8月，小编拿到一个选题，调查演唱会年消费过万的人群。 第二天，我又发布了另一条，以询问的态度咨询网友，"大家一年大概会花多少钱在看演唱会上？"出乎意料的是，评论一条一条的进来，大家在评论区互 动、分享、相互交流，有的贴出几页长长的演唱会list和票价统计，有的分享了自己精心整理的应援棒九宫格拼图，有人谈起现场的激动瞬间，也有人调 侃道"别问这些大家都不开心的事"。 100 多条留言里，藏着比数据更鲜活的真相，75% 的人年消费超万，其中60% 集中在 1 - 3 万，更有 10% 的人为热爱豪掷 5 万甚至 10 万。但比起这些数 字，更动人的是评论区里流动的快乐情绪，那些关于现场的尖叫与泪水，关于和陌生人合唱时的默契，关于偶像的歌声如何成为生活的铠甲。 这让我突然意识到，当我们谈论演唱会消费时，其实是在谈论那些无法被标价的热爱与连接。 "演唱会消费过万"，这听起来会是一个偏商业和客观的话题，感觉可能缺点什么。带着犹疑和对交稿日的担忧，小编发布了第一篇小红书笔记，"演唱会 年花费过万的人请进"，结果仅有1人回复，没有什么水花。 被访者来自小红书评论区和朋友推荐，以下为根据访谈内容整理的自述，供参考： 今年32 ...

央视网消息：近期，文娱演出市场可谓热度爆表，但在音乐狂欢的背后，各类购票诈骗陷阱也悄然滋生。公安部网安局发布提示，这几类购票陷阱一定要小 心，避免票务诈骗那些"坑"。 套路一："内部人员"代购 套路三："转票"陷阱 社交软件上的"个人转票"信息，看似诚意满满，实则暗藏玄机。诈骗分子会诱导购票者私下交易，转账后便拉黑，或发送一张无法验证的电子票。 演唱会 车票 机票 应通过正规平台购买 违法犯罪分子通常会冒充售票平台的官方票务人员，以"官方渠道""录入内部票"为借口，诱导购票者在官方平台提交邮箱等个人信息"申请"。提交后，便谎 称"信息已录入成功"，随即发来虚假邀请函链接，诱导购票者扫码购票后，会伪造出票错误的假象，诱骗购票者开启屏幕共享"办理退款"，实际上却是在借 机窥探购票者的银行卡号、支付验证码等敏感信息，一步步套取钱财。 套路二：伪造票务网站App 诈骗分子会仿冒正规票务平台的"双胞胎"网站或App，通过网络广告或社交平台大肆宣扬"限时折扣""内部渠道"。但当购票者支付成功后，他们便以"订单异 常""补交手续费"等借口，让购票者再次转账，最后消失得无影无踪。 民警提示：演唱会、车票、机票，应通过正规平台 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the evolving consumer behavior amidst economic pressures, highlighting a shift from impulsive spending to more intentional and selective purchasing decisions. Consumers are adapting to uncertainties and maintaining a sense of control over their spending choices [2][6][21]. Group 1: Consumer Pressure Index - The latest Consumer Pressure Index report from Kearney indicates that while economic pressures persist, they have not significantly increased in most regions [2][4]. - Inflation and housing costs are identified as the two main sources of anxiety for global consumers, with rising expenses in food and energy contributing to ongoing stress [4][5]. Group 2: Changing Consumer Behavior - Consumers are transitioning from a mindset of "buying everything" to "selectively choosing," reflecting a return to a sense of control over their purchases [7][8]. - The concept of "revenge spending" has evolved into a more restrained yet powerful form of consumer expression, where individuals make conscious choices to assert their preferences in a volatile market [8][21]. Group 3: Consumer Mindsets - Consumers can be categorized into three psychological states: "Enjoyment Tribe," "Scarcity Tribe," and "Neutral Tribe," each exhibiting different spending behaviors based on external circumstances [16][11]. - The article suggests that consumers are not merely reacting to pressure but are also seeking novelty and meaningful experiences in their purchases [17][19]. Group 4: Trends and Implications for Brands - The market is entering a phase of brand consolidation, where established brands may struggle if they do not adapt to changing consumer values that prioritize relevance over mere recognition [22][23]. - Brands that focus on delivering emotional value and joy, rather than amplifying consumer anxiety, are more likely to succeed in the current environment [21][26]. - The article highlights three emerging trends: the rise of selective purchasing, the importance of emotional engagement in branding, and the redefinition of everyday value through smarter consumption [22][25][26].

新京报讯(记者陈琳)8月6日，中国消费者协会发布的《2025年上半年全国消协组织受理投诉情况分析》 显示，上半年，随着线下演出市场升温，演唱会相关投诉量也持续攀升，其中退款诉求占比超过90%。 中消协表示，退票退款问题是演唱会领域消费者投诉的主要集中点，这反映出在演唱会票务业务中，退 票退款的规则、流程等可能存在较大争议。建议相关主管部门牵头制定演出行业退票管理办法，对退票 时间节点、手续费比例、演出取消责任分担等事项作出统一规定，防止平台和主办方单方面设定霸王条 款。售票平台应在购票环节显著标注退票政策，设定阶梯式退票手续费标准，避免设置"一律不退"等不 合理规则，优化退票退款政策，以提升消费者的满意度。消费者在购票时也应当注意退票条款和观演风 险，增强风险意识。 近日，消费者毕女士通过消协315平台投诉北京某文化传媒有限公司，消费者称其于2025年6月30日在该 公司平台购买演唱会门票后，因朋友同时在另外一个平台抢票成功导致重复购买，消费者于是在购票仅 几分钟内且未配票情况下申请退款，却被收取高达30%(948元)的手续费。消费者认为，该退票机制不合 理，手续费比例过高，且与演出尚有27天，不符合"梯次退 ...

Core Viewpoint - The concert ticketing market is experiencing significant challenges, with high demand leading to frustrations among fans regarding ticket acquisition and the emergence of "proxy ticketing" services [1][3][4]. Group 1: Concert Ticketing Challenges - Major concerts featuring popular artists like Mayday and Yi Yang Qianxi have created a highly competitive ticketing environment, making it difficult for fans to secure tickets [1]. - The membership system implemented by the group "Times Youth" requires fans to pay 298 yuan for priority ticket purchasing, with only 15% of tickets allocated to high-tier members, leading to dissatisfaction over the perceived value of this privilege [3]. - Complaints have arisen regarding the fairness of seat allocation, with some fans receiving inferior seats despite having priority access, raising questions about the transparency of ticket distribution [3]. Group 2: Proxy Ticketing Services - The demand for tickets has led to a surge in "proxy ticketing" services, which are prevalent on social media and second-hand trading platforms, often charging fees that can exceed the ticket price itself [4]. - Proxy ticketing fees can range from 20% to 100% of the ticket price, with some services charging as much as 6,500 to 7,000 yuan for a ticket priced at 1,880 yuan, resulting in total costs nearing 10,000 yuan for a single event [4]. - These services often operate in large groups, sharing personal information among members, which raises concerns about data privacy and potential legal implications for using unauthorized ticketing software [5]. Group 3: Trends in the Performing Arts Industry - The Chinese performing arts industry has seen significant growth, with total ticket sales exceeding 5.4 billion yuan in the first half of 2025, driven by a rise in various performance genres, particularly stand-up comedy [6]. - Stand-up comedy has emerged as a leading category, with performance numbers increasing by 54.1% and ticket sales soaring by 134.9% compared to the previous year, indicating a shift in audience preferences [6]. - Female audiences represent 68.8% of theatergoers, reflecting a growing trend in female engagement across various performance types, particularly in immersive and interactive theater experiences [7]. Group 4: Marketing and Audience Engagement - The marketing strategies for theater performances are evolving, with traditional advertising losing effectiveness, while social media interactions and audience reviews are becoming crucial for ticket purchasing decisions [7]. - Successful integration of online and offline marketing efforts, such as social media challenges and interactive campaigns, has proven effective in converting online interest into ticket sales [7]. - The industry faces the challenge of balancing artistic quality with commercial viability, emphasizing the need for high-quality content to attract and retain audiences [8].

Core Viewpoint - The ticket purchasing process for popular concerts, particularly for idol groups like the Times Youth League, has become increasingly competitive and controversial, leading to widespread complaints from fans about the fairness and effectiveness of ticketing systems [1][2]. Group 1: Ticket Purchasing Challenges - The Times Youth League's ticketing system requires fans to pay a membership fee of 298 yuan for priority access, with only 15% of tickets allocated to high-tier members and 85% to the general public, raising concerns about the value of this membership [1][2]. - Many fans have expressed dissatisfaction with the ticket allocation process, reporting that even with priority access, they received inferior seating compared to general ticket holders, leading to complaints about the fairness of the distribution rules [1][2]. - The high demand for tickets has resulted in a significant number of fans resorting to "proxy buying" services, which are prevalent on social media and secondary trading platforms [2][4]. Group 2: Proxy Buying Services - Proxy buying fees vary based on ticket popularity, typically ranging from 20% to 100% of the ticket price, with some fees for high-demand events reaching as high as 6,500 to 7,000 yuan, significantly exceeding the ticket's face value [4]. - The investigation revealed that proxy buying is often organized through large groups on social media, where personal information is shared openly, raising concerns about privacy and data security [5]. - Some proxy services utilize software tools to enhance ticket purchasing speed, which can lead to potential legal issues regarding unauthorized access to computer systems [6][7].

近日，重庆市南川区人民法院审结的一起演唱会门票诈骗案件中，被告人陈某所谓的"内部购票渠道"，居然是几 张"自导自演"的微信截图。 原来，陈某先是在社交平台上宣扬自己有与演唱会主办方合作的"独家渠道"，可采取信息录入空白票等方式购买 门票。其后，他又虚构了一个演唱会主办方的微信号，炮制自己与该微信号的聊天记录，骗取买家信任。 暑期，演唱会市场持续火爆，一些热门场次一票难求。记者在重庆、湖北等地采访了解到，近期一些诈骗分子利 用歌迷求票心切的心理，以特定话术精准钓"鱼"，涉演唱会票务的诈骗案件高发。如何慧眼识"骗"不踩坑，法 官、民警为你拆解其中套路。 小心！"内部渠道""内部票"套路深 南川区法院刑事审判庭法官姜福建说，法院经过审理，查明陈某先后骗取来自重庆、江苏等地4名受害者共计 26780元，其中大部分已被挥霍。 危险！以为买、退门票，实则被盗刷 记者采访了解到，还有部分诈骗分子以协助买、退演唱会门票为诱饵，精准钓鱼，令不少人被盗刷高额资金。 近日，重庆市民谭某就遭遇了一起套路更深、危害程度更高的购票骗局。 据警方介绍，谭某因抢不到票又怕被黄牛骗，就在网上找到一家号称可帮人代抢的"票务人员"。没想到一通操作 ...

Group 1 - Domestic demand is the main driver of economic growth in the first half of the year, contributing 68.8% to economic growth, with a significant increase to 77% in the second quarter [1][3] - Final consumption expenditure contributed 52% to economic growth, with retail sales of home appliances and cultural office supplies increasing over 25% year-on-year [1][2] - The service consumption growth rate was 4.9% year-on-year, with strong demand in cultural entertainment and tourism sectors [1][3] Group 2 - Capital formation contributed 16.8% to economic growth, with equipment investment increasing by 17.3% and infrastructure investment by 4.6% [2][4] - Investment in high-tech sectors such as aerospace and computer manufacturing grew by 26.3% and 21.5% respectively, indicating a shift towards new economic drivers [2][4] - High-tech service industry investment increased by 8.6%, with information services growing by 37.4% [2][4] Group 3 - The domestic market's size and potential for consumption and investment are highlighted as unique advantages for the economy, with a population of over 1.4 billion and a per capita GDP exceeding $13,000 [3][4] - There is significant potential for growth in service consumption and investment, with a focus on improving income and leisure time for consumers [4][5] - Strategies to enhance service quality and support innovation in consumption scenarios are emphasized to stimulate further growth [4][5]

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the cancellation of over 100 tickets for Jay Chou's concert on the Maoyan platform, which has led to public outcry and trending topics on social media [2] - Consumers reported that their successfully purchased tickets were unilaterally canceled by the platform without prior notice, resulting in forced refunds [2] - Maoyan's official statement indicated that the cancellations were due to a technical error during a stress test, where previously returned tickets were mistakenly released [2] Group 2 - Legal experts suggest that Maoyan's actions may constitute a breach of contract, as the platform canceled orders without consumer consent or meeting contract termination conditions [6] - Consumers affected by the cancellations are entitled to claim compensation for any economic losses incurred, such as hotel and flight bookings made in anticipation of the concert [6] - Similar incidents have occurred on the Maoyan platform in the past, indicating a pattern of technical issues that compromise consumer rights [7]

Core Viewpoint - The issue revolves around a consumer's complaint regarding the non-refund policy of a ticketing platform, Damai, after the consumer's grandmother passed away, raising questions about the fairness of such policies in light of unforeseen circumstances [1][3]. Group 1: Consumer Complaint - A consumer named Mr. Bai purchased tickets for a concert but sought a refund after his grandmother's death, providing necessary documentation as requested by Damai's customer service [1]. - Damai refused the refund, citing the ticket's non-refundable nature and the absence of a legal basis under consumer protection laws [3]. Group 2: Legal Perspective - Legal experts describe Damai's non-refund policy as a "霸王条款" (unfair clause), suggesting that such terms may be deemed invalid if they unreasonably limit consumer rights without adequate notice [4]. - The legal framework indicates that if a platform's terms excessively limit consumer rights and fail to provide reasonable notice, consumers may challenge the validity of those terms [4].