Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the challenges faced by the Shanghai Composite Index in breaking through the 3400-point barrier, highlighting the current high valuation levels and the lack of supportive policies or improved earnings expectations as key obstacles [4][10]. Valuation Analysis - The static PE ratio of the Wind All A (excluding financials) is currently at 31.51 times, which is at the 49th percentile since 2000, the 54th percentile over the past decade, and the 100th percentile over the last three years, indicating that the market is nearing its high tolerance for valuations [6][10]. - Compared to global equity markets, the valuation of Wind All A (excluding financials) is relatively high, with the Nasdaq at 44 times, S&P 500 (excluding financials) at approximately 30 times, and the Hang Seng Tech Index at 21 times, suggesting that A-shares lack a solid foundation to maintain levels above 3400 points [9][10]. Market Conditions - The article emphasizes that without new incremental policy support or significant improvements in earnings expectations, the market is unlikely to sustain levels above 3400 points. Current trade environment pressures limit the feasibility of large-scale policy stimulus [10]. - The Producer Price Index (PPI) has shown a continuous decline, with a year-on-year drop of 3.3% in May, indicating that A-share earnings are unlikely to improve in the near term [10]. Future Market Outlook - The market is expected to experience volatility, with a higher probability of downward movement. The focus will likely shift towards sectors with more predictable earnings, suggesting a strategy of seeking certainty and avoiding underperforming stocks [10][11]. - In the absence of significant changes in policies or PPI, a notable rise in the Shanghai Composite Index above 3400 points would be seen as a signal to reduce positions rather than increase them [11]. Structural Opportunities - The article outlines different market styles based on historical data since 2015, indicating that stable styles (e.g., utilities, consumer staples) are favored during external risks or tightening policies, while cyclical styles (e.g., materials, industrials) thrive in improving economic conditions [13][14]. - Growth styles (e.g., technology, emerging industries) depend on upward industry trends, policy support, and liquidity, while consumer styles are closely tied to economic recovery and consumer confidence [15][16]. - Currently, the market environment is characterized by weak earnings and low capital inflows, which is unfavorable for cyclical, growth, and consumer styles, but relatively beneficial for stable and financial styles [19]. Investment Recommendations - The article suggests a balanced allocation strategy, focusing on sectors with potential marginal improvements such as petrochemicals, brokerages, non-ferrous metals, military, and electric power, as well as industries aligned with policy and industry trends like AI applications, gaming, communication, and semiconductors [19].

Core Viewpoint - Major industry ETFs in the US are mostly down, with global airline and regional banking ETFs dropping over 2%, and banking ETFs nearly down 2% [1] Group 1: Industry Performance - Global airline industry ETF is priced at $21.87, down by $0.55 (-2.45%), with a trading volume of 620,500 shares and a year-to-date decline of 13.73% [2] - Regional banking ETF is priced at $56.56, down by $1.22 (-2.11%), with a trading volume of 2,409,700 shares and a year-to-date decline of 5.66% [2] - Banking ETF is priced at $53.16, down by $1.05 (-1.94%), with a trading volume of 110,800 shares and a year-to-date decline of 3.48% [2] - Financial sector ETF is priced at $50.09, down by $0.92 (-1.79%), with a trading volume of 5,092,500 shares and a year-to-date increase of 4.01% [2] Group 2: Other Sector Performance - Semiconductor ETF is priced at $259.13, down by $4.02 (-1.53%), with a trading volume of 833,400 shares and a year-to-date increase of 7.00% [2] - Global technology stock ETF is priced at $87.17, down by $0.97 (-1.10%), with a trading volume of 7,682 shares and a year-to-date increase of 2.86% [2] - Biotechnology index ETF is priced at $127.94, down by $1.06 (-0.82%), with a trading volume of 248,700 shares and a year-to-date decline of 3.15% [2] - Consumer discretionary ETF is priced at $212.08, down by $1.63 (-0.76%), with a trading volume of 253,000 shares and a year-to-date decline of 5.21% [2] - Energy sector ETF is priced at $87.38, up by $0.79 (+0.91%), with a trading volume of 7,943,300 shares and a year-to-date increase of 2.80% [2]

Group 1 - The issuance of the "Opinions" allows companies in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange to also list on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, marking a deepening of the interconnection mechanism of China's capital markets from the "trading end" to the "issuance end" [1][2] - This reform is expected to facilitate domestic financing for red-chip companies and the return of Chinese concept stocks, accumulating "Bay Area experience" for institutional innovation [1][2] - The policy aims to address the challenges of cross-border capital flow and institutional differences, enhancing regional synergy and promoting the dual listing mechanism to meet corporate financing needs [2][3] Group 2 - As of June 11, there are 2,636 H-share listed companies, with 1,589 of them registered in the Greater Bay Area, accounting for over 60% of the total and a market capitalization of approximately 20.72 trillion yuan, which is 32.23% of the total H-share market [3] - The characteristics of H-share companies in the Greater Bay Area include industry diversification, a concentration of well-known enterprises, and a strong demand for flexible financing environments due to international business needs [3][4] - Listing on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange is expected to enrich the industry matrix and types of companies in the Shenzhen market, optimizing the valuation system and enhancing the attractiveness of the A-share market to domestic and foreign investors [3][4]

Group 1 - Major industry ETFs in the US stock market mostly rose, with Energy ETFs and Biotechnology Index ETFs increasing over 1%, and Healthcare ETFs rising nearly 1% [1] Group 2 - Energy ETF (XLE) current price is $84.77, up by $1.20 (+1.44%), with a trading volume of 1.824 million shares and a total market value of $21.228 billion, showing a year-to-date change of -0.27% [2] - Biotechnology Index ETF (IBB) current price is $128.88, up by $1.29 (+1.01%), with a trading volume of 122,100 shares and a total market value of $10.233 billion, reflecting a year-to-date change of -2.43% [2] - Healthcare ETF (XLV) current price is $135.14, up by $0.99 (+0.74%), with a trading volume of 304,000 shares and a total market value of $25.860 billion, indicating a year-to-date change of -1.39% [2] - Semiconductor ETF (SMH) current price is $258.06, up by $1.10 (+0.43%), with a trading volume of 166,700 shares and a total market value of $3.051 billion, showing a year-to-date change of +6.56% [2] - Global Technology ETF (IXN) current price is $87.20, up by $0.23 (+0.26%), with a trading volume of 4,806 shares and a total market value of $1.221 billion, reflecting a year-to-date change of +2.89% [2] - Utilities ETF (XLU) current price is $80.86, up by $0.19 (+0.24%), with a trading volume of 531,700 shares and a total market value of $11.739 billion, indicating a year-to-date change of +7.59% [2] - Consumer Staples ETF (XLP) current price is $81.77, up by $0.19 (+0.23%), with a trading volume of 352,400 shares and a total market value of $13.837 billion, reflecting a year-to-date change of +4.57% [2] - Internet Index ETF (FDN) current price is $260.81, up by $0.39 (+0.15%), with a trading volume of 3,871 shares and a total market value of $17.318 billion, indicating a year-to-date change of +7.25% [2] - Consumer Discretionary ETF (XLY) current price is $213.94, down by $0.07 (+0.03%), with a trading volume of 77,139 shares and a total market value of $26.872 billion, showing a year-to-date change of -4.38% [2] - Technology Sector ETF (XLK) current price is $239.56, up by $0.03 (+0.01%), with a trading volume of 161,100 shares and a total market value of $76.193 billion, reflecting a year-to-date change of +3.21% [2] - Banking ETF (KBE) current price is $54.36, unchanged (0.00%), with a trading volume of 28,542 shares and a total market value of $4.208 billion, indicating a year-to-date change of -1.30% [2] - Regional Banking ETF (KRE) current price is $58.30, down by $0.01 (-0.01%), with a trading volume of 295,200 shares and a total market value of $4.866 billion, reflecting a year-to-date change of -2.75% [2] - Financials ETF (XLF) current price is $50.90, down by $0.10 (-0.19%), with a trading volume of 817,600 shares and a total market value of $56.655 billion, indicating a year-to-date change of +5.70% [2] - Global Airlines ETF (JETS) current price is $23.24, down by $0.08 (-0.34%), with a trading volume of 16,867 shares and a total market value of $73.206 million, reflecting a year-to-date change of -8.32% [2]

Core Viewpoint - The performance of major industry ETFs in the U.S. stock market is mixed, with semiconductor ETFs showing significant gains while financial sector ETFs are declining [1]. Group 1: Semiconductor Sector - Semiconductor ETF increased by 2.28%, reaching a price of $258.50, with a trading volume of 205.80 million shares and a total market value of $30.56 billion [2]. - Year-to-date performance for the semiconductor ETF is up by 6.74% [2]. Group 2: Regional Banks - Regional bank ETF rose by 0.94%, priced at $58.56, with a trading volume of 183.49 million shares and a total market value of $48.87 billion [2]. - Year-to-date performance for the regional bank ETF is down by 2.31% [2]. Group 3: Financial Sector - Financial sector ETF decreased by 0.86%, priced at $50.84, with a trading volume of 521.25 million shares and a total market value of $565.87 billion [2]. - Year-to-date performance for the financial sector ETF is up by 5.58% [2]. Group 4: Technology Sector - Technology sector ETF increased by 0.89%, priced at $240.49, with a trading volume of 119.49 million shares and a total market value of $764.89 billion [2]. - Year-to-date performance for the technology sector ETF is up by 3.61% [2].

金融界6月6日消息，A股三大指数收盘涨跌不一，中证苏银理财长三角创新指数 (苏银理财长三角， 931559)下跌0.05%，报1822.5点，成交额312.53亿元。 从指数持仓来看，中证苏银理财长三角创新指数十大权重分别为：澜起科技（6.44%）、海康威视 （4.83%）、国电南瑞（4.75%）、中微公司（4.45%）、联影医疗（4.23%）、沪电股份（3.63%）、思 源电气（3.47%）、恒生电子（3.12%）、新和成（2.58%）、天孚通信（2.3%）。 从中证苏银理财长三角创新指数持仓的市场板块来看，上海证券交易所占比56.30%、深圳证券交易所 占比43.70%。 从中证苏银理财长三角创新指数持仓样本的行业来看，信息技术占比43.30%、工业占比28.45%、医药 卫生占比16.07%、通信服务占比6.62%、可选消费占比4.08%、原材料占比1.48%。 资料显示，中证苏银理财长三角创新指数的样本每半年调整一次，样本调整实施时间分别为每年6月和 12月的第二个星期五的下一交易日。权重因子随样本定期调整而调整，调整时间与指数样本定期调整实 施时间相同。在下一个定期调整日前，权重因子一般固定不变。特 ...

Group 1: IPO Market Overview - The number of new IPOs in Hong Kong increased by 7 from the previous year, with total fundraising exceeding 710 million HKD in the first five months of 2025[3] - A+H shares accounted for over 70% of the total fundraising in 2025, with 5 A+H IPOs contributing 503 million HKD[45] - The average first-day premium for new listings rose to 10.8% in 2025, compared to 8.6% in 2024, while the first-day break rate decreased to 29%[64] Group 2: Investor Participation and Trends - Public subscription enthusiasm has increased, with 70% of projects triggering a reallocation mechanism in 2025[62] - The average effective subscription multiple for public offerings reached 688 times in 2025, indicating strong demand[62] - The allocation for cornerstone investors has remained above 40% since 2022, while the share for anchor investors has decreased to around 40%[32] Group 3: Valuation and Performance - The average initial valuation for new listings dropped from 27 times in 2024 to 19 times in 2025, marking a significant decline[3] - A+H new shares have generally been issued at a discount compared to their A-share counterparts, although the discount rate has narrowed recently[54] - The average first-day return for A+H shares in 2025 was notably strong, with no instances of breakage among the five listings[66]

从中证香港美国上市中美科技指数持仓的市场板块来看，纳斯达克全球精选市场证券交易所 (Consolidated Issue)占比41.82%、香港证券交易所占比35.21%、纽约证券交易所占比21.28%、纳斯达克 证券交易所(Consolidated Capital Market)占比1.69%。 从中证香港美国上市中美科技指数持仓样本的行业来看，信息技术占比39.19%、可选消费占比 20.43%、医药卫生占比15.96%、通信服务占比14.29%。 资料显示，指数样本每半年调整一次，样本调整实施时间分别为每年6月和12月的第二个星期五的下一 交易日。权重因子随样本定期调整而调整，调整时间与指数样本定期调整实施时间相同。在下一个定期 调整日前，权重因子一般固定不变。特殊情况下将对指数进行临时调整。如果新上市中国和美国科技公 司市值分别在中国样本公司和美国样本公司中排名前五，将在其上市第十一个交易日快速纳入指数。当 样本退市时，将其从指数样本中剔除。样本公司发生收购、合并、分拆等情形的处理，参照计算与维护 细则处理。 数据统计显示，中证香港美国上市中美科技指数近一个月上涨4.77%，近三个月上涨2.89%，年 ...

Core Viewpoint - The manufacturing sector showed mild recovery in May, with the manufacturing PMI rising by 0.5 points to 49.5, slightly above the seasonal average. However, this increase is not strong considering the low base from April due to tariff impacts. The absolute value of 49.5 is only better than May 2019 and May 2023 in the past decade [1][7][8]. Manufacturing Sector Analysis - In May, the manufacturing sectors that improved can be categorized into three types: emerging manufacturing (computer communication electronics, electrical machinery), essential consumer agricultural products, and the petrochemical industry chain (petrochemical refining, chemicals, synthetic fibers, and plastics) [2][9]. - The macroeconomic clues behind these improvements include: the cancellation of high tariffs leading to better export orders, the continued effects of domestic "two new" policies, and demand growth from the AI industry. The sectors experiencing significant downturns are mainly in the construction chain and optional consumer goods [2][9]. - The electrical machinery sector is leading in terms of prosperity, with a PMI above 55, benefiting from rapid growth in new energy and new energy vehicles, as well as policy dividends from "two new" initiatives [3][11]. Emerging Industries - Emerging industries such as new generation information technology, new materials, high-end equipment, and energy-saving and environmental protection sectors showed improved prosperity in May. This is attributed to the rebound in external demand and domestic policy support [3][12]. - The biological industry remains the weakest, with a significant decline in export orders continuing from April [3][12]. Construction Sector Insights - The construction industry in May is characterized by "infrastructure improvement and real estate drag." Civil engineering construction saw a continuous improvement for two months, while the real estate chain showed weakness across all stages [4][15]. - The construction activity index decreased by 0.9 points to 51.0 in May, indicating a slowdown in the real estate sector [14][16]. Service Sector Performance - The service sector saw a slight improvement, with the PMI rising by 0.1 points to 50.2. Key drivers include travel-related sectors benefiting from the May Day holiday and a rebound in the water transport industry [6][17]. - The information technology service sector continues to perform well, driven by trends such as "AI+" and online consumption [6][17]. Summary of Key Insights - The "two new" policies are concentrated in sectors benefiting from tariff reductions, such as electrical machinery and computer electronics, which currently show high prosperity [5][6]. - The new generation information technology sector leads in emerging industries, while the service sector's IT services maintain a leading position [5][6]. - External uncertainties continue to impact sectors like textiles, pharmaceuticals, and biotechnology, as indicated by their performance data [5][6]. - The construction sector is experiencing a rise in prosperity due to accelerated issuance of special bonds and project implementations, although upstream material sectors remain under pressure due to real estate slowdowns [5][6].

Core Viewpoint - The Zhongzheng Guangyin Wealth Management Hong Kong-Shenzhen Technology Leaders Index has shown a mixed performance, with a recent increase but a decline over the past three months, indicating volatility in the technology sector [1][2] Group 1: Index Performance - The Zhongzheng Guangyin Wealth Management Hong Kong-Shenzhen Technology Leaders Index rose by 1.15% to 2180.95 points, with a trading volume of 91.926 billion yuan [1] - Over the past month, the index has increased by 1.53%, while it has decreased by 6.24% over the last three months, and it has risen by 9.71% year-to-date [1] Group 2: Index Composition - The index comprises 50 large-cap listed companies from the information technology, biomedicine, and high-end manufacturing sectors, reflecting the overall performance of technology leaders in the mainland and Hong Kong markets [1] - The top ten holdings in the index include Alibaba-W (11.98%), Tencent Holdings (10.74%), Xiaomi Group-W (10.53%), CATL (8.42%), BYD Company (5.81%), and others [1] - The market distribution of the index holdings shows that the Hong Kong Stock Exchange accounts for 49.63%, the Shenzhen Stock Exchange for 28.12%, and the Shanghai Stock Exchange for 22.25% [1] Group 3: Industry Breakdown - The industry composition of the index holdings includes 31.19% in information technology, 23.16% in consumer discretionary, 18.11% in industrials, 15.02% in communication services, and 12.53% in healthcare [2] - The index samples are adjusted biannually, with adjustments occurring on the next trading day after the second Friday of June and December [2]