智通财经APP获悉，美国9月生产者价格指数(PPI)较8月有所上升，反映出能源和食品价格上涨。具体数 据显示，PPI环比上涨0.3%，与市场预期相符，同比涨幅则从8月的2.60%升至2.7%，同样符合市场预 期。其中，核心PPI(剔除食品和能源后)环比上升0.1%，虽低于市场预期的0.2%，但较前值-0.1%增加， 同比来看，9月核心PPI上涨2.6%，高于分析师预估的2.7%。 此次数据是因政府停摆而延迟发布后的首次更新，为评估美国通胀路径提供了关键依据。此前8月PPI曾 意外下降，主要受服务类别价格回落拖累，而9月数据已回归典型增长模式。 值得一提的是，该数据是美联储青睐的通胀衡量指标PCE物价指数的先行影响指标之一，并且PCE物价 指数会在12月5日公布。 当前通胀粘性与就业市场疲软形成矛盾，导致美联储内部意见分化，而此次PPI数据将为12月货币政策 会议提供重要决策参考之一。 批发商品价格上涨0.9%，其中60%的涨幅是由于汽油价格上涨所致。PPI报告显示，服务价格在上月下 降后保持不变。 在服务业方面，机械设备批发利润率下降，而食品批发利润率上升。航空旅客服务成本也有所上涨。 批发价格数据在9月份消 ...

Core Insights - The Federal Reserve is facing unprecedented challenges in guiding the economy amid a weak labor market and persistent inflation, exacerbated by the government shutdown [1] - The shutdown has disrupted the Fed's access to essential economic data, complicating its ability to make informed decisions regarding interest rates and economic policies [1][2] - The Fed is now relying on alternative data sources to assess labor market conditions and consumer spending, which are critical for balancing economic growth and price stability [1] Economic Data Dependency - The lack of government data is significantly hindering the Fed's decision-making process, as government statistics are considered the "gold standard" for measuring the U.S. economy [2] - The last time the Fed operated without key government economic data was during the 2018-2019 government shutdown, where it had to rely on credit card transactions and auto sales data [2] - Economists express concerns that private sector data cannot fully substitute for government data, especially since government data serves as a benchmark for many private sector metrics [2]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. government shutdown is creating a "blind" situation for policymakers at a critical moment for the economy, complicating the Federal Reserve's decision-making regarding interest rates due to a lack of updated economic data [1] Impact on Economic Data Collection - The government shutdown is significantly affecting the collection of key economic data, particularly the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which is crucial for the Federal Reserve's interest rate decisions [2] - The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has lost approximately one-third of the October price data due to the shutdown, which could lead to a decline in data quality over time [2][3] - Other economic indicators, such as the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index, will also be impacted, although some data sources like retail sales may be less affected [2] Historical Context - This shutdown marks the 15th federal government shutdown since 1981, with previous shutdowns causing delays in important economic reports [4] - Historical examples include the 1995-1996 shutdown, which delayed the employment report by two weeks, and the 2013 shutdown, which also caused significant delays in various economic data releases [5] Alternative Data Sources - In the absence of government data, private sector economic data is becoming increasingly important as a supplement [6] - Private institutions like ADP Research and Indeed provide alternative employment and job vacancy data, while financial institutions like Carlyle Group and Bank of America offer labor market updates [6][7] - Although these private indicators cannot fully replace the authority of official reports, they can help fill the data void and provide decision-making references for market participants [7] Federal Reserve's Decision-Making Challenges - The Federal Reserve is facing challenges in making interest rate decisions due to a slowdown in the labor market and inflationary pressures from tariffs [8] - The upcoming CPI report is critical for policy decisions, but the risk of further delays due to the shutdown complicates the situation [8] - The Fed is also considering alternative indicators from the private sector and local governments to inform their decisions, but the overall decrease in data availability is expected to increase the difficulty of their work [8]

Core Points - The U.S. federal government shutdown has entered its fifteenth day, marking the longest shutdown in nearly seven years, with no substantial progress in negotiations to restart the government [1][2] - The shutdown began on October 1 due to the Senate's failure to pass a new temporary funding bill before federal funds were exhausted, highlighting increasing political polarization and a lack of compromise between the Democratic and Republican parties [2][3] - The shutdown has led to significant disruptions in public services, affecting vulnerable populations and international visitors, with many federal employees being furloughed or forced to work without pay [4][5] Group 1: Political Dynamics - The Senate has failed to pass the funding bill after eight votes, with the latest vote resulting in 49 in favor and 45 against, indicating a deepening political stalemate [2][3] - The ongoing political battle has escalated into a public relations war, with both parties blaming each other for the shutdown, and the White House using a countdown timer to highlight the duration of the shutdown [3] - Historical context shows that government shutdowns have occurred over 20 times since 1974, often as a result of budgetary disputes between the two parties [3] Group 2: Economic Impact - The shutdown is expected to negatively impact the U.S. economy, with estimates suggesting a reduction of approximately 0.1% in annual GDP growth for each week the government remains shut down [6][7] - The previous shutdown from December 2018 to January 2019 resulted in a $11 billion loss in economic output, indicating the potential for significant economic repercussions if the current shutdown continues [6][7] - The shutdown has created a "data blind spot" for economic decision-making, as key federal agencies have paused operations, delaying important economic indicators and complicating monetary policy decisions for the Federal Reserve [6][7] Group 3: Public Services Disruption - Numerous public services have been halted, with federal employees facing furloughs and layoffs, impacting essential services such as air traffic control and social assistance programs [4][5] - The Smithsonian Institution and other federally funded organizations have closed, affecting tourism and public access to cultural resources [5] - Food banks and social assistance programs are struggling due to a lack of federal support, with reports of significant funding shortfalls impacting their ability to serve communities in need [5][6]

Core Points - The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) announced a delay in the release of the 2024 annual consumer spending data, originally scheduled for next Tuesday, without providing a reason or a new timeline for publication [1][4][5] Group 1: Delay Announcement - The BLS's announcement of the delay is unusual due to the lack of explanation or context, which has raised market concerns [4][5] - Last year's report also faced a delay, but the BLS provided a new release date and explained the reason for the postponement, which contrasts with the current situation [5][6] Group 2: Implications of the Delay - Analysts suggest that if the annual data can be finalized by the end of the year, there should be sufficient time to incorporate the new weights into the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for January 2026 [6] - Former BLS director William Beach indicated that the delay might simply be due to the publication process not being fully prepared, but he expressed concern if further delays occur [6] Group 3: Challenges Facing the BLS - The BLS is currently facing political pressure, staff shortages, and limited resources, which complicate its operations [7][8] - Following significant revisions to employment data, former BLS director Erika McEntarfer was dismissed, and the White House nominated E.J. Antoni to lead the agency, which has drawn criticism regarding its political implications [7] - An internal investigation has been initiated into the BLS's economic data collection processes, highlighting challenges in gathering and reporting critical economic data [7][8][9]

Key Points - The financial market is set to experience a series of critical data releases and events this week, with a focus on the Reserve Bank of Australia's interest rate decision and the U.S. July Consumer Price Index (CPI) [1] - The Australian Reserve Bank unexpectedly maintained the official cash rate (OCR) at 3.85% in July, but market expectations lean towards a potential cut to 3.60% due to easing inflation and a declining employment report [3] - The U.S. July CPI data is anticipated to provide insights into inflation trends, especially after the unexpected underperformance of the non-farm payroll data, which has heightened expectations for a Federal Reserve rate cut in September [5] - The International Energy Agency (IEA) and the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) will release their monthly energy outlook reports, which will offer guidance on oil demand, supply, and price forecasts [8] - The U.K. is expected to release GDP data for Q2 and June, with previous data indicating economic contraction, increasing pressure on the Bank of England to consider further rate cuts [9] - The Eurozone will also publish a revised GDP figure for Q2, with expectations of a modest growth rate of 0.1% [11] - Japan's GDP data for Q2 will be released, following a 0.7% year-on-year decline in Q1, raising concerns about the economic outlook and potential implications for the Bank of Japan's interest rate policy [12]

Group 1: Impact on Economic Data Integrity - Trump's decision to dismiss the BLS director has raised concerns about the integrity of U.S. economic statistics, with experts warning that it may lead to public skepticism regarding the accuracy of economic data [1][3] - The dismissal is seen as a politicization of data that should remain independent and credible, with long-lasting negative effects anticipated [1][3] Group 2: Labor Market Data Challenges - The July employment report indicated a significant slowdown in job growth, with only 73,000 jobs added, far below the expected 104,000, and previous months' data revised downward by a total of 258,000 jobs [2][4] - The BLS faces systemic challenges, including funding shortages and declining survey response rates, which complicate the accurate measurement of labor supply and demand [4][5] Group 3: Federal Reserve Personnel Changes - Following the dismissal of the BLS director, a Federal Reserve governor announced her resignation, creating opportunities for Trump to appoint new members to the Fed's board [2][8] - Trump's criticism of the Fed's current leadership and potential changes in personnel could reshape the decision-making environment regarding monetary policy and regulatory discussions [7][8]