Workflow
Zhong Guo Huan Jing Bao
icon
Search documents
“小菜园”让废水变“肥水”
Core Viewpoint - The "Small Garden" model provides an innovative solution for rural wastewater treatment, addressing challenges such as high costs and operational difficulties in traditional systems [1][2] Group 1: Cost-Effectiveness - The "Small Garden" model has a construction cost approximately 40% of that of centralized treatment systems, significantly lowering the economic barrier for rural areas to implement wastewater treatment [1] - This model is crucial for achieving comprehensive rural wastewater treatment and alleviating funding shortages [1] Group 2: Operational Simplicity - The "Small Garden" system requires minimal maintenance, with an annual maintenance cost of less than 10 yuan per household, making it suitable for areas with a lack of professional maintenance personnel [1] - The system occupies only about 6 square meters and operates without the need for electricity, further reducing operational burdens [1] Group 3: Resource Reutilization - The model transforms wastewater into usable resources, allowing treated water to be used for irrigation in nearby gardens and orchards, thus promoting ecological agriculture [2] - This approach aligns with the integration of ecology, production, and daily life in rural areas, enhancing community acceptance and participation in wastewater management [2]
“先整改、再论罚”,柔性执法需以刚性制度托底
据悉,河南省安阳市环委办将针对发现的面源污染问题出台"先整改、再论罚"的措施,即在市委、市政 府督导组通报问题后,暂不处罚责任单位,而是给予一定整改时间,根据整改结果决定后续是否追责。 这一举措引发了关于生态环境执法"刚性与柔性"平衡的讨论。 笔者认为,这一措施体现了执法的人性化趋势。按照以往,督导组发现问题并定性为典型问题后,要交 办县区进行处罚。这种模式虽具威慑力,却易引发责任主体的抵触情绪。由于处罚当先,责任单位觉得 挨罚了就了结了,问题整改动力不足,容易出现敷衍整改的情况。而敷衍整改会导致部分问题重复发 生,长期得不到彻底解决。 "先整改、再论罚",柔性执法需以刚性制度托底 现在,发现问题先不处罚,给予一定时间进行整改,说服教育在先。一些单位自己发现不了问题,督导 组从专业视角帮助发现问题,责任主体接到问题推送后,马上启动整改。这种"以改代罚"的激励导向, 充分体现了"处罚与教育相结合"的理念。笔者认为,这种柔性执法机制能够大大减少对抗性,激发责任 主体的主动性,形成"发现问题—整改提升—长效管理"的良性循环。 要构建"整改优先"的闭环,就需要让"整改优先"措施真正服务于环境治理目标,并制定可量化的整 ...
观鸟不喂鸟!你的投喂正在削弱鸟儿的生存本能
观鸟不喂鸟!你的投喂正在削弱鸟儿的生存本能 随着气温上升、春暖花开,北京玉渊潭公园内游人如织,波光粼粼的湖面上,黑天鹅、鸳鸯、绿头鸭等 鸟儿在水面上追逐嬉戏。笔者看到,有些游客不时从随身携带的袋子里掏出一些粮食,如稻谷、玉米、 窝头等,撒在湖岸边的石台上,许多鸟儿被吸引了过来,低头在地上啄食。这幅画面看似温馨,实则暗 藏生态隐患,投喂的"善意"实际上是在剥夺鸟儿的生存本能。 鸟儿是环境的测评师,黑天鹅、鸳鸯、绿头鸭等鸟类之所以选择在此落户,说明这里自然生态良好。事 实也是如此。玉渊潭公园开阔的水域和丰富的鱼虾等食物为它们提供了适宜的栖息环境,满足了它们生 存的需求。在这样的情况下,如果投喂食物就会打破原有的生态链,鸟类对人类投喂产生依赖,慢慢会 丧失自食其力、自然生存的本能。投喂看似爱护鸟儿,其实相反,严重时甚至会影响自然生态的平衡。 北京颐和园的观测数据显示,长期被投喂的斑头雁,其野外觅食时间减少了 63%,对水生植物和昆虫 的辨识能力显著下降。杭州西湖的研究发现,长期食用人工饲料的白鹭,体内胆固醇含量超出正常水平 2.7 倍,繁殖能力下降 18%。这些不健康的食物不仅损害鸟类个体健康,更通过食物链影响整个 ...