证 券 研 究 报 告 股票型ETF持续流出 ——流动性&交易拥挤度周报 2025年5月6日 证券分析师：姚佩 执业编号：S0360522120004 邮箱：yaopei@hcyjs.com 证券分析师：林昊 执业编号：S0360523070007 邮箱：linhao@hcyjs.com 本报告由华创证券有限责任公司编制 卖的出价或询价。本报告所载信息均为个人观点，并不构成对所涉及证券的个人投资建议。 请仔细阅读PPT后部分的分析师声明及免责声明。 @2021 华创 版权所有 核心结论 证 券 研 究 报 告 | 资金供给 | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 资金供给主体(亿元) | 上 期 | 本 期 | 近3年分位 | | 偏股型公募新发份额 | 74 | 45 | 65% | | 两融资金净流入 | -12 | -154 | 13% | | 股票型ETF净申购 | -117 | -144 | 7% | | 上市公司回购 | 23 | 16 | 43% | | 合 计 | -54 | -252 | | | 资金需求 | | | | | 资金需求主体(亿元) | 上 期 ...

证 券 研 究 报 告 南向资金24/08以来首次净流出 ——流动性&交易拥挤度周报 2025年4月29日 | 证券分析师：姚佩 | 执业编号：S0360522120004 | 邮箱：yaopei@hcyjs.com | | --- | --- | --- | | 证券分析师：林昊 | 执业编号：S0360523070007 | 邮箱：linhao@hcyjs.com | 本报告由华创证券有限责任公司编制 卖的出价或询价。本报告所载信息均为个人观点，并不构成对所涉及证券的个人投资建议。 请仔细阅读PPT后部分的分析师声明及免责声明。 @2021 华创 版权所有 核心结论 证 券 研 究 报 告 | 资金供给 | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 资金供给主体(亿元) | 上 期 | 本 期 | 近3年分位 | | 偏股型公募新发份额 | 39 | 74 | 81% | | 两融资金净流入 | -57 | -12 | 45% | | 股票型ETF净申购 | 350 | -124 | 8% | | 上市公司回购 | 19 | 23 | 63% | | 合 计 | 332 | -6 ...

Group 1: Liquidity and Fund Flows - Stock-type ETFs remain the main source of net inflows, with a net subscription of 343 billion CNY, ranking in the 87th percentile over the past three years[12] - Margin financing saw a significant reduction in net outflow, decreasing from 940 billion CNY to 57 billion CNY, representing a 29% percentile over the past three years[12] - The total amount of equity financing was 115 billion CNY, which is at the 45% percentile over the past three years[12] Group 2: Market Trends and Trading Activity - The trading heat for the chemical industry increased by 29 percentage points, while light industry, real estate, semiconductor, and banking sectors saw increases of 15, 12, 11, and 8 percentage points respectively[11] - The net increase in industrial capital was only 8 billion CNY, down from 59 billion CNY, indicating a significant contraction in capital inflows[12] - The total repurchase amount by listed companies was 19 billion CNY, down from 50 billion CNY, placing it at the 55% percentile over the past three years[12] Group 3: Southbound and Northbound Capital Flows - Southbound capital inflow was 219 billion CNY, a decrease from 780 billion CNY, with a strength ranking in the 82nd percentile over the past three years[12] - Northbound capital participation in the A-share market was 5.8%, which is at the 23% percentile over the past three years[12]

Group 1 - The trading sentiment of the A-share technology sector is currently at a high level, primarily driven by valuation rather than earnings, in contrast to the US market which is driven by both valuation and earnings [3][6][29] - The trading congestion in the A-share TMT sector has reached 43%, surpassing the previous historical high of 40%, while the US market is at 38% and Hong Kong at 39% [3][8][13] - The trading congestion of the ChiNext index is also high, currently at 37%, close to its historical peak of 41% [3][13][15] Group 2 - A-share technology sector valuations are overall high, with the computer industry PE (TTM) at 83 times, the electronics industry at 58 times, and the communication industry at 44 times, all above their historical percentiles [3][16][20] - The A-share Sci-Tech 50 index has a PE (TTM) of 87 times, which is at the 98th percentile of the past decade, while the ChiNext index is at 35 times, at the 22nd percentile [3][22][24] - A-share technology leaders have a PE average of 39 times, which is comparable to the US market, while the Hong Kong market is lower at an average of 29 times [3][26][27] Group 3 - The A-share technology market is primarily reliant on valuation fluctuations, with recent trends showing that the market's expectations for the technology sector's success rates are converging [3][29] - The performance of US technology stocks has been driven by earnings growth, with a significant portion of the gains attributed to profitability rather than valuation increases [3][29] - The report highlights a divergence in pricing logic between the US and A-share markets, with the latter being more sensitive to valuation changes [3][29]