1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Views of the Report - The US GDP growth rate is expected to slow marginally in the second half of 2025, with a low probability of recession. The growth rate gap between the US and non - US economies will continue to narrow. Q3 is relatively cautious, while Q4 and 2026 are moderately optimistic [2][50]. - The US CPI is expected to rebound in Q3 and then decline from Q4 to early 2026. However, recent Middle - East geopolitical risks bring uncertainties to the energy - inflation chain [50][61]. - Globally, there is no macro - environment for demand - inflation - inventory to rise. The employment situation is marginally weakening, and the consumption demand in the second half of the year may not be strong. The manufacturing and inventory cycles may improve slightly, but the space is limited [3]. - If the tariff policy remains stable and geopolitical risks are controllable, there may be a combination of moderate interest rate cuts (1 - 2 times) and moderate fiscal stimulus (tax cuts) in the US in the second half of the year, which may drive the macro - economy positively, but this depends on the situation [3]. - The US dollar index will remain weak in the second half of the year, but the decline rate is expected to slow down, with a target of 95 [3]. - The allocation of 10Y US Treasury bonds may reach its peak in Q3 this year. Looking forward to the second half of the year and 2026, the target yields of 10Y US Treasury bonds are set at 3.95% and 3.42%. There are entry points for long - term US Treasury bond allocation in the second half of the year, and opportunities for a "bullish steepening" of the US Treasury bond curve in Q4 [3]. 3. Summary by Related Catalogs 3.1 2025 H1 Overseas Macroeconomic Main Logic and Major Asset Performance Review 3.1.1 2025 H1 Overseas Macroeconomic Main Logic - The macro - economic cycle in 2025 was predicted to be relatively stable and decline moderately compared to 2024. The US quarterly - on - quarterly annualized rate was expected to decline in H1 and rebound in H2. The inflation continued to decline, and employment weakened moderately [6]. - In Q1, there were differences between the expected and actual US policies. The US economic momentum declined marginally, while non - US economic momentum rebounded. US asset valuations were high, and the core sectors of the US stock market declined [7]. - In Q2, the 4.2 reciprocal tariffs exceeded expectations and then entered an "exemption period" and a "negotiation period". The "stagflation trade" was formed and then eased. The "US exception" was reversed, and the "de - dollarization" trade was strengthened [8]. - Tariff shocks: In Q1, the intensity of tariffs was lower than expected, and in Q2, it suddenly increased and then declined marginally. The average US tariff rate reached a peak of about 26.8% in early April and then stabilized at around 13.45%. The tariff shock had a negative impact on non - US demand and increased US cost - inflation [9]. - Economic momentum: The US economic momentum declined marginally since H2 2024. In Q1 2025, the net export item was a major drag on GDP, but domestic consumption showed resilience. The data showed a structure of "weak expectations and strong reality" [17]. - Dual goals: In H1, there were significant differences between inflation expectations and reality, as well as between long - term and short - term inflation. The actual CPI growth rate was stable, while inflation expectations were strong [20]. - Relative strength: The growth rate gap between the US and non - US economies was narrowing, which was an important fundamental background for the reversal of the "US exception" and the "de - dollarization" narrative. Non - US economies were stronger than the US in terms of economic data surprises [23]. 3.1.2 H1 Major Asset Performance Review - The first half of the year was divided into two stages around April 2. Q1 was characterized by trading the expectation difference after the implementation of Trump 2.0 policies, with the reversal of the "US exception" and the rebound of non - US valuations. Q2 was characterized by the decline of tariff shocks and the rebound of risk assets [27][30]. - In terms of major asset performance, risk assets first declined and then rose, non - US assets were stronger than US assets, valuation repair was faster than demand repair, and supply factors led to differences in commodity performance [35]. 3.2 2025 H2 Overseas Macroeconomic Outlook 3.2.1 Core Conclusion - The US GDP growth rate will slow marginally in H2, with a low probability of recession. The growth rate gap between the US and non - US economies will continue to narrow. Q3 is relatively cautious, while Q4 and 2026 are moderately optimistic [50]. - Inflation will be affected by supply - side shocks in H2, with a rebound in Q3 and a decline from Q4 to 2026. However, Middle - East geopolitical risks bring uncertainties to energy inflation [50]. - Globally, there is no macro - environment for demand - inflation - inventory to rise. The employment situation is marginally weakening, and consumption demand may not be strong in H2. The manufacturing and inventory cycles may improve slightly, but the space is limited [50]. 3.2.2 Economic Growth - The US GDP growth rate is expected to slow marginally in H2, with a low point in Q4. The US economic growth rate gap with the eurozone will continue to narrow. The financial conditions index may face resistance in further improvement, which may lead to a decline in real - time GDP momentum in Q3 [53][54]. 3.2.3 Inflation Trend - The US CPI growth rate is expected to rebound in Q3 and reach its peak in Q4, then decline until 2026. Middle - East geopolitical risks may lead to an increase in energy inflation. In the long - term, if the geopolitical - energy - inflation situation is controllable, there may be an opportunity for inflation to return downward [61][63]. 3.2.4 Cycle Positioning - There is no strong demand cycle globally. Employment may receive positive contributions from consumer and business confidence improvement and seasonal factors, but key sectors may remain weak. Consumption demand may not be strong, and there are uncertainties in the "抢进口" and "抢补库" behaviors. The manufacturing and inventory cycles may improve slightly in H2, but the space is limited [74][84][95]. 3.2.5 Tariff Impact - After the Sino - US Geneva Joint Statement, the US average tariff rate on China decreased, and the average tariff rate on the rest of the world also declined. The probability of further tariff escalation between the US and China is low, but there is high uncertainty in the US - RoW tariff policy. Tariffs still have a negative impact on demand - cost [102]. - From the perspective of supply - chain dependence and tariff cost bearers, "embargo - level" tariffs are not realistic. The US "抢进口" and inventory replenishment have certain characteristics, and the impact of tariffs on prices may be reflected in July [103][112]. 3.2.6 Fiscal Policy - The "One big, beautiful bill" may have different impacts in different time dimensions. In the 10 - year dimension, its impact on long - term US Treasury bonds is limited. In the 3 - year dimension, it may increase the interest rate center. In the 3 - month dimension, it may drive the interest rate up in the short - term [122]. - Stable tariff revenue can offset fiscal expenditure to some extent, but the tariff rate needs to balance tax revenue, trade, and economic stability [133]. 3.2.7 Monetary Policy - The Fed is expected to have 1 - 2 interest rate cuts this year, possibly in September, October, or December. In Q3, the Fed's tone may be hawkish, while in Q4, interest rate cuts may be implemented, and the expectation of interest rate cuts in 2026 will be opened. The Fed's interest rate cuts may be greater than those of other central banks in 2026, which may lead to a weakening of the US dollar index in the medium - term [137][138][139]. 3.3 2025 H2 Major Asset Performance Outlook 3.3.1 2025 H2 US Dollar Index Outlook - The view of a weak US dollar is maintained. In H2, the US dollar index will remain weak, but the decline rate will slow down, with a target of 95. The driving factors will change from valuation regression to the convergence of the growth rate gap between the US and non - US economies and the increase in the hedging demand for US dollar assets [150]. - In the medium - to - long - term, the US dollar is overvalued, and the driving factors for its strength are weakening. The "US exception" in the FX market is reversing, and the US dollar is expected to return to its equilibrium level [151][152][155].

【文/观察者网 王一】当地时间6月16日，日本首相石破茂和美国总统特朗普在七国集团（G7）峰会上 举行了30分钟的会晤，主要讨论关税问题，但双方未能达成一致。 《日经亚洲》18日分析指出，日本自恃是美国的盟友和最大的投资者，一上来就想争取特殊关税豁免的 态度，反而导致美国更加不愿松口。而日本原想在此次谈判中打"中国牌"，提议与美国在稀土、半导体 等领域加强合作，却没想到美国率先与中国达成了协议，导致日本失去了这一谈判筹码。 在会晤后的记者会上，石破茂表示，"现在仍然存在双方认识不一致的点，因此未能达成整体协议"。 日美首脑会谈未能就取消关税达成一致。视觉中国 "美国急于与中国谈判是日本的另一项误判，"日媒指出，作为谈判筹码之一，日本原本计划向美国提 议，双方在美国与中国存在紧张关系的领域进行合作，例如加强稀土和半导体供应链的建设。但美国先 与中国达成了协议，导致日本的提议不再那么有吸引力。 当被问及达成协议的时间框架时，石破茂表示："很难说何时能解决此事。" 汽车产业对日本经济至关重要。根据日本汽车工业协会的数据，8.3%的日本劳动力都从事汽车相关工 作，汽车业为日本贡献了约10%的GDP（国内生产总值）。联 ...

Core Viewpoint - The comments from former Bank of Japan member Takako Sato suggest that U.S. tariffs under President Trump may have halted the interest rate hike cycle of the Bank of Japan, with expectations of a decline in exports impacting the likelihood of further rate increases [1] Group 1: Economic Impact - U.S. trade policy uncertainty is causing significant disruption to the global economy, which may adversely affect Japan's exports, output, wage growth, and consumption [1] - The automotive industry plays a crucial role in the Japanese economy, making U.S. tariffs on automobiles particularly damaging [1] Group 2: Future Outlook - The real test for the Japanese economy may come in 2026, as the effects of U.S. tariffs are expected to manifest 6 to 12 months after implementation [1] - The Bank of Japan may be unable to raise interest rates for a considerable period [1]

在美国总统特朗普4月扩大关税措施之前，日本经济已经处于收缩状态。 对于一季度已萎缩的日本经济而言，前景依旧不容乐观。 日本内阁府6月9日发布的数据显示，日本第一季度国内生产总值（GDP）折合年率为下降0.2%，低于 此前预估的0.7%。 其中，个人消费增长了0.1%，企业支出增长了1.1%。库存为经济增长贡献了0.6个百分点，而净出口则 拖累了经济增长0.8个百分点。上述数据显示，在美国总统特朗普4月扩大关税措施之前，日本经济已经 处于收缩状态。 牛津经济研究院（Oxford Economics）日本首席经济学家长井滋人（Nagai Shigeto）近日在接受第一财 经记者采访时表示，对日本经济后续的走势较为悲观。在一季度增速下降后，长井预计，今年二季度日 本GDP增速会持平，"消费会维持温和增长的态势，但是全球经济增速放缓会影响日本的出口，同时， 围绕美国关税的高度不确定性会抑制日本国内外的投资。" 五轮关税谈判"无果" 在日本内阁府关于最新GDP数据公布前，日美刚刚结束第五轮关税谈判，但依然毫无进展。日本经济再 生担当大臣赤泽亮正于当地时间6月5日~6日在华盛顿出席了第五轮日美关税谈判。事后，他表示双 方 ...

投资咨询业务资格：证监许可【2011】1778 号 资讯早班车 资讯早班车-2025-06-09 二、商品投资参考 综合 一、 宏观数据速览 | 发布日期 | 指标日期 | 指标名称 | 单位 | 当期值 | 上期值 | 去年同期值 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 20250416 | 2025/03 | GDP:不变价:当季同比 | % | 5.40 | 5.40 | 5.30 | | 20250531 | 2025/05 | 制造业 PMI | % | 49.50 | 49.00 | 49.50 | | 20250531 | 2025/05 | 非制造业 PMI:商务活 | % | 50.30 | 50.40 | 51.10 | | | | 动 | | | | | | 20250603 | 2025/05 | 财新 PMI:制造业 | % | 48.30 | 50.40 | 51.70 | | 20250605 | 2025/05 | 财新 PMI:服务业经营 活动指数 | % | 51.10 | 50.70 | 54.00 | | | | ...

日美部长级磋商后，日本经济财政再生相赤泽亮正回答记者提问（6月6日，华盛顿） 在日美关税磋商中，日本向美国提出了应对中国的一揽子方案。但与此同时，中美两国表现 出接近的姿态，这可能使日本在美国眼中的优先级下降。日本表示"面向达成协议，讨论进一 步深入"，但同时表示：还未找到一致点…… 日美两国政府正在不断快速推进关税谈判。日本经济财政再生相赤泽亮正于美国当地时间6月 6日下午在华盛顿出席第五次部长级磋商。日美最近已连续三周进行高频率谈判。赤泽亮对记 者团表示："以达成协议为目标的讨论进一步取得进展"，但同时也表示"尚未找到一致点"。 考虑到6月中旬的首脑会谈，正在加紧进行协调。 日本首相石破茂6月7日对记者团的提问回答称："据我所知，双方围绕国家利益展开了全力以 赴的认真讨论"。 磋商结束后的6日晚（日本时间7日），赤泽亮正出现在日本驻美大使馆，做出揉眼动作，显 露出疲惫的神情。谈判团的一名成员透露："连续出差让身体有些吃不消了"，"虽然很想休 息，但现在并不是休息的时候"。 关于第五轮谈判的结果，赤泽亮正表示"面向达成协议，讨论进一步深入"，避免提及具体内 容。但同时表示："我们还未找到一致点" 能否进一步 ...

Group 1: Banking and Finance - In Q1 2025, the total RMB loans increased by 9.78 trillion yuan, with a total balance of 265.41 trillion yuan, reflecting a year-on-year growth of 7.4% [1] - The balance of RMB real estate loans reached 53.54 trillion yuan, with a slight year-on-year increase of 0.04% and a quarterly increase of 619.7 billion yuan [1] - The consumer finance sector has seen a surge in bad asset transfers, with 103 announcements made by 15 licensed consumer finance companies by May 29, 2025, indicating a significant market activity [2] Group 2: Manufacturing and Industry - China's shipbuilding industry continues to show strong resilience, with new orders in the first four months of 2025 maintaining the largest global market share [3] - The automotive sector reported an import and export total of 23.09 billion USD in April 2025, with exports increasing by 6.9% month-on-month [3] Group 3: Agriculture and Livestock - Major pig farming companies have received notifications to suspend the expansion of breeding sows and control the weight of pigs for slaughter, indicating regulatory measures to stabilize prices [4] Group 4: Technology and Innovation - The first fully automated testing system for medical electronic instruments based on NQI technology has passed inspection, marking a significant advancement in China's medical instrument industry [5] Group 5: Corporate Actions - Zhejiang Medicine plans to use up to 1 billion yuan of idle funds for entrusted wealth management, with a maximum investment period of 12 months [10] - All-in-one subsidiary Jinbo Hydrogen Energy of Quanxin Co. has received a supplier designation notice, indicating a strategic move in the hydrogen energy sector [11]

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing US-Japan tariff negotiations are critical, with Japan pushing for the complete removal of tariffs while the US remains resistant. The recent phone call between Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and President Trump has introduced new dynamics into the discussions, particularly regarding investment and economic security [1][2]. Group 1: Tariff Negotiations - Japan has consistently requested the full cancellation of tariffs on automobiles, steel, and aluminum, but the US has not agreed to this demand [1]. - The third round of tariff negotiations, held on May 23, continued the previous discussions' tone, with Japanese Economic Revitalization Minister Akira Amari stating that the exchanges were more candid and in-depth than before [1][2]. - A new round of negotiations is scheduled for May 30 in Washington, indicating ongoing efforts to reach an agreement [1]. Group 2: Strategic Discussions - The phone call between Ishiba and Trump covered several key topics, including plans for a face-to-face meeting during the G7 summit, economic security-related tariff negotiations, and potential Japanese procurement of US fighter jets [2]. - Japan is considering establishing a "Japan-US Shipbuilding Fund" to revitalize its shipbuilding industry, which could enhance cooperation in sectors deemed critical to national security by the US [2]. Group 3: Economic Implications - Trump's recent Middle East trip resulted in approximately $2 trillion in investment agreements, which he communicated to Ishiba, aiming to encourage Japan to increase its investments in the US [2]. - Japan has already invested significantly in US manufacturing, but further investments are seen as necessary under Trump's "revitalize American manufacturing" agenda [2]. Group 4: Broader Trade Context - The situation with the EU serves as a cautionary tale for Japan, as delays in trade negotiations have led to threats of increased tariffs from the US [3]. - The outcome of the G7 summit, particularly regarding breakthroughs in automotive and steel tariffs, could have substantial implications for related industries in Japan [3].

Group 1 - The Federal Reserve may consider interest rate cuts in the second half of 2025 if tariffs remain around 10% [1] - The ongoing trade tensions have created a dilemma for the Federal Reserve, balancing between persistent inflation data and market volatility caused by tariffs [3] - The U.S. market experienced a significant downturn on May 21, with a sharp rise in bond yields, a drop in stock prices, and the dollar index falling below 100 [4] Group 2 - The long-standing debt issues have been exacerbated by the trade tensions, leading to increased scrutiny on the Federal Reserve's role in stabilizing the market [5] - The weak auction of 20-year U.S. Treasury bonds on May 22 resulted in a "triple whammy" effect on stocks, bonds, and currencies, with the S&P 500 index dropping nearly 1.6% [7] - The auction's final yield of 5.047% marked a significant increase from previous rates, indicating a lack of demand and raising concerns about the U.S. fiscal situation [8] Group 3 - The recent surge in U.S. Treasury yields has raised fears among investors regarding the government's fiscal health and monetary policy [8] - The ongoing trade war has revealed underlying issues in the U.S. economy, with tariff revenues not keeping pace with rising national debt [9] - The proposed tax cuts are expected to further pressure the U.S. debt situation, with potential implications for the bond market [10] Group 4 - The anticipated tax legislation is projected to reduce household tax burdens significantly, which could impact the fiscal deficit and bond market reactions [11] - The recent rebound in U.S. stocks has raised questions about the sustainability of this rally amid ongoing geopolitical risks and rising federal spending [12] - Investors are advised to be cautious with dollar assets as the market navigates through the current volatility, with a potential shift towards safe-haven assets like gold and yen [13][14]

Summary of Key Points from the Conference Call Industry or Company Involved - The conference call discusses macroeconomic trends and monetary policies affecting various regions, particularly focusing on the Euro area, United States, and Asia Pacific. Core Insights and Arguments 1. **U.S. Economic Policy and Deficits** - The House passed a reconciliation bill proposing $3.8 trillion in new deficits over the next 10 years, which is the lower end of earlier estimates that reached up to $15 trillion [4][15][16] - The Senate's approval is pending, and the process may extend until after August, potentially requiring temporary debt-limit relief [18][19] 2. **Inflation and Monetary Policy in the Euro Area** - Flash inflation data for May is expected to show stable or lower total inflation across most Euro area countries, with a focus on the impact of new tariff threats [5][40] - The European Central Bank (ECB) is anticipated to implement a 25 basis point rate cut in June, with discussions ongoing about future cuts [39][44] 3. **Consumer Confidence and Spending Trends** - Consumer confidence in the U.S. remains weak, driven by fears of price increases and potential layoffs, despite healthy consumer spending trends [20][23][31] - April consumer spending is expected to show a nominal increase of 0.3%, with real expenditures rising by 0.2% due to low inflation [33][34] 4. **Asia Pacific Economic Outlook** - The Bank of Korea (BoK) is expected to cut its policy rate by 25 basis points amid weak economic growth [6][39] - India's GDP growth is projected to have picked up in Q1, driven by government spending and investment [6][39] 5. **Tariff Impacts and Trade Dynamics** - President Trump's threats of new tariffs against the EU and potential tariffs on iPhones have created uncertainty that could negatively impact global growth [3][5] - The Euro area is experiencing disinflation amidst these tariff threats, with consumer confidence showing signs of decline in France [38][41] Other Important but Possibly Overlooked Content 1. **Sector-Specific Insights** - The manufacturing sector in the Euro area is showing signs of improvement, while the services sector is lagging, indicating a divergence in economic recovery [38][45] - The U.S. durable goods orders are expected to show a significant drop in April, particularly in the aircraft sector, which had previously seen strong orders [29][30] 2. **Geopolitical Considerations** - The geopolitical landscape, particularly regarding U.S.-China trade relations, continues to influence economic sentiment and market expectations [19][39] - Brazil's economic activity suggests strong GDP expansion in Q1, but underlying components may indicate potential weaknesses ahead [8][13] 3. **Monetary Growth Trends** - M3 money supply growth in the Euro area has been improving, driven by higher loan demand in the private sector, although there are concerns about banks' external asset sales [53][54] This summary encapsulates the key points discussed in the conference call, highlighting the macroeconomic trends, monetary policies, and sector-specific insights that could influence investment decisions.