【导读】私募出海风再起，券商竞逐相关业务 中国基金报记者 吴君 见习记者 舍梨 伴随着市场回暖，今年以来，私募出海风再起，多家私募取得香港9号牌，同时，一些私募获 得了海外机构资金青睐，将所募资金投向A股市场。 受访机构表示，中国市场的配置价值让私募出海更有"底气"，同时，通过全球化布局，私募 能够拓展多市场、多策略的收益来源。不少中资海外券商、外资券商积极竞逐私募出海业 务，提供牌照申请、资金募集、融资融券、交易等多种服务。当前，私募出海机遇与挑战并 存，私募需要专注于提升运营能力和积累海外基金投资业绩。 私募出海提速： 从牌照布局到竞争力构建 今年以来，黑翼资产、前海博普资产、磐松资产等量化私募获得了香港9号牌照，为未来业务 出海拿下许可证。据私募排排网统计，截至今年7月21日，已获得9号牌照且牌照为存续状态 的私募共有87家，其中，主观私募有58家，量化私募有20家，"主观+量化"的私募有9家。 "据我了解，今年有几家私募拿到了中东、欧洲的资金，如养老金、主权基金等长线资金。与 此同时，一些海外机构投资人想接触和了解优质的中国管理人，因为现在他们对中国市场兴 趣浓厚，希望积极配置。"一家中资券商的市场人 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that over 90% of billion-level private equity firms have achieved positive returns this year, indicating a strong profit effect and increased capital inflow into the market [1][2] - As of the end of July, the average return for billion-level private equity firms with performance disclosures is over 16%, with a positive return ratio of 98% [2][3] - The number of billion-level private equity firms has increased to 90, reflecting an expanding tier of firms benefiting from structural market opportunities [1][2] Group 2 - Quantitative private equity firms are leading in performance, with an average return of 18.92% and a 100% positive return ratio, compared to 13.59% and 93.75% for subjective private equity firms [3] - The private equity issuance market has significantly rebounded, with 1,298 private equity securities investment funds registered in July, an 18% increase from the previous month [4] - Major billion-level private equity firms are maintaining aggressive positions and actively adjusting their portfolios to seize structural opportunities in the market [4][6] Group 3 - Companies are focusing on sectors such as technology, innovative pharmaceuticals, non-ferrous metals, new consumption, and non-bank financials, with a high portfolio allocation of over 80% [5][6] - The current market environment is expected to continue providing structural opportunities for Chinese equity assets, supported by increased capital inflow and ongoing policy effects [6]

Core Viewpoint - The quantitative private equity industry is experiencing renewed interest, with trading commission rates and rebate issues becoming focal points [1] Group 1: Trading Commission Rates - The trading commission rates for quantitative private equity firms generally range from 0.01% to 0.015%, with significant variations based on the firm's scale, strategy, and business relationships [1][2] - Larger quantitative firms, due to their high trading frequency and capital scale, often negotiate lower base trading rates, typically between 0.01% and 0.02% [2] - Smaller firms, despite having lower management scales, also engage in high-frequency trading, leading to substantial trading volumes [2] - The commission structure can be viewed as a combination of fixed and variable rates, with the breakeven point for trading commissions generally set around 0.012% [3] Group 2: Cost Implications - A quantitative private equity firm with a scale of 10 billion yuan and an annual turnover rate exceeding 200 times could incur annual trading commission expenses of approximately 200 million yuan, assuming an average commission rate of 0.01% [4] - Recent regulatory changes have significantly increased high-frequency trading costs, compelling firms to reduce trading frequency and turnover rates [4] Group 3: Compliance and Rebate Issues - Commission rebates are explicitly prohibited by regulations, raising compliance concerns within the industry [5] - The return of commissions not only violates regulatory guidelines but also reflects a lack of internal risk control and compliance mechanisms [6] - Various regulations, including the Securities Brokerage Business Management Measures, explicitly forbid the return of commissions or any form of non-compliant incentives to investors [6][7]

Core Viewpoint - A significant commission rebate scandal involving the domestic quantitative private equity firm, Huansheng Quantitative, has emerged, with the case amounting to 118 million yuan over six years, drawing considerable market attention due to its connection with the DeepSeek AI model [1][3]. Group 1: Case Details - The scandal involves Huansheng Quantitative's marketing director, Li Cheng, who allegedly colluded with a brokerage manager from 2018 to 2023 to fabricate broker identities, directing trades to a designated brokerage to siphon off 40% of the commission as performance bonuses, totaling 118 million yuan, with over 20 million yuan directly benefiting Li Cheng [3]. - Several individuals involved in the case have been handed over to judicial authorities for further investigation [3]. Group 2: Company Response - Huansheng Quantitative has stated that Li Cheng's actions were personal and not representative of the company's practices, asserting that the company was unaware of any rebate activities and has not been contacted by regulatory bodies [5]. - The company emphasized that all its cooperation channels operate under the same fee structure, which is considered to be at a relatively low level within the industry [5]. Group 3: Industry Context - The practice of "brokerage rebates" typically involves brokers returning a portion of commissions to investors based on trading volume, which can lead to conflicts of interest and corruption issues [8]. - In the quantitative private equity sector, high-frequency trading can result in substantial commission rebates, with some brokers offering rebates ranging from 0.01% to 0.03% of trading volume, which can accumulate to significant amounts depending on the trading volume [8]. Group 4: Company Background - Huansheng Quantitative, founded by Liang Wenfeng, is a leading player in China's quantitative investment space, managing two billion-level private equity platforms and reaching a scale of 100 billion yuan in 2021 [10]. - The firm has recently ventured into the general artificial intelligence sector with the establishment of DeepSeek in April 2023, planning to launch its AI model by January 2025 [10].

靖奇投资的股东之争，似有愈演愈烈之势。 近日，靖奇投资公众号发布了《关于非法使用法人印章及合作机构尽职调查义务的声明》（简称《声明》）。《声明》称，公司存在人员未经法定代表人 范思奇授权，非法使用伪造法人印章及冒用法人签名的情形，且目前公司印章由法人范思奇依法管理。 对此，靖奇投资股东、风险控制官唐靖人称，公司公众号于8月6日被人挂失，唯一有权限的是当前靖奇投资法人的范思奇；但事实上，公司并不存在范思 奇所说的伪造印章之事，且已经紧急召开临时股东会会议，免除范思奇的公司执行董事、法定代表人职务。 不同股东各执一词背后，究竟发生了什么？ 公开资料显示，靖奇投资的股东之争始于两个月前。6月，范思奇曾发文称卸任靖奇投资基金经理职务，但不久便再次以"十年努力，一朝背刺"为标题发 文表示自己被踢出公司。7月末，范思奇又发布《关于近期市场传言的事实说明》，表示公司其他两位股东从未与其本人直接沟通过任何股权转让事宜。 而唐靖人则称，一直在试图和范思奇进行沟通。 近日，靖奇投资公众号发布《声明》称，近期，公司发现存在人员未经法定代表人范思奇授权，非法使用伪造法人印章及冒用法人签名，擅自进行基金设 立、清盘、证券账户开立等关键 ...

Group 1 - On August 8, the China Interbank Market Dealers Association issued five penalties related to violations in the primary bond issuance process [1] - The penalties involved one credit rating agency, one futures company, and three private equity firms, two of which had their private fund manager registrations revoked [1][4] - The penalties highlight issues of non-compliance and misconduct in the bond market, particularly concerning the role of private equity firms in assisting issuers with non-market-based bond issuance [4][5] Group 2 - Zhongzheng Pengyuan Credit Rating Co., Ltd. received a warning for multiple violations, including sending rating upgrade proposals to potential rated entities and failing to maintain the required separation between rating analysts and marketing personnel [3] - The association mandated a comprehensive rectification of the issues identified, emphasizing the importance of independence and objectivity in credit rating practices [3] - The penalties reflect a broader concern regarding potential conflicts of interest within credit rating agencies and the need for stringent adherence to professional standards [3] Group 3 - Four of the penalized institutions were involved in assisting issuers with illegal bond issuance, violating principles of fairness and transparency in the market [4] - Shanghai Fuxi Asset Management Co. and Jiangsu Yuning Private Fund Management Co. were specifically noted for facilitating non-market-based issuance and charging significant fees for their services [4][5] - The actions of these firms have been described as disruptive to market order, with a trend of private equity firms engaging in similar misconduct leading to multiple disciplinary actions in recent years [5][6]

Group 1 - The meeting between Russian President Putin and US President Trump is scheduled for August 15 in Alaska, focusing on achieving long-term peace in Ukraine [10][11] - The Chinese National Bureau of Statistics reported that the Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose by 0.4% month-on-month in July, while the Producer Price Index (PPI) decreased by 3.6% year-on-year [3] - The Henan Provincial Development and Reform Commission announced the establishment of a 3 billion yuan artificial intelligence industry fund to support the development of the AI ecosystem [4] Group 2 - Sichuan Province has launched a new "immediate refund" service for outbound tax refunds, allowing international travelers to shop and receive refunds at various airports [5] - The total box office for the summer film season in 2025 has exceeded 8.2 billion yuan, with the film "Nanjing Photo Studio" leading with over 2 billion yuan [6] - The Gansu Province experienced severe flooding, resulting in 15 fatalities and 28 individuals missing, prompting a response from the Ministry of Natural Resources [6][7] Group 3 - The company *ST Tianmao, controlled by capital mogul Liu Yiqian, announced plans to voluntarily withdraw its A-share listing on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange [16][17] - The private equity firm Jinglin Asset's recent holdings reveal a shift in investment strategy, including new positions in Nvidia and a complete exit from Apple [18][19] - Harvard's endowment fund invested approximately $116 million in BlackRock's Bitcoin ETF, becoming the fifth-largest investor in the fund [21]

Core Viewpoint - The short drama "Rebirth in the Millennium: I Rely on Futures to Achieve Revenge" has attracted attention not only for its plot but also for its production companies, which include private equity firms such as Waying Investment and Shenhan Capital [1][6] Group 1: Production and Release - The short drama is set to premiere next month, with private equity firms planning to provide a unified response to related questions at that time [2] - This marks the first instance of private equity firms producing a short drama, which has elicited mixed reactions from industry insiders [3][10] Group 2: Plot Summary - The drama's storyline revolves around the male protagonist, Ying Shun, a private equity fund manager who faces betrayal and financial ruin, leading to his death and subsequent rebirth to seek revenge [4][6] - The female lead, Su Xiaoman, is connected to Ying Shun through their past, and her life is also affected by the financial turmoil depicted in the story [4][6] Group 3: Industry Implications - The involvement of private equity firms in producing a short drama is seen as a way to help investors better understand the futures market and the role of institutional investors [3][10] - However, there are concerns that such dramatizations may oversimplify financial concepts and lead investors to overlook risks and uncertainties associated with investing [11][12] Group 4: Company Backgrounds - Shenhan Capital, established in 2015, has a small team and is led by Wei Wei, who has a background in oil product investment [6][7] - Waying Investment, also founded in 2015, has a slightly larger team and is led by Zhou Wei, a known figure in the futures market [8][9]

Core Insights - Lingjun Investment has undergone a systematic restructuring in risk control, compliance management, corporate governance, and strategy iteration following a crisis [1][2] - The company has developed a cultural framework termed "36 Essentials" and "1+5" to enhance governance and operational efficiency [2] Governance and Management - Following the "2.19 incident," Lingjun Investment optimized its governance structure, leading to a clearer division of responsibilities between its chairman and chief investment officer [2][3] - The management styles of the two core leaders, Cai Meijie and Ma Zhiyu, complement each other, with Cai focusing on pragmatic leadership and Ma emphasizing rationality and rule-based management [3][4] Cultural and Operational Philosophy - Cai emphasizes the importance of entrepreneurial spirit and a proactive mindset in navigating challenges, highlighting the need for continuous vigilance and humility in business operations [5][6] - The company aims to instill a culture of accountability and effective communication to enhance decision-making and operational efficiency [3][6] Risk Control and Compliance - Lingjun Investment has integrated risk control parameters into its trading strategies to ensure compliance and minimize human error [7] - The company has established a dual-layered risk management system that combines strategy and system-level controls to align with regulatory requirements [7] Technological Advancements - The firm has achieved a significant increase in computational power, doubling its capacity and enhancing its ability to process short-term signals [9] - Lingjun Investment's focus on memory-sharing technology has led to a 20-fold improvement in individual computational scheduling capabilities [9] Competitive Edge - The company's competitive advantages lie in its long-term accumulation of systematic capabilities and the ability of top talent to implement cutting-edge technologies effectively [10] - Lingjun Investment differentiates itself through its depth of experience and the practical application of advanced models in investment strategies [10]

Group 1: Fund Manager Movements - Renowned fund manager Zhai Xiangdong announced his departure from China Merchants Fund on August 9 due to personal reasons, with speculation about his next move possibly being to a private equity fund [1] - Xue Zhen has been appointed as the new chairman of Dongwu Fund, succeeding Ma Zhenya, who transitioned to a senior supervisory role [1] Group 2: Public REITs Market - The public REITs market continues to thrive, with two new data center public REITs listed on August 8, both achieving a 30% limit-up on their first trading day, with total trading volume nearing 700 million yuan [1] - As of August 8, the CSI REITs total return index and the CSI REITs index have increased by 13.37% and 9.91% year-to-date, respectively, outperforming major indices like the CSI 300 [2] Group 3: Asset Management Developments - GF Securities Asset Management has withdrawn its application for public fund management qualifications, indicating a tightening of public fund license approvals in the industry [3] - The trend of fund managers publicly sharing their real-time trading performance is growing, with many achieving positive returns, signaling a shift towards more transparency and investor engagement [6] Group 4: Fund Performance and Restrictions - The China Europe Digital Economy Mixed Fund has announced a suspension of large subscriptions over 1 million yuan due to its impressive performance of over 150% in the past year, ranking 8th out of 4349 similar funds [4] - The total asset management scale of Huaxia Fund has surpassed 2.85 trillion yuan, with its public fund scale exceeding 2 trillion yuan for the first time, driven by growth in various fund types [8] Group 5: Market Trends and Insights - Convertible bond funds have shown remarkable performance, with over ten thematic funds achieving net value growth rates exceeding 15%, and the highest reaching nearly 25% [7] - The bond ETF market is expanding, with the recent launch of a bond ETF surpassing 10 billion yuan in scale, contributing to a total market size of nearly 520 billion yuan [10]