Core Insights - Yiwu has become the first county-level city in China to exceed 10,000 foreign-funded enterprises, with a total of 10,000 foreign business entities as of July 31, 2023 [2][4] - The foreign investment in Yiwu covers over 160 countries and regions, with 81% coming from countries involved in the Belt and Road Initiative [5][11] - The city has a diverse range of foreign businesses, with 89% in wholesale and retail, and significant growth in sectors like rental and business services, as well as manufacturing [5][11] Group 1: Business Environment - Yiwu's business environment has been enhanced by policy reforms, including the reduction of registration time for foreign companies from 15 days to 3 days [7][11] - The city has seen a significant increase in foreign entrepreneurs, with many establishing networks and sharing resources, leading to a collaborative business ecosystem [8][11] - The foreign trade export scale of Yiwu has grown from 0.1% of national exports in 2011 to 2% in 2024, highlighting its importance in China's foreign trade landscape [11][26] Group 2: Entrepreneurial Opportunities - Foreign entrepreneurs in Yiwu are increasingly moving from simple trading roles to more integrated supply chain operations, with examples of businesses expanding into manufacturing and brand creation [8][17] - The local market is perceived as having abundant opportunities, with many foreign business owners expressing confidence in the potential for growth and collaboration [8][20] - The rise of the foreign restaurant industry in Yiwu, with 443 foreign-funded entities, reflects the city's cultural diversity and the growing demand for international cuisine [20][23] Group 3: Future Prospects - Yiwu's foreign investment ecosystem is expected to continue evolving, with a focus on high-value manufacturing and service-oriented businesses [19][26] - The city is positioning itself as a hub for international trade and investment, with ongoing improvements in the business environment and support for foreign entrepreneurs [11][26] - The integration of foreign businesses into the local economy is fostering a sustainable and resilient trade environment, contributing to both local and global economic growth [26]

文 | 《BUG》栏目 张奥、刘丽丽、张俊 专题：专题|罗永浩直播曝光西贝后厨：鲈鱼保质期18个月，羊腿肉生产于2024年，网友称"西贝儿童餐 的年龄可 炒股就看金麒麟分析师研报，权威，专业，及时，全面，助您挖掘潜力主题机会！ 在刚刚过去的深夜，罗永浩和西贝员工可能都无法安心入睡。 今天凌晨3点21分，罗永浩依然在发微博质疑：如果不使用防腐剂，有机西蓝花的保质期能到24个月？ 还能做成适合给儿童食用的菜肴？……而西贝则召开了一场全员大会，会议题目为"1.8万名伙伴跟罗永 浩之战"…… 就在昨晚，罗永浩在持续1小时的直播中，反复回应了西贝预制菜事件。 他直言"西贝称没有预制菜是100%撒谎，因为国家还没有相关标准出台"。 罗永浩的直播间中背景板上挂着"不反对预制菜，推动预制菜透明化，维护消费者知情权"字样，他多次 表明态度：自己不反对预制菜，反对的是卖预制菜伪装成不是预制菜。 "有人说我直播间也卖预制菜，这是事实，我们知道卖的是预制菜，也说了是预制菜，这没有任何问 题。你买的时候也知道是预制菜，预制菜本身是合法的。" 他在直言，我是个褒贬不一的人，但这个事件的评论把我感动了，支持的人超过了90%。"今天受宠若 ...

罗永浩悬赏10万"扒"预制菜 9月10日，罗永浩公开发布微博称，"好久没吃西贝了，今天下飞机跟同事吃了一顿，发现几乎全都是预 制菜，还那么贵。希望国家尽早推动立法，强制饭馆注明是否用了预制菜"。随后，罗永浩多次发文质 疑西贝"预制菜"问题。 9月11日晚间，罗永浩在社交平台连发多条内容，征集西贝预制菜证据，并称"如果有录像之类的、法律 上可以采信的真凭实据，奖励十万元"。此后，再度表示，"本人实名追加两万，只想要个真相"。 | | 餐員 | 9寸靖义盘 7.5寸靖兰盘底座 | | --- | --- | --- | | | 出餐鉴别 | 牛肉条软嫩,土豆口感软糯形状完整 口味干香浓郁 | | 二.切配 | | | | 工器具:绿色砧板,绿色刀具 | 储存:冷藏 | 赏味期:2餐(不隔夜) | | | | 大葱花川短线 清洗,去根蒂,直刀切0.3-0.5cm未 | | | | 蒜片 清洗,去蒂,切0.2-0.3cm片 | | | | 图0.7cm条,自然长度 书记得 (或0.7cm切条器) | | | | 改刀后清洗,粒水、分份感封冷藏储存 | | 压制 | | | 分份 | | | | | --- | --- ...

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing dispute between Luo Yonghao and Xibei regarding the definition of "pre-prepared dishes" has intensified, with industry figures like Yu Donglai weighing in to support Xibei's reputation and clarify the situation [1][3][6]. Group 1: Background of the Dispute - The controversy began on September 10, when Luo Yonghao criticized Xibei for serving pre-prepared dishes, which sparked significant public debate [3]. - Xibei's founder, Jia Guolong, responded strongly, asserting that none of their dishes are pre-prepared and announced plans to sue Luo Yonghao for defamation [3][4]. - Yu Donglai publicly expressed gratitude towards Xibei for providing trustworthy meals, adding credibility to Xibei's defense [1][3]. Group 2: Definition of Pre-prepared Dishes - The definition of "pre-prepared dishes" was clarified in a notice issued by six government departments, which outlines the criteria for what constitutes a pre-prepared dish [4]. - Xibei argues that the dishes consumed by Luo Yonghao do not fit the government's definition of "pre-prepared dishes," challenging the validity of Luo's claims [4][6]. - The core of the dispute centers on differing interpretations of the term "pre-prepared," with Xibei emphasizing the "packaged" aspect while critics focus on the "industrial processing" involved [6][7].

【导读】罗永浩：不反对预制菜，希望推动预制菜透明化、维护消费者知情权 9月12日晚八点半，网络大V罗永浩就近日"吐槽西贝预制菜且贵"引发的争议，在微博、抖音、B站等多个平台同步开启直播，再次作出回应。 在这场约1个小时的直播中，罗永浩多次强调，其不反对预制菜，希望通过这次事件推动预制菜透明化，维护消费者知情权。 "所谓根据国家标准，西贝100%没有预制菜，这个是彻头彻尾的撒谎，因为我们国家甚至还没有出台预制菜国标。这也是我们今天开直播的目的，希望能 够通过这件意外发生的事件，以它为契机，促进和推动预制菜产业的健康发展。"罗永浩说。 在直播中，罗永浩还点赞了老乡鸡。他认为，老乡鸡将菜品根据实际加工情况进行分类并注明（餐厅现做、半预制、复热预制），以颜色作为区分，保障 了消费者的知情权和选择权，值得餐饮同行学习。 此前，罗永浩对西贝的吐槽，引发西贝及其创始人贾国龙的强烈反应。在本次直播前，西贝和罗永浩已经来回"斗争"了数个回合。9月11日，西贝召开媒 体沟通会，贾国龙表示将起诉罗永浩。而罗永浩随后反击称，将发布10万元悬赏，公开征集西贝使用预制菜的"真凭实据"。 罗永浩直播谈"西贝预制菜" 9月12日晚八点半，罗 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the controversy surrounding the use of pre-prepared dishes (pre-cooked meals) by the restaurant chain Xibei, sparked by influencer Luo Yonghao's criticism, emphasizing the need for transparency in the pre-prepared food industry and consumer rights protection [5][12]. Summary by Sections Luo Yonghao's Live Broadcast - Luo Yonghao conducted a live broadcast to address the backlash against his comments about Xibei's use of pre-prepared dishes, stating he does not oppose pre-prepared meals but advocates for transparency and consumer rights [5][7]. - He criticized Xibei's claim of not using pre-prepared dishes, arguing that there are currently no national standards for pre-prepared meals in China [5][6]. Xibei's Response - Xibei's founder, Jia Guolong, strongly denied Luo's allegations, asserting that their restaurants do not use pre-prepared dishes and announced plans to sue Luo [9][14]. - Xibei released a letter to customers detailing the preparation standards of the dishes Luo ordered, aiming to demonstrate their commitment to fresh cooking [9][14]. Consumer Reactions and Market Impact - The controversy has led to mixed consumer reactions, with some supporting Luo and others defending Xibei, highlighting a divide in public opinion [10][12]. - Reports indicated a significant drop in Xibei's delivery orders following the controversy, with orders in Beijing falling from over 200 to around 100 [9]. Industry Standards and Definitions - The lack of a national standard for pre-prepared dishes has resulted in differing interpretations between consumers and restaurant operators regarding what constitutes a pre-prepared meal [12][13]. - The recent notification from the National Market Supervision Administration outlines that pre-prepared dishes must be pre-packaged and free from preservatives, clarifying the definition and regulatory framework for the industry [13][14]. Transparency and Consumer Rights - Concerns about transparency, value for money, and consumer rights have emerged as significant issues, with consumers feeling misled if they pay for freshly cooked meals but receive pre-prepared dishes instead [14]. - Luo Yonghao emphasized that his goal is not to target Xibei but to use this incident to promote transparency in the pre-prepared food industry and protect consumer rights [14].

9月12日，西贝发布致顾客的一封信，称罗永浩在微博中对西贝的指责不实，并决定向全社会开放后厨参观，还将陆续开放原产地、央厨工厂等西贝产地 源头。 红星资本局走访西贝线下门店，一门店店长表示，事件发酵后，已对所在门店客流、营收产生影响。门店已将罗永浩此前消费的菜品列成清单，共计13道 菜，但尚未有消费者询问或下单"老罗菜单"。 红星资本局9月12日消息 近日，"罗永浩吐槽西贝预制菜"登上微博热搜。对此，西贝创始人贾国龙予以否认，表示会起诉罗永浩，并于今日在全国门店上 线"罗永浩菜单"。 罗永浩与西贝之争，将"预制菜"话题再次推向公众视野，消费者舌尖尝出的"预制味"和企业认定的"非预制菜"成为争议焦点。预制菜的界定标准是什么？ 消费者为何会反感预制菜？预制菜是否意味着不健康？为此，红星资本局采访了多方人士，对这一概念的边界进行梳理。 西贝成都万象城店 罗永浩吐槽西贝预制菜 西贝：公开13道菜制作过程 9月12日，红星资本局走访西贝线下门店，西贝成都万象城店的店长表示，"罗永浩吐槽西贝预制菜"事件对门店有一定影响，门店平时客流大约在200人， 昨日大约减少了20人，门店营收减少了大约2000元。 该店店长还称，所在 ...

Core Insights - The article discusses the evolution and success of family businesses in Hong Kong, highlighting their long-standing history and the lessons learned in ownership and management succession [3][25]. Group 1: Historical Context - Hong Kong has over 180 years of modern economic development, producing numerous family businesses that have operated for multiple generations [2]. - In the 2024 Hurun China 500 list, 42 companies have a history of over 50 years, with 70% from Hong Kong and Taiwan, including six companies over 100 years old [3]. Group 2: Ownership Succession - The article outlines the challenges of ownership succession in family businesses, particularly the pitfalls of equal share distribution, as exemplified by the case of Yung Kee Restaurant [4][5][6]. - Trust structures have been increasingly utilized for ownership succession, with the case of New World Development illustrating the complexities involved [7][8]. Group 3: Successful Trust Structures - The Lee Shau Kee family has implemented a mature trust mechanism that allows for dynamic adjustments based on contributions, ensuring smooth succession and governance [8][9]. - Other families, such as the Cheng Yu-tung family, have also successfully utilized trust structures to maintain control over their businesses despite management changes [9][10]. Group 4: Governance and Leadership - Family governance has evolved from informal rules to structured systems, with families like Lee Kum Kee establishing comprehensive governance mechanisms [21][22]. - The role of family leaders has been crucial, with examples of non-business leaders stepping up to guide family governance, as seen in the case of Kwan Siu-king from New World Development [24]. Group 5: Lessons for Mainland China - The experiences of Hong Kong family businesses provide valuable insights for mainland Chinese family enterprises, emphasizing the importance of learning and adapting governance and succession practices [25][26]. - Successful family businesses prioritize not only the continuity of the enterprise but also the cultivation of talent and the prosperity of the family across generations [28].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article revolves around Luo Yonghao's criticism of the pre-prepared food industry, emphasizing the need for transparency in restaurant menus regarding the use of pre-prepared dishes [1] - Luo Yonghao announced a reward of 100,000 yuan for anyone who can expose restaurants that do not disclose the use of pre-prepared food, indicating a push for consumer awareness and legislative change [1] - The article highlights Luo's call for consumers to actively question restaurant staff about the nature of their food, suggesting that increased consumer scrutiny could lead to more transparent practices in the industry [1]

Core Viewpoint - Luo Yonghao criticized the lack of transparency in the pre-prepared food industry, emphasizing the need for clear definitions and standards for pre-prepared dishes [1] Group 1: Industry Insights - Luo Yonghao highlighted that the common understanding of pre-prepared food is often misrepresented, stating that while some ingredients may be pre-prepared, it does not equate to the entire dish being pre-made [1] - He called for national standards to be established for pre-prepared food, arguing that the complexity of definitions is overstated by restaurant businesses [1] Group 2: Company Actions - In response to Luo Yonghao's comments, the restaurant chain Xibei launched a menu that directly addresses the controversy surrounding pre-prepared dishes [1]