Workflow
政治极化
icon
Search documents
国际观察|美联邦政府“停摆”近纪录 民众“伤不起”
Xin Hua She· 2025-11-04 02:15
Core Points - The U.S. federal government shutdown has reached its 34th day, nearing the record of 35 days set in late 2018 to early 2019, causing significant disruptions in various sectors, particularly aviation, food assistance, and healthcare [1][4] - The ongoing political deadlock between the Republican and Democratic parties is exacerbating the situation, with both sides using the shutdown to further their political agendas without signs of compromise [1][7] Aviation Industry - Approximately 13,000 air traffic controllers and 50,000 airport security personnel are working without pay, leading to staffing shortages and increased flight delays [2][3] - Nearly half of the major air traffic control facilities in the U.S. are experiencing personnel shortages, with 90% of air traffic controllers in the New York area absent from work [3] - On November 2, nearly 4,300 flights were delayed and over 550 flights were canceled due to the staffing crisis [3] Food Assistance - The federal food assistance program, known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), ceased issuing benefits on November 1 due to funding exhaustion, affecting approximately 42 million Americans [4][6] - The interruption of SNAP is expected to have a particularly severe impact on African American communities [4] Healthcare Sector - The new enrollment period for the Affordable Care Act (ACA) began on November 1, with around 24 million participants, but rising premiums are anticipated due to the lack of agreement on government subsidies [6] - The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the shutdown could reduce the U.S. GDP growth rate by 1-2 percentage points in Q4, translating to economic losses of $7 billion to $14 billion depending on the duration of the shutdown [6] Political Landscape - The shutdown is primarily driven by a stalemate over healthcare spending, with both parties unwilling to compromise, which has led to a lack of urgency to resolve the situation [7][9] - The Republican party is leveraging the shutdown to push for budget cuts and a reduction in federal employment, while the Democratic party is using the situation to bolster its image as a representative of low-income groups [7][9]
国际观察丨美联邦政府“停摆”近纪录 民众“伤不起”
Xin Hua Wang· 2025-11-04 01:21
Core Points - The U.S. federal government shutdown has reached its 34th day, nearing the record of 35 days set in late 2018 to early 2019, causing significant disruptions in various sectors, particularly aviation, food assistance, and healthcare [1] - The ongoing political deadlock between the Republican and Democratic parties is exacerbating the situation, with both sides using the shutdown to further their political agendas without signs of compromise [1][9] Aviation Industry - Approximately 13,000 air traffic controllers and 50,000 airport security personnel are working without pay, leading to staffing shortages and increased flight delays across the country [2][3] - Nearly half of the major air traffic control facilities in the U.S. are experiencing personnel shortages, with 90% of air traffic controllers in the New York area absent from work [3] - On November 2, nearly 4,300 flights were delayed and over 550 flights were canceled, indicating a severe impact on air travel [3] Food Assistance and Healthcare - The federal food assistance program, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), ceased issuing benefits on November 1, affecting 42 million Americans, many of whom live below the poverty line [6] - The new enrollment period for the Affordable Care Act began on November 1, with 24 million participants expected, but rising premiums are anticipated due to the lack of agreement on government subsidies [8] - The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the shutdown could reduce the U.S. GDP growth rate by 1-2 percentage points in Q4, translating to potential economic losses of $7 billion to $14 billion depending on the duration of the shutdown [8] Political Dynamics - The shutdown is primarily driven by a stalemate over healthcare spending, with both parties unwilling to compromise, and each using the situation to advance their political goals [9][10] - The Republican party is seen as leveraging the shutdown to push for government downsizing, while the Democratic party aims to maintain support among low-income voters by advocating for food assistance [10]
美国政府“停摆”逼近历史纪录
第一财经· 2025-11-04 01:15
Group 1 - The U.S. federal government shutdown has entered its 34th day, nearing the record of 35 days set in late 2018 to early 2019, causing significant disruptions in various sectors including aviation, food, and healthcare, leading to increased pressure on both livelihoods and the economy [3][10] - Approximately 13,000 air traffic controllers and about 50,000 airport security personnel have been forced to work without pay, resulting in a shortage of staff and increased flight delays, raising safety risks in the aviation industry [5][6] - The U.S. Department of Transportation has reported a shortage of 2,000 to 3,000 air traffic controllers, exacerbating the operational challenges faced by the aviation sector [6] Group 2 - The government shutdown has led to the suspension of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) as of November 1, affecting 42 million Americans, which is about one-eighth of the U.S. population, with the most severe impact on low-income individuals [9] - The Affordable Care Act's enrollment for the new year began on November 1, with approximately 24 million participants, but rising premiums are expected due to a lack of agreement on government subsidies between the two parties [9] - The Congressional Budget Office has projected that the ongoing shutdown could reduce the annual GDP growth rate by 1 to 2 percentage points in Q4, translating to an economic loss of $7 billion if the shutdown lasts four weeks, $11 billion for six weeks, and $14 billion for eight weeks [9]
政府“停摆”逼近历史纪录 美民生经济双重承压
Yang Shi Xin Wen· 2025-11-03 16:23
Core Points - The U.S. federal government shutdown has entered its 34th day, nearing the record of 35 days set in late 2018 to early 2019, causing significant disruptions in various sectors, particularly aviation, food, and healthcare [1] - Approximately 13,000 air traffic controllers and 50,000 airport security personnel are working without pay, leading to staffing shortages and increased flight delays, raising safety concerns in the aviation industry [3] - The shutdown has exacerbated the financial burden on citizens, particularly in the healthcare sector, where the Affordable Care Act's enrollment began on November 1, with an estimated 24 million participants facing potential premium increases due to unresolved subsidy issues [5] - The federal food assistance program, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, has ceased operations as of November 1, affecting 42 million Americans, with a significant impact on low-income individuals [6] - The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the prolonged shutdown could reduce the U.S. GDP growth rate by 1-2 percentage points in Q4, translating to economic losses of $7 billion to $14 billion depending on the duration of the shutdown [8] - The shutdown highlights the increasing political polarization in the U.S., with both parties using the situation to further their political agendas without signs of compromise, negatively impacting the public [9]
国际观察丨美联邦政府“停摆”近纪录 民众“伤不起”
Xin Hua Wang· 2025-11-03 13:43
新华社华盛顿11月3日电题:美联邦政府"停摆"近纪录民众"伤不起" 美国联邦政府"停摆"11月3日进入第34天,距离打破2018年年底至2019年年初"停摆"35天的历史纪录仅"一步之遥"。此次"停摆"造成的破坏性影响 直指民航、食品、医疗等领域并持续扩大,民生与经济双重承压。 民生"耗不起" 除民航交通外,食品救济、医保福利等多个民生领域也在美国联邦政府"停摆"中遭到重创,民众生活负担不断加重。 分析人士指出,此次"停摆"凸显美国党争加剧的现实,共和、民主两党利用"停摆"相互指责并服务自身政治目的,且未见妥协迹象。美国民众不 仅自身利益受到严重损害,还要为不断升级的政治极化买单。 民航"飞不动" 据统计,此次美国联邦政府"停摆"以来,约1.3万名空中交通管制员和约5万名机场安检人员被迫无薪工作,请假人员日渐增多,导致民航业人手 短缺问题突出,多地航班延误情况加剧,航空安全风险增加。 10月31日,在美国纽约拉瓜迪亚机场,乘客排队值机。新华社记者张凤国摄 美国联邦航空局10月31日表示,全美约一半的主要空中交通管制机构存在人员短缺问题,纽约地区近90%的空管人员未能到岗。该部门10月30日 还对华盛顿里根国家 ...
美媒:美政治分歧战火烧到心理诊所
Huan Qiu Shi Bao· 2025-10-21 22:31
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses how political divisions in the United States are negatively impacting interpersonal relationships and the effectiveness of psychological therapy, with therapists increasingly allowing their political biases to influence their practice [1][3]. Group 1: Impact of Political Divisions - A recent poll indicates that 27% of Democrats and 10% of Republicans report that political divisions have profoundly affected their relationships [1] - Political polarization is becoming a new form of illness in America, similar to addiction or phobias, leading to social isolation and heightened anxiety [3][4] - One-third of Americans refuse political compatibility, and one-sixth have ended intimate relationships due to political differences [5] Group 2: Ethical Concerns in Therapy - The foundational ethics of neutrality in therapy, as advocated by figures like Sigmund Freud and Carl Rogers, are collapsing, with many therapists failing to act as neutral guides [3] - Some therapists are engaging in political indoctrination rather than providing genuine therapy, labeling differing political views as "pathological" [4][5] - The American Psychological Association's classification of racism as a "public health crisis" has encouraged therapists to engage in social justice actions, further polarizing their own views [3] Group 3: Consequences for Patients - Patients are increasingly leaving therapists who exhibit bias and turning to alternative sources like TikTok influencers or chatbots for more neutral responses [5][6] - The shift towards virtual therapy could lead to patients detaching from reality, as effective therapy should help individuals confront differences rather than avoid them [6] - Good therapy should aim to resolve conflicts without eroding emotional bonds, helping patients recover from the trauma of political polarization [6]
近7年头一遭,美国遭致命危机!特朗普彻底失算,回旋镖扎回老巢
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-10-20 03:36
Government Shutdown: A Result of Political Struggle - The government shutdown is a consequence of the political standoff between Trump and Congress, with Trump insisting on including tariffs on China in the budget, which Democrats opposed, leading to a failed budget proposal [1][2] - Over 700,000 federal workers were forced to stop working, affecting various sectors including national parks and educational activities, highlighting the severe impact of the budget impasse [1] Tariff Policy: Economic Self-Harm - Trump's belief that increasing tariffs would lead to victory in the trade war has backfired, with U.S. importers and consumers bearing over 90% of the costs of tariffs on Chinese goods [6][8] - The increased costs of imported components have raised production costs for U.S. companies, particularly small businesses, leading to layoffs and halted expansion plans [8] - The "decoupling" supply chain strategy has resulted in supply shortages and rising prices across various consumer goods, contributing to persistent inflation and declining corporate profits [8][10] Political Polarization: A Root Cause of National Division - The ongoing political struggle has transformed the U.S. into a battleground of endless political conflict, with both parties prioritizing power over national interests [12][14] - Trust in the government has plummeted to historic lows, with the public perceiving that both parties are more focused on undermining each other than addressing the needs of ordinary citizens [14] Repercussions: International Image Crisis - Trump's hardline stance on China has inadvertently led to economic turmoil and political chaos within the U.S., undermining its international credibility [15][17] - In contrast, China has continued to advance its global standing through high-quality development and international cooperation, making Trump's policies appear increasingly ineffective [19]
美国两党拉锯:治理失灵,政府“死机”|新漫评
Zhong Guo Xin Wen Wang· 2025-10-19 00:45
拉锯不止,代价却由民众买单:每周高达150亿美元的经济损失、两百多万名联邦政府雇员停薪、公共服务大面积瘫痪。政治极 化的恶果层层传导,民生保障系统如同断裂的电网,一片片陷入黑暗。 当权力的游戏凌驾于公共利益之上,熄灭的,不只是联邦政府大楼的灯光,更是普通民众对生活的希望与信任。若这场"人为系 统故障"不能尽快修复,那么坠入长期黑暗的,将不是冷漠的政客,而是依赖这套系统生存的美国人民。 责编:李磊、姚凯红 当地时间10月18日,美国联邦政府停摆进入第18天。民主、共和两党依旧在预算僵局中针锋相对,互不相让。表面上,这似乎 是一场"钱该拨给谁"的争论,实则是政治体系深层裂痕的集中爆发——国家治理再次陷入"政治短路",政府机器几近停转。 ...
美国两党拉锯:治理失灵,政府“死机”
Zhong Guo Xin Wen Wang· 2025-10-18 14:24
当地时间10月18日,美国联邦政府停摆进入第18天。民主、共和两党依旧在预算僵局中针锋相对,互不 相让。表面上,这似乎是一场"钱该拨给谁"的争论,实则是政治体系深层裂痕的集中爆发——国家治理 再次陷入"政治短路",政府机器几近停转。 当权力的游戏凌驾于公共利益之上,熄灭的,不只是联邦政府大楼的灯光,更是普通民众对生活的希望 与信任。若这场"人为系统故障"不能尽快修复,那么坠入长期黑暗的,将不是冷漠的政客,而是依赖这 套系统生存的美国人民。 (文章来源:中国新闻网) 拉锯不止,代价却由民众买单:每周高达150亿美元的经济损失、两百多万名联邦政府雇员停薪、公共 服务大面积瘫痪。政治极化的恶果层层传导,民生保障系统如同断裂的电网,一片片陷入黑暗。 ...
政府关门18天,美国公务员有人靠兼职糊口,有人延迟还贷
Hu Xiu· 2025-10-18 13:35
Core Points - The U.S. government shutdown has entered its third week due to the Senate's repeated failure to pass a temporary funding bill, affecting nearly a million families and key industries, while shaking market confidence [1][2][4]. Group 1: Economic Impact - The shutdown is estimated to cause economic losses of up to $15 billion per week, with systemic damage becoming increasingly evident [4][9]. - The transportation sector is particularly hard-hit, with over 13,000 air traffic controllers working without pay, leading to significant flight delays and cancellations [10][12]. - The real estate market faces uncertainty due to the interruption of the National Flood Insurance Program and the suspension of various loan approvals, potentially delaying or halting home transactions [12][13]. Group 2: Federal Employees' Struggles - Approximately 700,000 to 750,000 federal employees are on forced leave, while many essential workers are required to work without pay, leading to financial strain and increased anxiety among families [6][7]. - To cope with income disruptions, many federal employees are seeking side jobs, with some taking on multiple roles to make ends meet [7][8]. Group 3: Political Stalemate - The ongoing political deadlock is characterized by extreme polarization, with both parties unwilling to compromise, making a resolution unlikely in the short term [14][15]. - Experts predict that this shutdown could become the longest in U.S. history, as both parties engage in strategic maneuvers to influence voter sentiment ahead of upcoming elections [15][16].