepared food has contributed to the confusion and debate surrounding the issue [8][11]

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing controversy surrounding Luo Yonghao's criticism of XIBEI's use of pre-prepared dishes has led to public discussions about food transparency and consumer rights in the restaurant industry [1][4]. Group 1: Company Response - XIBEI issued a letter to customers clarifying that the dishes Luo Yonghao consumed do not fall under the definition of "pre-prepared dishes" as outlined by the six ministries in their recent notification [1][3]. - XIBEI expressed gratitude to Luo Yonghao for dining at their establishment but firmly opposed his claims, stating that they are unfounded and damaging to the brand's reputation [3][4]. - The company provided a detailed "operational guideline" for the preparation of the 13 dishes Luo ordered, emphasizing their commitment to food safety and quality [3]. Group 2: Luo Yonghao's Position - Luo Yonghao clarified in a live stream that he does not oppose pre-prepared dishes but advocates for transparency regarding their use in restaurants, emphasizing consumers' right to know whether dishes are freshly made or pre-prepared [4][5]. - He highlighted specific examples of pre-prepared items found in XIBEI's kitchen, questioning the integrity of the restaurant's claims about their food preparation practices [5][6]. - Luo referenced a report indicating that a significant percentage of major restaurant chains in China, including XIBEI, utilize pre-prepared dishes, suggesting that the industry lacks clear standards [5][8]. Group 3: Industry Insights - The China Chain Store and Franchise Association provided insights into the definition and scope of pre-prepared dishes, clarifying that items produced in central kitchens for specific restaurant chains do not qualify as pre-prepared dishes under current regulations [8][9]. - The association emphasized the importance of food safety and quality standards in the production of semi-finished and finished dishes, which are prepared on-site by restaurant chefs [9][10]. - There is an ongoing effort to establish national standards for pre-prepared dishes, with the health commission leading the initiative to solicit public opinions on these standards [10].

完整早报音频，请点击标题下方小耳机收听 【西贝公开信回应争议：罗永浩指责不实， 13 道菜品具体制作过程公布】 9 月 12 日早上，罗永浩用餐的西贝北 京中粮祥云小镇餐厅工作人员介绍，目前，店里已上线"罗永浩套餐"。店员称，"罗永浩套餐"一共 13 道菜，食客 点餐时可以与店员沟通，可以直接点套餐，也可以根据套餐增加或删减菜品。另外，工作人员表示，食客点餐后， 可以带领食客参观西贝后厨。店中提供参观后厨的服装和网帽，保证参观后厨过程中的卫生要求。西贝宣布将从 9 月 12 日起，在全国所有门店上线"罗永浩菜单"。 同日，西贝发文称：经确认，罗永浩在微博中对西贝的指责不实。针对所涉菜品在门店端的实际制作方式，我们现 将 13 道菜品具体制作过程的"作业指导书"正式向全社会公布。（上观新闻） 【哪吒汽车账面仅剩 1500 万元，已确认债权约 51 亿】 9 月 12 日上午，在宣布破产重整百余日后，哪吒汽车品 牌运营方合众新能源汽车股份有限公司破产重整案第一次债权人会议以网络形式正式召开。 管理人披露，截止 8 月 31 日，共有 1631 家债权人（合众新能源）向法院申报债权，申报债权的总金额为 260 多亿 ...

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing dispute between Luo Yonghao and the well-known restaurant chain Xibei centers around accusations of using pre-prepared dishes, with Luo claiming that most of the dishes he consumed were pre-prepared and overpriced, while Xibei's CEO asserts that no pre-prepared dishes were served [1][3][4]. Group 1: Dispute Background - Luo Yonghao publicly criticized Xibei on September 10, stating that his meal consisted mostly of pre-prepared dishes and called for legislation requiring restaurants to disclose the use of such dishes [3][4]. - Xibei's CEO, Jia Guolong, responded by stating that a review of the meal showed no pre-prepared dishes were served and announced plans to sue Luo for damaging the brand's reputation [4][11]. Group 2: Legal and Regulatory Context - The definition of pre-prepared dishes is a key issue, with current standards indicating that only factory-made, packaged foods with labels and shelf lives qualify as pre-prepared, while semi-finished products made in central kitchens do not [1][7]. - Experts note that there is currently no national standard for pre-prepared dishes, but a forthcoming regulation in March 2024 will clarify definitions and safety standards for the industry [7][8]. Group 3: Consumer Rights and Responsibilities - Consumers, including influential public figures like Luo, have the right to express their dining experiences, but they also bear a higher duty of care in their statements [11][12]. - If Xibei pursues legal action, it must provide evidence that Luo's statements caused reputational harm, while Luo could counter with proof of his claims regarding pre-prepared dishes [12][11]. Group 4: Industry Implications - The dispute highlights a broader need for transparency in the pre-prepared food sector, with calls for clearer labeling and definitions to bridge the gap between consumer perceptions and industry practices [12][10]. - The attention surrounding this case may lead to increased regulatory scrutiny and potential legislative changes in the pre-prepared food industry, benefiting consumer rights and safety [12][11].

Group 1 - Xibei's founder, Jia Guolong, announced plans to sue Luo Yonghao over allegations of using pre-made dishes, while Luo offered a reward for evidence supporting his claims [2][3] - Xibei confirmed that some dishes may be prepared in advance, with the chef stating that lamb chops can be served up to three meals after cooking [2][3] Group 2 - A court ruled that the parents of two teenagers involved in a public urination incident at a Haidilao restaurant must pay a total of 2.2 million yuan in damages [3][4] - The compensation includes 130,000 yuan for cleaning and damages, and 2 million yuan for business losses and reputation damage [3][4] Group 3 - Apple delayed the launch of the iPhone Air in China due to regulatory issues related to its eSIM technology, with all models pending approval [4][5] - Major Chinese telecom operators will support the iPhone Air with eSIM services once regulatory approval is obtained [4][5] Group 4 - Nio's M9 interior design was leaked by a man who was later ordered to pay 250,000 yuan in damages for infringing on trade secrets [5][6] - The court found that the man's actions diminished consumer interest and disrupted marketing strategies for the new vehicle [5][6] Group 5 - Ant Group introduced a new "pay for performance" model for its enterprise AI services, allowing clients to pay based on the actual results achieved [6] - This model aims to reduce upfront costs for businesses, particularly benefiting small and medium enterprises [6] Group 6 - China Resources Land denied rumors of an intention to acquire Evergrande Property, stating that such information is untrue [7] - Evergrande Property had previously announced a trading suspension pending the release of insider information [7] Group 7 - Shanghai Disneyland responded to complaints about the high price of sanitary products, reducing the price of a pack of five sanitary pads from 150 yuan to 70 yuan [7][8] Group 8 - Wumart Supermarket announced plans to open 20 newly renovated stores by the end of September, as part of its strategy to enhance customer experience [8] Group 9 - Tencent refuted claims regarding a former OpenAI researcher's salary exceeding 100 million yuan upon joining the company [9] Group 10 - Gold prices reached a new record high of $3,674.27 per ounce, surpassing the inflation-adjusted peak from 1980 [10] - The price increase reflects a nearly 40% rise this year, highlighting gold's status as a safe-haven asset amid macroeconomic uncertainties [10] Group 11 - The China Securities Regulatory Commission announced penalties against Beijing Dongtong Technology for serious financial fraud, proposing fines totaling 229 million yuan [10] - The company faces potential delisting due to significant violations of securities laws [10] Group 12 - Dazhonghua's operations remain unaffected despite the investigation of a senior executive for alleged misconduct [11] - The company emphasized its commitment to legal compliance and maintaining operational efficiency [11] Group 13 - Xiamen Hengkang New Materials Technology received approval for its initial public offering on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board [12] - Figure Technology became the first platform focused on real-world assets to list on NASDAQ [12] Group 14 - Albania appointed an AI named "Diera" as a government minister, marking a global first for AI in a governmental role [13] - The AI will oversee public procurement processes to ensure transparency and reduce corruption [13] Group 15 - The U.S. Federal Trade Commission initiated an investigation into AI chatbots from seven companies, including Meta and OpenAI, to assess their impact on children [14] Group 16 - Chasing Car completed its first round of financing and is planning to establish a factory near Tesla's German facility [15]

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the pre-prepared dishes of the restaurant chain "Xibei" has gained significant attention, particularly following a live broadcast by Luo Yonghao, who criticized Xibei's marketing and public relations efforts while advocating for transparency in the pre-prepared food industry [1][4][6]. Group 1: Luo Yonghao's Live Broadcast - Luo Yonghao's live broadcast attracted over 100,000 viewers within the first 10 minutes and nearly 5 million views on Weibo by the end of the session [1]. - He criticized Xibei's public relations team for their lack of professionalism and highlighted the importance of consumer awareness regarding pre-prepared dishes [4]. - Luo emphasized that while he supports the concept of pre-prepared dishes, he opposes selling them at prices equivalent to freshly made meals [4][6]. Group 2: Xibei's Response - In response to Luo's accusations, Xibei issued an open letter claiming that his statements were untrue and provided detailed production processes for 13 dishes to clarify their preparation methods [8]. - Xibei announced plans to allow customers to tour their kitchens and production facilities to enhance transparency and consumer trust [8]. Group 3: Definition and Regulation of Pre-prepared Dishes - The definition of pre-prepared dishes has been clarified by regulatory authorities, stating that they must not contain preservatives and should be pre-processed for safe consumption [11][12]. - The distinction between pre-prepared dishes and pre-processing was emphasized, with the latter referring to the preparation of raw ingredients rather than finished products [12].

Core Viewpoint - The article argues that Luo Yonghao will ultimately win against Xibei, despite Xibei potentially winning the lawsuit, as the brand may suffer irreparable damage due to public sentiment and perception of pre-made dishes [3][4]. Group 1: Public Sentiment and Brand Perception - The article highlights that in internet communication, personal stance and emotions often outweigh facts, leading to differing conclusions about whether Xibei's dishes are pre-made [3][4]. - Social media platforms are witnessing intense debates, with many consumers equating any dish not prepared on-site as pre-made, which could negatively impact large chain restaurants [4][6]. - Xibei's defense, citing a government document that distinguishes their dishes from pre-made ones, is deemed ineffective due to existing consumer distrust regarding food safety [6][12]. Group 2: Implications for the Restaurant Industry - The article emphasizes that the downfall of a reputable chain like Xibei would not improve the dining environment; rather, it could lead to worse conditions for consumers [11][12]. - A well-established brand provides job stability and better service quality, which smaller establishments may not guarantee [11][12]. Group 3: Xibei's Strategic Errors - Xibei's aggressive public relations strategies, including revealing Luo Yonghao's menu and pursuing legal action, are criticized as unwise moves that reinforce their position as the dominant party in the dispute [15][16]. - The article suggests that Xibei should have adopted a more conciliatory approach, acknowledging public sentiment rather than escalating the conflict [16][18]. Group 4: The Nature of Pre-made Dishes - The article argues that using pre-made dishes is not inherently wrong; rather, the issue lies in the perception and communication of their use by brands [20][22]. - It is noted that pre-made dishes can enhance efficiency and maintain quality, especially when produced by larger companies with stricter safety standards [20][22]. Group 5: Recommendations for Xibei - The article advises Xibei to embrace transparency and openness in their communications to counter negative public sentiment, rather than attempting to prove their innocence [22][24]. - Engaging with consumers through live demonstrations and addressing their concerns directly could help mitigate the backlash [22][24].