转自：北京日报客户端 12月19日，中国人民银行发布行政处罚信息显示，交通银行因违反账户管理规定、违反清算管理规定等 11项违法行为被处以警告，并被没收违法所得23.982116万元，罚款6783.43万元； 工商银行因违反金融统计相关规定、违反账户管理规定等10项违法行为被警告，被没收违法所得 434.570857万元，罚款3961.5万元。 同日，金融监管总局披露的罚单显示，浦发银行因相关理财、代销等业务管理不审慎，员工管理不到位 等被罚款1560万元。 上述三家银行所涉多名相关责任人一并遭罚，其中有多人遭受禁业处罚。 交通银行被罚6783.43万元 处罚信息显示，交通银行违法行为包括： 1.违反账户管理规定； 2.违反清算管理规定； 7.违反信用信息采集、提供、查询及相关管理规定； 8.未按规定履行客户身份识别义务； 9.未按规定保存客户身份资料和交易记录； 10.未按规定报送大额交易报告或者可疑交易报告； 11.与身份不明的客户进行交易或者为客户开立匿名账户、假名账户。 3.违反特约商户实名制管理规定； 4.违反反假货币业务管理规定； 5.占压财政存款或者资金； 6.违反国库科目设置和使用规定； 作出 ...

（原标题：央行罚没工行、交行合计超1.1亿元 30名责任人被追责） 12月19日，中国人民银行官网发布两份行政处罚公告，对交通银行股份有限公司与中国工商银行股份有 限公司开出合计超过1.1亿元的罚没决定，并同步追究30名相关责任人的个人责任。公告显示，交通银 行被警告、没收违法所得23.982116万元，并处罚款6783.43万元；工商银行被警告、没收违法所得 434.570857万元，并处罚款3961.5万元。两项合计罚没金额达1.1243亿元。所有处罚决定均于2025年12 月10日作出，公示期为五年。 此次处罚覆盖范围广泛。交通银行共涉及11类违法行为，包括违反账户管理规定、清算管理规定、特约 商户实名制管理、反假货币业务管理、占压财政存款或资金、违反国库科目设置和使用规定、信用信息 采集与查询违规、未按规定履行客户身份识别义务、未保存客户身份资料和交易记录、未报送大额或可 疑交易报告，以及与身份不明客户交易或开立匿名、假名账户。 来源：中国人民银行 此次处罚涉及的银行均为系统重要性银行，其合规整改措施和内部管理调整将对整个银行业产生示范效 应。预计各家银行将重新评估在反洗钱、客户信息保护、支付结算等领 ...

交通银行因违反账户管理规定、违反清算管理规定等11项违法行为被处以警告，并被没收违法所得 23.982116万元，罚款6783.43万元； 工商银行因违反金融统计相关规定、违反账户管理规定等10项违法行为被警告，被没收违法所得 434.570857万元，罚款3961.5万元； 同日，国家金融监督管理总局官网披露信息显示，浦发银行因相关理财、代销等业务管理不审慎，员工 管理不到位等遭罚1560万元。 上述三家银行所涉多名相关责任人一并遭罚，其中有多人遭受禁业处罚。 交通银行被罚6783.43万元 12月19日晚间，中国人民银行发布行政处罚信息显示： 12月19日，央行披露的行政处罚公示显示，交通银行因11项违法行为被警告，没收违法所得23.982116 万元，罚款6783.43万元。同时13名责任人领罚。作出处罚的日期为12月10日。 具体来看违法行为类型： 1.违反账户管理规定； 2.违反清算管理规定； 3.违反特约商户实名制管理规定； 4.违反反假货币业务管理规定； 5.占压财政存款或者资金； 6.违反国库科目设置和使用规定； 7.违反信用信息采集、提供、查询及相关管理规定； 8.未按规定履行客户身份识别义 ...

12月19日晚间，中国人民银行发布行政处罚信息显示，交通银行因违反账户管理规定、违反清算管理规定等11项违法行为被处以警告，并被没收违法所 得23.982116万元，罚款6783.43万元；工商银行因违反金融统计相关规定、违反账户管理规定等10项违法行为被警告，被没收违法所得434.570857万 元，罚款3961.5万元。 同日，国家金融监督管理总局官网披露信息显示，浦发银行因相关理财、代销等业务管理不审慎，员工管理不到位等遭罚1560万元。 上述三家银行所涉多名相关责任人一并遭罚，其中有多人遭受禁业处罚。 5.占压财政存款或者资金； 6.违反国库科目设置和使用规定； 7.违反信用信息采集、提供、查询及相关管理规定； 交通银行被罚6783.43万元 12月19日，中国人民银行公开行政处罚公示信息显示，交通银行股份有限公司（简称"交通银行"）因十一项违法违规行为被警告，没收违法所得23.982116万元， 遭罚款6783.43万元。 具体来看违法行为类型： 1.违反账户管理规定； 2.违反清算管理规定； 3.违反特约商户实名制管理规定； 4.违反反假货币业务管理规定； 8.未按规定履行客户身份识别义务； 9. ...

Group 1 - The People's Bank of China has imposed administrative penalties on Bank of Communications for multiple violations, including account management and anti-counterfeiting regulations [1] - The total amount of illegal gains confiscated is 239,821.16 yuan, with fines totaling 67,834,300 yuan, and 13 responsible individuals were fined a total of 929,000 yuan [1] - The violations occurred prior to 2023, and the bank has acknowledged the penalties and completed corrective actions [2] Group 2 - Bank of Communications has committed to enhancing internal control and compliance management, aiming to foster a culture of prudent operation and improve management levels [2] - The bank views the corrective actions as an opportunity to optimize long-term mechanisms and drive high-quality development [2]

Core Viewpoint - Three banks in China received significant fines totaling over 100 million yuan due to various regulatory violations, highlighting ongoing compliance issues within the banking sector [1]. Group 1: Bank Penalties - Bank of Communications was fined 67.8343 million yuan for 11 violations, including breaches of account management and clearing regulations, and had illegal gains of 239,821.16 yuan confiscated [2][3]. - Industrial and Commercial Bank of China faced a penalty of 39.615 million yuan for 10 violations, including financial statistics and account management breaches, with illegal gains of 4.34570857 million yuan confiscated [4][5]. - Shanghai Pudong Development Bank was fined 15.6 million yuan for imprudent management of wealth management and distribution businesses, with multiple related personnel also penalized [6]. Group 2: Specific Violations - Violations by Bank of Communications included: 1. Breaching account management regulations 2. Violating clearing management regulations 3. Failing to identify customer identities as required 4. Engaging in transactions with unidentified clients [3]. - Violations by Industrial and Commercial Bank of China included: 1. Breaching financial statistics regulations 2. Violating account management regulations 3. Failing to report large or suspicious transactions as required [5]. - Violations by Shanghai Pudong Development Bank included: 1. Inadequate management of wealth management and distribution businesses 2. Insufficient employee oversight [6]. Group 3: Personnel Consequences - Bank of Communications had 13 related personnel penalized, with fines ranging from 4,000 to 170,000 yuan, and two individuals received warnings [3]. - Industrial and Commercial Bank of China had 17 personnel penalized, with fines between 20,000 and 150,000 yuan, and four individuals received warnings [5]. - Shanghai Pudong Development Bank saw six personnel warned and fined a total of 300,000 yuan, with seven individuals facing industry bans ranging from 5 to 15 years [6].

Core Viewpoint - Three banks in China received significant fines totaling over 1 billion yuan due to various regulatory violations, highlighting ongoing compliance issues within the banking sector [1][6]. Group 1: Traffic Bank Penalties - Traffic Bank was fined 67.8343 million yuan for 11 violations, including breaches of account management and clearing regulations, and had illegal gains of 239,821.16 yuan confiscated [1][8]. - The penalties were based on a comprehensive enforcement inspection conducted by the People's Bank of China from November 2022 to April 2023, with all violations occurring before 2023 [2][8]. - Traffic Bank acknowledged the penalties, stating that it has completed corrective actions and is committed to enhancing internal compliance management [2][8]. Group 2: Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Penalties - The Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) faced fines of 39.615 million yuan for 10 violations, including breaches of account management, clearing regulations, and customer identity verification [3][9]. - ICBC had illegal gains of 4.34570857 million yuan confiscated, and 17 related personnel were penalized, with fines ranging from 20,000 to 150,000 yuan [4][11]. - The bank emphasized that the issues leading to the penalties were identified during enforcement inspections in 2021 and 2023, and corrective measures have been implemented [4][11]. Group 3: Shanghai Pudong Development Bank Penalties - Shanghai Pudong Development Bank was fined 15.6 million yuan due to imprudent management of wealth management and agency sales, along with inadequate employee management [5][12]. - Multiple personnel were penalized, with six receiving warnings and fines totaling 300,000 yuan, and seven individuals facing industry bans ranging from 5 to 15 years [5][12].

12月19日晚间，中国人民银行发布行政处罚信息显示，交通银行因违反账户管理规定、违反清算管理规定 等11项违法行为被处以警告，并被没收违法所得23.982116万元，罚款6783.43万元；工商银行因违反金融统 计相关规定、违反账户管理规定等10项违法行为被警告，被没收违法所得434.570857万元，罚款3961.5万 元。 12月19日，中国人民银行公开行政处罚公示信息显示，交通银行股份有限公司（简称"交通银行"）因十一项违 法违规行为被警告，没收违法所得23.982116万元，遭罚款6783.43万元。 具体来看违法行为类型： 1.违反账户管理规定； 2.违反清算管理规定； 3.违反特约商户实名制管理规定； 4.违反反假货币业务管理规定； 同日，国家金融监督管理总局官网披露信息显示，浦发银行因相关理财、代销等业务管理不审慎，员工管理不 到位等遭罚1560万元。 上述三家银行所涉多名相关责任人一并遭罚，其中有多人遭受禁业处罚。 交通银行被罚6783.43万元 5.占压财政存款或者资金； 6.违反国库科目设置和使用规定； 7.违反信用信息采集、提供、查询及相关管理规定； 8.未按规定履行客户身份识别义务； ...

中国基金报记者 嘉合 12月19日，中国人民银行披露一批行政处罚公告。其中，交通银行因涉及11项违法违规行为，被中国人民银行处以警告、没收违法所得23.98万元，罚款 6783.43万元。 具体来看，交通银行主要涉及以下违法行为：违反账户管理规定；违反清算管理规定；违反特约商户实名制管理规定；违反反假货币业务管理规定；占压 财政存款或者资金；违反国库科目设置和使用规定；违反信用信息采集、提供、查询及相关管理规定；未按规定履行客户身份识别义务；未按规定保存客 户身份资料和交易记录；未按规定报送大额交易报告或者可疑交易报告；与身份不明的客户进行交易或者为客户开立匿名账户、假名账户。 | 序号 当事人名称 | | 行政处罚 | 违法行为类型 | 行政处罚内容 | 作出行政处罚 | 作出行政处罚 | 公示期限 备注 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | 决定书文号 | | | 决定机关名称 決定日期 | | | | | | | 1. 违反账户管理规定; | | | | | | | | | 2. 违反清算管理规定; | | | | | | | ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the acceleration of mergers and acquisitions among rural banks, with over 200 banks involved since 2025, marking a significant increase compared to 2024 [1] - As of the end of 2024, the total number of rural banks in China was 1,538, a decrease of 98 banks from the end of 2023 [1] - Various reform and restructuring methods have emerged, including "village to branch" and "village to division" models, primarily initiated by local rural commercial banks and supported by state-owned banks [2][3] Group 2 - The first state-owned bank to engage in the "village to branch" model was the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, which completed its acquisition of Chongqing Bishi Rural Bank in June 2025 [2] - Other state-owned banks, such as Agricultural Bank of China and Bank of Communications, have also been involved in acquiring rural banks throughout 2025 [2] - Analysts suggest that the participation of state-owned banks in rural bank reforms is crucial for risk management and reflects their responsiveness to regulatory requirements [3] Group 3 - The financial indicators of state-owned banks are currently stable, and their involvement in rural bank reforms is expected to have minimal impact on their operations [3] - The bankruptcy of rural banks is rare, with only two instances reported by 2025, indicating ongoing challenges in risk management within this sector [4][5] - The Dalian Jinzhou Lianfeng Rural Bank was approved for bankruptcy proceedings in July 2025, becoming the second rural bank to do so, with its deposits being taken over by Dalian Rural Commercial Bank [5] Group 4 - The ongoing reform of rural banks aims to address issues such as deteriorating asset quality and increasing credit risks, particularly in economically weaker regions [7] - The China Banking Association's report indicates that rural banks are facing multiple challenges, including intensified regulatory compliance and competition, necessitating urgent reforms [7] - The restructuring of rural banks is being pursued through mergers, acquisitions, and dissolutions, with a notable reduction of 99 banks in 2024, accounting for nearly 50% of the total reduction in banking institutions that year [7] Group 5 - Employees of merged rural banks have reported changes in job roles but generally view the transitions positively, indicating a degree of stability post-merger [8] - For initiating banks, the restructuring can present opportunities for growth, as seen with Changshu Bank, which has actively pursued mergers to enhance its market presence [8] - The central economic work conference emphasized the importance of reducing and improving the quality of small financial institutions to mitigate financial risks in the coming year [8]