Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for healthy competition in the market, moving away from harmful practices like "involution" and excessive price competition [1][2][3] - The recent discussions among various government departments highlight the importance of companies adhering to their social responsibilities and maintaining fair competition to protect consumer rights and promote a healthy market environment [1][3][5] - The call for innovation and improvement in product quality by leading companies is crucial for enhancing competitiveness and resilience in the industry [1][3] Group 2 - The necessity for strengthening legal frameworks related to fair competition is underscored, with ongoing revisions to laws such as the Anti-Unfair Competition Law and the Anti-Monopoly Law [4] - The 2025 legislative plan indicates a focus on enhancing regulations in key and emerging sectors to ensure effective supervision and penalties for unfair competition practices [4] - The emphasis on industry associations to promote self-regulation and compliance among their members is seen as a vital step towards maintaining market order [5][6] Group 3 - Companies are encouraged to adopt ESG reporting practices to demonstrate their progress in environmental, social, and governance areas, fostering accountability and transparency [6] - The current complex international economic landscape necessitates a stronger emphasis on regulating competition to encourage fair and legitimate practices while avoiding detrimental competition [6]

来源：半月谈微信公众号 作者：刘美子 如今，山寨食品的"势力范围"早已突破传统农村市场的局限，凭借与正品高度相似的包装、极具迷惑性 的名称以及低廉的价格，悄然潜入监管薄弱地带，在网购、外卖等平台以及一些线下零食店等渠道频频 "冒头"。 "搭车"线上售卖 "看着像老干妈，包装上的名字却是'陶碧华'""远看是金典牛奶，近看却是全典牛奶"……不少网友在社 交平台上晒出自己踩过的坑。曾经以农村市场为主要根据地的山寨食品，如今借助网购、外卖以及一些 新商业模式，大规模蔓延至线上平台，出现"搭车"售卖等现象。 直播间、线上购物、外卖平台成为山寨食品的温床。一些商家将山寨食品与餐食打包成套餐捆绑销售， 部分商家还使用"收藏店铺送饮料"或"低价加购饮料"等促销手段吸引顾客购买。网友反映，线上看这些 山寨食品外观与正品相似，极易误导消费者。 全链条整治山寨食品 近日，国家市场监管总局针对农村市场发起假冒伪劣食品专项整治行动，剑指原料污染、知假造假、误 导消费三大顽疾。打击山寨食品是一项系统性、长期性、广泛性的治理任务，需要多方面共同努力。 提高违法成本。受访专家认为，相对于不法行为获取的高额利润，罚款、吊销营业执照等较轻处罚起 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Beijing Haidian District People's Court ruled that Ocean Company engaged in unfair competition by extensively scraping and transferring data from Era Company, ordering Ocean Company to eliminate the impact and compensate Era Company with 2 million yuan in economic losses and 300,000 yuan in reasonable expenses [1][3]. Group 1: Case Background - Era Company operates a leading internet medical platform, accumulating significant data related to diagnosis and treatment over years of operation [1]. - Ocean Company operates a competing platform and is accused of scraping patient reviews and medical articles from Era Company's platform [1][2]. Group 2: Legal Arguments - Era Company claims that Ocean Company's actions violate business ethics and harm its competitive advantage, resulting in severe economic losses [1][2]. - Ocean Company argues that its platform operates in a different segment of the internet medical field, asserting that there is no competitive relationship and that the data belongs to users [2]. Group 3: Court's Findings - The court found that both companies operate in the same internet medical field, targeting overlapping user groups and services, thus establishing a competitive relationship [2]. - The court ruled that Era Company has legitimate rights to the user-generated content it collects and organizes, which is protected under anti-unfair competition laws [2][3]. Group 4: Outcome - The court determined that Ocean Company's actions constituted unfair competition, as it gained competitive advantages without investment or costs, violating principles of good faith and disrupting market order [3]. - After the ruling, Ocean Company appealed, but the second-instance court upheld the original judgment, which is now effective [4].

Core Viewpoint - The opening of "Pandu Lai" in Jiaxing, Zhejiang, raises questions about brand name similarity to the established "Pang Dong Lai," leading to potential legal and consumer perception issues [1][2]. Group 1: Brand Name Similarity - "Pandu Lai" has a name that closely resembles "Pang Dong Lai," which may cause consumer confusion and is subject to legal scrutiny under regulations that prevent unfair competition [1]. - The registration process for business names requires local authorities to ensure that new names do not infringe on existing brands, but the criteria for "similarity" can be ambiguous [1][2]. Group 2: Legal Actions and Consumer Perception - Following the opening, "Pang Dong Lai" has initiated legal actions, including sending a lawyer's letter and preparing for potential administrative review or litigation against "Pandu Lai" [2]. - Regardless of the legal outcome, "Pandu Lai" may struggle to win consumer trust due to the negative associations with being perceived as a "copycat" brand [2]. Group 3: Brand Building vs. Name Mimicking - The article emphasizes that successful brands like "Pang Dong Lai" focus on service quality and customer satisfaction rather than relying on name similarity for recognition [3]. - Companies are encouraged to invest in genuine brand development rather than seeking short-term gains through name imitation, as consumers are likely to see through such tactics [3].

Core Viewpoint - The opening of a new shopping mall named "胖都来" in Zhejiang has sparked controversy due to its similarity to the well-known brand "胖东来," leading to accusations of trademark infringement and consumer confusion [1][4]. Group 1: Mall Overview - The "胖都来" shopping mall covers a significant area with two sections, A and B, and primarily sells clothing and daily necessities sourced directly from nearby factories, allowing for competitive pricing [2]. - The mall's total property scale is approximately 300,000 cubic meters, including a 50,000 cubic meter experiential shopping center, a 30,000 cubic meter exhibition center, and a 20,000 cubic meter live streaming base. A second phase of 30,000 square meters for a smart commercial complex is expected to open in October [2]. Group 2: Trademark Controversy - The "胖东来" brand has officially responded to the naming of "胖都来," stating that they have filed a complaint with local market supervision authorities and sent a lawyer's letter to "胖都来" [3][4]. - Legal experts suggest that the name "胖都来" may constitute trademark infringement and unfair competition due to its close resemblance to "胖东来," which could confuse consumers regarding the relationship between the two entities [4].

Core Viewpoint - Nintendo is suing accessory manufacturer Genki for allegedly revealing details about the Switch 2 console before its official release, claiming trademark infringement, false advertising, and unfair competition [1][3][4] Group 1: Legal Actions - Nintendo has filed a lawsuit against Genki, accusing the company of trademark infringement, false advertising, and unfair competition related to its planned sales of accessory products for the Switch 2 [1][3] - The lawsuit was prompted by Genki's claims of having a "replica" of the Switch 2 before its official announcement, which included features consistent with leaked information about the console [3][4] Group 2: Events Leading to the Lawsuit - In January, during CES 2025, Genki made headlines by claiming to have a physical replica of the Switch 2, which led to a confrontation between Nintendo's legal team and Genki at the event [3] - Following discussions with Nintendo, Genki closed its booth at CES just before the event concluded [3] Group 3: Specific Allegations - Nintendo alleges that Genki's CEO Eddie Tsai engaged in actions on social media that infringed on Nintendo's trademark rights, particularly in promoting Switch 2 accessories [4] - The lawsuit highlights that Genki released a promotional video on April 2, coinciding with Nintendo's announcement of the Switch 2's release date, which Nintendo claims was a deliberate act of false advertising [4]

5月2日晚间，"胖东来向胖都来寄律师函"话题一度登上微博热搜第二位。 浙江胖都来卖场开业 活动现场有女明星参与 5月1日，浙江胖都来卖场在其账号发布了开业视频，活动现场有女明星参与。该账号此前发布的视频中，也有多位明星艺人送上祝福。主页信 息显示，该卖场位于嘉兴市海宁市，地理位置接近杭州市。 5月1日，浙江嘉兴一家名为胖都来的卖场举办开业活动。因其名称与品牌胖东来相似，引发争议。2日，胖东来方面回应称，已经取证并向对方 邮寄律师函。 PANG D U LAI YINGZHONG HOLDIN 搜索 奧特 著名艾演员、制片人 咱们这个胖都来 764 不少网友直言胖都来"东施效颦""山寨的味道"。 浙江胖都来卖场开业（截图自卖场社交账号视频） 浙江胖都来卖场（截图自卖场社交账号视频） 胖东来：已发律师函 胖都来工作人员：没有刻意模仿 有网友发现，胖东来账号留言称，感谢大家对胖东来的关注和反馈，关于"胖都来"，他们已经取证并向市场监督管理局提交投诉书，也给"胖都 来"公司成功邮寄了律师函。 胖东来方面会持续跟进此事，有阶段性的结果也会通过他们的账号进行公示。 据极目新闻报道，记者联系到许昌市胖东来超市有限公司。 办 ...

来源丨21财经客户端、极目新闻、潇湘晨报、公开信息 5月1日，浙江嘉兴一家名为胖都来的卖场举办开业活动。因其名称与品牌胖东来相似，引发争议。 2日，胖东来方面回应称，已经取证并向对方邮寄律师函。 5月2日晚间，"胖东来向胖都来寄律师函"话题一度登上微博热搜第二位。 01 浙江胖都来卖场开业，活动现场有女明星参与 5月1日，浙江胖都来卖场在其账号发布了开业视频，活动现场有女明星参与。该账号此前发布 的视频中，也有多位明星艺人送上祝福。主页信息显示，该卖场位于嘉兴市海宁市，地理位置接 近杭州市。 寓意着丰盈、富足、 张俊 | 普吕作曲家 7 128 ♥ 121 1647 V 盈中控股 胖都来" H # and Ha PANG DU LAI 视频 胖都来盛 c | 0Q乐享生活 购在都来 AA 日十十五元 ♡ 1676 2 286 学来更多丰富的生活 e 如何为社会创造价值 PANG DII LA AA ■Q乐享生活 购在都来 と 时间: 5月1-3日 e PANG DU LAI YINGZHONG HOLDIN 搜索 興特 著名艾演员、制片人 3110 咱们这个胖都来 764 浙江胖都来卖场开业（截图自卖场社交账 ...

5月1日，浙江嘉兴一家名为胖都来的卖场举办开业活动。因其名称与品牌胖东来相似，引发争议。2 日，胖东来方面回应称，已经取证并向对方邮寄律师函。 5月2日晚间，"胖东来向胖都来寄律师函"话题一度登上微博热搜第二位。 浙江胖都来卖场开业 活动现场有女明星参与 5月1日，浙江胖都来卖场在其账号发布了开业视频，活动现场有女明星参与。该账号此前发布的视频 中，也有多位明星艺人送上祝福。主页信息显示，该卖场位于嘉兴市海宁市，地理位置接近杭州市。 FANG DU LAI HOLDIN YINGZHONG 搜索 奥特 Hine 番名艾演员、制片人 3110 咱们这个胖都来 764 浙江胖都来卖场开业（截图自卖场社交账号视频） 浙江胖都来卖场（截图自卖场社交账号视频） 不少网友直言胖都来"东施效颦""山寨的味道"。 胖东来：已发律师函 胖都来工作人员：没有刻意模仿 寓意着丰盈、富足、 张俊 号作曲 7 1647 128 121 胖都来 了 盈中控股 文庫 张 DAT 都需需 8 iiQ乐享生活 购在都来 c) N 0+ H 2867*更多丰富的生活 ♡ 1676 0 如何为從会创造价值 PANG DI LAT Q乐享生活 购在 ...

Core Viewpoint - The opening of a new shopping mall named "胖都来" in Zhejiang has sparked controversy due to its similarity to the well-known brand "胖东来," leading to accusations of trademark infringement and unfair competition [1][5]. Group 1: Company Responses - "胖东来" has acknowledged the situation and confirmed that they have filed a complaint with local market supervision authorities regarding "胖都来," citing potential consumer confusion due to the similarity in names [3][4]. - The company has also sent a lawyer's letter to "胖都来" and will continue to monitor the situation, providing updates through their official channels [3][4]. Group 2: Legal Implications - The name "胖都来" is suspected of constituting trademark infringement and unfair competition, as "胖东来" has significant market recognition, and the two names are phonetically and visually similar, which could mislead consumers [5]. - According to Chinese trademark law, using a name that closely resembles a registered trademark without permission can lead to confusion and is considered an infringement of exclusive trademark rights [5]. Group 3: Business Model Considerations - While business models can be learned and adapted, they are not protected by intellectual property laws. Companies must adhere to principles of good faith and honesty in market activities [6][7]. - Businesses should avoid simply copying others' branding or names, as this could infringe on trademark rights and lead to claims of unfair competition [7]. Group 4: Financial Performance - As of April 30, "胖东来" reported a sales figure of 17.49 billion yuan for April, with a cumulative annual sales total exceeding 80 billion yuan, reaching 80.27 billion yuan [7].