Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the achievements and measures taken by the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) in promoting high-quality development of market regulation during the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, emphasizing the importance of building a unified national market to facilitate domestic circulation and competition [2][3][7]. Group 1: Measures for Building a Unified National Market - SAMR has initiated special actions to curb the abuse of administrative power and eliminate competition restrictions, resulting in the investigation of 239 administrative monopoly cases and the clearance of over 8,000 local standards [2][3][6]. - The revision of the Anti-Monopoly Law and the third amendment of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law have been implemented to strengthen the legal framework for competition policy, adapting to new market conditions [3][6]. - A comprehensive review mechanism for fair competition has been established, scrutinizing 42,200 important policy measures and proposing amendments to 11,400 of them to prevent policies detrimental to the unified national market [6]. Group 2: Focus on Antitrust Enforcement in Livelihood Sectors - Continuous special actions in the livelihood sector have led to the investigation of monopolistic practices in pharmaceuticals, water supply, gas, and other areas, effectively reducing public living costs and production burdens [4][6]. - A total of 3,400 cases related to operator concentration have been reviewed, with 145 cases of illegal operator concentration being addressed, thereby maintaining fair competition in the market [4]. Group 3: Regulation of Platform Economy - The rapid development of the platform economy has prompted SAMR to address issues such as algorithm abuse and unfair competition while promoting healthy industry growth [8][9]. - Regulatory measures include the introduction of guidelines for online trading supervision and the establishment of a national standardization committee for platform economy governance [8]. - Significant actions have been taken against online market irregularities, including the removal of 4.541 million illegal product listings and the investigation of 105,000 internet-related cases [9]. Group 4: Future Directions - SAMR plans to continue focusing on the construction of a unified national market, aiming to eliminate local protectionism and market segmentation while ensuring fair competition [7]. - The agency will enhance its regulatory framework for the platform economy, balancing regulation and promotion to foster sustainable development [9].

Core Viewpoint - The State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) has made significant progress in promoting high-quality development during the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, focusing on building a unified national market and eliminating local protectionism and market monopolies [1][3][4]. Group 1: Measures Taken by SAMR - SAMR has initiated special enforcement actions to curb the abuse of administrative power, resulting in the investigation of 239 administrative monopoly cases and the elimination of over 8,000 local standards [1][5]. - The agency has revised the Anti-Monopoly Law for the first time in 15 years and has updated the Anti-Unfair Competition Law to strengthen the legal basis for competition policy [3][4]. - SAMR has established a comprehensive review mechanism for fair competition, scrutinizing 42,200 important policy measures and providing feedback on 11,400 of them to prevent policies detrimental to the unified national market [4][5]. Group 2: Focus on Key Areas - The agency has intensified monitoring and assessment of monopoly risks in key sectors, particularly in the platform economy, to prevent disorderly competition [4][7]. - SAMR has conducted special enforcement actions in the livelihood sector, addressing monopolistic practices in pharmaceuticals, water supply, gas, and construction materials, effectively reducing public living costs [4][5]. - The agency has reviewed 3,400 cases of operator concentration and penalized 145 cases of illegal concentration, thereby maintaining fair competition in the market [4][5]. Group 3: Platform Economy Regulation - SAMR is balancing regulation and promotion in the platform economy, addressing issues like algorithm abuse and unfair competition while fostering healthy industry development [7][8]. - The agency has implemented various regulations to enhance enforcement efficiency, including the "Network Transaction Supervision Management Measures" and guidelines for anti-monopoly in the platform economy [7][8]. - SAMR has taken strong actions against online market irregularities, removing 4.541 million pieces of illegal product information and shutting down 58,000 non-compliant online stores [8].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government is focusing on high-quality development of market regulation during the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, emphasizing the construction of a unified national market to enhance domestic circulation and competition [2][4][7]. Group 1: Measures for Building a Unified National Market - The State Administration for Market Regulation has initiated actions to curb the abuse of administrative power and eliminate competition restrictions, resulting in 239 cases of administrative monopoly being investigated and over 8,000 local standards being cleared [2][6]. - The revision of the Anti-Monopoly Law and the third amendment of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law have been implemented to strengthen the legal framework for competition policy, adapting to new market conditions [4][6]. - A comprehensive review mechanism for fair competition has been established, scrutinizing 42,200 important policy measures and proposing amendments to 11,400 of them to prevent policies detrimental to the unified market [6]. Group 2: Anti-Monopoly and Competition Enforcement - Continuous enforcement actions in the public welfare sector have been undertaken, addressing monopolistic practices in pharmaceuticals, utilities, and construction materials, effectively reducing living costs for the public [5][6]. - The market regulation authority has reviewed 3,400 cases of operator concentration and penalized 145 cases of illegal concentration, maintaining fair competition in the market [5][6]. Group 3: Regulation of Platform Economy - The rapid development of the platform economy has prompted the need for balanced regulation, with new rules established to enhance regulatory efficiency and clarify competition rules in the sector [8][9]. - Significant actions have been taken against online market irregularities, including the removal of 4.541 million illegal product listings and the investigation of 105,000 internet-related cases [9]. - The market regulation authority is committed to promoting compliance among platform enterprises and enhancing communication with various stakeholders to foster a healthier market environment [9].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent regulatory actions taken by the Henan Provincial Asset Evaluation Association against an institution that allegedly engaged in unfair competition by bidding below the maximum procurement price by 45%, which is considered a violation of the "Implementation Opinions on Anti-Unfair Competition" [2][3]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The Henan Provincial Asset Evaluation Association issued a regulatory notice to the institution, emphasizing the need for risk identification and adherence to evaluation standards during project execution [2]. - This case marks the first public report of low-price bidding since the release of the "Implementation Opinions" in July 2023, aimed at protecting public interests and promoting fair competition in the asset evaluation industry [2][3]. Group 2: Implementation Opinions - The "Implementation Opinions" require evaluation institutions to supervise each other and resist unfair competition, fostering a fair competitive environment [3]. - Institutions can report suspected unfair competition to various regulatory bodies, providing evidence related to bidding prices, cost calculations, and historical fees [3]. Group 3: Related Notifications - The Interbank Market Dealers Association also issued a notification to combat "involution" in the bond market, emphasizing the need for reasonable cost calculations by lead underwriters [4]. - The notification encourages market participants to report violations related to underpricing and interference in underwriting fee quotes [4].

Core Viewpoint - The joint statement from Li Auto, China Automotive Technology & Research Center, and Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor aims to address the controversy surrounding the crash test of the Li Auto i8, highlighting the need for clarity in legal boundaries regarding advertising and competition [1][6]. Group 1: Joint Statement and Apologies - Li Auto and China Automotive Technology & Research Center issued apologies for the potential brand association risks caused by the dissemination of related content [1]. - Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor called for the resistance of unfair competition and adherence to legal and compliant business practices [1]. Group 2: Legal Implications - The initial video presentation by Li Auto may lead to consumer concerns regarding the safety of Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor's "Chenglong" trucks, potentially harming its reputation [2]. - The current laws on unfair competition and advertising need to be examined, particularly whether the initial video constitutes infringement or violates the Advertising Law [3][4]. Group 3: Advertising Law Violations - If the crash test parameters were not fully disclosed, it could violate the principle of advertising authenticity as per the Advertising Law, potentially leading to claims of false advertising [3][4]. - Selectively showcasing favorable footage without disclosing critical parameters may result in misleading promotion [3]. Group 4: Risk Mitigation Strategies - Li Auto should publicly disclose complete test parameters and clarify that results pertain only to specific scenarios [5]. - China Automotive Technology & Research Center could issue a written statement emphasizing that the tests were conducted per the client's requirements [5]. - Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor may consider third-party testing of its trucks to validate safety claims and guide public perception regarding non-standard tests [5]. Group 5: Industry Lessons - The incident serves as a warning for companies to ensure that promotional content is grounded in factual accuracy and to respect legal boundaries in competitive practices [6]. - Companies should strive for transparency and integrity in advertising to foster a fair competitive environment in the automotive industry [6].

Core Viewpoint - The Beijing Catering Industry Association issued a statement highlighting that "involution" and malicious competition disrupt fair market order, harm consumer rights, squeeze reasonable profit margins for businesses, erode the foundation for sustainable industry development, and hinder overall economic quality improvement [1][2]. Group 1: Call for Fair Competition - The association calls for adherence to fair competition principles, urging businesses to avoid predatory pricing below cost, coercive subsidy arrangements, and manipulative practices like "traffic tilting" and "search downgrading" [2][4]. - It emphasizes the importance of maintaining quality and service standards, prohibiting misleading practices such as false advertising and excessive low-price promotions that could harm consumer interests [2][3]. Group 2: Enhancing Core Competitiveness - Companies are encouraged to abandon short-sighted price competition and focus on sustainable business models that avoid negative profit cycles and quality degradation [4][5]. - The statement advocates for investment in value creation and innovation, utilizing advanced technologies like big data and AI to enhance efficiency and customer service [4][6]. - It stresses the need for differentiated competitive advantages by accurately targeting market needs and enhancing user experience [4][6]. Group 3: Strengthening Self-Regulation - Businesses are urged to conduct regular compliance checks against relevant laws and industry standards to identify and rectify potential risks of unfair competition and price violations [5][6]. - The establishment of robust internal compliance management systems is recommended to prevent systemic risks and ensure transparency in operations [6][7]. Group 4: Collaborative Industry Ecosystem - The association highlights the importance of maintaining symbiotic relationships within the supply chain, advocating for fair trading practices and timely payments to ensure stability [6][7]. - It calls for social responsibility, including fair labor practices and environmental sustainability, to promote rational consumption and reduce resource waste [6][7]. - Participation in industry self-regulation and standard enhancement initiatives is encouraged to elevate overall industry quality and standards [6][7].

Group 1 - The People's Bank of China and seven other departments released guidelines to support new industrialization, focusing on 18 targeted measures to enhance financial services for high-quality industrial development by 2027 [2] - The guidelines aim to prevent "involution" competition and promote the advancement of industries towards mid-to-high-end development [2] - The China Machinery Industry Federation issued an initiative against unfair competition in the photovoltaic industry, highlighting the negative impact of below-cost exports on the industry's reputation [2] Group 2 - The Ministry of Finance allocated 1.015 billion yuan for agricultural disaster relief, supporting regions affected by floods and droughts [2] - The National Health Commission and 16 other departments launched a plan to promote a healthy environment in China, aiming for improved drinking water quality and health literacy by 2030 [2] - The Shanghai Stock Exchange reported significant abnormal fluctuations in the stock of a company, urging investors to exercise caution [2] Group 3 - Xiamen Port Authority plans to acquire 70% of a container terminal group for 6.178 billion yuan [6] - Shandong Haihua intends to invest 2.32 billion yuan to acquire a 29% stake in a salt and alkali company [6] - Haimi Information reported a 40.78% year-on-year increase in net profit for the first half of the year, reaching 1.201 billion yuan [6]

(责任编辑：宋政 HN002) 【免责声明】本文仅代表作者本人观点，与和讯网无关。和讯网站对文中陈述、观点判断保持中立，不对所包含内容 的准确性、可靠性或完整性提供任何明示或暗示的保证。请读者仅作参考，并请自行承担全部责任。邮箱： news_center@staff.hexun.com 格隆汇8月1日｜"京东黑板报"发文称，近期，外卖行业补贴引发社会广泛关注，不少行业协会、商家发 声，希望停止"0元购"等内卷式补贴促销行为，构建良好行业生态，实现多方互利共赢良性发展。我们 在此承诺：规范补贴行为。京东外卖将继续坚持反内卷立场，坚决杜绝不正当竞争，抵制"0元购"等恶 性补贴，绝不以冲单量体现市场地位、制造市场泡沫。搭建简单透明的补贴机制，依法向商家和消费者 公示营销活动信息，商家可自主经营和参与促销活动。抵制恶性竞争。通过打造差异化特色菜品、提升 服务质量等，坚守品质定位，以技术赋能、供应链创新等打造核心竞争力，用产品、价格、服务赢得用 户口碑、创造长期价值，推动行业从"比补贴"回归"比品质"、"比服务"。 ...

近日，理想汽车新车上市发布会上播放的一段理想i8与一卡车100公里/小时对撞测试的视频显示，正面碰撞后卡车的四个车轮出现弹起，卡车驾驶室发生倾 倒，此视频引发争议。 该测试在互联网引起不少争议，在最初发布视频的时候，由于碰撞的重卡车型方向盘没有打码，网友发现该卡车品牌为乘龙卡车。 7月31日晚，"乘龙卡车"微信公众号发布《东风柳州汽车有限公司关于某品牌使用碰撞视频侵权的声明》。 乘龙卡车表示："某汽车品牌在2025年7月29日发布与乘龙卡车正面碰撞视频的行为，已构成严重侵权，并超过正常商业竞争范畴，严重误导和损害公众知情 权，对我司品牌及商业名誉带来了巨大负面影响，涉嫌违反《反不正当竞争法》《广告法》及《民法典》等相关法律。 截至目前我司了解到的情况，某汽车品牌未公开测试车辆状况（双方车辆是否改装、减配、卡扣是否固定、车辆是否过检等）、场景环境（测试场地状况、 车速、驾驶状态等），通过自定义碰撞条件，特定设计非常规测试场景，发布与公众认知的正常碰撞结果偏差较大的碰撞视频，不仅贬低我司品牌形象，还 容易对广大车主造成误导，形成安全隐患。" 理性传播:不过分炒作扩大,不被流量诱惑;不被某品牌利用,借机放大影响力。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the commitment of JD.com to establish a healthy ecosystem in the food delivery industry by resisting unhealthy competition and promoting transparency in subsidy mechanisms [1][2]. Group 1: Subsidy Regulation - JD.com will continue to oppose unhealthy competition and resist "0 yuan purchase" and other malicious subsidies, ensuring that market position is not reflected through order volume [2][3]. - The company aims to create a simple and transparent subsidy mechanism, legally disclosing marketing activities to merchants and consumers, allowing merchants to operate and participate in promotional activities autonomously [2]. Group 2: Quality and Service Improvement - The focus will shift from competing on subsidies to competing on quality and service, with an emphasis on differentiated specialty dishes and enhanced service quality [2][3]. - JD.com is committed to maintaining food safety and integrity in operations, promoting a quality consumption experience, and actively working against food waste [2]. Group 3: Mutual Benefit Promotion - The company will provide various incentives to merchants, including commission incentives, advertising support, traffic assistance, delivery fee subsidies, and exclusive after-sales services to help merchants operate better [3]. - There will be efforts to optimize rider protection, enhancing the dignity and sense of gain for delivery riders, aiming to create a win-win ecosystem for consumers, merchants, riders, and platforms [3].