Group 1: Report's Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the given content Group 2: Report's Core Viewpoints - In the neutral scenario, the increase in bond demand from the growth of fixed - income + fund scale may not offset the decrease in bond demand caused by the shrinkage of pure - bond fund scale. Credit bond and convertible bond demand will increase, while interest - rate bond, especially policy - financial bond, demand will significantly decline [1] - In the short term, the bond market has entered a volatile stage after the previous rebound. The core strategy is carry trade, with a focus on allocating safe assets such as 4 - 5 - year credit bonds, 5 - year treasury bonds, and 5 - 7 - year CDB bonds. In January, interest rates may still face upward pressure due to factors like the front - loaded issuance of government bonds and high CD renewal pressure in the first quarter [1][2][33] Group 3: Summary by Relevant Catalogs 1. How much bond demand does the growth of fixed - income + fund scale bring? - **1.1 Fixed - income + fund scale and bond - holding structure**: The growth of the equity market has driven up the profitability and scale of fixed - income + funds. From Q4 2024 to Q3 2025, the scale increased from 1.69 trillion yuan to 2.44 trillion yuan. The bond - holding scale of fixed - income + funds has generally risen, reaching 3.3 trillion yuan in Q3 2025 with a 16% QoQ increase. In contrast, the bond - holding scale of pure - bond funds declined to 7.9 trillion yuan in Q3 2025. Both types of funds mainly hold credit bonds, but fixed - income + funds have a higher convertible bond position and a lower policy - financial bond position [10][12] - **1.2 Estimation of the incremental bond demand brought by the growth of bond fund scale in 2026** - **1.2.1 Changes in bond demand due to the growth of fixed - income + fund scale**: Under pessimistic, neutral, and optimistic scenarios, the bond demand scales of fixed - income + funds in 2026 are 3 trillion yuan, 3.40 trillion yuan, and 3.95 trillion yuan respectively, with incremental demands of 2723 billion yuan, 6807 billion yuan, and 12253 billion yuan. The demand for credit bonds may increase significantly. In the neutral scenario, compared with Q4 2025, the increments of general credit bonds and financial bonds are 2740 billion yuan and 1751 billion yuan respectively [18] - **1.2.2 Changes in bond demand due to the shrinkage of pure - bond fund scale**: Under pessimistic, neutral, and optimistic scenarios, the bond demand scales of pure - bond funds in 2026 are 6.58 trillion yuan, 6.97 trillion yuan, and 7.35 trillion yuan respectively, with demand decreases of 11608 billion yuan, 7739 billion yuan, and 3869 billion yuan. The demand for general credit bonds and policy - financial bonds will decrease relatively more. In the neutral scenario, compared with Q4 2025, the changes in general credit bonds and policy - financial bonds are - 2268 billion yuan and - 3043 billion yuan respectively [24] - **1.2.3 Total incremental bond demand brought by fixed - income + funds and pure - bond funds**: In the neutral scenario, overall bond demand decreases. The increase in bond demand from fixed - income + funds may not offset the decrease from pure - bond funds. Credit bond and convertible bond demand increase, while interest - rate bond, especially policy - financial bond, demand decreases significantly. The total demand for credit bonds and interest - rate bonds decreases by 1455 billion yuan [30] - **1.3 Bond market outlook**: In the short term, the bond market is in a volatile stage, and the strategy focuses on carry trade and safe - asset allocation. In January, interest rates may face upward pressure, but it may also present a good allocation window [33] 2. Overview of credit bond yields - From December 22 - 26, 2025, credit bond yields showed mixed trends. General credit bonds like urban investment bonds and industrial bonds performed better than financial bonds, and medium - and high - rated bonds performed better than low - rated ones. Urban investment bonds and industrial bonds mainly saw yield declines, while the yields of other financial bonds showed mixed trends. Insurance sub - bonds had all - around yield declines [34][35] 3. Primary market - **3.1 Issuance volume**: The issuance volume of credit bonds decreased MoM but increased YoY this week. The net financing volume increased both MoM and YoY. The net financing volume of financial bonds increased MoM, while that of urban investment bonds and industrial bonds decreased [42] - **3.2 Issuance cost**: The average issuance interest rate of credit bonds increased. The average issuance interest rate of industrial bonds decreased MoM, while those of urban investment bonds and financial bonds increased. The significant increase in financial bond issuance rates was due to the issuance of some high - interest - rate bonds [51] - **3.3 Issuance term**: The average issuance term of credit bonds decreased MoM. The issuance terms of urban investment bonds and industrial bonds decreased, while that of financial bonds increased [55] - **3.4 Cancellation of issuance**: The number and scale of cancelled credit bond issuances decreased MoM. From December 22 - 26, 8 bonds were cancelled, 2 less than the previous week, and the cancelled issuance scale decreased by 27.54 billion yuan [59] 4. Secondary market - **4.1 Trading volume**: Except for insurance sub - bonds, the trading volumes of other credit bonds rebounded. The trading terms of urban investment bonds and industrial bonds lengthened, while those of bank secondary capital bonds and insurance sub - bonds shortened. The trading terms of bank perpetual bonds and securities firm sub - bonds shifted from the middle to both ends [64] - **4.2 Trading liquidity**: The turnover rates of credit bonds increased. For urban investment bonds, except for the 3 - year - and - below term, the turnover rates of other terms increased, with the 7 - 10 - year term having the largest increase. For industrial bonds, except for the 3 - year - and - below term and the 3 - 5 - year term, the turnover rates of other terms increased, with the 7 - 10 - year term having the largest increase. For financial bonds, except for the 7 - 10 - year term and the 3 - 5 - year term, the turnover rates of other terms increased, with the 10 - year - and - above term having the largest increase [67] - **4.3 Spread tracking**: This week, the spreads of 1 - year and 7 - year urban investment bonds mostly widened, while those of other terms mostly narrowed. The spreads of AAA - rated industrial bonds mostly narrowed, while those of AA - rated industrial bonds mostly widened. The spreads of bank secondary and perpetual bonds mostly widened, with short - term spreads widening more. The spreads of securities firm sub - bonds and insurance sub - bonds mostly narrowed [74][77][79] 5. Weekly hot bonds overview - The report selects the top 20 urban investment bonds, industrial bonds, and financial bonds in terms of liquidity scores for investors' reference [83] 6. Review of credit rating adjustments - According to domestic rating agencies, 3 bonds had their credit ratings upgraded this week, and no bonds had their ratings downgraded [89]

机构认为，5年国开依然关注活跃券250208和250203，以及5年国开-TF的对冲策略。6-7年利率可以考虑 220205附近国开，250018。30年国债方面，当前新老券利差依然偏高，利率较高的非活跃券具有较好的 持有价值，重点关注250002和25T2，结合流动性预期和博弈机会，建议可以更偏好250002。50年和流 动性较差的30年适合小仓位持有，但当前可能不是最佳时点，如果负债稳定可以考虑。10年国开 250220-250215利差在7BP左右，10年国债可以关注250016-250022利差在1BP左右，两者利差均相对合 理。后续关注250220和250022明年是否会继续续发，如果续发，其利率还有相对下行空间。当前建议更 多关注10年活跃券。浮息债方面，货币基金可以关注25农发清发09。也可以考虑25江苏银行债03BC和 25兴业银行绿色债03。 风险提示：基金有风险，投资需谨慎。基金管理人承诺以诚实信用、勤勉尽责的原则管理和运用基金资 产，但不保证本基金一定盈利，也不保证最低收益。基金管理人提醒投资人基金投资的"买者自负"原 则，在做出投资决策后，基金运营状况与基金净值变化引致的投资风险，由投 ...

2025 年 11 月 23 日 债券研究周报 [Table_Title] 30 年国债切券的来龙去脉 债券研究周报 最近一年走势 相关报告 《债券研究周报：债市低波横盘的几条线索*颜子 琦，洪子彦》——2025-11-17 《固定收益专题研究：基金拉久期的背后*颜子琦， 洪子彦》——2025-11-10 《固定收益点评：美元流动性危机来了吗？*颜子 琦，洪子彦》——2025-11-05 《债券研究周报：11 月债市有哪些机会？*颜子琦， 洪子彦》——2025-11-02 《债券研究周报：同业存单已到配置时机*颜子琦， 洪子彦》——2025-10-26 本篇报告解决了以下核心问题：1、近期债券市场行情复盘；2、近期机 构行为变化；3、后续债市行情展望。 投资要点: 国海证券研究所 请务必阅读正文后免责条款部分 研究所： 证券分析师： 颜子琦 S0350525090002 yanzq@ghzq.com.cn 证券分析师： 洪子彦 S0350525100001 hongzy@ghzq.com.cn | 1、 | 本周债市点评 | 5 | | --- | --- | --- | | 2、 | 债券收益率曲线跟踪 | ...

Core Insights - The report from Bank of America highlights an unprecedented surge in bond issuance by major U.S. tech giants, particularly the five leading cloud computing companies, which have collectively issued $121 billion in bonds this year, significantly surpassing the average annual issuance of $28 billion over the past five years [1][2][4] Group 1: Bond Issuance and Market Impact - The total bond issuance from the five major cloud computing companies (Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Oracle) has reached $121 billion in 2023, with $81 billion issued since September alone [2][4] - This surge in supply has led to a significant widening of bond spreads for these companies, with Oracle's spread increasing by 48 basis points, while Meta and Google saw increases of 15 and 10 basis points respectively, underperforming the overall investment-grade bond index which only rose by 3% [4][6] Group 2: Future Outlook and Investment Opportunities - Looking ahead, the bond issuance trend is expected to continue, with a projected issuance of around $100 billion in 2026, driven by varying capital expenditure needs among the cloud giants [6] - Despite the high issuance levels, the current widening of spreads may present attractive investment opportunities, as these companies are expected to cover most of their capital expenditures with operating cash flow [6]

Group 1: Overall Investment Rating - No investment rating information provided in the report. Group 2: Core Viewpoints - As of November 3, 2025, private - owned real estate bonds and industrial bonds in the outstanding credit bonds have higher overall valuation yields and spreads compared to other varieties. Yields of non - financial and non - real estate industrial bonds and real estate bonds have generally declined, and financial bond yields have also decreased [8]. Group 3: Summary by Directory 3.1 General Information on Outstanding Credit Bonds - The weighted average valuation yields of public urban investment bonds in Jiangsu and Zhejiang are below 2.55%, while those with yields over 4.5% are from district - level in Guizhou. Private urban investment bonds in coastal provinces like Shanghai, Zhejiang, Guangdong, and Fujian have weighted average valuation yields below 2.9%, and higher - yield varieties are in Guizhou, Yunnan, and Gansu [2]. - Compared with last week, yields of public urban investment bonds have generally declined, with the 3 - 5 - year varieties having an average decline of 9.7BP. Yields of private urban investment bonds have also generally declined, with the 3 - 5 - year varieties having an average decline of 10BP [2]. - Non - financial and non - real estate industrial bonds (state - owned enterprises): 3 - 5 - year private non - perpetual and perpetual bonds have declined by 10.2BP and 9.8BP respectively, and the decline of varieties within 1 year is mostly within 5BP. Real estate bonds: yields have all declined, with significant differentiation between within 1 year and over 1 year, and non - perpetual bonds such as 2 - 3 - year state - owned public, 3 - 5 - year state - owned private, and private - owned public have a decline of over 9BP [3][8]. - In financial bonds, urban and rural commercial bank capital replenishment tools and leasing company bonds have relatively high valuation yields and spreads. Yields of financial bonds have declined. For example, in leasing bonds, the 2 - 3 - year private perpetual bonds have a yield decline of 9.5BP [4][8]. 3.2 Public Urban Investment Bonds - The weighted average valuation yields of public urban investment bonds in Jiangsu and Zhejiang are low, and those in Guizhou district - level are high. Yields have generally declined compared with last week, and the curve has flattened, with the 3 - 5 - year varieties having a large average decline [2][15]. - Specific varieties with large yield declines include 1 - 2 - year non - perpetual bonds of Zhejiang provincial level, 2 - 3 - year non - perpetual bonds of Henan district - level, etc. [2][15]. 3.3 Private Urban Investment Bonds - The weighted average valuation yields of private urban investment bonds in coastal provinces are low, and those in Guizhou, Yunnan, and Gansu are high. Yields have generally declined compared with last week, with the 3 - 5 - year varieties having an average decline of 10BP [2][23]. - Specific varieties with large yield declines include 3 - 5 - year perpetual bonds of Fujian district - level, 1 - 2 - year non - perpetual bonds of Guizhou prefecture - level, etc. [23].

Group 1 - A key valuation metric for U.S. corporate bonds has reached its highest level in nearly three decades, following the Federal Reserve's first interest rate cut since 2024, prompting investors to lock in still high yields [1] - The risk premium for U.S. investment-grade corporate bonds has narrowed to just 72 basis points, marking a new low not seen in decades, with the spread previously touching 73 basis points in August, the lowest since 1998 [1] - High-grade bond average yields are currently at 4.76%, significantly above the average level of approximately 3.6% since 2010 [1] Group 2 - For most of the past three years, average yields have remained above 5% due to the Federal Reserve's rate hikes aimed at curbing post-pandemic inflation, which has driven demand from investors like pension plans that need to fund long-term liabilities [2] - The Federal Reserve's updated economic forecasts indicate two more 25 basis point rate cuts this year, which could further lower yields and heighten urgency among some investors [2] - The current environment of tight spreads is considered ideal, with solid fundamentals, strong demand, and no excessive supply pressure [2]

Core Viewpoint - The report suggests that weaker-than-expected Eurozone GDP data could lead to an expansion of government bond yield spreads in the Eurozone [1] Group 1: Economic Indicators - If the preliminary Eurozone GDP data, set to be released at 17:00 Beijing time, is below expectations, it may catalyze an increase in government bond yield spreads [1] - Currently, the yield spread has narrowed as investors view European assets as a safe haven amid trade tensions [1] Group 2: Market Dynamics - With the recent trade agreement between Europe and the U.S., the attractiveness of Eurozone government bonds may diminish [1] - The latest data from Tradeweb indicates that the yield difference between Italian and German 10-year government bonds stands at 84 basis points [1]

Report Overview - Report Date: July 28, 2025 [1] - Research Team: Fixed Income Research Team [2] - Analysts: Chen Xi, Liu Rui [3] Investment Rating - The report does not mention the industry investment rating. Core Views - Credit bond issuance and net financing have recovered, and trading activity has increased [1][4] - The science and technology innovation bond market is in the second half, with room for spread compression [4] - Credit strategy focuses on balancing coupon and risk, increasing allocation to short - term high - coupon city investment bonds and 3Y/AAA - secondary capital bonds [6] Summary by Directory Policy and Market Trends - On July 18, 2025, the Shenzhen Stock Exchange issued a notice on pilot corporate bond re - issuance and asset - backed securities expansion business, aiming to enhance market depth and optimize financing efficiency [4] - The science and technology innovation bond market is in the second half. Driven by the expansion of underlying assets and policy guidance in the second half of the year, there is still room for spread compression [4] Primary Issuance - From July 21 - 25, the issuance amount of general credit bonds was 351 billion yuan, a week - on - week increase of 70.9 billion yuan; net financing was 128 billion yuan, a week - on - week increase of 83 billion yuan [4] - Among them, the issuance amount of urban investment bonds was 107.7 billion yuan, a week - on - week increase of 10.9 billion yuan; net financing was 29.8 billion yuan, a week - on - week increase of 27.5 billion yuan [4] - The issuance amount of industrial bonds was 243.2 billion yuan, a week - on - week increase of 60.1 billion yuan; net financing was 98.2 billion yuan, a week - on - week increase of 55.8 billion yuan [4] - The weighted issuance term of general credit bonds was 4.21 years, a week - on - week increase of 0.88 years; the weighted issuance interest rate was 1.75%, a week - on - week decrease of 0.09 pct [4] Secondary Trading - The turnover rates of general credit bonds with maturities of less than 1 year and 1 - 3 years increased, while those of other maturities decreased [5] - The turnover rate of bank Tier 2 and perpetual bonds increased overall, with a significant increase in the AAA - level, and a decrease in the AA+ and AA levels [5] Spread Tracking - As of July 25, the average yields of medium - and short - term notes, urban investment bonds, secondary capital bonds, and perpetual bonds with AAA ratings at various maturities were at historically low levels [5] - For urban investment bonds, most spreads widened, except for some 3 - year and 5 - year varieties [5] - For bank Tier 2 and perpetual bonds, the spreads of 3Y and 5Y levels widened, while the 1Y spread narrowed [5] - Regionally, most provincial urban investment bond spreads widened, with Heilongjiang having the largest widening amplitude of 11BP [5] - In the industrial bond sector, most industry spreads narrowed or remained flat, except for the AA - level chemical and AA - level building materials industries [6] Credit Strategy - Balance coupon and risk, and give priority to short - term high - rating varieties. Pay attention to liquidity premium opportunities at the ultra - long end and beware of policy and credit event disturbances [6] - Increase allocation to short - term high - coupon urban investment bonds and industrial bonds with a duration of less than 3 years [6] - Enter the ultra - long - term credit bond market after interest rate adjustments, and focus on the liquidity premium of insurance sub - debt and science and technology innovation bond ETF component bonds [6] - For bank Tier 2 and perpetual bonds, pay attention to changes in the capital market and the overall sentiment of the credit bond allocation end when considering sector games [6]

Group 1 - The spread of high-grade dollar bonds in Asia has widened by at least 2 basis points [1] - The credit default swaps in Asia have also increased by at least 2 basis points [1]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Views of the Report - The 20Y Treasury bond market may not be over yet, with potential for the 20Y - 30Y spread to compress further, and the 20Y Treasury bond may be more cost - effective than the 50Y Treasury bond [2][3][12] - Investors can look for opportunities in some old bonds with certain liquidity and spread compression potential, but the follow - up odds of 230023 may be insufficient [3][13] - In the current bond market environment of extending duration and increasing leverage, there is no need to overly worry about reversal risks before the end of the month, and attention should be paid to the right - side response after sudden event shocks [4][6] 3. Summary by Directory 3.1 This Week's Institutional Behavior Review: Which Bonds Can Be Explored? - **Yield Curve**: Both Treasury and China Development Bank bond yields generally declined. For Treasury bonds, the 1Y yield dropped 4bp, 3Y dropped 3bp, 5Y dropped 4bp, 7Y dropped about 2bp, 10Y changed less than 1bp, 15Y dropped 3bp, and 30Y dropped 1bp. For China Development Bank bonds, the 1Y yield dropped about 1bp, 3Y dropped 2bp, 5Y dropped 3bp, 7Y and 10Y dropped about 2bp, 15Y dropped 5bp, and 30Y remained flat [15] - **Term Spread**: Treasury bond spreads showed deeper inversion and short - end spreads widened, while China Development Bank bond spreads had a differentiated trend with long - end spreads widening [18][19] 3.2 Bond Market Leverage and Funding Conditions - **Leverage Ratio**: The leverage ratio rose to 107.85%. As of June 20, it was about 107.85%, up 0.38pct from last Friday and 0.35pct from this Monday [21] - **Average Daily Repo Turnover**: The average daily turnover of pledged repos was 8.3 trillion yuan, with an average overnight share of 89.71%. The average daily turnover increased compared to last week [28] - **Funding Conditions**: Bank funding supply fluctuated upward. DR007 first rose and then fell, R007 first fell and then rose. 1YFR007 and 5YFR007 both declined [33][34] 3.3 Duration of Medium - and Long - Term Bond Funds - **Median Duration**: The median duration of medium - and long - term bond funds rose to 2.82 years (de - leveraged) and 3.07 years (including leverage). On June 20, the median duration (de - leveraged) was 2.82 years, up 0.04 years from last Friday; the median duration (including leverage) was 3.07 years, up 0.11 years from last Friday [44] - **Duration of Bond Fund Types**: The median duration of interest - rate bond funds (including leverage) remained at 3.69 years, up 0.02 years from last Friday; the median duration of credit bond funds (including leverage) rose to 2.88 years, up 0.15 years from last Friday [47] 3.4 Comparison of Generic Strategies - **Sino - US Yield Spread**: The overall Sino - US yield spread widened. The 1Y spread narrowed by about 2bp, while the 2Y, 3Y, 5Y, 7Y, and 10Y spreads widened [51] - **Implied Tax Rate**: The short - end implied tax rate widened, while the medium - and long - end narrowed [52] 3.5 Changes in Bond Lending Balances On June 20, the lending concentration trends of the active 10Y and 30Y Treasury bonds rose, while those of the second - active 10Y Treasury bond, the active 10Y China Development Bank bond, and the second - active 10Y China Development Bank bond declined [57]