AI播客：换个方式听新闻 下载mp3 音频由扣子空间生成 据外媒报道，美国总统特朗普的政府正评估如何对美联储12家地区联储施加更大影响，这可能使其触角 延伸到华盛顿人事任命之外。 如果特朗普罢免美联储理事库克的举动最终在法院站得住脚，他将有机会在七人组成的理事会中获得多 数席位。 但是，负责制定利率政策的联邦公开市场委员会（FOMC）还包括五位地区联储主席，由纽约联储主席 和其他11家地区联储主席中的4人轮流组成。与理事不同，他们不是由白宫提名，也无需参议院确认。 地区联储主席的选任与连任过程由地区联储银行董事会与理事会共同承担，政府若重新评估这一过程， 将标志着特朗普在其持续影响货币政策的行动中又迈出非同寻常的一步。而货币政策传统上在一定程度 上是隔绝政治压力的。 美联储理事会下次为地区联储主席"背书"的五年一次授权将在明年2月举行。在特朗普宣布罢免库克之 后，这一节点的重要性陡然上升。政府指控库克涉及抵押贷款欺诈。库克的律师周二表示，她将对这一 举动提出法律挑战。 据知情人士透露，今年夏初，部分地区联储主席已开始担心特朗普对美联储的计划可能影响他们的职 位。特朗普在当地时间周一晚间的声明进一步加剧了这种担 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Federal Reserve Board member Lisa Cook is suing President Donald Trump over his attempt to dismiss her, claiming he lacks the authority to do so [2][3]. Group 1: Legal and Political Context - Trump's dismissal of Cook was based on allegations of mortgage fraud, which Cook's lawyer argues lacks factual and legal basis [2]. - Cook is the first African American woman to serve on the Federal Reserve Board and has stated she will not resign [3]. - If Trump successfully removes Cook, he would control four out of seven seats on the Federal Reserve Board, significantly impacting its independence [3][5]. Group 2: Market Reactions - Following the news of Cook's dismissal, long-term U.S. Treasury bond prices fell, while short-term yields rose as investors speculated on potential interest rate cuts [3][7]. - The market is also focused on Nvidia's upcoming quarterly earnings report, which could influence large tech stock trading [7][11]. - The dollar index decreased by 0.3%, reflecting market sentiment amid the political developments [7]. Group 3: Broader Economic Implications - Analysts express concerns that Trump's actions could undermine the independence of the Federal Reserve, which may have long-term negative effects on market stability [8]. - The market is currently optimistic about potential interest rate cuts, as indicated by recent comments from Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell [7][8]. - Recent economic data, such as a rise in U.S. business equipment orders, suggests that companies are continuing to invest despite uncertainties in trade and tax policies [11].

Core Points - The Federal Reserve has stated that it will continue to fulfill its legal responsibilities and adhere to any court rulings regarding the dismissal of Cook [2][3] - Cook's attorney argues that Trump lacks the authority to dismiss her, claiming the action is baseless both factually and legally [3] - Trump announced the dismissal of Cook, citing alleged mortgage fraud as the reason, and indicated he would comply with any court decisions regarding her position [2][3] Group 1 - The Federal Reserve system was established by Congress to fulfill its statutory mission, including promoting maximum employment and price stability [2] - The long terms and protections against arbitrary dismissal for Federal Reserve Board members are crucial for ensuring that monetary policy decisions are based on data and the long-term interests of the American people [2] - The Federal Reserve reaffirms its commitment to transparency, accountability, and independence in serving American families, communities, and businesses [2] Group 2 - Cook intends to challenge her dismissal in court, asserting her right to continue serving as a confirmed member of the Federal Reserve Board [1][3] - The final decision on Cook's potential lawsuit could ultimately be made by the U.S. Supreme Court [3] - The Federal Reserve did not respond to inquiries about whether Cook was working remotely or at the headquarters in Washington, D.C. [4]

Core Viewpoint - The legal dispute surrounding the dismissal of Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook by President Trump raises significant questions about the authority of the President to remove members of the Federal Reserve Board and the implications for the independence of the Federal Reserve [2][11]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Implications - Lisa Cook's attorney announced plans to file a lawsuit against President Trump, asserting that he lacks the authority to dismiss her without just cause as defined by the Federal Reserve Act [2][5]. - The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 stipulates that the President can only remove a Federal Reserve Board member for "just cause," which has historically been interpreted as serious misconduct [2]. - Cook may seek an injunction to restore her position while the lawsuit is ongoing [3]. Group 2: Background of the Dismissal - The dismissal follows a criminal investigation initiated by the Department of Justice regarding allegations of false statements made by Cook in mortgage applications [4][5]. - Trump cited these allegations in his notification to Cook regarding her dismissal, claiming just cause for the action [5]. Group 3: Political Reactions and Future Implications - Trump's actions are seen as an escalation in his efforts to exert control over the Federal Reserve, potentially impacting monetary policy significantly [11]. - If Trump successfully replaces Cook, he would hold a majority on the seven-member Federal Reserve Board, which could lead to a shift in policy direction favoring interest rate cuts [11]. - Democratic lawmakers have condemned Trump's actions, framing them as an unlawful power grab that undermines the Federal Reserve's independence [12].

【贝森特为特朗普解职库克辩护：美联储独立性来源于政治安排】智通财经8月27日电，美国财长贝森 特在特朗普宣布将解雇美联储理事库克的一天后，为特朗普针对美联储的最新举措进行了辩护。"美联 储的独立性来自它与美国公众之间的一种政治安排。公众的信任是其唯一的信誉来源，"贝森特周二在 白宫内阁会议上表示，"而您，总统先生，正在恢复政府的信任。您正在清除浪费、欺诈和腐败，过去 的做事方式已经不再足够。"（第一财经） 转自：智通财经 ...

Core Viewpoint - The legal dispute surrounding the dismissal of Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook by President Trump raises significant questions about the authority of the President to remove members of the Federal Reserve Board and the implications for the independence of the Federal Reserve [2][11]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Implications - Lisa Cook's attorney announced plans to file a lawsuit against President Trump, asserting that he lacks the authority to dismiss her without just cause as defined by the Federal Reserve Act [2][5]. - The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 stipulates that the President can only remove a Federal Reserve Board member for "just cause," which has historically been interpreted as serious misconduct [2][11]. - Cook may seek an injunction to restore her position while the lawsuit is ongoing [3]. Group 2: Background of the Dismissal - The dismissal follows a criminal investigation by the Department of Justice into allegations of false statements made by Cook regarding mortgage applications [4][5]. - Trump cited these allegations in his notification of Cook's dismissal, claiming just cause for her removal [5][7]. Group 3: Political Reactions and Consequences - Trump's actions have been criticized by Democratic lawmakers, who view the dismissal as an attempt to undermine the Federal Reserve's independence and as a power grab [12]. - Analysts suggest that if Trump successfully replaces Cook, he could gain a majority on the seven-member Federal Reserve Board, which could significantly influence monetary policy [11][12]. Group 4: Federal Reserve's Response - The Federal Reserve has stated that it will comply with any court ruling regarding Cook's status and emphasized the importance of long-term terms for board members to ensure independent monetary policy decisions [10].

美国央行风暴：一场关于独立性的残酷较量 美国总统特朗普近期对美联储理事库克发起的罢免行动，不仅是针对个人的一次政治攻击，更是一场对现代货币政策独立性根基的严峻挑战。特朗普以"不 可想象"和"诚信问题"为由，公开斥责库克，并要求她"立刻辞职"。然而，库克并未沉默，她坚决回应："我不会因一条推文而被霸凌辞职。"此番遭遇，将 美联储内部的分歧、总统权力边界的模糊以及全球金融市场的潜在动荡，推到了公众视野的中心。 历史回响与法律基石 这场围绕美联储独立性的争议并非孤例。回溯至1935年，罗斯福总统试图罢免联邦贸易委员会委员汉弗莱，却被最高法院以"最高法院明确裁定：独立机构 委员不受总统任意撤换"为由驳回。这项近百年前的判例，至今仍是保护美联储独立性的坚实基石。根据1913年《联邦储备法》，美联储理事的任期长达14 年，总统仅能因"正当理由"解职，而"正当理由"历来被理解为涉及履职能力的重大道德或法律瑕疵，绝非政策分歧。 风暴中心：人事变动与权力格局 然而，特朗普的指控并非空穴来风。据披露，特朗普以库克在2021年签署的密歇根州和佐治亚州房产文件存在"双重承诺"为由，指责她可能涉嫌贷款欺诈。 若此项指控属实，确实可能构 ...

◎记者 黄冰玉 美联储独立性正面临挑战。当地时间8月25日，美国总统特朗普以一纸公开信宣布"立即解除"美联储理 事丽莎·库克的职务，意欲"洗牌"美联储理事会。 这场罢免风波，不仅将双方推向法律对抗的漩涡，更引发市场对美联储独立性的担忧。分析认为，这一 解雇行动是美国政治干预经济的标志性事件，反映了白宫对美联储的深层战略意图，无疑是对美联储独 立性和未来货币政策方向的重大挑战。 一纸公开信掀波澜 数日前，特朗普在社交媒体上曾对库克进行辞职施压。当地时间8月25日，特朗普再度向美联储发难 ——发布了一封致库克的公开信，宣布免除其职务"立即生效"。 信中援引美国宪法第二条及经修订的《1913年联邦储备法》相关条款，宣称已认定存在"正当理由"撤销 库克美联储理事职务。 具体来看，该指控涉及库克在金融事务中存在的"欺诈性和潜在犯罪性行为"。信中引用联邦住房金融局 提交的材料，指控库克在抵押贷款申请中虚报"主要住所"，在密歇根和佐治亚两州重复享受优惠贷款条 件。信中斥责其行为"不可想象"，质疑库克的诚信与担任监管者的资格。 事发数小时后，库克回应称，"法律上没有理由"将她从美联储解雇，将会继续履行职责。此前，库克已 多次 ...

来源：滚动播报 美国财长贝森特：美联储的独立性来自政治安排。 ...

Group 1 - The Federal Reserve Board member Lisa Cook is suing former President Donald Trump over his attempt to dismiss her, claiming he lacks the authority to do so [4][5] - Trump's dismissal of Cook was based on allegations of mortgage fraud, which Cook and her lawyer argue are unfounded and lack legal basis [5][6] - If Cook successfully challenges her dismissal, she could seek an injunction to restore her position during the lawsuit, which could impact the Federal Reserve's independence [8] Group 2 - Following Trump's announcement, long-term U.S. Treasury bond prices fell, while short-term yields decreased, indicating market speculation on potential interest rate cuts [6][11] - The market is also focused on Nvidia's upcoming quarterly earnings report, which is expected to influence trading in large tech stocks [11][12] - Recent economic data showed that U.S. business equipment orders in July exceeded expectations, suggesting continued investment despite trade and tax uncertainties [15]