中国资本市场的壮阔图景，由五千多上市公司共同绘就。行业轮动、风格切换如四季更迭，难以精准把 握，与其在频繁的切换中消耗，不如选择一条相对更从容的路径——中证全指增强基金。 中国资本市场的壮阔图景，由五千多上市公司共同绘就。行业轮动、风格切换如四季更迭，难以精准把 握，与其在频繁的切换中消耗，不如选择一条相对更从容的路径——中证全指增强基金。 中证全指（000985）为投资者提供一幅覆盖沪深京三个交易所的"全景地图"，旨在从中国经济的整体发 展中获益。其全市场覆盖与均衡行业布局，从根本上分散风险，以均衡而全面的战略布局未来，让投资 回归简单与恒久。 在跟踪中证全指（000985）的基础上，东方红资产管理进一步开发量化增强策略，于11月24日至12月12 日发行东方红中证全指指数增强基金（A类025911、C类025912），以期实现超越中证全指的超额收 益。 更全面更均衡反映A股市场生态 中证全指（000985）由上海证券交易所、深圳证券交易所、北京证券交易所市场符合条件的股票和存托 凭证组成样本，要求上市时间超过一个季度（除非上市以来日均总市值排在前30位），扣除ST、*ST股 票，科创板和北交所股票要求上市 ...

- The report tracks the performance of various broad-based indices in the A-share market, including their daily, weekly, monthly, and yearly changes. For instance, on November 18, 2025, all tracked indices fell, with the CSI 2000 and CSI 500 experiencing the largest declines of -1.32% and -1.17%, respectively[1][2][10] - The report compares the indices against their moving averages and their positions relative to the highest and lowest points over the past 250 trading days. For example, all tracked indices have fallen below their 5-day and 10-day moving averages, with the CSI 2000 still above its 20-day moving average[13] - The report provides data on the trading volume and turnover rates of the indices. On November 18, 2025, the CSI 2000 had the highest trading volume share at 24.98%, followed by the CSI 300 at 22.28% and the CSI 1000 at 22.17%. The turnover rates for these indices were 4.48, 2.85, and 2.83, respectively[15] - The report analyzes the distribution of daily returns for the indices, noting that the ChiNext Index has the largest negative kurtosis deviation, while the CSI 1000 has the smallest. The CSI 2000 has the smallest negative skewness, while the SSE 50 has the largest[21][23] - The report examines the risk premiums of the indices relative to the 10-year government bond yield. As of November 18, 2025, the SSE 50 and CSI 300 had relatively high 5-year percentile risk premiums of 37.62% and 24.29%, respectively, while the CSI 2000 and CSI 500 had lower values of 15.95% and 13.41%[25][28][29] - The report evaluates the PE-TTM (Price-to-Earnings ratio based on trailing twelve months) of the indices as a measure of valuation. The CSI 1000 and CSI 500 had high 5-year percentile values of 96.86% and 95.45%, respectively, while the CSI 2000 and ChiNext Index had lower values of 82.64% and 55.04%[37][40][41] - The report assesses the stock-bond yield ratio, which compares the inverse of the PE-TTM to the 10-year government bond yield. None of the indices were above their 80% percentile (opportunity value), and none were below their 20% percentile (danger value)[43] - The report tracks the dividend yields of the indices, noting that the ChiNext Index and CSI 1000 had relatively high 5-year historical percentile values of 70.58% and 39.17%, respectively, while the CSI 500 and CSI 2000 had lower values of 16.94% and 13.55%[45][50][51] - The report monitors the net asset value break rates of the indices, indicating the proportion of stocks trading below their net asset value. As of the latest data, the break rates were 22.0% for the SSE 50, 16.0% for the CSI 300, 11.6% for the CSI 500, 7.2% for the CSI 1000, 2.45% for the CSI 2000, 1.0% for the ChiNext Index, and 5.65% for the CSI All Share Index[52]

Core Viewpoint - Investing in A-shares can indeed outperform inflation over the long term, as the overall economic development of the country supports stock market growth [4][5]. Group 1: A-share Market Performance - The representative index for A-shares is the CSI All Share Index, which covers all listed companies in A-shares, providing a stronger representation compared to the Shanghai Composite Index [6]. - The CSI All Share Index started at 1000 points at the end of 2004 and is projected to reach 4750.67 points by December 31, 2024. Including dividends, the total return index is expected to rise to 6284.26 points [6]. - The historical average annualized return for A-shares over the past decade is approximately 9%-10% [8]. Group 2: Investment Strategies - Investing in stock funds can yield better returns than directly investing in A-shares, with the total return index for all A-share stock funds rising from 1164 points at the end of 2004 to 9140.39 points by December 31, 2024, resulting in an annualized return of 11%-13% [8]. - The phrase "investing in funds is better than trading stocks" reflects the higher average returns from stock funds, as they can exclude poorly performing companies [9]. - Stock funds can be categorized into two types: passive funds (index funds) and active funds, with index funds being a good entry point for individual investors due to their clear rules, low costs, and ease of management [9].

Group 1: Market Overview - The risk premium percentile for the CSI All Share Index is 45.07%, indicating that the market is generally in a normal return area [1][5] - The current risk premium value for the CSI 300 is 5.17%, suggesting a high return level that warrants attention [1][6] - The price-to-book ratio percentile for the CSI All Share Index is 41.77%, indicating a normal valuation state for the market [1][10] - The price-to-book ratio percentile for the Shanghai Composite Index is 22.68%, reflecting a relatively low valuation level that deserves focus [1][11] - The deviation rate for the CSI All Share Index is 18.59%, suggesting that the overall price level of the market is in a normal strong area [1][15] - The Sci-Tech 50 and ChiNext 50 are in an overbought state, indicating a need for caution regarding short-term risks [1][16] Group 2: Market Style Rotation - The growth style has significantly outperformed over the past six months, suggesting a focus on growth-style targets moving forward [1][22] - The high valuation style has also shown notable outperformance in the last six months, recommending attention to high valuation style targets [1][25] - Small-cap style has continued to record negative excess returns, while large-cap style has gradually outperformed over the past three months, indicating a focus on large-cap style targets [1][27] Group 3: ETF Rotation - The report tracks the performance of a dual momentum rotation strategy for ETFs, which selects securities that show strong time-series and cross-sectional momentum [1][31] - Reference targets for the dual momentum rotation strategy include various ETFs such as the Gold Stocks ETF and Green Energy ETF [1][33] Group 4: Convertible Bond Strategy - Convertible bonds, which combine debt and equity characteristics, are highlighted as a valuable investment option, particularly for risk-averse investors [1][35] - The report focuses on the performance enhancement of equity-oriented convertible bonds, providing a list of specific convertible bonds to consider [1][38]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the unique characteristics and advantages of the China Securities A500 Index, highlighting its role in the A-share market and its potential for investment opportunities [3][8][33]. Group 1: Index Characteristics - The China Securities A500 Index includes leading companies from all industries, making it distinct in its comprehensive coverage [8][9]. - The selection process for the A500 involves multiple rounds of elimination based on trading activity, market capitalization, and ESG ratings, ensuring only the most viable stocks are included [12][14][18][19]. Group 2: Selection Process - The first round eliminates stocks with low trading activity, specifically those in the bottom 10% of average daily trading volume over the past year [12]. - The second round removes stocks with small market capitalization, specifically those in the bottom 70% [14]. - The third round excludes stocks that do not support trading through the Shanghai-Hong Kong or Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect, enhancing liquidity [16]. - The final round eliminates stocks with poor ESG ratings, ensuring the selected companies are sustainable and responsible [18]. Group 3: Industry Coverage - The A500 Index is designed to have a balanced industry representation, which helps mitigate risks associated with overexposure to any single sector [23]. - Compared to the CSI 300 Index, the A500 has a higher representation of emerging industries like industrials and information technology, while having less exposure to traditional sectors like finance and consumer goods [25]. Group 4: Advantages and Disadvantages - The balanced industry allocation of the A500 enhances its risk resilience, but it may lead to relatively average returns during market rallies driven by specific sectors [28]. - The A500 has a shorter historical data period compared to other indices like the CSI 300, which limits the ability to assess its performance across various market conditions [31]. Group 5: Performance Insights - The A500 has shown significant performance, with some quantitative private equity funds achieving nearly 35% returns year-to-date, compared to 14% for the CSI 300 Index [33].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that investment is based on future expectations, while valuation is a retrospective indicator, making investment decisions based solely on valuation highly limited [3]. Group 1: Valuation and Index Performance - Comparing valuation growth with index growth provides significant insights into the health of index increases and whether they are driven by earnings or valuation [4][5]. - If valuation growth closely matches index growth, the increase is primarily driven by valuation rather than earnings [6]. - A situation where valuation growth exceeds index growth indicates that the index's rise is entirely driven by valuation, often accompanied by negative earnings growth [6][7]. - Conversely, if valuation growth is smaller than index growth, the increase is primarily driven by earnings, which is considered a healthier and more sustainable rise [7]. Group 2: Recent Index Performance Analysis - Since September 24 of the previous year, major A-share indices have seen increases primarily driven by valuation growth, with significant contributions from indices like the Dividend Low Volatility and the CSI 500, where valuation growth greatly exceeded index growth [9][10]. - In contrast, the Hang Seng Technology and China Internet 50 indices have experienced increases primarily driven by earnings growth, with minimal valuation changes [10][11]. Group 3: Phase-by-Phase Index Performance - An analysis of index performance from September 24 to April 30 shows that A-share indices like the CSI 500 and Dividend Low Volatility were entirely driven by valuation growth, with earnings showing negative growth [12][14]. - From April 30 to August 29, A-share indices continued to see increases primarily driven by valuation growth, while the Hang Seng Technology indices experienced increases largely driven by earnings [17][19]. Group 4: Investment Viability - A review of the health of index increases and historical valuation percentiles indicates that most A-share indices are at high valuation levels, suggesting that further investment may not be supported by retrospective indicators [21][22]. - In contrast, the Hang Seng Technology and China Internet 50 indices are at significantly undervalued positions, indicating better investment potential due to their earnings-driven growth [23][24]. - The S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 indices are at high valuation levels, with recent performance primarily driven by valuation rather than earnings, raising concerns about the sustainability of their growth [25][26].

Core Viewpoint - The recent rise in popularity of the CSI All Share Index among fund companies is attributed to its comprehensive coverage of the A-share market, allowing investors to avoid missing out on market trends while seeking excess returns through quantitative strategies [1][3][12]. Group 1: Characteristics of the CSI All Share Index - The CSI All Share Index, while considered "niche," encompasses a wide range of stocks across large, mid, and small-cap categories, effectively representing the entire A-share market [2]. - The index's balanced allocation helps investors avoid structural pitfalls associated with focusing on specific sectors, providing a sense of security during volatile market conditions [3][4]. Group 2: Demand for Enhanced Index Funds - Fund companies are increasingly interested in creating "enhanced" versions of the CSI All Share Index to meet the investment needs of ordinary investors, who seek to avoid missing market opportunities while also aiming for excess returns [3][12]. - Enhanced index funds utilize quantitative strategies to select higher-quality stocks within the index, allowing for potential excess returns without the risks associated with actively managed funds [4][10]. Group 3: Performance of Enhanced Funds - The "Hongde Smart Selection" fund, which tracks the CSI All Share Index, has consistently outperformed the index since its inception, demonstrating the effectiveness of its quantitative strategies [6][8]. - The fund has shown lower excess drawdowns, indicating that it can retain excess returns even during market fluctuations, making it a reliable option for investors [8][10]. Group 4: Cost-Effectiveness of Public Funds - Public funds generally have lower fees compared to private funds, making them more accessible to ordinary investors. Public funds typically charge fixed management fees, while private funds often take a percentage of profits, which can reduce net returns for investors [11]. - The lower investment threshold for public funds allows more investors to participate, enhancing liquidity and flexibility in investment choices [11]. Group 5: Investment Strategy Recommendations - The current market environment suggests that investors should consider stable, broad-market coverage options like the CSI All Share Index enhanced funds as a foundational investment strategy, rather than chasing high-risk, high-reward opportunities [12][13].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the performance differences among various index funds, particularly focusing on the volatility and returns of large-cap and small-cap indices over the past decade, highlighting the challenges in choosing the best investment strategy among them [3][5][24]. Performance Analysis of Different Indices - Historical data shows significant performance disparities among indices of different sizes over the past ten years, with the 中证2000 exhibiting the highest volatility and returns during bullish phases, while the 沪深300 remains relatively stable [5][7]. - The 中证全指 demonstrates a balanced performance, generally staying within a moderate range with fewer extreme fluctuations compared to other indices [5][7]. Bull Market Performance - In 2014, all five indices saw substantial gains, with 沪深300 and 中证2000 both around 50%, while 中证全指, 中证500, and 中证1000 had returns between 30%-45% [10]. - The year 2015 marked extreme differentiation, with 中证2000 soaring over 100%, while 沪深300 showed minimal growth [11]. - In 2019, all indices rose moderately, with gains concentrated in the 20%-35% range, favoring 沪深300 and 中证全指 slightly [12]. - The year 2020 saw a general tightening of gains, with most indices recording increases between 10%-20%, and 沪深300 slightly outperforming small-cap indices [13]. Bear Market Performance - During bear markets, indices generally experienced significant declines, with the depth of the drop closely related to market capitalization structure [17]. - In 2016, the 中证全指 and 沪深300 fell by 5%-8%, while 中证500 and 中证1000 dropped by 10%-15%, and 中证2000 remained relatively stable [17]. - The year 2018 witnessed a severe downturn, with 中证1000 and 中证2000 suffering losses of nearly 40% and over 35%, respectively, while large-cap indices also faced declines exceeding 25% [18]. - In 2022, all indices recorded declines in the 15%-25% range, with small-cap indices and 中证全指 experiencing slightly larger drops, while 沪深300 fared better [19]. - In 2023, most indices recorded slight declines or remained flat, with only 中证2000 achieving approximately 2% positive returns, indicating that small-cap indices often bear greater adjustment pressure in bear markets [20]. Summary of Returns and Volatility - 中证2000 has the highest cumulative return at nearly 197% with an annualized return of 10.19% and a volatility of 28.26%, indicating high elasticity and risk [23]. - 中证全指 and 沪深300 show long-term returns of 84.46% and 79.11%, respectively, with annualized returns in the 5%-6% range and lower volatility, reflecting stability and balanced returns [23]. - 中证500 and 中证1000 fall in between, with cumulative returns of 67.92% and 55.63%, annualized returns slightly below 5%, and volatility ranging from 21%-27% [23]. Investment Strategy Recommendations - The article suggests that small-cap indices perform better during favorable market conditions but come with higher volatility and drawdown risks, while large-cap and broad-based indices offer more stable returns [24]. - A diversified investment approach, such as balancing large-cap and small-cap allocations and integrating growth and value styles, is recommended to enhance adaptability across different market conditions [24].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the importance of understanding different stock indices, particularly the Shanghai Composite Index and the Shenzhen Composite Index, for making informed investment decisions in the Chinese stock market [5][9]. Group 1: Index Characteristics - The Shanghai Composite Index includes only stocks listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange, while the Shenzhen Composite Index includes stocks from the Shenzhen Stock Exchange and the ChiNext board [5][9]. - Historically, from 2019 to 2021, the Shenzhen stocks experienced greater price increases compared to Shanghai stocks, indicating a disparity in performance during bull markets [5][6]. - The Shanghai stocks tend to have more value-oriented characteristics, resulting in smaller price fluctuations during both bull and bear markets [6][7]. Group 2: Market Performance - The overall performance of the A-share market is better assessed by looking at both the Shanghai and Shenzhen indices, as they each represent about half of the A-share market [9]. - The CSI All Share Index, which includes all listed companies from both exchanges, saw an approximate 80% increase from 2019 to 2021, reaching over 6000 points at its peak [10].

Group 1: Core Insights - The report emphasizes the importance of growth factors in investment strategies, highlighting various indices that represent growth styles [10][12][24] - It identifies three main expressions of growth styles: absolute growth, relative growth, and cash flow growth, each with specific metrics and methodologies for evaluation [15][24][28] Group 2: Growth Factors - The report defines several growth factors, including net profit growth, operating profit growth, and revenue growth, with specific calculation methods outlined for each [15][18] - Correlation analysis among growth factors shows strong relationships, indicating that net profit growth has a 100% correlation with itself and significant correlations with other factors like operating profit growth (94.22%) and revenue growth (52.02%) [18][21] Group 3: Growth Style Performance - Backtesting results indicate that absolute growth composite strategies yield excess returns across various indices, with the highest information ratio observed in the CSI 300 index [21][28] - The report presents performance metrics for different growth styles, showing that the SUE (Surprise Earnings) factor and analyst forecast growth have significant positive impacts on returns [24][28]