【#惊蛰无声会泄密吗#】#惊蛰无声为何主要角色都是中国人#首部聚焦当代国家安全题材的电影《惊蛰 无声》农历大年初一上映。虽是艺术创作，但诸多真实感满满的呈现，不担心"泄密"吗？@北京日报 记者专访了国际关系学院国家安全学院文化与传播系讲师刘以宁。[话筒]影片还是展示了一些国安干警 的工作模式和内部情况，真的不怕泄密吗？刘以宁：首先，国家安全部的全程指导本身就是一道最严格 的"防火墙"。影片呈现的所有内容都是经过专业审核、符合保密规定的。国家安全部在全国厅局长工作 交流会上提出影视创作要做好"脱密解密保密工作"，在确保不泄露任何真实机密的前提下，"用好用足 事迹感人、形象丰满、故事性强的鲜活素材"。这意味着影片中的"真实感"是经过专业处理的"艺术真 实"，而非对真实机密的直接披露。其次，适度揭开"神秘面纱"，恰恰是为了更好地守护国家安全。国 家安全机关创新打造新媒体平台、推出影视作品，打破认知隔阂。当观众意识到"谍战不是故事，是真 实发生的事件"时，全民国家安全教育就已经是"正在进行中"了。[话筒]《惊蛰无声》中的主要角色为什 么都是中国人？我们通常理解的情报战可能有更多外国面孔。刘以宁：这体现了当下国家安全斗 ...

首部聚焦当代国家安全题材的电影《惊蛰无声》农历大年初一上映，两天拿下近4亿元票房，在竞争激烈的春节档位列第二。 影片由国家安全部指导，讲述了我国先进战机涉密信息外泄，国安小组以"惊蛰"为代号展开行动，在内部遭到渗透情况下，与境外情报机构展开激烈较量的 故事。导演张艺谋表示，国家安全部的同志讲了"很多故事"，被他凝练成了一个100分钟左右的故事。 近年来，国家安全部开设官方账号引人注目，以往神秘而严肃的国家安全话题越来越接近每一个人，国安部此时指导拍摄全明星阵容的影片并投入春节档， 有何特殊用意？007、碟中谍等欧美谍战片早已为观众所熟知，我国的首部当代国安题材电影却为何"姗姗来迟"？《惊蛰无声》虽是艺术创作，但诸多真实 感满满的呈现，不担心"泄密"吗？@北京日报 记者专访了国际关系学院国家安全学院文化与传播系讲师刘以宁。 国家安全从"神秘"走向"可感" 北京日报：当代国安战线一向给人十分神秘和严肃的印象，当前形势下，由国安部指导、隆重推出这部影片有怎样的用意？我们注意到这几年国安部开了公 众号，推送内容很受关注。 刘以宁：这两个现象其实是同一战略思路的两种体现。过去，受制于特殊的工作性质，国安工作给公众的印象 ...

【#张艺谋回应间谍交接手机方式#】#张艺谋说国安的同志说可以# 春节假期，我国首部聚焦当代国家 安全题材的电影《惊蛰无声》正在上映。影片中，角色通过垃圾桶交接加密手机的情节引发热议。2月 18日，在《惊蛰无声》首映会上，有观众问及"间谍在垃圾桶交接手机不怕被保洁拿走吗？"导演张艺谋 回答说："真的间谍传递手机方式，我们也不知道，国安的同志也不会说，只能自己设想用强力胶把手 机粘垃圾桶旁。""在规定的时间和地点，那个人去拿。那个人如果不拿，无非就是清洁工把它收走了， 没有任何损失，其实是最安全的。"张艺谋说，"我问国安的同志这样可以吗，他们说可以。"据国家安 全部公众号介绍，《惊蛰无声》以最新科技涉密信息外泄为导火索，将镜头对准代号为"惊蛰"的国安专 项行动小组。螺旋穹顶下无人机追踪的暗战、摩天楼群的玻璃幕墙后交织着数据攻防的较量、AI换 脸、量子通信干扰等新型间谍手段的呈现，不仅还原了当代隐蔽战线斗争的科技化、隐蔽化特质，更真 实复刻了国家安全面临的复杂局势。在此前接受采访时，张艺谋表示，国安的同志也给我讲了很多故 事。但实际上把它要变成一个100分钟左右的故事，需要高度的凝练，也需要紧凑。把故事要讲好，讲 ...

美国能源部长赖特称，特朗普政府对格陵兰的主要兴趣在于国家安全，而非开发其稀土或能源资源。特 朗普长期以来一直寻求控制格陵兰，自他重返白宫以来，其政府一直在就开发当地尚未开发的矿产资源 进行谈判。但赖特周二表示，这些努力只是次要目标的一部分，即美国寻求扩大在格陵兰岛的军事存在 的同时，为格陵兰人创造更多经济机会。 ...

赖特在法国国际关系研究所于巴黎举办的一场会议上表示："我们可以在很多地方开采稀土金属、生产 油气。这或许能让格陵兰人的生活变得更好；我们的兴趣在于国家安全。" 近期特朗普政府把重点从采矿转向稀土的下游加工环节 —— 外界普遍认为，这是让替代供应真正落地 的关键瓶颈。 赖特说："'稀土元素'这个名字很糟糕，因为它们到处都是，根本不稀有。显然有适合得多的开采稀土 的地方。" 美国能源部长克里斯·赖特表示，特朗普政府对格陵兰的首要关切在于国家安全，而不是开发当地的稀 土或能源资源。 美国能源部长克里斯·赖特表示，特朗普政府对格陵兰的首要关切在于国家安全，而不是开发当地的稀 土或能源资源。 唐纳德·特朗普长期寻求控制格陵兰。他重返白宫后，美国政府也一直在就开发当地尚未充分开发的矿 产资源进行磋商。但赖特周二指出，这些努力属于次要目标，目的是在美国寻求扩大其在格陵兰的军事 存在之际，为当地民众带来更多经济机会。 唐纳德·特朗普长期寻求控制格陵兰。他重返白宫后，美国政府也一直在就开发当地尚未充分开发的矿 产资源进行磋商。但赖特周二指出，这些努力属于次要目标，目的是在美国寻求扩大其在格陵兰的军事 存在之际，为当地民众带来更 ...

【#朱一龙提醒有些朋友不能交# 】#朱一龙惊蛰无声致敬无名英雄# 著名导演张艺谋执导的电影《惊蛰 无声》@电影惊蛰无声官微 2月17日（大年初一）上映。日前，电影主演朱一龙@朱一龙 分享了一则真 实案例，向公众强调了维护国家安全的重要性。朱一龙在视频中说，近些年，境外间谍情报机关借着项 目合作、学术交流这些合法名头当掩护，专门拉拢策反重点人群。张某是国内某科研院涉密研究人员， 在国外大学做访问学者期间，碰到热心求职者，一边打听科研项目的敏感情况，一边甩咨询费用当诱 饵。被利益冲昏头脑的张某，早已把自己涉密身份、单位的保密规定，还有行前安全教育抛之脑后，向 境外间谍出卖了大量涉密科研资料。回国前，对方还给他配备了加密传输网站和窃密设备。最终，国家 安全机关火速出手，张某人赃并获。朱一龙提醒，有些钱不能挣，有些朋友不能交，国家送你出去学本 事，不是让你去卖本事，这条红线到哪儿都不能踩。问题越问越专业，红包越收越危险。增强国家安全 意识，共筑全民安全防线，多一份警惕心，少踩一个深水坑。据国家安全部介绍，电影《惊蛰无声》讲 述了我国最新战机的重要情报遭到外泄，国家安全面临威胁，国安小组迅速行动抓捕间谍的故事，在信 任 ...

【#易烊千玺揭秘境外间谍套路#】#易烊千玺提醒守护国家安全#2月16日，电影《惊蛰无声》发布倒计 时特别视频，主演易烊千玺@TFBOYS-易烊千玺 结合真实案例揭秘境外间谍渗透新套路：夏某曾接受 GPS坐标标注在内的特殊训练，受境外组织指挥，以登山、慈善等为掩护，深入边远地区，非法测绘军 事管理区，刺探国防军事和地理资源等敏感信息，并将数据加密传往境外。 视频中，易烊千玺提醒： 这些案例警示我们务必提高警惕！发现可疑线索，立即拨打12339举报！共同守护国家安全，从你我做 起。张艺谋新片《惊蛰无声》讲述了我国最新战机的涉密信息遭到外泄，国家安全面临威胁，以严迪 （易烊千玺饰）等人为骨干的国安小组，一路去伪存真，揪出内鬼，坚决击溃了境外间谍势力的侵袭。 （北京青年报综合） #易烊千玺[超话]# ...

Core Insights - The article emphasizes the importance of understanding the impact of national security and geopolitical factors on Chinese companies' overseas expansion, which may exceed the companies' capabilities to address [3][4][10]. Group 1: Future Predictions for Chinese Companies Going Abroad - Chinese companies are expected to succeed in localizing products and services, creating consumer welfare in host countries, and some have already reached the stage of creating globally competitive products [5]. - Compliance with local laws and regulations, as well as building good relationships with stakeholders, will also lead to positive outcomes for Chinese companies [5][6]. - The article highlights the need for deep localization and community engagement, as demonstrated by Zijin Mining's proactive approach in Serbia and China Minmetals' efforts in Peru [6][9]. Group 2: Challenges from Geopolitical Factors - Geopolitical issues and national security concerns pose significant challenges for Chinese companies, especially in sensitive markets, which could threaten their operational existence [10][11]. - Companies may seek assistance from government institutions and industry associations when facing geopolitical pressures, but it is difficult for a single company to withstand national and international pressures alone [11][12]. Group 3: Structural Changes in International Business Environment - The article discusses the structural changes in the international business environment, where national security and geopolitical factors have become a standard consideration for many countries, leading to increased intervention in markets [28][29]. - The U.S. and EU have adopted policies that prioritize economic security, viewing China as a significant threat, which has resulted in a shift towards protectionism and increased regulatory scrutiny [29][30][31]. Group 4: Recommendations for Chinese Companies - Companies are advised to enhance their awareness of controllability, especially in mergers and acquisitions, and to consider alternative strategies such as technology or service collaborations to mitigate risks [40][41]. - There is a strong emphasis on compliance with local laws and understanding local cultures to avoid conflicts and ensure sustainable operations [42][43]. - A dynamic balance between exports and overseas expansion is crucial, leveraging China's advantages while responding to global changes [43][44]. Group 5: National-Level Strategies - The article suggests that the government should integrate overseas expansion into national development strategies, fostering communication with companies to create a comprehensive roadmap for internationalization [45]. - It is essential to recognize the disruptive impact of national security and geopolitical factors and to deploy systematic support measures for companies venturing abroad [46].

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. is pursuing control over Greenland, a resource-rich territory, amidst strong European backlash against President Trump's aggressive acquisition strategy [1][3]. Group 1: Political Statements - Senator Lindsey Graham stated that "Greenland will belong to us," questioning the importance of ownership and emphasizing the goal of achieving results [1][3]. - Trump has expressed that his interest in Greenland is driven by national security concerns, citing threats from Russia [3][5]. - Graham humorously suggested that European allies should relax about the Greenland issue, indicating a dismissive attitude towards their concerns [3]. Group 2: International Relations - European leaders have united in opposition to Trump's threats of imposing tariffs on NATO allies until a deal for Greenland is reached, warning that such ultimatums could damage transatlantic relations [3]. - Following a productive meeting with NATO officials, Trump retracted his tariff threats, indicating a potential shift in diplomatic strategy [3]. - Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez expressed that the majority of Americans do not support tensions with Europe, criticizing Trump's actions as damaging to trust and peace [5].

Group 1 - The core accusation against SpaceX involves alleged secret investments from Chinese investors through offshore entities, which may pose a national security risk [2][3] - The senators' letter cites media reports and court testimonies claiming that Chinese capital is funneled through special purpose vehicles in tax havens to bypass regulations [3] - The recent acquisition of Musk's AI company xAI by SpaceX is highlighted as a significant risk factor, suggesting that the integration of technologies could create a "composite threat" to U.S. military and civilian infrastructure [5] Group 2 - SpaceX is noted for its critical role in U.S. national security, handling 80% of military satellite launches and supporting NASA's lunar missions [6] - The political context includes previous accusations against Musk regarding his business ties with China, which have been framed as serious national security threats [8] - The ongoing investigation reflects deeper political struggles in the U.S., where national security concerns are being used as a tool in partisan conflicts, potentially undermining market fairness and the stability of core technologies [10]