美联储MUSALEM表示，美元贬值可能导致通胀。 ...

金融环境支持经济增长。 关税将导致通胀上升。 关税可能会对价格产生暂时或持续的影响。 美国圣路易联储主席Musalem：经济处于良好状态，或接近充分就业。 通胀存在一些上行风险。 货币政策略带限制性。 高利润率为吸收关税提供了一些空间。 ...

美联储穆萨莱姆：目前还无法确定关税是否只会对通胀产生一次性影响，还是会带来更持久的影响。 ...

美联储穆萨莱姆：近期通胀出现了一些积极的趋势，但由于关税的原因，未来前景预计将会上升。 ...

美联储穆萨莱姆：经济形势良好，劳动力市场处于或接近充分就业。通胀存在一些上行风险。 ...

（转自：ETF炼金师） 三、贸易政策冲击有限，市场环境趋稳 在当前的海外债券市场中，美联储的货币政策动向依然是影响资产价格的关键因素。市场对美联储即将 进入宽松周期的预期逐渐增强，这一判断的基础主要在于美国最近的通胀数据受到关税政策的影响相对 有限。这为货币政策的转变创造了良好的条件，同时也为十年期国债及相关ETF提供了明确的投资机 会。 尽管特朗普政府的贸易政策面临不确定性，美国与越南之间达成的贸易协定显示出一定的妥协（最终加 征关税20%，远低于最初威胁的46%），其政策逻辑呈现出"高威胁、低落地"的特征。预计在未来的三 到四个季度内，美国与其他经济体的贸易谈判不会对全球金融市场造成显著冲击，从而为债券市场提供 相对稳定的外部环境。 一、关税影响有限，为美联储宽松铺平道路 近期美国政府对多个经济体，包括中国、欧盟、墨西哥和加拿大，实施了多轮关税措施。然而，根据数 据显示，关税对美国通胀的传导效果远低于市场预期。从进口价格指数来看，针对上述经济体的进口商 品价格在加征关税后并未出现显著上涨，表明关税对进口成本的推动力有限。 在核心消费者价格指数（CPI）和生产者价格指数（PPI）方面，核心CPI受到服务类通 ...

财富管理月报 2025年6月 主要股票市场月度涨跌幅(%) 主要债券市场月度涨跌幅(%) | 股票市场 | 月度 | YTD | | --- | --- | --- | | 标普500指数 | 4.96 | 5.50 | | 纳斯达克100指数 | 6.27 | 7.93 | | 道琼斯指数 | 4.32 | 3.64 | | 欧洲Stoxx 50指数 | -1.18 | 8.32 | | 富时100指数 | -0.13 | 7.19 | | 德国DAX指数 | -0.37 | 20.09 | | 法国CAC40指数 | -1.11 | 3.86 | | 恒生指数 | 3.36 | 20.00 | | 恒生科技指数 | 2.56 | 18.68 | | 上证指数 | 2.90 | 2.76 | | 沪深300指数 | 2.50 | 0.03 | | 富时中国A50指数 | 1.31 | 0.19 | | 日经225指数 | 6.64 | 1.49 | | MSCI 东盟指数 | -0.04 | 3.37 | | MSCI 印度指数 | 3.40 | 6.04 | | 债券市场 | 月度 | YTD | | - ...

经济学家、研究人员和分析师警告称，特朗普总统对大多数进入美国的商品加征高额关税的全面贸易政 策，将通过价格上涨给消费者带来沉重打击。然而，近几个月的经济数据显示，整体通胀仍相对温和。 特朗普及其政府成员将积极的经济报告吹嘘为关税正在奏效的标志。但越来越多的担忧指出：价格正在 上涨，而这仅仅是开始。 数据显示，看似温和的整体通胀数据并未反映全貌。私营部门和联邦数据表明，商品价格——尤其是受 关税影响的类别——已经开始上涨。 5月消费者价格指数显示，多个关税敏感类别的价格出现上涨： 家电价格在4月和5月均上涨0.8%，为近四年来最高月度涨幅。 DataWeave对美国13家主要电商平台上20万种产品的分析显示，自1月以来价格已上涨： 家居和家具价格在过去五个月加速上涨：2月上涨1.1%，3月上涨2.1%，4月上涨2.8%，5月上涨3.7%，6 月上涨4.7%。 玩具呈现类似轨迹，但幅度较小：6月价格较1月上涨3.8%。 服装和鞋类价格在2月至5月相对平稳，但6月小幅上涨，较1月上涨1.7%。 部分零售商的价格涨幅更大：例如，沃尔玛和塔吉特的玩具价格较1月分别上涨7.4%和6.1%，而平均涨 幅为3.8%。Data ...

兴业期货日度策略：2025.07.10 重点策略推荐及操作建议： 商品期货方面：反内卷预期暂难证伪，商品整体偏强。 联系电话：021-80220262 操作上： 品种基本面分析及行情研判： | 品种 | 观点及操作建议 | 方向研判 | 分析师 | 联系人 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 股指 | 冲高回落，韧性仍存 | 震荡 | | | | | 周三股指冲高回落，盘中上证指数站上 3500 点，沪深两市成 | | | | | | 交额继续回升至 1.53（前值为 1.47）万亿元。从行业来看，传媒、 | | | | | | 农林牧渔、综合金融板块涨幅居前，有色金属、基础化工行业领跌。 | | 投资咨询部 | | | | 股指期货随现货小幅调整，各期指基差相对稳定，IC、IM 维持深 | | 张舒绮 | 联系人：房紫薇 | | | 度贴水状态。 | | 从业资格： | 021-80220135 | | | 随着股指估值回升至高位，市场谨慎情绪有所提升，在没有新 | | F3037345 | 从业资格： | | | 增利好的情况下，短期回归高位震荡，考虑到 7 月中报业绩 ...

Report Industry Investment Rating - The industry is rated as "Overweight", with an expected increase of over 10% compared to the benchmark index in the next 6 - 12 months [25] Core Viewpoints - The recent rally in commodity prices is a result of the resonance between supply disruptions and improved expectations, and there are four "suspicious points" in this rally [1] - The divergence between commodity prices and PPI is due to the stickiness of spot prices and the time - lag in price transmission. If the current trend continues, PPI is likely to rebound [1] - For the bond market, the significance of monitoring commodity prices lies in re - inflation and the market's ability to distinguish between supply - side and demand - side factors. There is a risk of adjustment if expectations boost the fundamentals [1] Summary by Directory Suspicious Point 1: Long - lasting and High - amplitude Increase - The commodity rally has lasted for a month, the longest this year, and has recovered nearly 50% of the decline since the tariff announcement. Technically, it seems more like a market reversal than a short - term rebound [1][4] Suspicious Point 2: Driven by Seemingly Random Factors but with a Rising Price Center - The rally can be divided into three stages: the first stage (604 - 612) was a technical rebound after the release of pessimistic sentiment; the second stage (613 - 624) saw prices rise and then fall due to the Israel - Iran war; the third stage (625 onwards) was driven by the "anti - involution" market. After these stages, the industrial product price index rose by 5.6% compared to June 3 [7][8] - The rising price center is due to three reasons: low prices leading to a high probability of upward movement, improved pessimistic expectations after the China - US leaders' call, and the seasonal tendency for prices to rise during the safety inspection and maintenance months of June and July [10][11] Suspicious Point 3: Lack of Demand - side Support for the Price Rebound - From the perspectives of fundamentals and price spreads, the demand side has been weak. The "old economy" related to real estate has not reversed its weakness, and the real estate market shows "weak volume and price" [15] - There is a divergence between futures and spot prices for some commodities, with the price increase mainly reflecting expectations rather than actual demand [17] Suspicious Point 4: The Commodity Rebound Has Not Yet Appeared in PPI - In June, PPI remained weak, with the year - on - year figure dropping by 0.3 percentage points compared to May. The divergence is due to the stickiness of spot prices and the time - lag in price transmission [19] - The weekly production materials price index has rebounded for three consecutive weeks since June. If the current trend continues, PPI is likely to rebound in July [20] Impact on the Bond Market - The significance of monitoring commodity prices for the bond market lies in re - inflation and the market's ability to distinguish between supply - side and demand - side factors [1] - Currently, the risk of a fundamental reversal in commodity prices is low, but the price rebound may be transmitted to inflation. There is a high possibility of improvement in July's PPI [1] - In the long run, commodity prices depend on the relative changes in supply and demand. If expectations boost the fundamentals, there is a risk of adjustment in the bond market [1]