Core Viewpoint - The frequent fire incidents involving electric vehicles (EVs) have raised public concerns about the safety of new energy vehicles, particularly those equipped with ternary lithium batteries, which are linked to several recent accidents [2][3][4]. Group 1: Incident Overview - On the night of the 23rd, a Li Auto MEGA caught fire after sparks ignited from the vehicle's underside, leading to a total loss of the vehicle but allowing passengers to escape safely [2]. - A SAIC Volkswagen Tiguan L hybrid spontaneously ignited on an overpass, causing significant traffic disruption, but the occupants managed to escape unharmed [2]. - A Xiaomi SU7 Ultra caught fire after a collision, resulting in the death of the driver, highlighting the severe consequences of such incidents [2]. Group 2: Battery Safety Concerns - All three vehicles involved in the incidents were equipped with ternary lithium batteries, which are known to have higher risks of thermal runaway compared to lithium iron phosphate batteries [2][8]. - A report indicated that 90% of EV fire incidents are related to battery issues, particularly thermal runaway, which can occur due to collisions or battery overcharging [7][8]. Group 3: Fire Incident Statistics - According to the National Fire Rescue Bureau, the fire incident rate for EVs was 2.88 per 10,000 vehicles in the first quarter of 2022, which is comparable to the 2 per 10,000 rate for traditional fuel vehicles [4]. - From January 2018 to November 2024, over 1,730 fire incidents involving EVs were reported, with 305 recalls affecting approximately 4.62 million vehicles due to fire risks associated with power batteries [4]. Group 4: Fire Intensity and Risks - The intensity of fires in EVs is significantly higher than in traditional vehicles, with peak heat release rates reaching up to 11.6 MW, and toxic gases being released during combustion [5][6]. - The temperature of fires from ternary lithium batteries can exceed 1100°C, posing severe risks to occupants and first responders [8]. Group 5: Safety Standards and Regulations - New national standards for electric vehicle battery safety, effective from July 2026, will include revised thermal diffusion testing and additional safety measures to mitigate fire risks [10]. - The introduction of mandatory safety standards for vehicle door handles aims to ensure that doors can be opened in emergencies, enhancing passenger safety during fire incidents [11].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the ongoing safety concerns and controversies surrounding a specific automotive brand, particularly in light of recent accidents and the subsequent public and regulatory scrutiny regarding vehicle safety standards and marketing practices [1][7]. Group 1: Recent Incidents and Public Response - A serious accident involving the SU7 Ultra occurred in Chengdu, resulting in fatalities and raising significant public concern about the vehicle's safety features [1]. - The brand has faced multiple controversies over the past 198 days, including a fatal incident in March and ongoing issues related to product quality and safety [1][3]. - Following the Chengdu accident, the company's social media presence continued to focus on promotional content rather than addressing the incident directly, leading to public backlash and a decline in followers [3][4]. Group 2: Regulatory Developments - In response to the accidents, the Chinese government has introduced stringent safety standards for electric vehicles, particularly focusing on battery safety and autonomous driving features [7][8]. - New national standards have been proposed, including requirements for battery safety that mandate no fire or explosion within two hours of thermal runaway, and regulations for door handle safety to ensure accessibility in emergencies [8][7]. - The introduction of these standards reflects a broader industry shift towards prioritizing safety in the rapidly evolving electric vehicle market [7][8]. Group 3: Company Leadership and Strategy - The company's founder, Lei Jun, has publicly acknowledged the challenges faced by the brand, describing the period following the accidents as one of the most difficult times since its inception [4][6]. - Despite the controversies, the company reported significant pre-orders for its new model, YU7, indicating a strong market interest, although the authenticity of these figures has been questioned [4][6]. - Lei Jun has emphasized the difficulties of car manufacturing and the importance of safety, yet he has not directly addressed the safety issues in his public communications [6][4].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the ongoing safety concerns and controversies surrounding a specific automotive brand, particularly in the context of recent accidents and regulatory changes in the electric vehicle industry [5][12][14]. Group 1: Recent Accidents and Public Response - A recent accident involving the SU7 Ultra model resulted in a fire and fatalities, occurring just hours before a social media post promoting the vehicle [3][5]. - The brand has faced significant public backlash, with social media comments criticizing the vehicle's safety features, particularly the inability to open doors during emergencies [8][9]. - The company has not issued a formal response to the latest accident, contrasting with its previous actions following an earlier incident in March [8][15]. Group 2: Safety Standards and Regulatory Changes - The recent accidents have prompted the introduction of stricter safety standards for electric vehicles, particularly concerning battery safety and automated driving systems [12][14]. - New national standards have been proposed, including requirements for the safety of battery systems and door handles, reflecting the industry's need to address safety concerns highlighted by recent incidents [13][14]. - The automotive brand's issues have coincided with the rollout of these new regulations, which aim to enhance safety measures in the rapidly evolving electric vehicle market [12][14]. Group 3: Company Leadership and Communication - The company's CEO, Lei Jun, has faced criticism for his handling of the situation, with a notable lack of direct communication regarding the safety issues and accidents [9][11]. - Despite the controversies, the company continues to promote its products, raising questions about its commitment to addressing safety concerns [5][10]. - Lei Jun has acknowledged the challenges of vehicle manufacturing but has not specifically addressed safety issues in recent public statements [11].

2025年10月13日上午9时11分，小米集团董事长雷军在微博转发了小米YU7车主摄影大赛的作品，配文"帕米尔高 原非常美。我用小米YU7也拍几张风景"。 此时，距成都天府大道凌晨3时18分发生的小米SU7 Ultra碰撞起火事故，仅过去不足6小时。现场有多人参与救 援，4人合力"拳打脚踢"SU7门窗，但车门仍无法打开，车辆严重焚毁，驾驶人员未能脱逃。 从今年3月29日安徽铜陵3人遇难的"爆燃事故"，到10月13日凌晨成都"焚毁悲剧"。198天的时间里，小米汽车接连 陷入安全、智能驾驶宣传、产品质量问题等争议。 而电池安全、辅助驾驶安全、门把手安全三大国家强标今年来密集出台，恰似一面镜子，精准映照出企业和快速 发展的新能源汽车产业在安全设计等方面的疏漏。 一边是雷军微博里的"帕米尔高原"与汽车产品宣发，一边是车祸事故舆论与公众的质疑。小米汽车的市场口碑正 从上市初期的"爆款光环"陷入滑坡，更折射出新能源汽车行业智能化浪潮下的安全焦虑。 雷军和小米的高音与沉默 今年5月份，雷军首次公开回应状态，坦言"过去一个多月是创办小米以来最艰难的时期"，透露曾因情绪低落取消 会议、暂停出差及社交互动，未直接提及前舱盖争议或 ...

此时，距成都天府大道凌晨3时18分发生的小米SU7 Ultra碰撞起火事故，仅过去不足6小时。现场 有多人参与救援，4人合力"拳打脚踢"SU7门窗，但车门仍无法打开，车辆严重焚毁，驾驶人员未能 脱逃。 2025.10. 15 本文字数：2723，阅读时长大约5分钟 作者 | 第一财经 武子晔 2025年10月13日上午9时11分，小米集团董事长雷军在微博转发了小米YU7车主摄影大赛的作品， 配文"帕米尔高原非常美。我用小米YU7也拍几张风景"。 从今年3月29日安徽铜陵3人遇难的"爆燃事故"，到10月13日凌晨成都"焚毁悲剧"。198天的时间 里，小米汽车接连陷入安全、智能驾驶宣传、产品质量问题等争议。 而电池安全、辅助驾驶安全、门把手安全三大国家强标今年来密集出台，恰似一面镜子，精准映照出 企业和快速发展的新能源汽车产业在安全设计等方面的疏漏。 一边是雷军微博里的"帕米尔高原"与汽车产品宣发，一边是车祸事故舆论与公众的质疑。小米汽车 的市场口碑正从上市初期的"爆款光环"陷入滑坡，更折射出新能源汽车行业智能化浪潮下的安全焦 虑。 雷军和小米的高音与沉默 去年3月底车祸事件后，雷军微博持续日常打卡，更新樱花摄影 ...

以下文章来源于36氪汽车 ，作者徐蔡钰 36氪汽车 . 看懂汽车产业新百年。36氪旗下智能电动车产业报道公号。 纯电子结构有风险，物理结构不可或缺。 文 ｜ 徐蔡钰 编辑 ｜ 李勤 来源｜ 36氪汽车（ID：EV36Kr） 封面来源 ｜ 视觉中国 新能源车门安全性究竟如何？消费者的疑虑从未消散。 近日，成都一起小米SU7 Ultra碰撞事故引发关注。据官方通报，事故车发生碰撞后，越过道路中央绿化带，起火燃烧。 从围观群众拍摄的视频中可以看到，事故发生后，曾有热心群众尝试营救，但数名成年男性用力拉动门把手，都无法打开事故车门。 汽车门锁出现的初衷，是为了防止汽车不会随便别人开走、车内人员可以选择锁门保护自己。所以车门锁不锁，绝大部分情况下都是交由车主和车内人员 控制。 但碰撞事故后，车内人员很有可能陷入昏迷。如果车门锁依然只能由车内人员控制，救援难度便会大大增加。发生事故便要切割车门救人，车辆的财产价 值也将有所损失。 所以汽车厂商设计了一套精巧的应急自动上下锁机制：以安全气囊点火，作为车门锁应急程序的启动条件。 安全气囊是整车安全中最高等级的程序。 碰撞传感器、安全气囊这一套结构，通常拥有最高等级的运行权，传 ...

新能源车门安全性究竟如何？消费者的疑虑从未消散。 近日，成都一起小米SU7 Ultra碰撞事故引发关注。据官方通报，事故车发生碰撞后，越过道路中央绿 化带，起火燃烧。 从围观群众拍摄的视频中可以看到，事故发生后，曾有热心群众尝试营救，但数名成年男性用力拉动门 把手，都无法打开事故车门。 该事故目前仍在调查中，许多细节尚不明朗。但新能源汽车的安全问题，再次成为万千消费者关注的焦 点。 36氪此前曾对车门锁、隐藏式车门把手等进行过多篇报道，但安全话题永远值得更多关注。本篇文章， 我们继续探讨：应急情况下，新能源汽车门如何打开？ 气囊弹出，汽车会自动解锁车门 汽车门锁是一套复杂且精密的物理结构，主要由两部分构成。一部分是门锁，钥匙、遥控、手机远程、 车内中控屏开关锁，操作的均是门锁部分。而另一部分是锁扣，拉动车门把手，便是解开锁扣、打开车 门。 也就是说，想要顺利打开一扇车门，一共需要两个关键步骤：第一步解开车锁，第二步打开锁扣。 所以汽车厂商设计了一套精巧的应急自动上下锁机制：以安全气囊点火，作为车门锁应急程序的启动条 件。 安全气囊是整车安全中最高等级的程序。 碰撞传感器、安全气囊这一套结构，通常拥有最高等级的 ...

加入轩辕同学 ， 成就新汽车人! 撰文 / 常 笑 编辑 / 张 南 设计 / 甄 尤 美 2025年10月13日凌晨，四川成都天府大道主干道发生的一起严重交通事故，再次将小米汽车推上了舆论的风口浪尖。 涉事车辆为一台小米SU7，事发时天府大道路面车流较少，该车在以较快速度超越前方车辆时发生碰撞并失控，随后越过中央绿化带，车身翻滚至 对向车道并瞬间燃起明火，火势在短时间内迅速蔓延至全车。 一段现场视频显示，消防救援人员赶到现场后立即进行灭火操作，但明火扑灭后，车辆已仅剩车架，救援人员只能使用锤子、电锯等破拆车门。 从后续现场图片可见，涉事车辆车身主体已严重焚毁，初步判断其疑似为小米SU7 Ultra量产车型，该车型售价52.99万元，主打极速性能与赛道级 操控。 事发当日下午，成都市公安局交通管理局发布相关警情通报。根据通报内容：2025年10月13日凌晨3时18分许，成都市天府大道南段发生一起道路 交通事故。接警后，公安、消防、医疗救援等部门迅速到场处置。 事发后，驾驶人员被困车内，其间，有多名路人主动参与救援，徒手或用工具猛砸车窗，但因车门无法打开且火势迅猛救援失败，最终驾驶员不 幸遇难。 对于此次事故， ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the launch of Xiaomi's first SUV model, YU7, priced at 253,500 yuan, emphasizing its competitive features and safety standards [3][6]. - Xiaomi's CEO Lei Jun stated that safety is the foundation of their vehicle design, and the YU7 outperforms competitors like Model Y and Cayenne in various space metrics [6]. - The YU7 has undergone extensive testing over 539 days, covering 296 cities and accumulating 6.49 million kilometers, demonstrating its performance in extreme weather conditions [7]. Group 2 - Xiaomi reported a 47% year-on-year revenue growth in Q1 2025, with total revenue reaching 111.3 billion yuan, indicating strong market performance [7]. - The company has maintained its position among the top three smartphone manufacturers globally for 19 consecutive quarters [7]. - Xiaomi plans to invest an additional 200 billion yuan in research and development over the next five years, aiming for significant advancements by its 20th anniversary [7].

Core Viewpoint - The recent revision of the "GB 38031—2025" standard by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology aims to incorporate existing safety technologies from mainstream automakers and battery suppliers into mandatory standards, effectively eliminating low-quality products from the market. This is expected to have minimal impact on brands that prioritize quality and safety [1] Group 1: Nissan N7 - The Nissan N7, priced between 119,900 and 149,900 yuan, has undergone over 7,400 R&D tests and more than 5,500 quality confirmations, ensuring a solid quality guarantee [2] - It features a four-needle puncture multi-cell ultra-safe battery that has passed 146 high-standard tests and meets the upcoming 2026 national standard requirements [2] - The vehicle is equipped with 16 active safety systems, including forward and rear collision warnings, and advanced intelligent driving features provided by Momenta, enhancing safety and convenience during travel [2] Group 2: Dongfeng Yipai eπ007 - The Dongfeng Yipai eπ007 boasts a cage-type ultra-high-strength structure with a high-strength steel ratio of 71.5% and a hot-formed steel ratio of 20.3%, achieving a score of 93.78% in C-NCAP evaluations [3][4] - Its Mah battery has passed extreme condition tests, demonstrating safety features such as resistance to punctures and drops, with no fire or explosion during a multi-needle puncture test [3] - The vehicle is priced between 115,900 and 149,900 yuan and offers various promotional benefits, enhancing its cost-performance ratio [4] Group 3: Xiaopeng MONA M03 - The Xiaopeng MONA M03 starts at 119,800 yuan and includes over 20 hardware perception devices, providing strong environmental awareness [5] - It features 12 active safety systems, including collision warnings and emergency braking assistance, along with the XNGP full-scene intelligent driving system [5] - The vehicle's body composition includes 73% high-strength steel and aluminum alloy, improving handling and safety during collisions, while its new generation lithium iron phosphate battery enhances overall safety [6] Group 4: Summary of Models - Each model has unique advantages: the Nissan N7 excels in overall quality and safety for family users; the Xiaopeng MONA M03 stands out in active safety features for tech-savvy young consumers; and the Dongfeng Yipai eπ007 offers comprehensive safety systems and high cost-performance for practical consumers [7] - All three models are considered reliable and safe options within the 100,000 to 150,000 yuan price range, allowing consumers to choose based on their specific needs [7]