在长三角的金融版图上，杭州银行正在进行区域深耕，其零售资产质量保持稳健，而宁波银行却正在经历一场剧烈的转向，它们呈现的 是截然不同的展业路线。 宁波银行已经从过去的"消费贷王者"踩下了急刹车，消费贷新增规模从2023年的776亿元骤降至2025年上半年的-123亿元。尽管消费贷滑 坡，但公司的对公业务却强势补位。 而在它们旗下的消费金融子公司身上，这种分野也更加明显。 2023年，宁银消金以资产规模激增460%、净利润跃升677%的战绩成为行业黑马，到2025年上半年总资产更是已突破700亿元。另一边， 杭银消金却始终展现"不唯规模、守利润"的克制姿态。 但外界较为关注的是：宁银消金在狂飙期间能否消化风险？而杭银消金的审慎展业又是否意味着增长失速呢？ 两家银行不同的路线 说到杭州银行和宁波银行之间的竞争，实际上就是"专业化深度"和"多元化广度"之间的较量。分析它们在2025年的成绩单，更是发现这 种分野愈发清晰。 杭州银行将核心资源押注在了浙江本土和科创金融的赛道上，试图以进攻姿态在特定领域构筑壁垒。2025年末，杭州银行在制造业和科 技领域的贷款增速均已超过22%，理财子公司的规模更是突破6000亿元，同比 ...

股 票 研 究 大型银行短贷显著增加，中小银行信贷增长放缓 [Table_Industry] 商业银行 202601 信贷收支表 | [姓名table_Authors] | 电话 | 邮箱 | 登记编号 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 马婷婷(分析师) | 021-23185608 | matingting@gtht.com | S0880525100001 | | 陈惠琴(分析师) | 021-38676666 | chenhuiqin@gtht.com | S0880525100003 | 本报告导读： 1 月信贷收支表：负债端，春节错位对存款增长节奏形成扰动，个人定期储蓄存款延 续由中小银行向大型银行迁移的特征；资产端，信贷增速继续放缓，短期贷款显著 增加，其中大型银行更为明显。 投资要点： [Table_Summary] 负债端：春节错位对存款形成扰动 资产端：大型银行短贷显著增加，中小银行信贷增长放缓 1） 贷款：同比少增 4893 亿元，其中大型银行、中小银行分别同比 少增 2130 亿元、少增 2763 亿元，中小银行受信贷需求平淡、 揽储压力增加等因素影响，信贷增速 ...

Investment Rating - The report assigns a "Buy" rating for the banking sector, indicating an expectation of stock performance exceeding the market by more than 10% over the next 12 months [58]. Core Insights - In 2025, the banking sector's asset growth is projected to be 8.01%, an increase from 6.52% in 2024, driven by factors such as fiscal stimulus, cross-border capital inflows, and the activation of maturing deposits [5][13]. - The report identifies two key cycles affecting asset pricing in banking: the bank expansion cycle and the interest margin cycle, suggesting a comprehensive analysis of these cycles [5][13]. - The debt cycle is characterized as a fundamental aspect of the bank expansion cycle, with a model proposed by Dalio outlining seven stages of a typical debt cycle, which can be influenced by external debt reliance [16][19]. - The report anticipates limited upward space for the debt cycle in 2026, with government leverage expected to increase by 5.89%, lower than the 7.6% projected for 2025 [35][36]. - The banking interest margin cycle is expected to stabilize in 2025, following two complete cycles since 2010, with a correlation observed between bank interest margins and the 30Y-10Y government bond spread [41][45]. Summary by Sections Bank Expansion Cycle - The asset growth rates for different types of banks in 2025 are projected as follows: state-owned banks at 11%, joint-stock banks at 4.74%, city commercial banks at 9.68%, and rural commercial banks at 5.17%, all exceeding the average growth rate [5][13]. - The report emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between bank assets and liabilities, highlighting that credit and debt expansion are cyclical and self-reinforcing [15][16]. Debt Cycle Analysis - The report outlines that the current debt cycle, which began in 2022, has lasted 16 quarters, surpassing previous cycles, and indicates a shift in leverage dynamics among enterprises, government, and households [35][36]. - The analysis includes a comparison of deflationary and inflationary debt cycles, noting that the U.S. faces greater inflationary pressures due to higher external debt reliance compared to China [21][19]. Interest Margin Cycle - The report notes that the banking interest margin has experienced significant fluctuations since 2010, with a stabilization phase expected to begin in 2025 [41][45]. - It highlights the impact of loan repricing cycles on interest margins, with a notable decline in loan rates observed in recent years [49][50].

Investment Rating - The report maintains an "Overweight" rating for the securities and banking sectors [9]. Core Insights - The report highlights the structural relaxation of refinancing policies, which is expected to improve profitability in the banking sector. The central bank's Q4 monetary policy report emphasizes the implementation of personal credit repair measures, supporting micro-entities [1][28]. - The report identifies investment opportunities in the order of securities > insurance > banking, with a focus on the potential for marginal improvements in the brokerage business due to the recent refinancing policy adjustments [12][24]. Summary by Sections Securities Sector - The optimization of refinancing measures announced by the exchanges is expected to lead to marginal improvements in the brokerage business, with leading firms likely to solidify their advantages through professional capabilities. The Chinese brokerage index performed better than the Hang Seng index during the holiday period, increasing by 0.20% [2][13]. - Recommended stocks include leading brokerages such as CITIC Securities, Guotai Junan, and GF Securities, as well as quality regional firms like Guoyuan Securities [3][12]. Insurance Sector - The report notes a mixed performance in the insurance sector, with property insurance companies showing gains while life insurance companies mostly declined. China Property & Casualty Insurance rose by 5%, while China Taiping fell by 4% [24][25]. - Investors are advised to focus on quality leaders in the insurance sector, with a preference for defensive stocks like China Ping An and China Life Insurance for conservative investors [24][25]. Banking Sector - The banking sector is experiencing a recovery in performance, with Q4 profits improving and net interest margins stabilizing. The report indicates a year-on-year increase in social financing, primarily due to the pre-positioning of government bonds and a rebound in off-balance-sheet financing [28][37]. - Recommended stocks include quality regional banks such as Nanjing Bank and Chengdu Bank, which are expected to perform well due to their strong fundamentals [3][28].

Core Viewpoint - The People's Bank of China and the National Financial Regulatory Administration have conducted the 2025 assessment of systemically important banks, identifying 21 domestic banks categorized into five groups based on their systemic importance scores [1] Group 1: Assessment of Systemically Important Banks - A total of 21 domestic systemically important banks have been recognized, including 6 state-owned commercial banks, 10 joint-stock commercial banks, and 5 city commercial banks [1] - The banks are divided into five groups based on their systemic importance scores, with the first group consisting of 11 banks, the second group having 4 banks, the third group with 2 banks, the fourth group containing 4 banks, and the fifth group having no banks [1] Group 2: Breakdown of Bank Groups - The first group includes: China Minsheng Bank, China Everbright Bank, Ping An Bank, Huaxia Bank, Ningbo Bank, Jiangsu Bank, Beijing Bank, Nanjing Bank, Guangfa Bank, Zheshang Bank, and Shanghai Bank [1] - The second group consists of: Industrial Bank, China CITIC Bank, Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, and China Postal Savings Bank [1] - The third group includes: Bank of Communications and China Merchants Bank [1] - The fourth group comprises: Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, Bank of China, China Construction Bank, and Agricultural Bank of China [1] - The fifth group currently has no banks included [1] Group 3: Future Regulatory Actions - The People's Bank of China and the National Financial Regulatory Administration will implement additional regulatory measures for systemically important banks according to the "Regulations on Additional Supervision of Systemically Important Banks (Trial)" [1] - The aim is to enhance the synergy between macro-prudential management and micro-prudential supervision, ensuring the safe and sound operation of systemically important banks [1] - This initiative is intended to better support the high-quality development of the real economy [1]

Investment Rating - The industry investment rating is "Positive" and maintained [11] Core Insights - The banking index fell by 1.3% this week, underperforming the CSI 300 and ChiNext indices by 1.6% and 2.5% respectively, indicating a short-term style switch in the market [6][19] - H-shares of banks led the gains, while most A-shares declined, with notable performances from Huaxia Bank and Shanghai Bank due to improved earnings and strong expectations for convertible bond conversions [6][19] - The price-to-book (PB) ratio and return on equity (ROE) of bank stocks remain undervalued, with a continued recommendation for high-quality city commercial banks in Zhejiang, Jiangsu, and Shandong provinces, including Hangzhou Bank, Ningbo Bank, Jiangsu Bank, Nanjing Bank, Qingdao Bank, Qilu Bank, and Suzhou Bank [6][19] - The report also suggests focusing on low-valuation, high-dividend, and convertible bond opportunities, particularly in Industrial Bank [6][19] Summary by Sections Market Performance - The banking sector's trading activity has decreased, with turnover rates falling, although the transaction volume share for state-owned and rural commercial banks has rebounded [8][39] - The average dividend yield for the six major state-owned banks in A-shares is 4.28%, with a spread of 249 basis points over the 10-year government bond yield, while H-shares yield 5.21% [7][29] Profit Growth and Net Interest Margin - The overall asset growth rate for commercial banks reached 9.0% year-on-year by the end of Q4 2025, with major state-owned banks seeing a growth rate of 10.8% [9][44] - The net profit growth for commercial banks was 2.3% year-on-year, indicating a positive trend, particularly among city and rural commercial banks [9][44] - The net interest margin for 2025 is projected at 1.42%, with a marginal stabilization observed, and a further narrowing of the decline expected in 2026 [9][46] Asset Quality - The non-performing loan (NPL) ratios across various banks are stable or improving, attributed to increased write-off efforts, while the provision coverage ratio continues to decline [10][49] - Capital adequacy ratios remain stable, with attention on the potential impact of the second round of fiscal injections for state-owned banks and refinancing for smaller banks in 2026 [10][49]

Investment Rating - The report assigns an "Overweight" rating for the banking sector [4]. Core Insights - The banking sector's net profit growth has turned positive, with a year-on-year increase of 2.33% in Q4 2025, showing an improvement compared to the previous quarters [4][10]. - The net interest margin has stabilized at 1.42%, with expectations of a narrowing decline in 2026 due to the re-pricing of high-cost long-term deposits and a slowdown in the reduction of new loan rates [4][10]. - The non-performing loan (NPL) ratio decreased to 1.50%, indicating a positive trend in asset quality [4][10]. - The capital adequacy ratio improved slightly to 15.5%, reflecting a marginal increase in capital levels [4][10]. Summary by Sections 1. Key Regulatory Indicators for Q4 2025 - Total assets of commercial banks grew by 9.0% year-on-year, with large banks showing a growth rate of 10.8% [7]. - The average capital return rate was 7.78%, and the average asset return rate was 0.60% [10]. 2. Industry and Company Dynamics - The report highlights the ongoing implementation of a moderately loose monetary policy by the central bank, aimed at stabilizing economic growth and ensuring adequate liquidity [10]. - The banking sector's focus for 2026 includes identifying banks with potential for performance growth, particularly recommending Ningbo Bank, China Merchants Bank, and Nanjing Bank [4][10]. 3. Weekly Data Tracking - The report includes weekly tracking of stock performance, with notable fluctuations in bank stock prices, indicating market volatility [18].

文丨吴海珊 编辑丨承承 11家A股银行发布2025年业绩快报，总资产平均增速11.32%，城商行盈利增速显著领先股份行。 截至2月11日，共有11家A股上市银行发布2025年业绩快报。包括4家股份行，6家城商行，1家农商行。 从业绩快报数据看，11家银行2025年总资产规模同比增速平均为11.32%，营业收入平均增速为3.30%， 归母净利润平均增速为7.83%。 申万宏源证券分析师郑庆明预计，上市银行2025年呈现"营收平稳，利润增速逐步改善"的特征，同时业 绩表现分化明显。他预计，上市银行2025年营收同比增长0.9%，归母净利润增速修复至1.9%。 股份行企稳 浦发、中信资产规模站上10万亿 截至2月11日，发布业绩快报的4家股份行（浦发银行、中信银行、招商银行、兴业银行）资产规模均突 破10万亿元。 其中，浦发银行2025年末的资产总额达至100817.46亿元，较2024年末增加6198.66亿元，增长 6.55%； 中信银行（601998．SH）资产总额达101316.58亿元，相比2024年末的95327.22亿元同比增长6.28%；招 商银行资产规模为130705.23亿元，同比增长7.56% ...

Core Insights - The Chinese mobile banking market is entering a stage of stock competition in 2025, with monthly active users (MAU) stabilizing between 648 million and 739 million [2] - State-owned commercial banks dominate the market due to their ecological embedding advantages, with Agricultural Bank of China leading at 249 million MAU, followed by Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (194 million) and China Construction Bank (109 million) [2] - Private banks are expected to collectively exit the top 50 MAU rankings in 2025 due to a lack of offline branch support and local living ecosystems [2] Group 1: Major Players - Agricultural Bank of China has the highest MAU at 249 million, followed by Industrial and Commercial Bank of China with 194 million and China Construction Bank with 109 million, forming the first tier of banks [2] - China Bank and Postal Savings Bank have MAUs exceeding 50 million, constituting the second tier [2] - China Merchants Bank leads the joint-stock banks with 71.85 million MAU, while Ping An Bank and CITIC Bank form the second tier, with other joint-stock banks generally below 20 million MAU [2] Group 2: Market Dynamics - The core advantage of state-owned banks lies in their "full-scenario integration" capabilities, embedding services deeply into high-frequency life scenarios such as government affairs, social security, healthcare, and education [2] - Agricultural Bank of China extends its services to rural areas through intelligent service matching and customer customization, while Industrial and Commercial Bank of China utilizes its "Gong Xiao Zhi" model for interactive service [2] - Regional banks like Jiangsu Bank, Beijing Bank, and Ningbo Bank show stable performance by focusing on local markets, with some rural commercial banks like Fujian Rural Credit exceeding 4.5 million MAU, indicating the sustainability of localized operations in the stock market [2]

Core Insights - The report by iResearch indicates that the monthly active users (MAU) of mobile banking apps in China have stabilized after fluctuating between 648 million and 739 million, signaling a ceiling in user growth and a shift from acquiring new users to enhancing existing user engagement [2] - User behavior is undergoing a structural reversal, with the effective daily usage time per device dropping from 4.9 minutes in 2023 to around 2.7 minutes by mid-2025, leading to a focus on high-frequency, short-duration, and functional usage [2] - Financial institutions are compelled to streamline operations and focus resources on core transaction scenarios to survive in this competitive landscape, where efficiency and precision are paramount [2] Mobile Banking Market Overview - The top three banks in terms of MAU are Agricultural Bank of China (2.49 billion), Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (1.94 billion), and China Construction Bank (1.09 billion), with all six major state-owned banks ranking in the top ten [3][5][6] - Private banks, represented by WeBank and MYbank, have faced significant setbacks, with many dropping out of the top 50 MAU rankings by 2025 [4] Competitive Landscape - State-owned banks are solidifying their dominance through extensive customer bases and integrated ecosystems, leveraging services embedded in high-frequency life scenarios such as government services and healthcare [7] - Joint-stock commercial banks are adopting a "specialized and precise" survival strategy, with China Merchants Bank leading among them with 71.85 million MAU, focusing on wealth management and intelligent interaction [8][10] - Regional banks are thriving by deeply engaging with local markets, while private banks struggle due to high customer acquisition costs and lack of local ecosystem support [13][14] Future Outlook - The mobile banking market is transitioning from a phase of scale expansion to one of value cultivation, with state-owned banks building moats through ecosystems, joint-stock banks seeking niches through specialization, and regional banks solidifying their local roots [14] - The ability to create irreplaceable value in a limited user engagement environment will be crucial, with technology applications such as AI reshaping service processes and enhancing risk management [15][16]