北京时间9月11日晚，在降息预期推动下，美股高开高走，纳指一度站上22000点，再创历史新高。 截至22时30分，纳指涨0.41%，盘中一度站上22000点创新高，道琼斯指数涨超500点，突破46000点大关创历史新高，标普500指数涨0.58%。 | 美股指数 它 | | | | --- | --- | --- | | 道琼斯 | 纳斯达克 | 标普500 | | 46000.68 | 21978.85 | 6569.86 | | +509.76 +1.12% | +92.79 +0.42% | +37.82 +0.58% | | 中国金龙指数 | 纳指100期货 | 标普500期货 | | 8297.20 | 23955.00 | 6572.50 | | +144.70 +1.77% | +77.25 +0.32% | +32.75 +0.50% | 个股异动方面，甲骨文跌超4%。 | < W | 甲骨文(ORACLE) | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | ORCL.N | | | | | 313.165 量 2347.0万 股本 28.42亿 市盈 7 ...

Core Viewpoint - The current financial strain on middle and low-income consumers is likely to suppress their spending, which may mitigate the inflationary impact of tariffs [1] Group 1: Consumer Behavior - There are indications that consumers are more financially constrained than a few years ago, leading to potential reductions in consumption [1] - Consumers may accept price increases on essential goods but will likely respond by downgrading their consumption or delaying purchases in other areas [1] Group 2: Inflation Outlook - The inflation outlook is expected to be milder than previously anticipated, as consumers are no longer in a position of having ample cash and strong spending willingness as seen in 2022 [1] - By 2025, consumers are expected to feel financially tight, necessitating more careful budgeting [1]

今日周四（7月31日)亚盘时段，伦敦金目前交投于3295.79美元附近，涨幅0.37%，最高上探3295.8美元/盎司，最低触及3273.41美元/盎司。 目前来看，伦敦金短线偏向看涨走势。 消息面解读：美联储7月会议按兵不动，符合市场预期。有两位理事反对维持利率不变，但鲍威尔与多数官员倾向维持紧缩：他们认为关税 带来的通胀风险仍未解除，且劳动力市场依旧稳固，因此不具备降息条件。鲍威尔还强调了美联储独立性，暗示不会屈服于政治压力。我 们认为，未来几个月关税的通胀效应将进一步显现，美联储9月或难以降息，如果特朗普关税继续加码，降息时点还可能延后。至于特朗普 施压要求降息，我们认为市场低估了美联储维护独立性的决心。利率决议由12名票委共同决定，即便特朗普解雇了鲍威尔，也难以改变货 币政策走向。 今日月线收官，黄金月线级别还是保持着长上影线探顶之势，现在月尾金价高位回撤，现在的下影线并不突出，所以还有继续下探的可能 性；周线上，在3500的历史高位回撤以来，周线级别总体归于一个震荡，现在金价在周线布林带中轨获得短期支撑，亚欧盘先关注一下反 弹的力度后再去布空；日线级别上，最后一波的下跌是受制于欧美关税谈判后，现在走 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Federal Reserve's decision to maintain interest rates in September aligns with market expectations, despite dissent from two board members who advocate for a rate cut due to signs of labor market weakness [1][2][3] Group 1: Federal Reserve's Policy Signals - There is internal disagreement within the Federal Reserve regarding policy direction, as two board members voted against maintaining the current interest rate, marking the first time since 1993 that two members opposed a collective decision [2] - Powell and the majority of officials prefer to maintain a tightening stance, citing that the inflation effects from tariffs will gradually manifest over the coming months, impacting U.S. businesses and consumers [2][3] - Powell acknowledged that current monetary policy is somewhat restrictive, contributing to downward pressure on the labor market, but believes this is not sufficient to warrant a rate cut at this time [3] Group 2: Independence of the Federal Reserve - The Federal Reserve is committed to maintaining its independence, despite pressure from President Trump to lower interest rates, emphasizing that monetary policy aims to achieve full employment and stable inflation, not to assist the government in reducing debt costs [3][5] - The structure of the Federal Reserve's decision-making process, which involves a committee of 12 voting members, ensures that even if Trump were to dismiss Powell, the overall direction of monetary policy would remain unchanged [5] Group 3: Future Outlook on Interest Rates - The company predicts that the Federal Reserve is unlikely to be prepared for a rate cut in the near term, with future decisions dependent on inflation trends [4] - It is anticipated that inflation may rise in the latter half of the year, driven primarily by tariffs rather than overheating economic demand, suggesting that the Fed may choose to wait for inflation peaks before implementing any easing measures [4] - Given the relatively loose fiscal policy environment, economic growth and inflation are expected to remain sticky, leading to a prolonged period of tighter monetary policy [4]

中金研报称，美联储9月会议按兵不动，符合市场预期。有两位理事反对维持利率不变，但鲍威尔与多 数官员倾向维持紧缩：他们认为关税带来的通胀风险仍未解除，且劳动力市场依旧稳固，因此不具备降 息条件。鲍威尔还强调了美联储独立性，暗示不会屈服于政治压力。我们认为，未来几个月关税的通胀 效应将进一步显现，美联储9月或难以降息，如果特朗普关税继续加码，降息时点还可能延后。至于特 朗普施压要求降息，我们认为市场低估了美联储维护独立性的决心。利率决议由12名票委共同决定，即 便特朗普解雇了鲍威尔，也难以改变货币政策走向。 ...

金十数据7月31日讯，中金研报称，美联储9月会议按兵不动，符合市场预期。有两位理事反对维持利率 不变，但鲍威尔与多数官员倾向维持紧缩：他们认为关税带来的通胀风险仍未解除，且劳动力市场依旧 稳固，因此不具备降息条件。鲍威尔还强调了美联储独立性，暗示不会屈服于政治压力。我们认为，未 来几个月关税的通胀效应将进一步显现，美联储9月或难以降息，如果特朗普关税继续加码，降息时点 还可能延后。至于特朗普施压要求降息，我们认为市场低估了美联储维护独立性的决心。利率决议由12 名票委共同决定，即便特朗普解雇了鲍威尔，也难以改变货币政策走向。 中金：美联储9月或难以降息 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the current economic conditions in the U.S. and the implications for the Federal Reserve's monetary policy, particularly regarding interest rate decisions in light of inflation, employment, and trade agreements [2][3][10]. Group 1: Monetary Policy and Interest Rates - The probability of a rate cut in the upcoming Federal Reserve meeting is close to 0%, with a less than 60% chance for September, primarily due to stable employment and economic growth [2]. - Recent comments from Federal Reserve officials indicate a cautious approach to potential rate cuts, emphasizing the need for clearer economic signals before making decisions [3][10]. - The uncertainty surrounding tariffs has significantly decreased, which may influence the Fed's decision-making process regarding interest rates [5]. Group 2: Trade Agreements and Tariffs - The U.S. has reached trade agreements with key partners, including Japan and the EU, which has reduced uncertainty regarding tariffs [5]. - Current tariff levels are higher than before Trump's second term, but U.S. companies are absorbing some of these costs to maintain market share, indicating a potential impact on inflation [5]. - The article suggests that once tariffs are established, their inflation effects will be largely one-time and manageable, reducing the uncertainty that could hinder rate cuts [5][6]. Group 3: Inflation Trends - Current inflation levels have not shown significant increases, with the June CPI data indicating a year-over-year increase of 2.5% and core PCE inflation at 2.7% [7]. - Research indicates that inflation, excluding tariff impacts, is nearing the Fed's 2% target, suggesting that inflation concerns may not be a barrier to rate cuts [7][8]. Group 4: Employment and Economic Growth - Employment data shows signs of weakness, with only 147,000 new jobs added in June, primarily from government sectors, while private sector job growth appears stagnant [9]. - The article highlights concerns about the high unemployment rate among recent graduates and the potential for increased layoffs if labor demand continues to decline [9]. - Despite stable consumer spending and growth in the service sector, sectors sensitive to interest rates, such as manufacturing and real estate, are experiencing contraction, indicating a need for potential rate cuts to stimulate growth [9].

Group 1 - The current market is experiencing the end of the mid-year earnings forecast trend, with high forecast growth rates in certain industries leading to better market performance and upward adjustments in profit predictions [3][9][13] - Historical data indicates that the market's focus on mid-year earnings typically increases from June, peaking in early July before declining, suggesting a shift in market direction is imminent [3][9][13] Group 2 - The impact of tariffs on inflation is becoming evident in the U.S., with high dependency sectors seeing significant CPI increases, although the full effects of tariffs may not yet be realized [4][17][19] - Inventory levels are acting as a buffer for price transmission, with wholesalers being the main force behind inventory replenishment in the U.S. this year [4][17][19] - Approximately 75% of U.S. companies are likely to pass on increased costs due to tariffs to consumers, indicating potential inflationary pressures [20][23][28] Group 3 - In China, the GDP growth for Q2 2025 was 5.2%, slightly above expectations, but concerns about demand weakness persist, particularly in consumption and investment [4][39][41] - The export structure is changing, with a notable increase in the export growth rates of capital goods and intermediate goods, while some consumer goods are seeing a decline [39][40][41] - The differentiation between large and small enterprises is intensifying, with larger firms improving their market concentration and profitability outlook [41][42] Group 4 - The report suggests that despite short-term economic disturbances, the path for return on equity (ROE) in China is becoming clearer, driven by anti-involution policies and a stronger manufacturing sector [4][41][46] - Recommendations for asset allocation include focusing on upstream resource products and capital goods that benefit from both domestic policies and international demand [4][46]

Overview - The core CPI data for June in the US was slightly weaker than expected, but the inflation effects of tariffs are becoming more evident [3][7][38] - The June CPI year-on-year was 2.7%, slightly above the market expectation of 2.6%, while the core CPI was 2.9%, matching expectations [3][38] - The market reacted to the data with a temporary decline in the 10Y Treasury yield and the US dollar index, which later recovered, indicating a focus on future inflation expectations [11][38] Structure - The main drivers of the CPI rebound include rising oil prices, core goods (excluding new and used cars), and non-rent services [4][39] - The energy CPI for June increased by 0.9% month-on-month, recovering from a previous decline of -1.0%, reflecting global oil price increases [4][39] - Core goods inflation showed signs of warming, with a month-on-month increase of 0.2%, driven by clothing, toys, and audio-visual equipment, indicating the impact of tariffs [20][39] - Rent inflation slightly slowed to 0.2% month-on-month, while core non-rent service inflation rebounded, particularly in medical, transportation, and entertainment services [4][39] Outlook - The second half of the year may see continued upward pressure on inflation, with the third quarter being a critical verification period for tariff inflation effects [5][28][40] - The Federal Reserve is expected to initiate rate cuts in September, with two cuts anticipated within the year, despite potential inflation increases [5][34][40] - The combination of moderate inflation increases and weakening employment may influence the Fed's decision-making [34][40]

Overview - The U.S. June core CPI data was slightly weaker than expected, with a year-on-year increase of 2.9% against a market expectation of 2.9% and a month-on-month increase of 0.2% compared to an expected 0.3%[2] - The overall CPI for June rose by 2.7% year-on-year, slightly above the expected 2.6%, and increased by 0.3% month-on-month, matching expectations[2] Inflation Drivers - The main contributors to the CPI rebound were rising oil prices, core goods (excluding new and used cars), and non-rent services[22] - The energy CPI increased by 0.9% month-on-month in June, recovering from a previous decline of -1.0%, reflecting global oil price increases[22] Core Goods and Services - Core goods CPI rose by 0.2% month-on-month in June, indicating a warming in core goods inflation, with clothing, toys, and audio-visual equipment showing upward trends[24] - However, the used car CPI fell by -0.7% month-on-month, although future trends may indicate a rebound according to the Manheim used car index[24] Future Outlook - The second half of the year may see further inflationary pressures, particularly in the third quarter, which is expected to be a critical verification period for tariff-induced inflation effects[35] - The combination of rising tariff revenues and strong cost-pass-through willingness from U.S. companies suggests that inflation may enter an upward trajectory[35] Federal Reserve Actions - The Federal Reserve is expected to initiate interest rate cuts in September, with two rate cuts anticipated within the year, despite potential inflationary pressures in the third quarter[39] - The labor market is showing signs of weakness, with private sector employment slowing down, which may influence the Fed's decision-making[39] Risks - Potential risks include escalating geopolitical conflicts, unexpected economic slowdowns in the U.S., and the Federal Reserve adopting a more hawkish stance if inflation proves more resilient than anticipated[41]