法律意见书 致：平安银行股份有限公司 根据《中华人民共和国证券法》、《中华人民共和国公司法》（以下统称"有关 法律"）及《平安银行股份有限公司章程》（以下称"公司章程"）的规定，北京市 海问（深圳）律师事务所（以下称"本所"）作为平安银行股份有限公司（以下称 "公司"）的特聘法律顾问，应公司的要求，指派李君娥律师和黄博文律师（以下 称"本所律师"）出席 2025 年 12 月 16 日召开的公司 2025 年第一次临时股东会（以 下称"本次会议"），对本次会议召开的合法性进行见证，并依法出具本法律意见 书。 在本法律意见书中，本所律师仅对本次会议召集和召开的程序、出席本次会 议的人员资格及表决程序是否符合有关法律和公司章程的规定以及本次会议审 议议案的表决结果发表意见，并不对本次会议所审议的议案内容以及该等议案所 表述的事实或数据的真实性和准确性发表意见。本所律师假定公司提交给本所律 师的资料（包括但不限于有关人员的居民身份证、授权委托书、营业执照、网络 投票结果等）真实、完整，资料上的签字和/或印章均是真实的，资料的副本或 复印件均与正本或原件一致。 本所律师按照律师行业公认的业务标准、道德规范和勤勉尽责的 ...

证券代码：000001 证券简称：平安银行 公告编号：2025-065 优先股代码：140002 优先股简称：平银优 01 平安银行股份有限公司董事会决议公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假记载、误导 性陈述或重大遗漏。 平安银行股份有限公司（以下简称本行）第十三届董事会第一次会议通知以 书面方式于 2025 年 12 月 11 日向各董事发出。会议于 2025 年 12 月 16 日在本行 召开。本次会议的召开符合有关法律、法规、规章和本行公司章程的规定。会议 应到董事 12 人（包括独立董事 5 人），董事谢永林、冀光恒、郭晓涛、付欣、蔡 方方、项有志、杨志群、杨军、艾春荣、吴志攀、刘峰和潘敏共 12 人到现场或 通过视频等方式参加了会议。 根据公司章程，经董事会过半数董事推举，谢永林董事主持本次会议。会议 审议通过了如下议案： 一、审议通过了《关于选举谢永林先生为平安银行股份有限公司第十三届董 事会董事长的议案》。 同意选举谢永林先生为平安银行股份有限公司第十三届董事会董事长。 主席：刘峰 委员：蔡方方、付欣、吴志攀、张杰 3、风险管理委员会 本议案同意票 11 票， ...

Core Viewpoint - Major Chinese banks are actively distributing mid-term cash dividends, reflecting strong profitability and capital adequacy, which is expected to enhance shareholder value and market confidence [6][8]. Group 1: Dividend Distribution by Major Banks - On December 15, Industrial and Agricultural Banks announced a total cash dividend of approximately 92.2 billion yuan for the first half of 2025, with A-share dividends amounting to about 76.2 billion yuan [1]. - Industrial Bank distributed a cash dividend of 0.1414 yuan per share, totaling approximately 503.96 billion yuan, with A-share dividends around 381.23 billion yuan [3]. - Agricultural Bank issued a cash dividend of 0.1195 yuan per share, totaling about 418.23 billion yuan, with A-share dividends approximately 381.5 billion yuan [3]. - Other major banks, including China Bank and Construction Bank, have also announced significant cash dividends, contributing to a total of over 200 billion yuan in cash dividends from the six major banks [4]. Group 2: Participation of Other Banks - Several joint-stock banks, such as CITIC Bank and Ping An Bank, have also joined the mid-term dividend distribution, with CITIC Bank distributing 104.61 billion yuan and Ping An Bank distributing 45.80 billion yuan [7]. - New entrants to the mid-term dividend distribution include Industrial Bank, which plans to distribute 119.57 billion yuan, and Ningbo Bank, which will distribute 19.81 billion yuan [7]. - Chongqing Bank plans to distribute 5.85 billion yuan, representing 11.99% of its net profit attributable to ordinary shareholders [7]. Group 3: Market Implications and Analyst Insights - Analysts indicate that the increase in mid-term dividends is a response to regulatory guidance and market demand for high-yield assets, particularly in a low-interest-rate environment [8]. - The trend of early and substantial mid-term dividends reflects the stable profitability of quality banks and their enhanced capacity for dividend distribution [8]. - Mid-term dividends are seen as a strategy to optimize capital structure and improve return on equity (ROE), while also attracting long-term investors [8].

Core Insights - The transfer of non-performing loans (NPLs) is gaining momentum, becoming a crucial strategy for financial institutions to mitigate asset risks by 2025 [1][2] - The pace of asset disposal has accelerated significantly in 2025, with both the scale and frequency of disposals showing marked increases [2][4] - Consumer finance institutions are actively participating in the NPL market, contributing to the overall asset disposal efforts [3][4] Group 1: NPL Transfer Activities - The Silver Transfer Center reported nearly 60 NPL transfer announcements within three days, with major banks like China Construction Bank and Postal Savings Bank participating [1] - In the first quarter of 2025, the batch transfer of personal NPLs reached 37.04 billion yuan, a staggering increase of 761.4% year-on-year, with personal consumption loans making up over 70% of this figure [2] - Several banks, including Ping An Bank and Zhongyuan Bank, have initiated significant NPL transfer projects, with outstanding principal and interest amounts reaching 762 million yuan and 522 million yuan respectively [2] Group 2: Market Dynamics and Challenges - The pressure on asset quality is evident, with rising non-performing loan ratios among various banks, such as Chongqing Bank's ratio climbing to 6.23% [4] - The financial environment, characterized by macroeconomic fluctuations, is impacting the repayment capabilities of individuals and businesses, leading to increased NPLs [4] - The Silver Transfer Center's report indicates that the pressure for NPL disposal will persist throughout 2025 [4] Group 3: Regulatory and Technological Support - Regulatory policies are providing robust support for NPL disposal efforts, with calls for increased asset disposal and capital replenishment [5] - Financial institutions are leveraging technology to enhance risk management and improve the efficiency of NPL disposals, with initiatives like "smart disposal" platforms being developed [5][6] - Institutions like Agricultural Bank of China and China Bank are emphasizing digital transformation to strengthen risk control and reduce new NPLs [5]

Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant information provided. Report Core View - As of the end of November 2025, there were 469 fund investment advisor portfolios on the Tiantian Fund APP, an increase of 4 from the end of the previous month. Among them, there were 2 new balanced, 1 new aggressive, and 1 new consumer-themed portfolio [2][8]. - In terms of performance, over the past year, the median returns of aggressive and balanced portfolios outperformed similar FOF products, while the median return of the stable portfolio underperformed. In November, the median returns of aggressive, balanced, and stable portfolios outperformed both similar FOF products and their benchmarks. Among the track-type portfolios, only the gold track had a positive median return in November. For the regional portfolios, both the Hong Kong stock strategy and overseas strategy portfolios had median returns that underperformed their benchmarks in November [2][17][24]. - Regarding position changes, stable portfolios reduced bond funds and increased QDII funds; balanced portfolios reduced bond funds and increased money market funds; aggressive portfolios reduced hybrid funds and increased QDII funds. In terms of individual fund positions, consumer-themed, small-cap strategy, and real estate-themed funds were significantly increased [2][33][42]. - In November 2025, there were 91 portfolio adjustments, an increase of 1 from the previous month. Stable portfolios increased commodity funds and reduced active bond funds; balanced portfolios increased fixed-income + funds and reduced QDII funds; aggressive portfolios increased passive equity funds and reduced QDII funds [2][65]. Summary by Directory Fund Investment Advisor Portfolio Overall Situation - **Portfolio Structure**: As of the end of November 2025, there were 412 stock-bond central, 36 track-type, and 21 regional investment advisor portfolios. The number of stock-bond central portfolios dominated, with the aggressive type being the most numerous among them. Track-type portfolios were concentrated in growth industries, and regional portfolios mainly targeted global overseas markets including Hong Kong and US stocks [8]. - **Investment Advisor Institution Distribution**: Institutions such as Huabao Securities, Guolian Securities, Southern Fund, and Zhongou Fortune had a relatively large number of portfolios on the platform. The top ten institutions accounted for 66% of the total. Most of the portfolios were established between February and May 2022, with 2 new portfolios launched in November 2025 [12]. Investment Advisor Portfolio Performance Tracking - **Stock-Bond Central Investment Advisor Portfolio Performance**: Over the past year, the median returns of aggressive and balanced portfolios outperformed similar FOF products, while the stable portfolio underperformed. In November, all three types outperformed similar FOF products. Compared with the benchmark, the median returns of aggressive portfolios underperformed the benchmark over the past year, while the other three types outperformed. In November, all three types outperformed the benchmark. The Anxin Aggressive 90 of Guolian Securities, Taoli Buyan of Guolian Securities, and Shendu Stable of Shenwan Hongyuan Fund had the highest returns this year. The Huaxia All-Weather Multi-Aggressive Allocation of Huaxia Fortune, Zhongou Multi-All-Weather of Zhongou Fortune, and China Merchants Spare Money Best of China Merchants Fund had the highest Sharpe ratios this year [16][17][21]. - **Track-Type and Regional Investment Advisor Portfolio Performance**: Over the past year, all track-type portfolios had positive median returns, with most outperforming the benchmark except for the intelligent manufacturing and gold tracks. In November, only the gold track had a positive median return, and several tracks outperformed the benchmark. For regional portfolios, the Hong Kong stock strategy portfolio outperformed the benchmark over the past year, while both the Hong Kong stock strategy and overseas strategy portfolios underperformed in November. The top-performing track-type portfolios this year were mainly in the medical and technology sectors, and the top-performing regional portfolios were mainly in the Hong Kong stock strategy, with some overseas strategy portfolios also performing well [23][24][28]. Investment Advisor Portfolio Position Adjustment Tracking - **Holding Fund Position Change Tracking**: When analyzing the position changes of 449 portfolios, stable portfolios decreased bond funds and increased QDII funds; balanced portfolios decreased bond funds and increased money market funds; aggressive portfolios decreased hybrid funds and increased QDII funds. Among the 77 portfolios that disclosed individual fund positions, stable portfolios decreased active bond funds and increased fixed-income + funds; balanced portfolios decreased active bond funds and increased money market funds; aggressive portfolios decreased quantitative funds and increased passive equity funds [33][36]. - **Investment Advisor Portfolio Individual Fund Holding Tracking**: - **Active Equity Funds**: Value-style, quantitative strategy, dividend strategy, and technology-themed fund managers were favored. Consumer-themed, small-cap strategy, and real estate-themed funds were significantly increased [38][42]. - **QDII Funds**: Products such as Southern Asia US Dollar Bond A RMB, Huaxia Hang Seng Technology ETF Link A, and Tianhong S&P 500 A were favored. Global allocation products like Huatai-PineBridge Global Medical RMB and China Merchants Pusu Global Allocation A, as well as products tracking the Hang Seng Technology Index in the Hong Kong market, were significantly increased [43][47]. - **Passive Index Funds**: Dividend low-volatility strategy index funds and industry index funds such as Hong Kong Stock Connect Internet, gold stocks, liquor, and chemicals were favored. Industry-themed index products such as banks, coal, and gold stocks were significantly increased [49][52]. - **Fixed-Income + Funds**: Products such as Invesco Great Wall Jingyi Double Dividend, Zhongou Jintong, and Yongying Stable Enhancement were favored. Products such as China Merchants Anben Zengli and Huatai-PineBridge Zunli were significantly increased [54][57]. - **Active Bond Funds**: Products managed by fund managers such as Wang Xiaochen, Wang Shuai, Fang Chang, Song Qianqian, and Ji Lingyun were favored. Products such as Zhongou Pure Bond and Fullgoal Short Bond were significantly increased [59][62]. - **Fund Investment Advisor Position Adjustment Situation Tracking**: In November 2025, there were 91 portfolio adjustments, mainly in aggressive and stable portfolios. Stable portfolios increased commodity funds and reduced active bond funds; balanced portfolios increased fixed-income + funds and reduced QDII funds; aggressive portfolios increased passive equity funds and reduced QDII funds. A total of 13 funds had a net increase of 5 or more investment advisor portfolios, including 3 active equity funds, 4 passive equity funds, 2 active bond funds, 3 QDII funds, and 1 commodity fund [65][70].

Core Insights - The article highlights the top 20 stocks in the S&P China A-Share Dividend Opportunity Index (CSPSADRP) based on their performance and dividend yield as of December 15, 2025 [1][4] Group 1: Stock Performance - The top-performing stock is LuRi Co., Ltd. (002083.SZ) with a daily increase of 10.03% and a year-to-date increase of 138.01% [1][4] - Dai Mei Co., Ltd. (603730.SH) ranks second with a daily increase of 3.58% and a year-to-date increase of 22.61% [1][4] - Changbao Co., Ltd. (002478.SZ) follows with a daily increase of 3.24% and a year-to-date increase of 69.53% [1][4] Group 2: Dividend Yields - Jiangsu Jinzhong (600901.SH) offers the highest dividend yield among the top 20 stocks at 6.70% [1][4] - Other notable dividend yields include Changsha Bank (601577.SH) at 6.54% and Huaxia Bank (600015.SH) at 5.97% [1][4] - The average dividend yield for the top 20 stocks varies, with several companies offering yields above 5% [1][4] Group 3: Additional Stock Insights - The performance of stocks like Midea Group (000333.SZ) shows a year-to-date increase of 12.77% despite a daily increase of only 1.37% [1][4] - Some stocks, such as Oppein Home Group (603833.SH), have experienced a year-to-date decline of 22.63% [1][4] - The data reflects a diverse range of performance and dividend strategies among the top stocks in the index [1][4]

如何看待银行的分红？博通咨询金融业资深分析师王蓬博在接受记者采访时认为，上市银行此举对内可 优化资本结构，对外则增强投资者黏性，尤其吸引险资、社保等长期资金配置。从市场表现看，近期宣 布分红的银行股普遍获得估值修复，股息率优势成为支撑股价的重要锚点。 具体来看,工商银行以503.96亿元位居本次分红榜首，建设银行（601939）、农业银行、中国银行 （601988）、邮储银行（601658）、交通银行紧随其后，分红分别为486.05亿元、418.23亿元、352.50 亿元、147.71亿元、138.11亿元。在本次中期分红中，六大国有银行的分红比例均保持在归母净利润的 30%或以上。 今年以来，银行板块以及个股在A股市场上表现抢眼。统计数据显示，截至12月15日收盘，A股银行板 块今年累计上涨10.71%，板块整体呈现结构性上涨特征，其中，农业银行股价今年以来累计涨幅 48.88%，厦门银行（601187）累计涨幅39.85%。 【深圳商报讯】（首席记者 谢惠茜）12月以来，A股上市银行正陆续带来一场"红包雨"——六大国有银 行先后发布A股分红派息实施公告，中期现金分红总额高达2046.57亿元。另据统计数 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Central Economic Work Conference held on December 10-11 emphasizes a policy direction of "seeking progress while maintaining stability" and outlines key tasks for economic work in the coming year through "eight persistences" [1] Group 1: Focus on Financial Supply and Support - Multiple financial institutions stress the importance of optimizing financial supply in key areas such as expanding domestic demand, supporting technological innovation, and aiding small and micro enterprises [1][2] - Institutions like Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) and Agricultural Bank of China highlight their commitment to high-quality development and support for rural financing and advanced manufacturing [2][3] Group 2: Technological Innovation - Financial institutions are focusing on enhancing financial services for technological innovation, with ICBC aiming to provide comprehensive financial solutions and support for manufacturing and regional coordination [2][3] - China Ping An emphasizes its role as a "catalyst" for new productive forces, investing heavily in strategic emerging industries and advanced manufacturing [3] Group 3: Domestic Market Development - Agricultural Bank of China and China Bank are aligning their strategies with policies aimed at boosting domestic demand and consumption, supporting major projects to enhance consumer spending [4][5] - Institutions are committed to improving financial services to meet diverse consumer needs and support effective investment [5][6] Group 4: Risk Management and Compliance - Financial institutions are prioritizing risk management and compliance, with ICBC and Agricultural Bank of China focusing on stabilizing asset quality and managing risks in real estate and local government debt [10] - The emphasis is on maintaining a balance between development and safety, ensuring that systemic risks are avoided [10]

低空经济，是以各种有人驾驶和无人驾驶航空器的各类低空飞行活动为牵引，辐射带动相关领域融合发展的综合性经济形态。2021年2月，中共中央、 国务 院在 《国家综合立体交通网规划纲要》 中首次提出发展低空经济2023年12月，中央经济工作会议将低空经济明确为国家战略性新兴产业2024 年3月，《政 府工作报告》 首次写入低空经济2024年7月，党的二十届三中全会通过的决定中首次写入 "低空经济" 本文参考孙嘉俊等（2025）在《"赋能" 抑或 "负能"：企业ESG表现与低空经济企业孵化》一文中关于低空经济概念上市企业名单的整理方法，筛选并整理 了截至2025年12月低空概念上市企业名单，匹配形成上市公司"低空经济"概念数据 数据名称：上市公司"低空经济"概念数据 数据范围：A股上市公司 时间范围：2000-2024年 样本数量：68852条 数据来源：东方财富网、同花顺网 数据说明：低空概念名单整理时间为2025年12月 二、数据指标 | 年份 | 股票代码 | 股票简称 | | --- | --- | --- | | 中文全称 | 行业名称 | 行业代码 | | 首份 | 城市 | 区首 | | 省份代码 | ...

| 姓名 | 职务 | 任职状态 | 2024 年度税前薪酬其余部分 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 冀光恒 | 董事、行长 | 在任 | 145.00 | | 项有志 | 董事、副行长、 首席财务官 | 在任 | 159.76 | | 杨志群 | 董事、副行长 | 在任 | 225.15 | | 孙永桢 | 职工监事 | 在任 | 138.80 | | 邓红 | 职工监事 | 在任 | 38.43 | | 周强 | 董事会秘书 | 在任 | 136.68 | （平安银行） 12月12日，平安银行（000001）发布公告称，该行董事会会议听取了《关于部分高级管理人员2024年度绩效奖金结算的报告》，在该行领取薪酬的相关董 事、监事及高级管理人员已确认的2024年度税前薪酬的其余部分披露如下：董事、行长冀光恒145万元；董事、副行长、首席财务官项有志159.76万元；董 事、副行长杨志群225.15万元；职工监事孙永桢138.80万元；职工监事邓红38.43万元；董事会秘书周强136.68万元。 公告显示，根据《商业银行稳健薪酬监管指引》和平安银行相关规定，平安银行高级管理人员的绩效 ...