傅聪强调，作为二战战败国，日本必须深刻反省历史罪责，恪守就台湾问题做出的政治承诺，立即停止 挑衅越线，收回错误言论。（央视记者 徐德智 曹健） 责编：张青津、卢思宇 傅聪介绍，历史上，日本曾侵略中国、朝鲜半岛和东南亚，并进行惨无人道的殖民统治，日本侵略者在 台湾犯下罄竹难书的罪行，先后有65万多台湾同胞惨死在日军屠刀下，约20万台湾青年被强征入伍， 2000多名台湾妇女被强迫成"慰安妇"，台湾七成土地被强占，煤矿、金矿等资源遭到毁灭性开采，这是 台湾历史上最黑暗的一页。 傅聪表示，要坚决捍卫中国人民抗日战争和世界反法西斯战争的胜利成果，坚决捍卫战后国际秩序，决 不允许否认和歪曲侵略历史，决不允许军国主义死灰复燃，决不允许历史悲剧重演。一切挑战和妄图颠 覆战后国际秩序的言行，都可能给世界制造动荡不安，给人类这个命运共同体带来严重灾难，必须高度 警惕、坚决反对。 0:00 当地时间12月18日，中国常驻联合国代表傅聪在联合国大会纪念首个"反对一切形式和表现的殖民主义 国际日"高级别会议上发言时指出，日本惨无人道的殖民统治，在台湾犯下罄竹难书的罪行，决不允许 否认和歪曲侵略历史，决不允许军国主义死灰复燃，决不允许历 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the renewed trade policies under Trump's second term, focusing on aggressive tariffs and sanctions aimed at China, particularly in sectors like semiconductors and high-end manufacturing [1][11] - Trump's administration aims to leverage tariffs as a negotiation tool to gain an upper hand in trade discussions, believing that economic pressure will force China to concede on issues like intellectual property and market access [1][11] - The response from China has been measured, with a focus on diversifying its export markets and strengthening regional partnerships, indicating a shift in its economic strategy away from reliance on the U.S. [1][11] Group 2 - The article highlights the impact of tariffs on U.S. consumers, noting that prices for various goods have increased by 10% to 20%, contributing to inflation concerns [1][11] - Despite the imposition of tariffs, China's export performance remains strong, with significant growth in exports to ASEAN, the EU, and the Middle East, suggesting a reduced dependency on the U.S. market [1][11] - The article points out that the U.S. trade deficit with China has decreased, but the overall trade deficit has widened, indicating structural issues within the U.S. economy [1][11] Group 3 - The article emphasizes the long-term strategic differences between the U.S. and China, with the U.S. focusing on short-term gains through tariffs while China invests in technology and infrastructure for future growth [1][11] - It notes that the U.S. is losing its position as the sole rule-maker in global trade, as other countries are increasingly seeking multilateral cooperation over unilateral actions [1][11] - The narrative suggests that the ongoing trade tensions are not just about tariffs but reflect deeper ideological differences regarding economic governance and global trade practices [1][11]

Group 1 - The core message of the article highlights that the EU has received positive news regarding rare earth supply from China, as China has begun issuing one-year general licenses for rare earth exports to European companies [1][3] - The EU has expressed concerns over China's complex export licensing procedures since the implementation of the rare earth export license system in April, with over 2,000 applications submitted by European companies, of which only slightly more than half were approved [3][5] - China's decision to simplify the licensing process and extend its validity is seen as a strategic move to stabilize the global supply chain, particularly for critical materials essential for the EU's electric vehicles and clean technologies [5][7] Group 2 - In contrast, China has announced anti-dumping duties on pork and pork products from the EU, effective December 17, indicating a calculated response to perceived dumping practices that harm domestic industries [3][5] - The dual approach of easing rare earth export controls while imposing tariffs on EU pork products reflects China's intention to maintain fair trade practices and protect its domestic market [7][9] - The article emphasizes that the EU and China have significant trade interdependence, with bilateral trade expected to reach €850 billion in 2024, suggesting that cooperation in areas like new energy and digital economy could be more beneficial than competition [7][9]

Core Viewpoint - Merkel's recent statement reflects deep concerns about Europe's future amid rising tensions with the U.S. under Trump's administration, emphasizing the need for Europe to maintain strategic autonomy and unity [1][17][28] Group 1: Merkel's Statement and Its Context - Merkel's unexpected return to public discourse highlights her discontent with the U.S. National Security Strategy, which she perceives as a direct warning about future risks for Europe [3][10] - The U.S. strategy document portrays Europe as facing economic decline and cultural survival crises, indicating a shift from ally criticism to outright denial of European values [5][10] - The leaked, more aggressive version of the strategy suggests U.S. intentions to weaken the EU by encouraging certain member states to distance themselves from the union [7][8] Group 2: Implications for Europe - The pressure from the U.S. has exacerbated internal divisions within Europe, particularly between left and right political factions, and has raised fears of abandonment by the U.S. [11][19] - Merkel's analysis points to the contradictions in Trump's policies, which aim for U.S. strategic withdrawal while simultaneously attempting to exert influence over Europe [13][22] - The failure of Trump's allies, such as Musk, to gain traction in European politics underscores the challenges of altering the European political landscape [15][24] Group 3: Strategic Recommendations - Merkel advocates for Europe to remain calm and united, resisting both external pressures from the U.S. and internal divisions, to navigate through the current political climate [26][28] - The emphasis is on maintaining the Atlantic alliance framework, which could provide Europe with the opportunity for future change as U.S. policies evolve [22][26] - The call for strategic patience and resilience is seen as essential for Europe to withstand the current challenges posed by the Trump administration [20][28]

Core Viewpoint - The selection of the Chinese character "tax" as Malaysia's annual character reflects public dissatisfaction with U.S. tariff policies and highlights ongoing concerns about social and economic issues in the context of increasing uncertainty [1][2]. Group 1: Impact of U.S. Tariff Policies - The U.S. has imposed significant tariffs on trade partners, which has notably impacted Malaysia's trade environment and market expectations, particularly for electronics and semiconductor companies operating in Malaysia [1][2]. - The U.S. trade diplomacy is perceived as a means to establish a framework of punishment and submission rather than a fair economic order, with tariffs being used as a "diplomatic weapon" [1]. Group 2: Trade Agreements and Conditions - During the 47th ASEAN Summit, a trade agreement was reached between the U.S. and Malaysia, which includes conditions that could limit Malaysia's trade policy choices, particularly regarding new bilateral free trade agreements with third parties [2]. - The agreement allows for zero tariffs on many U.S. goods entering Malaysia, but the coverage for Malaysian goods is limited, with some tax reductions contingent on additional conditions such as market openness and non-tariff barrier adjustments [2]. Group 3: Public Sentiment and Reflection - The character "tax" symbolizes the societal reflection on the costs associated with engaging in trade with the U.S., prompting broader discussions about existing economic models and cooperation paths [3]. - There is a growing public desire for a fair tax system and trade practices, as many citizens express opposition to the unilateral and excessive imposition of tariffs by the U.S., particularly affecting developing countries like Malaysia [3].

Core Viewpoint - The selection of the Chinese character "tax" as Malaysia's annual character reflects public dissatisfaction with U.S. tariff policies and highlights ongoing concerns about social and economic issues in the context of increasing uncertainty [1][3]. Group 1: Impact of U.S. Tariff Policies - The U.S. has imposed significant tariffs on trade partners, which has notably impacted Malaysia's business environment and market expectations, particularly for electronics and semiconductor companies operating in the region [1][2]. - Malaysia's dependence on the U.S. market is under scrutiny as companies face rising compliance costs and pressure to reassess their reliance on U.S. business [1][2]. - The U.S. trade diplomacy is perceived as a means to establish a framework of punishment and submission rather than a fair economic order, with tariffs being used as a "diplomatic weapon" [1][2]. Group 2: Trade Agreements and Conditions - During the 47th ASEAN Summit, a trade agreement was reached between the U.S. and Malaysia, which includes conditions that could lead to the termination of the agreement if Malaysia signs new trade deals deemed harmful to U.S. interests [2]. - The agreement allows for zero tariffs on many U.S. goods entering Malaysia, but the coverage for Malaysian goods is limited and contingent on various conditions, creating a passive situation for Malaysia's trade policy choices [2]. - The ambiguous language regarding "U.S. core interests" raises concerns about how Malaysia's cooperation with other countries could be interpreted as detrimental to these interests [2]. Group 3: Societal Reflections and Expectations - The character "tax" symbolizes a broader societal reflection on the costs of engaging in trade with the U.S., prompting discussions about the existing economic models and cooperation paths [3]. - The selection of "tax" also represents the public's desire for a fair tax system and trade practices, opposing the hegemonic pressures faced by developing countries like Malaysia [3].

Group 1 - Mexico plans to impose tariffs ranging from 5% to 50% on goods from countries that have not signed trade agreements with it, including China, starting January 1, 2026 [1][3] - The tariffs will particularly target Chinese exports that significantly impact local industries, such as automobiles, textiles, and steel [1][3] - The Mexican government aims to protect domestic industries and improve trade balance, but the extensive nature of the law suggests broader motivations beyond just industry protection [3] Group 2 - Mexican Finance Minister indicated that the tariff measures are part of a framework for future trade negotiations with North American partners, signaling a collaborative stance with the U.S. against China's rise [3][5] - The U.S. Trade Representative confirmed that the U.S. cannot allow Mexico to become a transshipment point for Chinese goods, reinforcing the pressure on Mexico to adopt similar protective tariffs [3][5] - The tariffs could severely impact China's automotive exports to Mexico, which have seen a growth rate of nearly 25% over the past year, potentially eliminating cost advantages for Chinese vehicles in the Mexican market [5][7] Group 3 - The increase in tariffs may lead to significant price hikes in the Mexican market for automobiles and other goods, contradicting the government's previous commitments to expand the adoption of electric vehicles [5][7] - Industry experts believe that Mexico's local supply chain is already facing shortages, and increasing tariffs will not provide immediate solutions, potentially leading to higher costs for manufacturers [7][8] - The decision to raise tariffs could strain Mexico-China relations and challenge the openness and mutual benefits of economic cooperation between the two countries [7][8]

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the need for effective strategies in international economic and trade struggles to safeguard national development interests and expand international cooperation [1] - The concept of "precise countermeasures" is introduced as a response to U.S. trade hegemony, integrating industrial balance, rule negotiation, and diplomatic coordination [3][4] - The article highlights the importance of "self-initiated openness" in countering unilateralism and protectionism, advocating for broader and deeper foreign openness [4][6] Group 2 - The article discusses the necessity of leveraging international rules and multilateral mechanisms to counteract targeted pressures from allied nations of the U.S. [6] - It points out the need for reform in international trade rules to address structural deficiencies and to shift from being rule takers to rule makers and leaders [7] - The focus on domestic demand as a primary driver of economic resilience is emphasized, with specific targets set for optimizing consumer goods supply by 2027 and achieving a high-quality development pattern by 2030 [9][10]

12月11日至12日，2026年亚太经合组织(APEC)非正式高官会在深圳举行。这是我国担任2026年APEC东 道主主办的首场活动，拉开APEC"中国年"帷幕。 此次会议主要目的是推动APEC各方就明年APEC会议有关计划和安排集思广益、达成一致，确定主办 经济体的工作计划、筹备工作和会议日程表。 12月11日上午，主题和优先领域研讨会上，APEC高官、工商界代表、专家学者等齐聚一堂，探讨构建 亚太共同体的新图景、新机遇、新展望。 亚太发展面临更多不确定性 来自21个经济体的代表与专家学者约200人参会。中国太平洋经济合作全国委员会会长詹永新致欢迎 辞，亚太经合组织秘书处执行主任爱德华多·佩德罗萨，外交部国际经济司司长、2026年亚太经合组织 高官会副主席兼总干事白天发表主旨演讲。 会上，白天表示，亚太经合组织的研讨会不仅为APEC未来的合作提供指导方针，还激发了亚太地区长 期合作的灵感，"回顾过去四十年，我们有理由为亚太地区取得的显著成就感到自豪。"白天说，当前， 世界经济面临错综复杂的变局和动荡，单边主义和保护主义抬头，亚太发展也面临更多不确定性，在这 场较量中，如何推动合作发展至关重要，也是亚太经合组 ...

Group 1 - The Mexican Senate passed a new import and export tariff law on January 10, which will impose tariffs ranging from 5% to 50% on certain products from several Asian countries, including China, starting January 1, 2026 [1] - The law was approved with 76 votes in favor, 5 against, and 35 abstentions, following prior approval from the House of Representatives [1] - Tariffs will be applied to a wide range of products, including automobiles, auto parts, textiles, clothing, plastics, and steel, with most products set at a tariff rate of 35% [1] Group 2 - Business groups in Mexico have expressed strong opposition to the tariff law, arguing it could hinder technological development, disrupt supply chains, and increase household costs [1][2] - Key manufacturing sectors that support Mexico's production, employment, and exports, particularly in electrical and electronic components, are expected to be significantly affected by the tariffs [2] - The president of the National Chamber of Commerce highlighted that 66% of the national GDP sectors were not consulted before the proposal was submitted, indicating a lack of proper communication and technical assessment [2] Group 3 - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce has stated its opposition to unilateral tariff measures and is conducting a trade and investment barrier investigation against Mexico to protect Chinese industry interests [3]