Economic Overview - In the first quarter, China's economy achieved a stable start and good performance under more proactive macro policies [1] - The average daily transaction volume in the interbank market decreased, with a total transaction volume of 452 trillion yuan, down 24% quarter-on-quarter and 19% year-on-year [1] Monetary Policy and Market Operations - The People's Bank of China (PBOC) is implementing more proactive macro policies, with potential adjustments to reserve requirement ratios and interest rates to maintain liquidity [1][2] - The net liquidity injection from monetary policy operations in the first quarter was 22,618 billion yuan, with significant reverse repo operations [2] Repo Rates and Market Dynamics - Major repo rates initially increased and then decreased, with the overnight repo rate (DR001) and the overnight pledged repo rate (R001) rising by 34 and 37 basis points respectively to 1.77% and 1.95% [3] - The first quarter saw fluctuations in funding rates due to seasonal factors and liquidity conditions, with DR007 reaching a high of 2.34% [3] Government Bond Issuance and Market Activity - A total of 12.3 trillion yuan in bonds were issued in the first quarter, a 3.5% increase quarter-on-quarter and a 24% increase year-on-year [4] - The issuance of ordinary government bonds was notably high, with the issuance pace reaching about 30% of the annual target, the highest level for the same period in recent years [4][5] Bond Market Performance - Bond yields increased across various maturities, with the 1-year and 10-year government bond yields rising by 45 and 11 basis points respectively [5] - The yield curve for 10-year government bonds showed a fluctuation range of approximately 30 basis points [5] RMB Derivatives Market - The RMB derivatives market saw significant growth, with daily trading volume of interest rate swaps increasing by 33.4% in the first quarter [6] - The average nominal principal amount for RMB interest rate swaps reached 11.1 trillion yuan, with a daily average of 1,876.1 billion yuan, reflecting a 23.2% increase [6]

Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the content Core Viewpoints - From April 21 to April 25, most bond yields increased, and most credit spreads widened. Specifically, the yields of 0.5 - 1Y securities company subordinated bonds rose by more than 3bp, and those of 1Y industrial bonds rose by more than 1bp. The yields of 2 - 3Y urban investment bonds, industrial bonds, commercial bank secondary capital bonds, and securities company ordinary bonds mostly rose by more than 3bp, and those of 2 - 3Y commercial bank perpetual bonds rose by more than 1bp. The yields of 5Y industrial bonds, commercial bank secondary capital bonds, securities company subordinated bonds, and securities company perpetual bonds rose by more than 3bp, and those of 2 - 5Y urban investment bonds mostly rose by more than 4bp. In terms of credit spreads, the credit spreads of 1 - 2Y urban investment bonds and industrial bonds mostly widened by more than 1bp, those of 3Y urban investment bonds, industrial bonds, and commercial bank secondary capital bonds mostly widened by more than 2bp, and the credit spreads of 5Y commercial financial bonds narrowed by more than 2bp [2][6]. Summary by Relevant Catalogs Yield and Spread Overview - **Yields and Changes by Term**: Various bond yields showed different degrees of increase. For example, the yields of government bonds, national development bonds, local government bonds, and various types of corporate bonds all had corresponding upward trends, with different magnitudes of change in different terms. For instance, the 5Y urban commercial bank secondary capital bond yield increased significantly by about 37bp, while the 2 - 3Y state - owned commercial bank financial bond yield decreased significantly [7][12]. - **Spreads and Changes by Term**: Credit spreads also showed different trends. The credit spreads of most bonds widened, but there were also some exceptions, such as the 5Y commercial financial bond credit spread which narrowed by more than 2bp. Different types of bonds and different terms had different degrees of spread change [2][6][14]. Credit Bond Yields and Spreads by Category (Hermite Algorithm) - **Urban Investment Bonds by Region**: The yields of urban investment bonds in most provinces increased, but the 5Y Shanghai urban investment bond yield decreased by about 11bp. The credit spreads of urban investment bonds generally widened, and the 5Y Guizhou urban investment bond credit spread was significantly higher than that of medium - and short - term bonds, with high riding returns. The performance of AA - rated bonds continued to be differentiated, with high - yield provinces often accompanied by larger credit spreads [7]. - **Industrial Bonds by Industry**: From April 21 to April 25, the yields of industrial bonds generally increased, and the credit spreads generally widened [7]. - **Financial Bonds by Issuer**: The yields of financial bonds generally increased, but the 2 - 3Y state - owned commercial bank financial bond yield decreased significantly, and the credit spread narrowed accordingly. The 5Y urban commercial bank secondary capital bond yield increased significantly by about 37bp, and the credit spread of financial bonds generally widened [7]. Credit Bond Yields and Spreads by Category (Balance Average Algorithm) - **Yields and Spread Differentiation**: From April 21 to April 25, most bond yields increased, and credit spreads were differentiated. The 5Y Guizhou bonds could achieve yields of more than 2.9%, and the 5Y Qinghai/Yunnan bonds could achieve yields of 3.1% and above, with the 5Y Guizhou bond spread significantly higher than that of medium - and short - term bonds, with high riding returns. Except for the obvious differentiation of AA - rated bond yields, there was no significant difference in the yields of the optimal individual bonds of urban investment bonds in provinces with medium - and high implicit ratings. In terms of administrative levels, Guizhou district - level bonds could achieve yields of more than 4.3%, and Yunnan district - level bonds could achieve yields of more than 3.9%. The yields of real - estate private enterprise bonds at all terms were higher than those of other bond types, and the 0.5 - 1Y basic chemical industry yields decreased by more than 12bp. The credit spreads of financial bonds were differentiated, and the yields of 0 - 0.5Y/3 - 5Y private securities company subordinated bonds could achieve 4.0% and above [8].

周一(4月28日)欧市尾盘，英国10年期国债收益率涨2.9个基点，报4.508%，北京时间22:27曾涨至4.529% 刷新日高。两年期英债收益率涨0.8个基点，报3.865%，22:27也曾涨至3.885%刷新日高。30年期英债收 益率涨5.1个基点，50年期英债收益率涨6.3个基点。2/10年期英债收益率利差涨2.12个基点，报+64.07个 基点。 ...

新华社北京4月23日电 经济知识问答｜为什么市场抛售会推高美债收益率 新华社记者宿亮 曹筱凡 2024财年，美国政府的利息支出已超过1万亿美元，占GDP约4%，占全年财政收入比例超过22%，也就 是说政府收入近四分之一要拿去付利息。这种背景下，美国政府信用动摇导致票面利率不断提高，会继 续推高美国财政负担。 当美国政府信用动摇时，美国联邦储备委员会作为美债的"最后保险人"会出资增持美债，相当于向市场 增发美元，这实际上就是"财政赤字货币化"。 债券价格和收益率的关系涉及几个概念：发行价、到期价、市场价、票面利率。 根据圣路易斯联储银行的数据，截至2024年第四季度，美联储持有的美国政府债务总额为4.6万亿美 元。这笔钱是美联储和美国联邦政府通过左手倒右手"制造"出来的现金。从2019年开始，美联储持有的 美债规模显著增长，显示近年来美联储不得不增发更多货币才能稳定美债收益率，由此不断削弱美元信 用。（完） 举例来说，一张债券发行价为100美元，到期价为105美元，那么票面利率就是5%。不过，这个5%的票 面利率并不等于收益率，因为债券可以上市交易，在到期前根据供求关系涨价、降价。交易过程中，如 果购买者以10 ...

英国30年期债券收益率升至自3月26日以来的最高水平，达到5.395%，日内上涨7.7个基点。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article suggests that the short-term interbank interest rate, DR007, is expected to fluctuate between 1.7% and 2.0% in the near future, with limited upward or downward potential due to the current monetary policy stance and the behavior of resident deposits [2][4]. Group 1: Monetary Policy Perspective - The central bank's monetary policy is currently in a tight balance, influenced by the release of resident deposits, which has reduced the necessity for further monetary easing [4][6]. - The upward potential for interest rates is constrained by the temporary reverse repurchase agreement rate cap set at 2.0% [6][22]. - The current situation indicates that the need for the central bank to increase liquidity is decreasing as resident deposits transition from accumulation to release [6][21]. Group 2: Resident Deposits and Bond Yield Comparison - The yields on three-year and five-year government bonds are currently higher than the corresponding fixed deposit rates offered by major banks, indicating an attractive opportunity for residents to invest in bonds [7][25]. - As of the end of 2024, the three-year government bond yield is approximately 1.25%, and the five-year yield is about 1.49%, both lower than the fixed deposit rates, suggesting that bond returns are primarily driven by capital gains rather than interest income [25][27]. - Recent adjustments in the bond market show that as of March 21, 2025, the three-year and five-year government bond yields have risen to 1.64% and 1.70%, respectively, indicating a shift in attractiveness towards bonds compared to fixed deposits [25][27]. Group 3: Banking System and Bond Yield Relationship - The inversion between DR007 and the ten-year government bond yield has largely ended, suggesting that the most rapid adjustments in bond yields may have already occurred [8][29]. - However, the one-year interbank deposit rate remains higher than the ten-year government bond yield, indicating that banks are still in a phase of needing to secure liabilities [8][29]. - The current financial environment suggests that as long as the one-year interbank deposit rate exceeds the ten-year government bond yield, the optimal window for banks to invest in ten-year government bonds has not yet arrived [8][29].

Group 1: Market Operations - The central bank conducted a 382 billion yuan 7-day reverse repurchase operation on March 4, with an operation rate of 1.5%. On the same day, 318.5 billion yuan of reverse repos matured, resulting in a net withdrawal of 280.3 billion yuan [2][3]. - The central bank's recent operations indicate a net withdrawal of funds for two consecutive days in March, which does not hinder the overall liquidity in the market [3]. Group 2: Interest Rates and Bonds - The latest one-year interbank certificates of deposit traded around 1.99%, showing little change from the previous day [5]. - Major interbank bond yields initially declined but then fluctuated and turned upward. For instance, the 1-year government bond yield was at 1.4600%, while the 10-year yield was at 1.7175% [7]. - The recent trends in city investment bonds (AAA) across various maturities indicate changes in yield spreads [8]. Group 3: Global Economic Insights - The Reserve Bank of Australia indicated a stronger case for interest rate cuts, expressing concerns over economic downturn risks and the potential for prolonged tight monetary policy. If inflation persists, rates may remain at 4.1% for an extended period or could be increased [11]. Group 4: Bond Market Events - The National People's Congress Standing Committee will strengthen supervision over government debt management. Additionally, work has begun on issuing 2 trillion yuan of replacement bonds by 2025 [13]. - Longfor Group successfully redeemed the "20 Longfor 04" bond, with a total redemption amount of 2.5 billion yuan [13].

文 ｜ 明明 李晗 徐烨烽 俞柯帆 来正杰 近期债市波动明显加大，债券发行人更多的选择推迟或取消发行信用债以避免市场波动的影响，由 此信用债的取消发行规模也明显抬升。与2 0 2 2年以来历轮债券取消发行所对比，我们认为本轮取 消发行是多方因素共振的结果，其一是发债主体主动进行融资成本管理，其二是发债主体保护自身 对于未来市场的"定价权"，避免因高融资成本释放"负面印象"，其三是后续地方债供给放量引起市 场偏谨慎。往后看，若后续负债端赎回压力可控，预计本轮信用债取消发行潮高峰并不会持续过 久。从配置角度看，在当前基准利率波动时期，信用债票息性价比会更加显著，年初更应把握短端 收益率反弹的机会。 ▍ 受债市波动影响，近期信用债推迟或取消发行规模明显抬升。 受资金面偏紧影响，近期债券市场波动加剧，且为避免市场波动对债券发行定价的不利影响，近 期发行人更多的选择推迟或取消发行信用债。根据企业预警通数据，2 0 2 5年2月1 7日至2月2 3 日，累计公告信用债取消或推迟发行共2 8只，合计1 4 8 . 8 0亿元，为近一年第二高单周取消发行规 模。具体来看，今年以来取消发行的信用债主体集中在中高等级的国企，且主 ...