登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 不过，黑芝麻近年在信息披露方面曾多次"踩线"。今年6月16日，广西证监局对其出具警示函，指出控 股股东及关联方非经营性资金占用、违规对外担保。具体来看，2024年年报显示，黑芝麻控股股东及相 关方曾占用公司资金，且未及时披露，构成重大信披瑕疵。 此外，2020年9月，黑芝麻以所持广西广投国医投资有限公司36.41%股权为限，为南宁市儿童医院借款 提供担保6553万元，但黑芝麻直至2024年10月30日才披露上述对外担保事项。 公开资料显示，黑芝麻是一家以食品研发、生产、销售于一体的大健康食品企业，目前，公司食品业务 包括黑芝麻糊、黑芝麻丸、黑芝麻饼等多个系列产品，还推出了国内唯一获得保健食品标志的南方牌黑 芝麻糊。 炒股就看金麒麟分析师研报，权威，专业，及时，全面，助您挖掘潜力主题机会！ 记者丨见习记者李益文 8月4日，黑芝麻（000716.SZ）发布公告称，控股股东广西黑五类食品集团有限责任公司（以下简称"黑 五类集团"）正在筹划涉及其所持有公司股份转让事宜，该事项可能导致公司控制权发生变更。目前黑 五类集团与对手方正积极推进本次交易的相关工作。公司股票自2 ...

Core Viewpoint - The controlling shareholder of Heizhima, Guangxi Heiwulei Food Group, is planning to transfer approximately 20% of its shares, which may lead to a change in the company's control. The stock has been suspended for trading for up to two days as the parties negotiate the transaction details [1]. Group 1 - Heizhima's stock price has been volatile, with a year-to-date decline of 4.94%. As of August 1, 2023, the stock closed at 6.54 yuan per share, with a daily increase of 4.81% [1]. - The company has faced scrutiny for its information disclosure practices, receiving a warning from the Guangxi Securities Regulatory Bureau for non-operational fund occupation and unauthorized guarantees [2]. - Heizhima has a history of delayed disclosures regarding external guarantees, including a 65.53 million yuan guarantee for a loan to Nanning Children's Hospital, which was only disclosed in October 2024 [3]. Group 2 - Heizhima's financial performance has been poor, with revenue only slightly increasing in 2021, while experiencing significant declines in other years. The company reported a total loss exceeding 200 million yuan in 2021 and 2022, with a slight recovery in 2023 and 2024. However, in Q1 2025, revenue was 442 million yuan, down 3.74% year-on-year, and net profit was 2.25 million yuan, down 29.61% [5]. - Prior to the potential change in ownership, Heizhima attempted several unsuccessful cross-industry transformations, including a 256 million yuan acquisition of a logistics park in 2015, which was divested two years later, and a 700 million yuan acquisition of an e-commerce platform that later underperformed [5]. - In 2023, Heizhima announced a 3.5 billion yuan investment in the energy storage battery sector, planning to build a facility in Nanchang, but this project was suspended a year later due to market conditions [5].

Core Viewpoint - Hainan Shuangcheng Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (referred to as "Shuangcheng Pharmaceutical") reported a significant decline in revenue and an expanded net loss for the first half of 2025, raising concerns about its potential delisting if it fails to turn around its financial performance by the end of the year [1][5]. Financial Performance - For the first half of 2025, Shuangcheng Pharmaceutical achieved operating revenue of 84.12 million yuan, a year-on-year decrease of 11.35% [1]. - The net loss attributable to shareholders was 18.47 million yuan, worsening from previous losses [1]. - Revenue has been consistently declining over the past three years, with figures of 275 million yuan, 236 million yuan, and 174 million yuan for 2022, 2023, and 2024 respectively, reflecting year-on-year declines of 14.22%, 14.18%, and 26.16% [3]. Industry Challenges - The pharmaceutical industry is facing increased scrutiny and regulatory measures, impacting Shuangcheng Pharmaceutical's operations in the peptide market [2]. - Rising costs of raw materials due to stricter environmental regulations have further pressured the company's production costs [2]. Strategic Moves - Shuangcheng Pharmaceutical attempted a strategic shift by planning a major asset restructuring to acquire shares in Ningbo Aura Semiconductor Co., Ltd. (referred to as "Aura"), aiming to transition into the semiconductor industry [6][7]. - The stock price surged significantly following the announcement of this acquisition, reaching a peak of 40.98 yuan per share, a cumulative increase of 685% [7]. Failed Transformation - The acquisition of Aura was ultimately terminated due to disagreements on transaction terms and expectations among the parties involved [8]. - The failure of this transformation effort has compounded the company's operational challenges and financial instability [11]. Current Strategies - Shuangcheng Pharmaceutical is focusing on cost control and enhancing its sales strategies to mitigate the risk of delisting [9][10]. - The company is working to expand its export business and improve its product quality while maintaining existing customer orders [9]. - Despite these efforts, doubts remain about the effectiveness of these strategies given the ongoing pressures in the pharmaceutical industry and limited resources for research and market expansion [11].

Core Viewpoint - The control of Bangjie Co., Ltd. will change as the current controlling shareholder, Mr. Tao Jianwei, is transferring 23.1 million shares, leading to Mr. Huang Rongyao of Shanghai Qishuo becoming the new actual controller [1][9]. Group 1: Management Changes - Following the change in control, significant adjustments will occur in the company's board of directors, with several key resignations including Chairman Chen Jiansong and Vice Chairman Tao Shiqing, while other executives will retain their positions in subsidiaries [3]. Group 2: Financial Struggles and Business Transition - Bangjie Co., Ltd. attempted to transition from the apparel industry to the photovoltaic sector, investing hundreds of millions but ultimately failing, leading to severe debt issues [5][11]. - The company announced the termination of two major projects in the photovoltaic sector, originally planned with a total investment of 8 billion yuan [5]. - Financial data shows a continuous decline in profitability, with net losses increasing from 150 million yuan in 2022 to 787 million yuan in 2024, and a significant drop in revenue in Q1 2025 [7]. Group 3: Debt and Legal Issues - As of May 19, the company's photovoltaic subsidiaries had overdue loans totaling approximately 776 million yuan, representing 258.85% of the company's audited net assets for 2024 [6]. - Multiple lawsuits have been filed against the company due to debt issues, and the equity of five core subsidiaries is under judicial freeze [6]. Group 4: New Ownership and Future Strategies - Mr. Huang Rongyao, the new controller, is recognized for his experience in debt restructuring and is expected to engage with stakeholders to resolve the company's debt problems [10]. - Analysts suggest a potential strategy of "stop the bleeding, slim down, and rebirth," focusing on resolving debt disputes, divesting unprofitable assets, and revitalizing the apparel business [11].

Core Viewpoint - The decision by the Shenzhen Stock Exchange to delist Hengli Industrial marks the end of a long struggle for the company, which has faced significant operational decline and financial losses over the years [1][4]. Group 1: Company Performance and Financials - Hengli Industrial's stock will enter a delisting period starting June 25, 2025, with the final trading day expected to be July 15, 2025 [1]. - The company has experienced a drastic decline in revenue, with figures dropping from 346 million yuan in 2021 to 111 million yuan in 2023, and only 70.06 million yuan in the first three quarters of 2024 [1]. - The company reported a net profit of negative 33 million to negative 43 million yuan for the year 2024, despite a revenue forecast of 300 million to 350 million yuan [3]. Group 2: Strategic Moves and Challenges - In an attempt to avert delisting, Hengli Industrial acquired 100% of a newly established lithium battery materials processing company for no more than 15 million yuan in August 2024 [2]. - The acquisition led to a significant revenue increase in the fourth quarter, but the company faced discrepancies with its auditing firm regarding revenue figures, which were reported as only 196 million yuan [3]. - The company’s chairman obstructed the board's review of the annual report, leading to a delay that contributed to the delisting process [4]. Group 3: Industry Context and Implications - The failure of Hengli Industrial's cross-industry venture into lithium battery materials reflects a broader trend of over a hundred companies exiting the lithium battery sector due to industry oversupply and cyclical fluctuations [4]. - The case illustrates the regulatory environment under the new registration system, which has zero tolerance for "shell restructuring" and "financial engineering" practices [4]. - The shift in the new energy industry from rapid growth to refined competition indicates that companies lacking core competitiveness will face significant challenges [4].

Group 1 - The core point of the article is that Kexin Development (600234) successfully removed the delisting risk warning on May 20, 2024, marking the seventh time it has done so since its listing in 2000, earning it the title of "Delisting King" in the A-share market [2][6][9] - Kexin Development has experienced significant fluctuations in performance and has frequently changed its main business focus, raising concerns about its actual financial health and ability to generate sustainable profits [2][8][18] - In 2024, Kexin Development reported a revenue of 375 million yuan, a year-on-year increase of 434.28%, primarily driven by its construction engineering segment, which contributed 360 million yuan, reflecting a growth rate of over 500% [7][9][10] Group 2 - The company’s construction engineering business has seen a dramatic increase in revenue, from 84.69 million yuan in 2022 to 360 million yuan in 2024, indicating a significant shift in its revenue sources [8][9] - Despite the impressive revenue growth, Kexin Development's financial health remains questionable, with a net profit of only 3.9977 million yuan in 2024, heavily reliant on non-recurring gains [18][19] - The company has faced scrutiny from regulators due to its history of performance volatility and compliance issues, which have led to multiple warnings and penalties over the years [2][6][11] Group 3 - Kexin Development's main business segments now include construction engineering, office leasing, and internet advertising marketing, with the latter two contributing less to overall revenue [6][8] - The company has undergone several ownership changes, with the latest being the acquisition by the Lian family, which has raised questions about its future direction and stability [12][14][15] - The construction engineering segment's rapid growth contrasts sharply with the overall industry trend, where many companies are reporting losses or declining performance [9][10][11]

Core Viewpoint - The contrasting fortunes of Pop Mart's success and Eddie's failures highlight the importance of strategic focus and long-term vision in capital markets [46]. Group 1: Eddie's Rise and Initial Success - In 2016, Eddie was a prominent figure in the investment community, recognized for her achievements and accolades [2][3]. - Eddie's firm, Lianchuang Investment Group, managed over 10 billion yuan in assets and had a diverse investment portfolio [7]. - In December 2016, Eddie led a significant acquisition of a 29.9% stake in Harbin Intelligent Technology for 3.24 billion yuan, marking her entry into the robotics sector [8][9]. Group 2: Downfall Due to Acquisitions - Following the acquisition of Harbin Intelligent, Eddie's team aggressively pursued further acquisitions, including a 9 billion yuan purchase of Tianjin Fuzhen Industrial Equipment, which had a high premium of 213.22% [15]. - Harbin Intelligent's financial performance deteriorated post-acquisition, with cumulative losses of 1.99 billion yuan from 2021 to 2024 [18][21]. - The company faced significant internal control issues, leading to an audit report that expressed an inability to provide an opinion on its financial statements [19]. Group 3: Governance Issues and Financial Crisis - Tianyu Information, another company under Eddie's control, faced governance failures, including unauthorized guarantees and fund misappropriation, resulting in a negative audit opinion [24]. - The company's market value plummeted from 8 billion yuan in 2021 to 1.7 billion yuan, with a significant portion of its bank accounts frozen [26]. - Tianyu Information reported a net loss of 364 million yuan in 2024, indicating a severe decline in operational capability [27][29]. Group 4: Missed Opportunities - Eddie's decision-making led to missed investment opportunities, notably in Pop Mart, which has since achieved a market value exceeding 100 billion HKD [33]. - Eddie's conservative approach and focus on short-term returns resulted in her team's exit from a promising investment in a toy brand, which was later acquired by Hillhouse Capital at a valuation of 5 billion yuan [35][36]. Group 5: Personal and Professional Consequences - Eddie faced personal financial troubles, being listed as a dishonest executor due to a 150 million yuan debt, with her properties and bank accounts being seized [38]. - Regulatory scrutiny increased as she continued to serve as a director despite her financial issues, raising concerns about compliance [39][40]. Group 6: Conclusion and Market Implications - The termination of Harbin Intelligent's listing and the ongoing risks for Tianyu Information signify a broader trend of failures in the capital market, reflecting the pitfalls of neglecting core competencies and governance [42][46]. - Eddie's downfall serves as a cautionary tale for investors and companies in the capital market, emphasizing the need for strategic foresight and adherence to governance standards [44][46].

Core Viewpoint - China Nuclear Titanium Dioxide (中核钛白) announced the termination of its 2021 non-public stock issuance projects, specifically the "Water-soluble Phosphate Monoammonium (Water-soluble Fertilizer) Resource Recycling Project" and the "Annual Production of 500,000 Tons of Iron Phosphate Project," reallocating the remaining raised funds of 1.666 billion yuan to supplement working capital for daily operations and business development [3][10] Company Summary - The decision to terminate the projects was influenced by significant changes in the supply-demand relationship in the downstream market for water-soluble phosphate monoammonium and iron phosphate, leading to a slowdown in demand growth and overall industry profitability falling below expectations [3][7] - The company had initially planned to raise up to 7.091 billion yuan for various projects, including the aforementioned projects and working capital, but the actual net funds raised in 2023 amounted to 5.249 billion yuan [3] - As of April 30, 2025, the original total investment commitment for the iron phosphate project was 3.385 billion yuan, later adjusted to 2.524 billion yuan, with cumulative investment of 1.309 billion yuan [4] Industry Summary - The iron phosphate industry has seen rapid capacity expansion since the second half of 2020, with many companies attempting to diversify into the lithium battery sector, but increasing market competition and raw material price fluctuations have made this transition challenging [4][6] - The domestic iron phosphate production is projected to reach 2.0276 million tons in 2024, a 47.87% increase from 1.3712 million tons in 2023, while prices are expected to remain low, with a year-on-year decline of 20.67% [8] - The supply-demand imbalance in the iron phosphate market is exacerbated by rapid capacity growth and insufficient demand from the electric vehicle and energy storage sectors, leading to a projected excess capacity of over 3 million tons by 2025 [8][9] - The prices of key raw materials for iron phosphate production, such as phosphate rock and sulfuric acid, have been volatile and generally on the rise, increasing cost pressures for production companies [9]

Core Viewpoint - Beijing Wantong New Development Group Co., Ltd. (600246.SH) has faced setbacks in its cross-industry plans following the termination of a merger and acquisition (M&A) plan, with a recent announcement of overdue financial assistance amounting to $43.19 million [1][10]. Financial Assistance and M&A Plans - The overdue financial assistance of $50 million was intended for equity acquisition, aiming to transition into the optical communication industry [1][3]. - The financial assistance was provided to Source Photonics (Chengdu) Co., Ltd., with the goal of acquiring shares in Source Photonics Holdings [3][10]. - The M&A plan involved a cash purchase of at least 51% of Source Photonics, which was expected to constitute a significant asset restructuring [3][7]. Board Opposition and Regulatory Scrutiny - Two board members opposed the financial assistance and M&A proposals, citing insufficient time for review [2][4]. - The board meeting to approve these plans was held just three days after the notice was sent, raising concerns about the rushed decision-making process [2][3]. - Regulatory authorities raised questions regarding the company's capability to integrate assets and operate in the new industry, as well as potential speculative motives behind the plans [6][9]. Financial Details and Performance Metrics - The proposed acquisition price for 60.16% of Source Photonics was approximately $324 million, with funding sources split between self-funding (40%) and external financing (60%) [7][9]. - As of April 2024, Source Photonics had total assets of approximately ¥2.372 billion and total liabilities of about ¥1.734 billion [8]. - Source Photonics' revenue for 2022 and 2023 was ¥1.501 billion and ¥1.293 billion, respectively, with net profits of ¥125 million and a loss of ¥17.49 million [8]. Termination of M&A Plan - The M&A plan was ultimately terminated due to changes in the external environment and disagreements on certain commercial terms among the parties involved [9]. - Despite the failure of the M&A plan, the company stated that it gained experience for future technology industry layouts [9]. Overdue Financial Assistance - The overdue financial assistance was split into two payments, with only $6.81 million of the principal repaid by May 31, 2024, leaving $43.19 million overdue [10][12]. - The financial assistance was considered a critical part of the M&A plan, and the company initiated arbitration against the involved parties due to the overdue amount [12][13].

陶建伟及其一致行动人以4.18元/股（较市价溢价5.8%）向上海启烁转让5.03%股份（对应2310万股，总 价9655.8万元），同时将剩余14.91%股份的表决权委托给上海启烁行使。上海启烁仅支付不足1亿元现 金即获得19.94%表决权，成为控股股东，黄荣耀成为实控人。这种结构大幅降低收购成本，同时保留 原股东未来股权处置灵活性。 陶建伟自2022年宣布跨界光伏后，已通过四次套现收割超6亿元：2022年股权转让套现4.84亿元；2023 年初减持套现1.36亿元；此次控制权转让再获现金近亿元。其辞任董事长、引入协鑫系背景高管（后因 内幕交易被罚）等操作，已显露退出意图。 6月2日晚间，棒杰股份公告称，公司控股股东、实际控制人陶建伟及其一致行动人陶士青、持股5%以 上股东苏州青嵩与上海启烁睿行企业管理合伙企业（有限合伙）（下称"上海启烁"）签署《股份转让协 议》及《表决权委托协议》。本次交易完成后，棒杰股份的控股股东由陶建伟变更为上海启烁，实际控 制人将由陶建伟变更为黄荣耀。 同时，棒杰股份光伏业务主体扬州棒杰决定其生产线继续停产，复产时间未提及。 控制权变更：低价让渡与资本纾困的博弈 - 跨界转型≠市值捷 ...