Market Performance - The city commercial bank sector increased by 1.64% on September 24, with Qilu Bank leading the gains [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3853.64, up 0.83%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13356.14, up 1.8% [1] Individual Stock Performance - Qilu Bank closed at 5.87, with a rise of 1.73% and a trading volume of 1.0666 million shares, amounting to a transaction value of 624 million yuan [1] - Hangzhou Bank closed at 15.32, up 0.66%, with a trading volume of 451,600 shares and a transaction value of 691 million yuan [1] - Zhengzhou Bank closed at 2.03, up 0.50%, with a trading volume of 920,500 shares and a transaction value of 18.7 million yuan [1] - Nanjing Bank closed at 11.01, up 0.46%, with a trading volume of 1.7333 million shares and a transaction value of 806 million yuan [1] - Other banks such as Changsha Bank, Ningbo Bank, and Qingdao Bank also showed slight increases in their stock prices [1] Capital Flow Analysis - The city commercial bank sector experienced a net outflow of 69.1764 million yuan from institutional investors, while retail investors saw a net inflow of 55.8208 million yuan [2] - The overall capital flow indicates a mixed sentiment, with institutional investors withdrawing funds while retail investors continued to invest [2] Detailed Capital Flow for Selected Banks - Ningbo Bank had a net inflow of 74.388 million yuan from institutional investors, but a net outflow of 51.098 million yuan from speculative funds [3] - Shanghai Bank saw a net inflow of 17.1761 million yuan from institutional investors, while retail investors had a net outflow of 30.1701 million yuan [3] - Chengdu Bank experienced a net inflow of 16.3117 million yuan from institutional investors, with a net outflow from retail investors [3]

近日，宁波银行股份有限公司开展了特定对象调研活动，吸引了包括富国基金、平安资管、泉果基金在 内的3家机构参与。以下为本次调研的详细情况。 调研基本信息投资者活动关系类别：特定对象调研时间：2025年9月24日上午地点：公司总部大厦参与 单位名称：富国基金、平安资管、泉果基金上市公司接待人员姓名：公司投关团队 调研精彩要点贷款增速能否持续：近年来，宁波银行积极响应政策，重点支持民营小微企业、制造业企 业等领域，实现贷款规模稳步增长。未来，随着扩内需、促消费政策红利释放以及新质生产力培育，该 行将扩大金融服务覆盖面，保持信贷合理增长，支持实体经济发展。资本计量高级法推进：2024年11月 国家金融监督管理总局发布相关规定后，宁波银行正在积极研究跟进，同时关注监管动态与同业进展， 稳妥推进资本计量高级法相关工作。资产质量展望：面对经济周期与局势变化带来的挑战，宁波银行将 依托"四化五帮"服务体系助力重点领域，严格授信准入。同时完善全流程信用风险管理，预计资产质量 将保持在行业较好水平。 声明：市场有风险，投资需谨慎。 本文为AI大模型基于第三方数据库自动发布，任何在本文出现的信 息（包括但不限于个股、评论、预测、图 ...

宁波银行股份有限公司投资者关系活动记录表 编号:2025-30 | 投资者关系活动 | 特定对象调研 □分析师会议 | | --- | --- | | 类别 | □媒体采访 □业绩说明会 | | | □新闻发布会 □路演活动 | | | □现场参观 □其他： | | 活动参与人员 | 公司投关团队； | | | 富国基金 徐健荣、平安资管 王可、泉果基金 张家盛 | | 时间 | 2025 年 9 月 24 日上午 | | 地点 | 公司总部大厦 | | 形式 | 现场会议 | | | 1、请问公司贷款增速较高，未来能否保持？ | | | 答：近年来，公司认真贯彻落实各级政府和金融监管部门的决策部署，聚焦 | | | 民营小微企业、制造业企业、进出口企业、民生消费等重点领域，加大资源 | | | 倾斜和支持力度，持续提升金融服务水准，助力实体经济提质增效，实现贷 | | | 款规模稳步增长。下阶段，随着扩内需、促消费等政策红利持续释放，新质 | | | 生产力加速培育，公司将持续扩大金融服务的覆盖面，有效对接实体经济融 | | | 资需求，保持信贷合理增长，切实支持实体经济发展。 | | | 2、贵行是否会 ...

/ 机构调研pro小程序 宁波银行分析师会议 调研日期：2025年09月23日 调研行业：银行 参与调研的机构：Marshall Wace LLP、Aberdeen Asset Management PLC、Public Sector Pension Investment Board、Millennium Capital Management (Hong Kong)… DJvanbao.com 关注公众号即可体验 机构调研pro小程序~ 洞见研报 出品 : 机构调研pro小程序致力于为金融证券投资者提供最新最全的调研会议纪要。 来机构调研pro小程序，了解最新的：行业投资风向、热门公司关注、权威机构分析... 权威完善的信息持续更新! 更多精彩的机构调报告请移步机构调研pro小程序~ 一解投资机构行业关注度。 频判市场 | Gallia | | | --- | --- | | 11 2 12 200 2 110 | | | 1:给我们 = 影片面临官 = | | | 阿里巴巴佩尼 | | | 钢铁机之题。 8 | 图纸制图: 23 | | 20GB Millio Aller 19 | | | 海双集团 | | ...

银行行业今日上涨1.52%，全天主力资金净流入14.00亿元，该行业所属的个股共42只，今日上涨的有40 只；下跌的有1只。以资金流向数据进行统计，该行业资金净流入的个股有28只，其中，净流入资金超 亿元的有7只，净流入资金居首的是工商银行，今日净流入资金4.62亿元，紧随其后的是中国银行、招 商银行，净流入资金分别为2.50亿元、2.36亿元。银行行业资金净流出个股中，资金净流出超5000万元 的有6只，净流出资金居前的有宁波银行、成都银行、浦发银行，净流出资金分别为1.81亿元、1.03亿 元、9676.21万元。（数据宝） 银行行业资金流向排名 沪指9月23日下跌0.18%，申万所属行业中，今日上涨的有5个，涨幅居前的行业为银行、煤炭，涨幅分 别为1.52%、1.11%。银行行业位居今日涨幅榜首位。跌幅居前的行业为社会服务、商贸零售，跌幅分 别为3.11%、2.90%。 | 代码 | 简称 | 今日涨跌幅（%） | 今日换手率（%） | 主力资金流量（万元） | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 601398 | 工商银行 | 3.06 | 0.23 | 46205.5 ...

Group 1: Competitive Advantage and Business Strategy - The company adopts a differentiated business strategy to adapt to changes in the operating environment, focusing on sustainable development and high-quality growth [2] - Key strategies include deepening operational focus, strengthening core advantages, accelerating technological transformation, and maintaining risk management to ensure stable operations [2] Group 2: Capital Growth and Financing - The company emphasizes the long-term relationship between dividends and internal capital growth, ensuring a solid capital foundation for sustainable business development [2] - Internal capital is expected to create greater value for the company's development, with a commitment to enhancing performance and maintaining steady internal capital growth for shareholder returns [2] Group 3: Asset Quality Outlook - The company acknowledges new challenges in asset quality management due to economic fluctuations and changes in domestic and international situations [2] - It plans to focus on key areas, adhere to risk management principles, and implement prudent credit policies while enhancing risk monitoring through financial technology [2] - The asset quality is projected to remain at a relatively good level within the industry [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Shanghai Composite Index is currently above the six-month moving average, with a slight decline of 1.04% and a total trading volume of 1.262 trillion yuan [1] Group 1: Market Performance - As of 10:29 AM today, the Shanghai Composite Index stands at 3788.76 points, indicating a trading volume of 12,621.13 million yuan [1] - There are 13 A-shares that have surpassed the six-month moving average today, with notable stocks including Air China Ocean, Guisheng Co., and Samsung Medical, showing divergence rates of 4.09%, 2.35%, and 1.79% respectively [1] Group 2: Individual Stock Analysis - The top three stocks with the highest divergence rates are: - Air China Ocean (Code: 833171) with a price increase of 4.78%, a turnover rate of 10.78%, a six-month moving average of 10.52 yuan, and a latest price of 10.95 yuan, resulting in a divergence rate of 4.09% [1] - Guisheng Co. (Code: 600992) with a price increase of 4.08%, a turnover rate of 5.15%, a six-month moving average of 14.45 yuan, and a latest price of 14.79 yuan, resulting in a divergence rate of 2.35% [1] - Samsung Medical (Code: 601567) with a price increase of 4.73%, a turnover rate of 2.47%, a six-month moving average of 23.27 yuan, and a latest price of 23.69 yuan, resulting in a divergence rate of 1.79% [1]

Core Viewpoint - Recent announcements from multiple banks regarding the redemption of subordinated capital bonds and perpetual bonds indicate a strategic response to changing interest rates, regulatory requirements, and capital management needs. The "perpetual bonds" will continue to be an important tool for capital replenishment in the banking sector [1][2]. Group 1: Reasons for Redemption - Several banks, including China Construction Bank and Qilu Bank, have recently redeemed their "perpetual bonds" due to three main reasons: lowering capital costs, enhancing market reputation, and specific bond terms that allow for redemption after five years [2][3]. - The decline in interest rates allows banks to redeem high-cost old bonds and issue new ones at lower rates, effectively reducing interest expenses and alleviating net interest margin pressure [3]. Group 2: Capital Management and Regulatory Compliance - The implementation of new capital management regulations has led to stricter counter-cyclical capital supervision, particularly for globally systemically important banks, necessitating the replacement of old bonds to optimize capital structure and improve capital tool adaptability [3][6]. - Redemption of old bonds may temporarily decrease a bank's capital scale, but if new bonds are issued simultaneously, it can enhance capital replenishment efficiency [3][4]. Group 3: Market Dynamics and Future Trends - The demand for capital replenishment in the banking sector remains urgent due to significant credit needs during economic transformation and the necessity for capital buffers in dealing with non-performing assets [5]. - The issuance of "perpetual bonds" is expected to show a divergence trend, with large banks and quality joint-stock banks likely to continue leveraging the interest rate decline to accelerate the redemption and issuance of new bonds, while smaller banks may face increased challenges in issuing new bonds [6].

Core Viewpoint - The mid-term dividend distribution among A-share listed banks is progressing, with several banks announcing their plans for 2025, indicating a positive trend in the banking sector's profitability and governance [1][4]. Group 1: Dividend Announcements - Recently, Hu Nong Commercial Bank and Changsha Bank announced their mid-term cash dividends, totaling 3.128 billion yuan, with Hu Nong distributing 2.324 billion yuan and Changsha distributing 804 million yuan [1][2]. - As of September 22, 17 banks have disclosed their mid-term profit distribution plans for 2025, with several banks, including Changsha Bank and Ningbo Bank, implementing mid-term dividends for the first time since their listings [1][4]. Group 2: Dividend Distribution Details - Hu Nong Commercial Bank's cash dividend is based on a total share capital of 9.644 billion shares, distributing 0.241 yuan per share, while Changsha Bank's distribution is based on 4.022 billion shares at 0.20 yuan per share [2]. - In September, three other banks, including Changshu Bank and Minsheng Bank, completed their mid-term dividend distributions, totaling 6.633 billion yuan [2]. Group 3: Dividend Ratios and Trends - The six major state-owned commercial banks have a cash dividend ratio of around 30%, with some city commercial banks and rural commercial banks exceeding this level [3]. - The expansion of mid-term dividends among listed banks reflects a recovery in bank performance, providing sufficient profit space for such distributions [4]. Group 4: Market Implications - Analysts suggest that mid-term dividends enhance predictability, boost investor confidence, and improve valuations, supported by the current strong performance of listed banks [4]. - The overall improvement in bank performance, driven by easing interest margin pressures and growth in non-interest income, is expected to sustain and potentially increase dividend distributions in the future [4][5].

Market Overview - On September 22, the city commercial bank sector declined by 1.17%, with Hangzhou Bank leading the drop [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3828.58, up 0.22%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13157.97, up 0.67% [1] Individual Bank Performance - Hangzhou Bank's closing price was 15.06, down 2.27% with a trading volume of 765,900 shares and a transaction value of 1.159 billion yuan [1] - Chengdu Bank closed at 17.15, down 2.17%, with a trading volume of 367,300 shares [1] - Suzhou Bank closed at 8.01, down 1.72%, with a trading volume of 389,400 shares [1] - Ningbo Bank closed at 26.35, down 1.50%, with a trading volume of 138,580 shares [1] - Jiangsu Bank closed at 10.12, down 1.36%, with a trading volume of 1,148,300 shares [1] - Xiamen Bank closed at 6.30, down 1.10%, with a trading volume of 79,000 shares [1] - Qingdao Bank closed at 4.80, down 1.03%, with a trading volume of 261,300 shares [1] - Changsha Bank closed at 9.01, down 0.99%, with a trading volume of 118,400 shares [1] - Zhengzhou Bank closed at 2.02, down 0.98%, with a trading volume of 1,188,200 shares [1] - Beijing Bank closed at 5.58, down 0.89%, with a trading volume of 1,304,400 shares [1] Capital Flow Analysis - The city commercial bank sector experienced a net outflow of 132 million yuan from institutional investors, while retail investors saw a net inflow of 132 million yuan [1] - The table shows the net capital flow for individual banks, indicating varying levels of institutional and retail investor activity [2] Individual Bank Capital Flow - Hangzhou Bank had a net inflow of 127 million yuan from institutional investors, but a net outflow of 15.3 million yuan from retail investors [2] - Shanghai Bank saw a net inflow of 7.31 million yuan from institutional investors, with a net outflow of 13.26 million yuan from retail investors [2] - Guiyang Bank had a net inflow of 4.12 million yuan from institutional investors, with a net outflow of 4.91 million yuan from retail investors [2] - Qilu Bank experienced a net inflow of 3.48 million yuan from institutional investors, but a significant net outflow of 30.56 million yuan from retail investors [2] - Changsha Bank had a net inflow of 1.00 million yuan from institutional investors, while retail investors saw a net outflow of 6.67 million yuan [2] - Other banks like Xiamen Bank, Qingdao Bank, and Zhengzhou Bank also showed varying trends in capital flow, with some experiencing net outflows from both institutional and retail investors [2]