Macroeconomic Overview - Trump's administration has significantly impacted both the US and global situations, with economic turbulence reflected in the decline of the S&P 500 index and the US dollar index, alongside volatility in the US bond market [1] - The US economy shows weakness across multiple sectors, with Trump attributing these issues to Biden's term, asserting that economic recovery is forthcoming [1] - Domestic challenges include calls for new tax reform and a looming trade war, with the Republican Party facing difficulties ahead of the midterm elections [1] - Internationally, trade negotiations with Europe and Japan are progressing slowly, while discussions with China regarding tariffs are ongoing, with China demanding sincerity from the US [1] - Geopolitical tensions include a potential ceasefire in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, a mineral agreement between the US and Ukraine, strained US-Iran relations, and a shift in Saudi policies [1] - Upcoming decisions from the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England are anticipated, with expectations for the Fed to maintain interest rates and the Bank of England to cut rates, contributing to uncertainty in the US economic outlook [1] US Dollar Index - The US dollar index experienced a downward trend, with a high of 100.304 and a low of 99.364, closing at 99.996 [2] - The weekly analysis indicates resistance at the 103.30 level, suggesting a bearish outlook for the dollar index in the medium term [2] - On the daily chart, the price has broken above the 99.30 resistance, indicating potential for further upward movement if it maintains above this support level [2] Gold Market - Gold prices showed volatility, reaching a high of 3269.13 and a low of 3222.59, closing at 3240.53 [4] - The monthly analysis indicates a correction after three months of gains, with a focus on market risks as May approaches [4] - The weekly support level is identified at 3070, while the key resistance level is at 3310, which will determine future price movements [4] Euro and USD Exchange Rate - The EUR/USD pair exhibited fluctuations, with a low of 1.1273 and a high of 1.1380, closing at 1.1298 [6] - Long-term analysis suggests support at 1.0800, with a continued bullish outlook despite recent price corrections [7] - Short-term trading strategies indicate a focus on the 1.1300-1.1000 support area, with potential for upward movement if this support holds [7]

Group 1 - The trade war initiated by the Trump administration has resulted in significant economic repercussions for young Americans, who are now facing increased living costs and reduced consumer choices due to tariffs [3][4] - Data indicates that the poorest American households spend three times more of their income on clothing compared to wealthier families, highlighting the disproportionate impact of tariffs on low-income groups [3] - A notable shift in public opinion has occurred, with disapproval of Trump among the 18 to 29 age group rising by 14 percentage points within four months, reflecting the adverse effects of trade policies on this demographic [3][5] Group 2 - China has responded to U.S. tariffs with strategic measures, including rare earth export controls and expanding free trade agreements, demonstrating its commitment to maintaining economic stability and countering protectionism [4][6] - Chinese e-commerce platforms like Temu and Shein are effectively meeting global consumer demands, showcasing the resilience and competitiveness of China's digital economy in the face of geopolitical tensions [4][5] - The global economic contribution of China remains significant, with over 30% of global growth attributed to the country in 2023, emphasizing its role in promoting an open world economy [5][6] Group 3 - The backlash from young Americans against trade policies reflects a broader discontent with the manipulation of globalization benefits for political gain, indicating a potential shift in consumer behavior and political support [6] - The ongoing challenges in the global economy, such as climate change and technological advancements, necessitate international cooperation, particularly between major economies like the U.S. and China [6] - The narrative suggests that closing off markets will not yield future benefits, reinforcing the idea that collaboration and mutual benefit are essential for navigating economic uncertainties [6]

Core Viewpoint - Japan's strong stance against the U.S. in trade negotiations signals a shift in its economic strategy, leveraging its relationship with China as a counterbalance to U.S. pressure [2][3][4]. Group 1: Japan's Trade Position - The second round of trade talks between Japan and the U.S. ended without agreement, with Japan's Prime Minister asserting that Japan will not accept increased tariffs on automobiles [2]. - Japan's Finance Minister threatened to use its $1.13 trillion in U.S. Treasury holdings as leverage in negotiations, indicating a significant shift in Japan's approach to U.S. economic pressure [3][7]. - Japan's trade with China has been robust, with trade volume exceeding $400 billion in 2024, making China Japan's largest trading partner for 16 consecutive years [4][5]. Group 2: Economic Strategies - Japan is considering increasing exports to China, where import tariffs on cars are significantly lower than those proposed by the U.S. [5]. - Japan is accelerating negotiations for a free trade agreement with China and South Korea, capitalizing on the benefits seen from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) [5]. - Japan's internal reports suggest that while losing the U.S. market would be challenging, losing access to the Chinese market would be catastrophic for its economy [5]. Group 3: Financial Leverage - Japan holds a significant amount of U.S. debt, and a large-scale sell-off could lead to a spike in U.S. Treasury yields, creating financial pressure on the U.S. government [7][8]. - The potential for Japan to utilize yen carry trades as a financial weapon could destabilize U.S. financial markets if Japan were to raise interest rates or strengthen the yen [8][9]. - The current geopolitical landscape, where the U.S. relies on Japan to counter China, gives Japan leverage in its negotiations with the U.S. [9]. Group 4: Global Trade Dynamics - The ongoing trade war has seen China emerge as a strategic pivot for other nations, with Japan and the EU considering similar tactics to delay U.S. demands [14][16]. - The U.S. is facing increasing isolation as allies like Japan and the EU begin to push back against its trade policies, leading to a potential weakening of U.S. economic dominance [16][18]. - Recent data indicates that while U.S. tariff revenues have increased, the trade deficit has also widened, suggesting that the current strategy may not be effective [18].

Group 1 - The U.S. added 177,000 non-farm jobs in April, exceeding the expected increase of 130,000, while the unemployment rate remained stable at 4.2% [1] - Despite strong job growth, there are indications of employment pressure among U.S. residents, with many struggling to find work after being laid off [1] - The impact of Trump's trade policies is still unfolding, with significant layoffs in the federal government and potential supply chain disruptions affecting major retailers like Walmart and Target [1] Group 2 - Concerns have been raised about the reliability of U.S. economic data, which is perceived to serve Wall Street rather than reflect the realities of residents' lives [2] - Warren Buffett criticized current U.S. trade policies and highlighted the unsustainable nature of the fiscal deficit, emphasizing the risks of currency devaluation [2] - Berkshire Hathaway's cash reserves reached a record high of over $347 billion, indicating Buffett's cautious outlook on the U.S. economy [2] Group 3 - The better-than-expected non-farm data temporarily stabilized U.S. stocks, but it led to a downward adjustment in expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts, with Goldman Sachs now predicting a cut in July instead of June [3] - Former Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen warned that Trump's tariff policies could have significant negative impacts, potentially leading the U.S. into recession [3] - There is a growing disconnect between the seemingly positive economic data and the underlying realities, suggesting that financial risks in the U.S. may need to be carefully monitored [3]

华见早安之声 请各位听众升级为见闻最新版APP，以便成功收听以下音频。 市场概述 关税方面有更多利好消息，叠加美国非农就业强劲，缓解市场对经济的担忧，市场的风险偏好上升。 周五，美股指涨超1%，标普连涨九天，创最近21年最长连涨天数，收复"对等关税"以来所有跌幅。Meta收涨超4%，微软、英伟达、特斯拉涨超2%，周四盘 后公布财报的苹果一度跌超5%、亚马逊曾跌2%。中概指数涨超3%。 美债再下挫。非农就业报告后，美债收益率连续第二日盘中拉升超10个基点。离岸人民币一度涨超700点、涨破7.21。比特币逼近9.8万美元。 OPEC+讨论6月增产消息后，原油盘中跌超2%。 要闻 市场收报 欧美股市：道指涨1.39%，标普500指数涨1.47%，纳斯达克涨1.51%。欧洲STOXX 600指数收涨1.67%，全周累计上涨3.07%。 债市：美国10年期基准国债收益率上涨8.88个基点，报4.3064%，全周累计上涨7.30个基点。两年期美债收益率涨12.53个基点，报3.8239%，全周累计涨7.60 个基点。 付鹏说|利率、汇率、资产价格"不可能三角"，普通人如何保住钱包？了解详情>> 2025年伯克希尔股东大会 ...

Core Points - The dissatisfaction among young Americans towards Trump's administration is growing, particularly due to trade policies affecting their lifestyle and economic independence [1][2][6] - Trump's trade war, including a 145% tariff on Chinese goods, is seen as detrimental to young consumers who rely on affordable products from platforms like Shein and Temu [2][6][9] - The price increases on goods from Shein and Temu have been significant, with some items seeing price hikes of over 377% [3][5] Group 1: Young Voter Sentiment - Young voters initially supported Trump, with significant increases in support in key states, but this trend is reversing as they express concerns over economic policies [2][6] - A recent poll indicates that 57% of Americans aged 18-29 disapprove of Trump's performance, marking a 14 percentage point increase since he took office [6][10] Group 2: Economic Impact of Tariffs - The tariffs have led to substantial price increases on everyday items, affecting low-income families the most, as they often rely on affordable options from Chinese e-commerce platforms [6][9] - Specific examples of price increases include kitchen cleaning towels rising by 377% and other household items seeing similar spikes [3][5] Group 3: Political Ramifications - The dissatisfaction among young voters could have lasting effects on the Republican Party's performance in the upcoming midterm elections [6][10] - Some young Republicans are voicing their concerns about Trump's trade policies, indicating a potential shift in party dynamics [10][11]

中国正处在一个至关重要的历史节点，是能够超越汉唐的辉煌，还是将继续面对美国的压制与挑战？这是一个激发所有中华儿女激情与奋斗的话题。对炎黄 子孙来说，前者一直是代代相传的期望与梦想。 回顾历史，秦始皇和汉武帝是极为重要的历史人物，他们分别在北方击败匈奴，南征百越；在文化上，汉武帝提出"罢黜百家，独尊儒术"，奠定了国家 的"大一统"格局。从此，统一与强大深深植入了每一位中华儿女的血脉。 古人言："明犯我强汉者，虽远必诛"、"王师北定中原日，家祭无忘告乃翁"、"天下兴亡，匹夫有责"……这些话语都早已深深镌刻在中华文化的脉络中，激 励着我们民族无数次地从困境中涅槃重生，浴火重生。 . asse and and t 1 11 11 and the program 如今，特朗普为打压我国采取了种种手段，但他能否压制住中国强大的国运呢？"时来天地皆同力，运去英雄不自由"，回顾五千年华夏历史，近现代我们从 未像现在这样遭遇一个小国的屡次压迫。日本的侵略战争唤醒了中国人民强烈的爱国情怀，凝聚了全体中华儿女的力量。 国运就像一条曲线，当它触底时必然会有强劲的反弹。在汉朝的文景之治时期，中国的国运达到了空前的巅峰，超越了任何一个前 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the impact of the US-China trade war on soybean imports, highlighting China's shift from US soybeans to Brazilian sources due to tariffs and trade barriers, resulting in significant losses for American farmers [1][5][40]. Group 1: Trade Dynamics - Following the initiation of the trade war, China reduced imports of US agricultural products, including soybeans, leading to a loss of the Chinese market for the US [1]. - China has turned to Brazil for soybean imports, purchasing at least 240 million tons, making Brazil the largest supplier [5]. - The cost of US soybeans has increased by 600 RMB per ton due to tariffs, eroding their price advantage compared to Brazilian soybeans [7][42]. Group 2: Import Challenges - A shipment of 300,000 tons of soybeans from Argentina was returned by China, indicating strict enforcement of import regulations [3]. - Chinese customs have implemented advanced technology, including a blockchain traceability platform, to monitor the origin of soybeans, ensuring compliance with import standards [22][48]. - Instances of US soybeans being misrepresented as Argentine soybeans have been detected, leading to increased scrutiny and penalties for involved companies [15][28][42]. Group 3: Economic Impact - As of April 25, 2025, the price of imported soybean meal has exceeded 4,200 RMB per ton, reflecting the economic strain on US soybean farmers, with reported income declines of 23% [11][51]. - The US soybean market share in China has plummeted to 15%, while Brazil holds a dominant 70.8% share, indicating a significant shift in trade relationships [40]. - The ongoing trade conflict has led to calls from US farmers for an end to the trade war, highlighting the adverse effects on their livelihoods [12][44].

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. has officially implemented a 25% tariff on key automotive parts as of May 3, following two rounds of negotiations with Japan, which has expressed strong concerns and demands for the removal of these tariffs [1][13]. Group 1: Negotiation Dynamics - Japan was the first country to initiate face-to-face tariff negotiations with the Trump administration, demonstrating a proactive approach [1]. - Despite claims of "significant progress" from the White House, Japan's response has been one of resistance, with no agreements reached in the first round of talks [5][3]. - Japan's Economic Revitalization Minister, Akira Amari, emphasized that Japan would not make major concessions in the negotiations and is not in a hurry to reach an agreement [1][8]. Group 2: Economic Implications - The automotive sector is critical for Japan, with exports to the U.S. accounting for nearly one-third of its total exports, making the 25% tariff particularly damaging [6]. - Japan's Prime Minister, Shigeru Ishiba, has raised concerns about the inconsistency of the current tariffs with a previous trade agreement made in 2019, where the U.S. had indicated no higher tariffs would be imposed [7]. Group 3: Future Negotiation Topics - The second round of negotiations is expected to address sensitive topics, including currency exchange rates, which have historically been contentious between the U.S. and Japan [10]. - Japan has made it clear that it will not yield on the issue of currency exchange rates, indicating a firm stance in upcoming discussions [10]. Group 4: Public Sentiment and Media Response - Japanese media has been critical of the U.S. stance, with outlets like Nikkei Asia using terms like "boasting" to describe Trump's claims of progress in negotiations, reflecting a growing discontent [2][4]. - The shift in public sentiment in Japan indicates a reevaluation of its relationship with the U.S., as traditional allies begin to reassess their positions in light of current trade dynamics [17][18].

自特朗普发动贸易战以来，美国大豆正在逐渐失去中国市场。早在特朗普第一任期内，中美的贸易战就已经开始了。2017年中国进口美国的大豆有3285万 吨，到了2018年就降至到了1664万吨。 2025年4月，特朗普又对中国加征了关税，这场关税战中美都加征到了125%；如此高的关税下，中美的很多贸易都陷入了暂停。美国出口中国的大豆自然也 被暂停，不过美国那边不死心，居然想靠披上阿根廷和巴西的马甲，企图卖到中国。 不过中国的海关部门，可没有那么好糊弄；2025年4月份，有30万吨标注是阿根廷的大豆，中国海关在查验的时候，发现里边的包装居然是美国产的。于是 中国海关，立即将这批大豆退回了阿根廷。那么下次这批大豆的包装换了，我们还能认出来吗？中国海关还有什么应对的方法？ 在本轮贸易战发动前，2024年中国大豆进口量有1.05亿万吨，2024年中国进口美国大豆2213万吨。中国作为大豆消费大国，每年进口的这些大豆主要是用来 榨油和当饲料用。 大豆里蕴含的蛋白质非常高，养殖业最广泛的饲用蛋白来源就是大豆，且目前并没有什么好的替代品；所以中国每年需要进口大量的大豆，来满足国内养殖 业的需求。 中国对美国大豆需求的减少 美国大豆 ...