来源：新华社 外交部回应美国对与伊朗有商业往来的国家加征25%关税：中方将坚定维护自身正当合法权益 。 美国总统特朗普1月12日在社交媒体发文称，任何与伊朗有商业往来的国家在与美国进行任何商业往来时将被加征25%的关税。外交部 发言人毛宁1月13日在例行记者会上回答相关提问时表示，中方在关税问题上的立场非常明确，关税战没有赢家。中方将坚定维护自身 正当合法权益。 End 欢迎分享给你的朋友！ 出品 | 中国能源报（c ne ne rgy） 编辑丨赵方婷 ...

有记者问，美国总统特朗普1月12日在社交媒体发文称，任何与伊朗有商业往来的国家在与美国进行任 何商业往来时将被加征25%的关税。 外交部发言人毛宁13日主持例行记者会。 毛宁表示，中方在关税问题上的立场非常明确，关税战没有赢家。中方将坚定维护自身正当合法权益。 ...

北京日报客户端消息，1月13日，外交部发言人毛宁主持例行记者会。 毛宁 资料图 图源：外交部网站 毛宁回应，中方在关税问题上的立场非常明确，关税战没有赢家。中方将坚定维护自身的正当合法权 益。 原标题：特朗普称将对伊朗商业伙伴加征25%关税，中方回应 编辑：杨雁琳 责编：吴光亮 审核：杨四海 迪拜中阿卫视记者提问，美国总统特朗普12日下午在社交媒体发文称，任何与伊朗开展商业往来的国 家，在与美国进行的任何商业活动中都将被加征25%的关税。请问中方对此有何评论？ ...

特朗普称任何与伊朗有商业往来的国家将面临美国25%关税 中方回应 来源：中国新闻网 编辑：王永乐 广告等商务合作，请点击这里 本文为转载内容，授权事宜请联系原著作权人 中新经纬版权所有，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载、摘编或以其它方式使用。 关注中新经纬微信公众号(微信搜索"中新经纬"或"jwview")，看更多精彩财经资讯。 中新网北京1月13日电 (记者 郭超凯)中国外交部发言人毛宁13日主持例行记者会。 有记者提问：美国总统唐纳德・特朗普在社交媒体发文称，任何与伊朗有商业往来的国家，在与美国进 行的全部贸易活动中，都将被征收 25%的关税。中方对此有何评论？ 毛宁：中方在关税问题上的立场非常明确，关税战没有赢家，中方将坚定维护自身的正当合法权益。 (完) ...

责任编辑：王永生 谷物分析师预计，美国农业部将于周一发布备受市场关注的作物报告，届时或将下调本作物年度的大豆 出口需求预估。部分人士认为，此前的相关预估过于乐观。 谷物分析师预计，美国农业部将于周一发布备受市场关注的作物报告，届时或将下调本作物年度的大豆 出口需求预估。部分人士认为，此前的相关预估过于乐观。 分析师同时预计，美国玉米和大豆的产量预估也将被下调，这在一定程度上与今年秋季的干旱天气有 关；不过，随着南美地区大规模收割工作即将展开，全球谷物供应预计仍将保持充足。 这份月度报告对美国谷物需求的研判将受到市场的特别关注。当前，农户正面临谷物价格低迷的压力， 同时还受到全球关税战对出口（尤其是大豆出口）造成的冲击，上述因素曾促使特朗普政府宣布向种植 户提供 120 亿美元的援助计划。 "美国农业部终将直面现实，下调大豆出口预估。" 美国斯通克斯集团旗下经纪公司 RJ 奥布莱恩的分析 师兰迪・米特尔施泰特表示。 美国农业部将于本周一美国中部时间上午 11 点发布多项核心报告，这也是其本年度规模最大的一次数 据集中发布，涵盖月度全球谷物供需报告、美国作物产量报告、美国谷物库存季度简报以及冬小麦播种 报告。 新 ...

编辑|林时砚 大家好，今天我想和大家一起探讨特朗普第二任期下，美国政治发生的变化。近年来，美国的局势有点 像进入了超现实状态。无论是国会山的争斗，还是美墨边境的紧张局势，甚至贸易谈判和街头的抗议， 我们过去认为不可能发生的事情，正一步步成真。这背后不仅仅是政策的调整，更多的是对政治规则的 一场压力测试。那么，这个国家究竟在经历着怎样的变动呢？ 过去一年的变化中，最引人注目的是总统的权力得到了前所未有的扩展。美国总统的权力原本就很大， 但长期以来，这些权力被一些不成文的规则、政治惯例和不同机构间的默契所限制。就像足球场上有条 隐形的边线，大家默契地遵守，不越雷池一步。然而如今，这条边界被不断试探，有时甚至直接被挪 动。其中，最常用的工具之一便是国家紧急状态的宣布权。 这种做法立竿见影，尤其在美墨边境，特朗普动用了大量的军人和国民警卫队，承担了通常由执法部门 负责的任务，造成了军事和民事领域的界限模糊。在今年六月，当洛杉矶爆发抗议时，联邦政府绕过了 加州州长，直接派遣了数千名士兵进入城市街头。许多美国人认为，这种情景只会出现在电影里，而不 是现实中。 这个权力最初是为了应对类似珍珠港事件或9·11那种极端的危机情 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that India is facing significant challenges due to the U.S. imposing a 50% tariff on its exports, leading India to seek alternative markets, particularly China, for its goods that are no longer viable in the U.S. market [1][3] - India has attempted to reduce its oil imports from Russia to appease the U.S., but this has not resulted in any substantial retaliatory measures against the tariffs, leaving India in a more passive position [1][3][7] - The Indian government is encouraging businesses to pivot away from the U.S. market and explore opportunities in China, despite the challenges posed by the competitive nature of the Chinese market [3][5] Group 2 - Despite some months showing growth in exports, Indian companies are merely adjusting prices and sales strategies to cope with the tariffs, leading to a false sense of security for the Modi administration [7][9] - The introduction of Colombian oil into India's procurement system is seen as a political maneuver to signal flexibility in energy sourcing to the U.S., but it may not be sufficient to satisfy American demands [9][11] - India's reliance on the U.S. and the need to appease both the U.S. and Russia has created a precarious situation, where each concession leads to new tensions and challenges [11][13] Group 3 - The article emphasizes that India's lack of a strong industrial base and effective countermeasures against U.S. tariffs has left it vulnerable, contrasting with China's ability to manage external pressures through its robust market and industrial capabilities [13][15] - Modi's strategy of making limited concessions to gain leverage in negotiations is flawed, as India lacks the necessary bargaining power to compel the U.S. to reconsider its tariffs [15][17] - The overall situation illustrates that India's attempts to balance its relationships with both the U.S. and Russia have resulted in a narrowing of its strategic options, ultimately leading to a more constrained position in international trade [17]

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing "tariff war" initiated by the United States is significantly impacting China's foreign trade, particularly in Guangdong province, which is facing immense pressure on orders, profits, and supply chains due to soaring tariffs reaching up to 145% [1]. Group 1: Impact on Companies - A packaging company in Dongguan has adapted to the challenges, achieving a sales increase from over 60 million yuan in 2023 to an expected 130 million yuan in 2025 by adjusting its market structure and focusing on quality and customization [5][8]. - A Shenzhen supply chain company reported a significant drop in shipping volumes to the U.S. in April 2025, with traditional foreign trade clients and cross-border e-commerce sellers initially halting operations due to the tariff war [7]. - Different companies are employing various strategies to cope with the tariff impacts, such as pre-stocking, expanding into European markets, and investing in equipment to enhance future capabilities [9]. Group 2: Market Adjustments and Opportunities - The resilience of Chinese foreign trade is supported by a complete manufacturing system and efficient supply chain capabilities, allowing for rapid responses to global customer demands, which many overseas markets cannot replicate [10]. - Emerging markets are becoming new growth engines, with a cross-border e-commerce platform focusing on Southeast Asia reporting strong sales in countries involved in the Belt and Road Initiative, indicating a shift in market focus from traditional Western markets [12]. - Despite uncertainties, companies are adopting a cautious approach, with the fourth quarter of 2025 expected to underperform compared to previous years, leading to a consensus on prioritizing stability [13]. Group 3: Future Outlook - Guangdong foreign trade companies are navigating the challenges of the tariff changes by pursuing technological upgrades, market diversification, and digital transformation to enhance their resilience against risks [15]. - The dual release of demographic and digital dividends in emerging markets is driving demand for new infrastructure, positioning these markets as both manufacturing destinations and direct consumer targets [16]. - The path of foreign trade remains turbulent, but through continuous adjustment and innovation, Chinese foreign trade companies are demonstrating that resilience is the key to overcoming cyclical challenges [18].

Group 1 - The article discusses significant events affecting PTA prices in 2025, highlighting the impact of the US-China trade war, geopolitical conflicts, and market dynamics on PTA pricing [1][2][4] - In April, PTA prices dropped to a four-year low of 4016 yuan/ton due to a 34% tariff imposed by the US, leading to a total tariff of 54% on Chinese goods and a significant decline in demand [1] - A rebound in PTA prices occurred in May after the US and China made progress in trade negotiations, resulting in the cancellation of 91% of tariffs and a price recovery of over 600 points [1] - The "Israel-Iran conflict" in June caused a spike in PTA prices due to rising crude oil costs, but prices corrected after a ceasefire was reached [1] - By September, the chemical sector faced a downturn as supply outstripped demand, leading to a collective price drop for chemical products, including PTA [2] - A meeting was held in October to address the issue of excessive competition in the PTA and bottle-grade polyester slice industries, aiming to stabilize the market and improve supply-demand dynamics [2] - In December, expectations for PTA improved as production slowed, leading to a significant rebound in prices and increased trading activity [4]

新的一年刚刚开始，然而关税战已然打响。墨西哥率先采取行动，对未与其签署自贸协定的国家统一加税，税率高达35%。这一举措看似不大，但其背后的 政治意义非常深远。这不仅仅是一次简单的关税调整，而是一次带有明显政治目的的交换，结果谁来承担代价，目的指向何方，已经显而易见。 墨西哥为何在这个敏感时刻出手？这一时间点极具象征意义。墨西哥立法机构已经通过了一项方案，明确规定自2026年1月1日起执行。涉及的国家不少，其 中包括中国。表面上看，规则对所有国家一视同仁，实际上，这一决定的影响并不对等。原因很简单，中墨两国的贸易额巨大，受影响最大的无疑是中国。 虽然墨西哥方面表示这不是针对任何特定国家，但实际上这一政策的政治目的非常明确。明年7月，美国与墨西哥的自贸协定将迎来关键时刻，是否续签， 取决于美国的评估。特朗普曾多次警告，如果墨西哥不配合美国的关税立场，美国随时可能对墨西哥商品加税。在这种背景下，墨西哥必须提前表态，采取 具体行动。对中国等未签署自贸协定的国家加税，实际上是向美国示好的一种方式。换句话说，墨西哥正试图通过牺牲他国利益来换取美国的善意。 墨西哥的行动不仅仅是单一国家的决策，更带来了示范效应。其他与中国有 ...