智通财经APP获悉，11月13日,阿里巴巴-W（09988）、小米集团-W（01810）、华润万象生活 （01209）南向资金净流入金额位列市场前三，分别净流入13.15 亿、7.77 亿、6.71 亿 盈富基金（02800）、恒生中国企业（02828）、腾讯控股（00700）南向资金净流出金额位列市场前 三，分别净流出-62.19 亿、-22.83 亿、-8.78 亿 在净流出比方面，中集集团（02039）、绿城管理控股（09979）、361度（01361） 以-59.72%、-56.62%、-56.52%位列市场前三。 | 股票名称 | 净流入比↓ | 净流入(元) | 收盘价 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 南方港美科技(03442) | 88.11% | 1.10 亿 | 9.435（+0.05%） | | 南方东西精选(03441) | 74.90% | 1930.75 万 | 10.580（-0.47%） | | 至源控股(00990) | 62.95% | 1787.74 万 | 0.760（+1.33%） | | 深圳高速公路股份 | 60.48% | 645.88 ...

大型蓝筹股多数下跌，汇丰控股收报110.738港元，较香港收市跌1.21%；腾讯控股收报629.180港元，较香港收市跌1.15%。 | 序号 | 名称 | 港股代码 | 最新价 | 涨跌额 | 涨跌幅 | ADRICH | ADR换算价(HKD) | 较港股升跌 较 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | 腾讯控股 | ○ 00700 | 636.500 | -4.500 | -0.70% | TCEHY | 629.180 | -7.320 | | 2 | 阿里巴巴-W | 09988 | 154.900 | 0.000 | 0.00% | BABA | 153.262 | -1.638 | | 3 | 建设银行 | 00939 | 8.240 | -0.110 | -1.32% | CICHY | 8.190 | -0.050 | | 4 | 汇丰控股 | 00005 | 112.100 | -0.800 | -0.71% | HSBC | 110.738 | -1.362 | | 5 | 小米集团-W | 0181 ...

Core Points - Xiaomi Auto has announced a new benefit for car owners, offering a 3-month free membership to NetEase Cloud Music for all owners who have taken delivery of their vehicles [1] - The company has also launched a series of promotional activities, including a tax subsidy plan for year-end purchases and free ETC activation, with existing car owners receiving 500 points as compensation [1]

Core Viewpoint - Lei Jun's recent public statements aim to address the public relations crisis surrounding Xiaomi's automotive division, particularly in response to criticisms regarding safety and design priorities [2][3][6] Group 1: Public Relations and Communication Strategy - Lei Jun's active engagement on social media reflects Xiaomi's reliance on the founder's personal brand for effective communication and crisis management [4][6] - The ongoing rumors about the internal reassignment of Xiaomi's public relations manager suggest dissatisfaction with the current PR strategies and may indicate a significant shift in Xiaomi's communication approach [3][4] - The effectiveness of founder-driven marketing strategies in the automotive sector is under scrutiny, especially in light of recent safety incidents involving Xiaomi's vehicles [6][7] Group 2: Safety and Product Issues - The core of Xiaomi's public relations challenges stems from real safety concerns related to its automotive products, including issues with driving assistance and battery safety [6][10] - The controversy surrounding the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra's carbon fiber hood highlights potential consumer deception and dissatisfaction, leading to legal actions against the company [11][12] - The evolving perception of "safety" in the automotive industry is shifting from a baseline expectation to a marketing narrative, raising concerns about consumer focus on fundamental product attributes [9][10] Group 3: Industry Trends and Implications - The rise of founder-driven marketing strategies in the automotive industry is linked to the fragmentation of content in the social media era and the increasing consumerization of automotive products [7][9] - The challenges faced by Xiaomi serve as a case study for the broader automotive industry, prompting reflections on the essential priorities and transformations within the sector [9][13] - The ongoing discussions surrounding Xiaomi's public relations crisis may provide valuable insights for other companies in the rapidly evolving smart electric vehicle market [13]

Core Points - Consumers expressed dissatisfaction over Xiaomi's failure to deliver refrigerators purchased during a flash sale on an e-commerce platform, despite successfully placing orders at a promotional price of 11.11 yuan [1][3] - Xiaomi's customer service indicated that the inability to fulfill orders was due to a system configuration error, and offered a 30 yuan compensation to affected customers [6][8] Group 1 - Multiple consumers reported similar experiences of order cancellations after participating in Xiaomi's flash sale, leading to widespread discussion on social media [6] - The specific model involved in the sale, the "Xiaomi Mijia 206L Two-Door Refrigerator," has since been removed from the platform, with no identical product currently available [6] - Opinions among consumers varied, with some insisting that Xiaomi should honor the orders while others believed the low price indicated a mistake that should not require fulfillment [6][8]

今日上榜个股中，盈富基金、阿里巴巴-W、小米集团-W等7只股同时上榜港股通（深）、港股通 （沪）成交活跃股， 盈富基金合计成交额39.03亿港元，成交净买入37.27亿港元，阿里巴巴-W合计成 交额101.70亿港元，成交净买入20.71亿港元。赣锋锂业合计成交额19.17亿港元，成交净卖出8353.42万 港元，中芯国际合计成交额38.54亿港元，成交净卖出7329.47万港元。 11月17日恒生指数下跌0.71%，南向资金全天合计成交金额为913.76亿港元，其中，买入成交499.12亿 港元，卖出成交414.64亿港元，合计净买入金额84.48亿港元。具体来看，港股通（深）累计成交金额 351.89亿港元，买入成交196.51亿港元，卖出成交155.38亿港元，合计净买入金额41.13亿港元；港股通 （沪）累计成交金额561.86亿港元，买入成交302.61亿港元，卖出成交259.26亿港元，合计净买入金额 43.35亿港元。 成交活跃股方面，今日上榜个股中，南向资金成交金额最多的是阿里巴巴-W，合计成交额101.70亿港 元，盈富基金、中芯国际成交额紧随其后，分别成交39.03亿港元、38.54亿港元 ...

Market Overview - On November 17, the Hang Seng Index fell by 0.71%, closing at 26,384.28 points, while southbound funds through the Stock Connect recorded a net purchase of HKD 8.448 billion [1][3] - The total trading volume for the Stock Connect on the same day was HKD 91.376 billion, with a net purchase of HKD 8.448 billion [1] Trading Activity - In the Shanghai Stock Connect, the trading volume was HKD 56.186 billion with a net purchase of HKD 4.335 billion, while in the Shenzhen Stock Connect, the trading volume was HKD 35.189 billion with a net purchase of HKD 4.113 billion [1] - The most actively traded stock in the Shanghai Stock Connect was Alibaba-W, with a trading volume of HKD 6.484 billion, followed by the Tracker Fund of Hong Kong and SMIC, with trading volumes of HKD 3.356 billion and HKD 2.080 billion, respectively [1][2] Net Buying and Selling - In terms of net buying, the Tracker Fund of Hong Kong led with a net purchase of HKD 3.180 billion, despite its closing price dropping by 0.75% [1] - Tencent Holdings recorded the highest net selling amount of HKD 180 million, with its closing price also down by 0.70% [1] - In the Shenzhen Stock Connect, Alibaba-W again topped the trading volume with HKD 3.686 billion, and a net purchase of HKD 1.202 billion, closing flat [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the negative impact of malicious video editing on public figures like Lei Jun and Tim, highlighting how original content can be distorted to create misleading narratives, leading to public backlash and misinterpretation of their statements [5][12][18]. Group 1: Impact of Video Editing - Lei Jun faced backlash after a statement about car design was taken out of context, leading to accusations of prioritizing aesthetics over safety [1][9]. - Tim's video was similarly misrepresented, with a humorous segment being edited to suggest he looked down on ordinary people, creating a false narrative of class conflict [3][12]. - Both cases illustrate how video snippets, once a tool for positive engagement, have turned into instruments of misinformation [7][13]. Group 2: Evolution of Video Snippets - Initially, video snippets helped figures like Lei Jun gain popularity by highlighting humorous or impactful moments, such as his "Are you OK" phrase during a product launch [8][16]. - The shift from positive to negative editing reflects a broader change in content consumption, where sensationalism and conflict drive engagement over context and accuracy [12][17]. - The article emphasizes that the same tools that once aided in building reputations are now being used to undermine them [11][18]. Group 3: Industry and Platform Responsibility - The article calls for clearer regulations around video snippets, emphasizing the need for proper authorization and ethical standards in content creation [17][18]. - It suggests that platforms should adjust algorithms to promote accurate content rather than sensationalized snippets, which often mislead viewers [12][18]. - The need for creators to proactively protect their content by emphasizing key messages and clarifying context is highlighted as a necessary strategy [17][18].

Core Insights - On November 17, 2025, Alibaba-W (09988), the Tracker Fund of Hong Kong (02800), and SMIC (00981) were the top three stocks by trading volume in the Southbound Stock Connect, with trading amounts of 6.484 billion, 3.356 billion, and 2.080 billion respectively [1] - In the Southbound Stock Connect for the Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect, Alibaba-W (09988), SMIC (00981), and Tencent Holdings (00700) led the trading volume, with amounts of 3.686 billion, 1.774 billion, and 1.599 billion respectively [1] Southbound Stock Connect (Shanghai-Hong Kong) - Top active companies by trading amount: - Alibaba-W (09988): 6.484 billion, net buy of 868 million - Tracker Fund of Hong Kong (02800): 3.356 billion, net buy of 3.180 billion - SMIC (00981): 2.080 billion, net sell of 29.1529 million - Tencent Holdings (00700): 1.735 billion, net sell of 1.8 billion - Xiaomi Group-W (01810): 1.577 billion, net buy of 435 million - Huahong Semiconductor (01347): 1.571 billion, net buy of 85.3433 million - Ganfeng Lithium (01772): 1.209 billion, net sell of 88.1303 million - Horizon Robotics-W (09660): 842 million, net buy of 60.0033 million - Pop Mart (09992): 824 million, net buy of 219 million - Jingtaik Holdings (02228): 806 million, net buy of 60.6432 million [2] Southbound Stock Connect (Shenzhen-Hong Kong) - Top active companies by trading amount: - Alibaba-W (09988): 3.686 billion, net buy of 1.202 billion - SMIC (00981): 1.774 billion, net sell of 44.1418 million - Tencent Holdings (00700): 1.599 billion, net buy of 258 million - Xiaomi Group-W (01810): 1.372 billion, net sell of 15.5 million - Huahong Semiconductor (01347): 1.054 billion, net sell of 74.6878 million - Ganfeng Lithium (01772): 708 million, net buy of 4.5961 million - Meituan-W (03690): 612 million, net buy of 248 million - Tracker Fund of Hong Kong (02800): 547 million, net buy of 546 million - XPeng Motors-W (09868): 532 million, net sell of 52.5404 million - China Mobile (00941): 491 million, net sell of 18.3796 million [2]

84页证据甩在桌上，法律不相信眼泪，只认证据。小米与车主之间的维权战争，成了2025年智能汽车行 业最受关注的"样板间"。 "网上有不少人断章取义，歪曲抹黑。"2025年11月16日，雷军在微博上连续发声，情绪罕见激烈。这场 突如其来的"爆发"，源于一句被断章取义的话——"一辆车，好看是第一位的"。 （图源微博） 这句话被部分网友曲解为"小米重颜值、轻安全"，甚至成为攻击小米SU7安全性的"铁证"。 就在雷军微博喊冤的前一天，242名小米汽车YU7准车主因超长等车周期与定金不退问题提起诉讼，将 这家跨界造车新势力推向舆论风口浪尖。 01 信任危机，小米怎么了？ 信任危机像一张无形的网，将小米牢牢困住。 更令人担忧的是，在"碳纤维前舱盖"纠纷中，部分车主认为小米的解决方案缺乏诚意。 一位江苏的车主对小米汽车发起诉讼后，作为被告的"江苏小米景明科技有限公司"连续提出管辖权异 议，主张案件应移送至小米汽车宣传主体所在地的北京市大兴区人民法院。 这被外界解读为小米试图在程序上设置障碍，增加消费者维权难度。 02 信任不是感觉：拆解小米危机的五个缺口 亨利·克劳德博士在《信任之书》中提出的"信任五要素"模型，为我们提供 ...