大型体育赛事不仅是竞技拼搏的舞台，更是生态价值融入社会生活的良好契机。推进生态文明建设，不 仅需要政策规制与技术创新，更依赖于社会公众广泛而自觉的实践。然而，传统自上而下的宣导模式， 往往因单向灌输、与日常生活情境脱节而效果有限。在此背景下，湖南省足球协会超级联赛（以下简称 湘超）这一草根赛事，却意外地成为一个规模宏大的生态公民培育实践课堂，为创新环境治理的社会参 与路径提供了鲜活范本。 湖南省构建了"省—市—区—街道—社区"五级联动工作体系，借助赛事影响力，推动垃圾分类宣传，打 造绿色环保湘超。各市州城市管理部门与赛事主办方精心组织每一场活动，社工部门、区县相关部门、 街道社区与赛事主办方形成合力，实现了垃圾分类宣传从"面上覆盖"到"精准滴灌"的转变。截至2025年 12月14日首轮淘汰赛结束，湘超联赛已累计开展垃圾分类宣传94场，吸引61.57万人次参与，并带动 463.2万人次加入垃圾分类行动。 生态行为从理念到实践的第一步，是使其在特定时空背景下变得具体、可行。组委会发布的《文明观赛 倡议书》没有简单复述抽象规范，而是进行了高度情境化的转译，将"爱护公共环境"具体化为"离场时 自觉清理座位"，将"践行 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of reforming the three core systems of ecological environment zoning control, environmental impact assessment (EIA), and pollutant discharge permits to enhance ecological governance and support high-quality development [1][5]. Summary by Sections Ecological Environment Zoning Control - Ecological environment zoning control provides the "bottom line" and "framework" for various development activities, serving as a foundational system for ecological management [2]. - It is essential for ensuring the construction of a beautiful China, with ecological protection red lines, environmental quality bottom lines, and resource utilization upper lines as key components [2][3]. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) - EIA acts as a primary system for source prevention, crucial for controlling environmental access for planning and projects [2]. - The EIA system has developed over 40 years but faces challenges that require reform to reduce burdens on local levels while maintaining strict access controls [2][3]. Pollutant Discharge Permits - Pollutant discharge permits are the core system for regulating fixed pollution sources, linking source control with end-of-pipe treatment [2][3]. - The permits are essential for precise lifecycle management of fixed pollution sources [2]. Interconnections Among the Three Systems - The three systems are interconnected, forming a logical closed loop of "spatial control—access control—emission regulation" [3]. - Each system focuses on improving environmental quality through precise management, supporting the overall ecological environment system [3]. Distinctions Among the Systems - Different control dimensions: zoning control focuses on spatial dimensions, EIA on decision-making, and discharge permits on emission dimensions [3][4]. - Different target objects: zoning control covers all spatial units, EIA focuses on specific projects, and discharge permits target fixed pollution sources [3][4]. Reforming Ecological Environment Zoning Control - Zoning control is seen as a basis for the synergy of the three systems, requiring reforms to enhance its scientific and operational effectiveness [5]. - Key areas for reform include strengthening multi-factor collaborative management, supporting precise standard formulation, and improving the institutional guarantee system [5][6][7]. Future Directions for Pollutant Discharge Permits - The vision for pollutant discharge permits is to establish a comprehensive, scientifically sound, and efficient regulatory system [8]. - Core reform tasks include full-factor coverage, integrated management, full-cycle control, quality standards, and reinforcing corporate responsibility [8][9][10]. Implementation Pathways for Optimizing Discharge Permits - Establishing a permit emission volume determination system based on environmental quality goals is crucial [9]. - Promoting interlinked management across zoning control, EIA, and discharge permits is necessary for effective governance [9]. - Implementing a "one certificate" management approach for coordinated pollution and carbon reduction is essential [10].

Core Viewpoint - The Guangling District of Yangzhou has successfully integrated ecological protection, cultural heritage, and economic growth through the "Two Mountains" concept, demonstrating a model for sustainable development in the context of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project and the Grand Canal [2][19]. Group 1: Ecological and Economic Integration - Guangling District has been recognized as a national "Two Mountains" practice innovation base since 2021, focusing on ecological protection and economic growth [2]. - The district has developed a comprehensive implementation plan for the "Two Mountains" concept, emphasizing ecological product value realization and cultural heritage [4]. - The establishment of a mechanism for ecological asset value assessment aims to quantify the value of ecological services, providing a scientific basis for ecological compensation and green development decisions [5]. Group 2: Environmental Protection Initiatives - Guangling District has implemented a multi-layered ecological safety barrier, ensuring the protection of water quality as a political responsibility [7]. - The district has established a high-efficiency air quality management system, utilizing advanced technologies for precise pollution control [8]. - A series of initiatives targeting rural waste, sewage, and sanitation have been launched, significantly improving local living conditions [9]. Group 3: Biodiversity and Ecological Restoration - The district has made significant progress in biodiversity restoration, with over 180 bird species recorded and a notable increase in the population of the endangered Yangtze River dolphin [10]. - The ecological restoration efforts have resulted in the completion of 355.13 hectares of ecological protection and restoration projects [10]. Group 4: Infrastructure and Community Development - The completion of the Ringzhou No. 1 Road has improved connectivity among towns, enhancing the local living environment and promoting rural tourism [11]. - The district has adopted an EOD (Ecological Environment-Oriented Development) model, integrating environmental governance with industrial development [17]. Group 5: Green Manufacturing and Smart Governance - Guangling District is fostering a green manufacturing ecosystem, with several enterprises achieving national and provincial recognition for their sustainable practices [14]. - The introduction of smart governance technologies, such as unmanned cleaning vehicles and drones, has improved urban management efficiency [15]. Group 6: Cultural and Economic Revitalization - The district's approach to urban renewal emphasizes small-scale, gradual improvements that preserve historical character while enhancing living conditions [17]. - The integration of ecological agriculture and rural tourism has generated significant economic benefits, with projections of over 10 million yuan in revenue from eco-tourism in 2025 [16]. Group 7: Overall Environmental Quality Improvement - The water quality in the district has consistently met high standards, with no inferior water bodies reported, and air quality has shown overall improvement [18].

明确碳金融产品发展路径，坚持由易到难与风险可控原则 根据市场成熟度与产品复杂程度，将按照"由易到难、风险由低到高"的路径，分阶段、有步骤地推动碳 金融产品落地。首先，在起步阶段，率先推出规则相对简单、风险可控的碳配额质押贷款和碳回购，以 激活市场流动性，夯实碳金融基础。其次，待市场参与者对碳资产定价与交易机制逐步熟悉后，适时引 入结构较为复杂、风险管理要求更高的碳期货与碳基金，发挥其价格发现与长期投资功能。最后，在市 场具备一定深度和较强抗风险能力时，再逐步推出碳期权、碳保险等更为精细化的衍生品与风险管理工 具。 在实施过程中，依托广东、湖北、上海等运行基础较好、创新活跃的区域碳市场开展差异化探索。待试 点产品运行机制成熟、风险可控后，再逐步将其成功经验审慎推广至全国碳市场，确保金融创新进程稳 健、市场发展平稳有序。 目前，我国已初步构建以碳配额现货交易为核心，并积极探索碳质押、碳回购等创新工具的碳金融体 系。但整体来看，这一体系仍面临制度基础尚不牢固、市场功能有待深化、参与主体结构有待优化、产 品体系仍需丰富等问题，亟待进一步研究完善。2025年，中共中央办公厅、国务院办公厅《关于推进绿 色低碳转型加强全国 ...

Core Viewpoint - The ecological environment bureau of Huzhou City, Zhejiang Province, is committed to empowering high-quality development and advancing the "delegation, management, and service" reform in the ecological environment sector [1] Group 1 - The Yangtze River Delta (Huzhou) Industrial Cooperation Zone is implementing a pilot program for environmental impact assessment (EIA) reform, focusing on the core of the "delegation, management, and service" reform [1] - A comprehensive reform system has been established, which includes "digital intelligence empowerment, institutional innovation, precise control, and infrastructure support" [1]

Core Viewpoint - The advancement of green agricultural development represents a profound revolution in agricultural development concepts, aiming to enhance ecological product supply to meet growing consumer demand [1] Group 1: Technological Empowerment - Strengthening the empowerment of technological elements is essential for enhancing the quality of green agriculture, with a focus on high-speed networks and IoT coverage in major agricultural production areas [1] - The cultivation of "new farmers" through a composite talent training program is encouraged, integrating disciplines such as agriculture, information technology, and ecological environment [1] - The introduction of "new capital" is vital, guiding venture capital and industry funds to focus on agricultural and food technology [1] Group 2: Multi-Subject Vitality - The innovation subject status of agricultural enterprises is reinforced, supporting leading agricultural companies to form "green agriculture" innovation alliances for technology integration [2] - Tax incentives are provided for small and medium enterprises developing integrated technologies and products [2] - The potential of research institutions is released through a mechanism for targeted research, transformation, and service, promoting rapid application of agricultural technologies [2] Group 3: Structural Optimization - The optimization of the entire industrial chain structure is crucial for expanding the efficiency of green agriculture, with a focus on future industries such as agricultural AI and synthetic biology [2] - Development of initial and deep processing technologies for functional agricultural products is emphasized, utilizing smart logistics and cold chain technologies [2] - The integration of agriculture with health, culture, and education is deepened, leveraging VR/AR and metaverse technologies to create cloud experience farms [2] Group 4: Governance and Assurance - A robust standard and regulatory system is established to accelerate the formulation of data security and interoperability standards for green smart agriculture [3] - An inclusive risk governance framework is constructed, incorporating climate change and market risks into smart decision-making models [3] - Advocacy for green consumption and value recognition is promoted, encouraging consumers to pay for safe, healthy, and sustainable agricultural products [3]

全民所有自然资源资产所有权委托代理机制（以下简称所有权委托代理机制）是指国家将全民所有的自 然资源资产，通过国务院授权自然资源部统一管理，再由自然资源部委托给省级、市级政府代为行使部 分管理职责。这一机制旨在解决自然资源资产"没人管、管不好、收益不落实"等问题，通过分级负责、 明确权责，实现资源的优化配置和保值增值。 作为全国所有权委托代理机制试点城市之一，江西省九江市坚持问题导向，着力解决自然资源资产底数 不清、权责不明晰、资源要素配置单一等问题，持续完善所有权委托代理机制，在明确试点原则、厘清 实践路径、凝聚多方合力等方面取得明显成效，为推动生态产品价值实现奠定了坚实基础。 坚持高位推动和市县联动相结合。自试点工作开展以来，九江市将其作为"一市一点"项目，为试点工作 提供全方位保障。试点初期，由市级层面做好顶层设计，明确了试点总体思路和总体目标，统一规划了 改革路径，授权指导各县（市、区）开展自然资源资产整体出让，不断丰富试点样本，形成市县联动良 好局面。 坚持国家要求和地方需求相结合。九江市以试点工作为契机，将"创新所有权管理方式、促进自然资源 资产高效配置和保值增值"的国家要求和"改变单一资源要素配置 ...

Core Viewpoint - The successful inclusion of the Shiyan River (Shiyan Reservoir) in Shenzhen into the fourth batch of beautiful rivers and lakes by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment highlights the city's innovative "city-water symbiosis" governance model, which has gained national recognition and serves as a replicable model for similar urban reservoirs [2][3]. Group 1: Urban Challenges - The Shiyan Reservoir, built in 1960 with a capacity of 31.98 million cubic meters, is the second-largest water supply reservoir in Shenzhen, providing an annual average of 360 million cubic meters of water [3]. - As urban development rapidly expanded, the reservoir became surrounded by dense construction, leading to challenges such as water resource shortages and unstable water quality from tributaries [3]. Group 2: Governance Solutions - Shenzhen implemented a systematic approach to governance, establishing a 108.02 square kilometer water source protection area and constructing over 105 kilometers of isolation fencing [4]. - The city executed a significant "one water demolition" campaign, removing 310,000 square meters of illegal constructions within the primary water source protection area in just eight months, a model now promoted nationwide [4]. Group 3: Technological Empowerment - A comprehensive monitoring network was established at the Shiyan Reservoir, including 35 automatic water quality monitoring stations and 11 AI ecological monitoring devices to detect illegal activities [5]. - The management team, consisting of nearly 100 personnel, ensures effective ground inspections to address issues promptly [5]. Group 4: Ecological Benefits - The water quality of the Shiyan Reservoir has improved to a stable level of Class II surface water, with an increased annual water supply capacity of 500 million cubic meters [6]. - The ecological restoration has led to a high natural ecological shoreline rate of 89.1% and a vegetation coverage of 91.4% in the buffer zone, supporting over 500 species of flora and fauna [7]. Group 5: Economic Transformation - The ecological improvements have transformed the Shiyan Reservoir into a "green engine" for high-quality regional development, enhancing both ecological and economic benefits [8]. - The area has attracted high-end talent and industries, with over 130,000 various talents introduced, showcasing the strong appeal of a livable ecological environment [8]. Group 6: Sustainable Development Model - The governance practices at Shiyan Reservoir provide a systematic model for managing urban reservoirs, emphasizing fine governance over large-scale demolition and promoting sustainable mechanisms instead of short-term fixes [9].

Core Insights - The article emphasizes the importance of the Ecological Environment-Oriented Development (EOD) model as a sustainable practice to convert ecological value into economic value, aligning with the concept of "lucid waters and lush mountains are invaluable assets" [1] - The EOD model is currently in a new phase of expansion and quality improvement, with 94 national pilot projects initiated under government guidance, particularly in provinces like Zhejiang, Jiangsu, and Fujian [1] - The article outlines the necessity for a multi-faceted approach involving local state-owned enterprises, market collaboration, and policy synergy to ensure the successful implementation of EOD projects [2][3] Group 1: EOD Model Implementation - The EOD model is based on ecological governance and industrial development, aiming for a quantifiable and sustainable transformation of ecological value into economic benefits [1] - As of July 2025, Zhejiang province has 50 EOD projects in national or provincial pilot status, attracting investments totaling 140 billion yuan [1] - The current practice of the EOD model is undergoing significant changes, including the decentralization of management authority and enhanced financial support [1] Group 2: Stakeholder Collaboration - Local state-owned enterprises play a crucial role in advancing EOD projects, and there is a need for strategic restructuring to enhance their dual functions in ecological restoration and market-oriented development [2] - Encouragement for collaboration among various market entities, including central enterprises and private companies, is essential for the planning, construction, and operation of EOD projects [2] - Establishing effective mechanisms for risk sharing, responsibility allocation, and profit distribution among stakeholders is vital for project success [2] Group 3: Policy and Market Mechanisms - Strengthening policy coordination and reforming natural resource asset rights are necessary to create a conducive environment for EOD projects [3] - The article highlights the importance of market mechanisms in optimizing resource allocation and reducing costs associated with EOD projects [4] - Developing a market-oriented mindset and enhancing the economic self-balancing capacity of EOD projects are critical for their sustainability [4] Group 4: Project Management and Risk Control - Comprehensive management throughout the project lifecycle is essential for the effective operation of EOD projects, ensuring they meet both project-specific and broader regional sustainability goals [6] - Establishing a robust quality supervision process and a project exit mechanism is necessary to address potential issues during implementation [6] - Enhancing risk assessment capabilities and monitoring for compliance with environmental standards are crucial for the long-term success of EOD initiatives [6]

我国排污许可制经历近30年试点探索，法律标准体系不断健全、管理体系持续完善、信息平台建设逐步 夯实，制度"四梁八柱"结构基本建立。目前，全国386.7万家固定污染源纳入排污管理，固定污染源排 污许可管理全覆盖的阶段性改革任务顺利完成。但随着改革进入"提质增效、系统整合"的深化阶段，固 定污染源监管制度体系的深层次堵点、断点和痛点日益凸显，对照"全要素、全联动、全周期管理基本 实现和固定污染源排污许可制度体系完善"的改革目标任务，仍面临多重挑战。 全要素、全周期管控体系存在部分短板，全量许可的量化管理机制亟待健全。环境要素、行业覆盖方 面，"全要素、全行业"管控程序基本齐全，但各要素管控要求尚不完善。部分要素和污染源监管技术规 范欠缺，也存在"应发未发"行业，畜禽养殖、地下水、海洋工程等领域管理路径仍不明晰。过程覆盖方 面，缺乏"全时段、全工况、全周期"许可管控机制。一方面，缺乏对重污染天气等特殊时段量化管控， 基于排污许可的应急减排清单动态管理机制亟待建立。另一方面，未考虑炉窑首次点火、放散等特殊工 况，缺乏对登记企业停产状态的有效判定机制。量化管控方面，距离污染物排放"全口径"管控、主要污 染物排放量全量管 ...