Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court is taking steps to address "involution" competition through judicial measures, focusing on regulating monopolistic behaviors and preventing large enterprises from squeezing the profit margins of small and medium-sized enterprises [1][3]. Group 1: Judicial Measures Against Involution Competition - The Supreme People's Court's Intellectual Property Court aims to explore judicial paths to comprehensively address "involution" competition, emphasizing the need to regulate predatory pricing and other exclusionary practices by dominant firms [1][3]. - The court has identified three main factors contributing to "involution" competition: monopolistic behaviors, insufficient innovation, and unfair competition practices [1]. Group 2: Actions Taken by the Intellectual Property Court - The court has increased the supply of competition rules and case studies, clarifying the boundaries of market behavior, and has published 34 typical cases related to monopolistic and unfair competition since 2021 [2]. - Judicial anti-monopoly efforts have intensified, with 66 cases recognized as monopolistic since the court's establishment, including 15 cases in 2025 [2][4]. - The court is focusing on protecting innovation and promoting high-quality competition by applying measures such as evidence preservation and punitive damages to combat patent infringements [2]. Group 3: Addressing Malicious Competition - The court is targeting malicious competition cycles by strictly regulating unfair competition behaviors, such as stealing trade secrets and organized poaching, to prevent downward competition spirals [2][3]. - In 2025, the court handled several high-profile cases in sectors like platforms, new energy, and pharmaceuticals, encouraging cooperation and innovation among leading enterprises [3]. Group 4: Strengthening Judicial and Administrative Coordination - The court is enhancing the integration of administrative enforcement and judicial adjudication, ensuring that antitrust violations identified in civil lawsuits are reported to enforcement agencies [4]. - Since its establishment, the court has effectively adjudicated 203 antitrust cases, with 66 cases confirmed as monopolistic, covering various sectors including pharmaceuticals, telecommunications, and e-commerce [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court is addressing the issue of "involution" competition in the national unified market, emphasizing the need for judicial measures to regulate monopolistic and unfair competition behaviors [1] Group 1: Judicial Measures - The Supreme People's Court will explore deeper judicial paths to combat "involution" competition [1] - There will be a strict regulation of predatory pricing and other abusive market dominance behaviors by leading enterprises to protect the profit margins of small and medium-sized enterprises [1] - The court aims to regulate typical horizontal monopoly agreements such as fixed pricing and market division to restore a healthy competitive environment [1] Group 2: Administrative and Competitive Practices - The court will correct the abuse of administrative power that excludes or restricts competition, aiming to break local protectionism and industry barriers [1] - There will be an increased judicial protection for key frontier technology innovations and business secrets to enhance innovation and entrepreneurial vitality [1]

今年是"十五五"规划的开局之年，中国经济版图上，"内需"二字的分量从未如此之重。 从2024年中央经济工作会议强调"大力提振消费"，到2025年会议明确将"坚持内需主导"置于首位，并提出"建设强大国内市场"，政策信号已然十分清晰： 中国经济的增长引擎，正在经历一场从外驱向内生的深度切换。 然而，在宏观政策的暖风与微观市场的体感之间，似乎仍隔着一层毛玻璃。一边是国家大力推行"国补"政策试图撬动存量；另一边则是不少消费者发 出"没啥可买"的感叹，供给端却陷入"内卷式"价格苦战。 我们不禁要问：中国内需的"富矿"究竟在哪里？ 2026年1月28日，在小红书"保持在场·生活经济小峰会"上，北京大学国家发展研究院生活经济课题组发布《2026生活经济报告》，为我们提供了一个极具 穿透力的观察视角。 这份以生活社区"小红书"为研究样本的报告提出：走出"内卷"与提振消费的关键，在于将关注从冰冷的交易数据转向鲜活的具体生活。一种被称为"生活 经济"的新范式正在浮出水面。 被遮蔽的内需 长期以来，我们习惯于用"平均数"来勾勒市场的基本面。在追求"有没有"的供给不足的时代，这种视角是高效的，因为消费者的需求高度趋同：大家都需 要一 ...

国家市场监管总局执法稽查局副局长南军当天在新闻发布会上介绍，针对充电宝安全事件多发、频发，国家市场监管总局对此部署开展了充电宝质量安全集 中整治行动。全国市场监管部门共查处充电宝相关违法案件1169件。其中，罗马仕违反强制性认证规定及虚假宣传较为典型。 南军介绍，罗马仕在未取得相关型号充电宝强制性认证证书情况下，擅自委托生产和销售充电宝产品，同时，在明知部分充电宝电芯容量衰减，实际电池容 量已达不到10000mAh时，仍在产品显著位置进行虚假标注。上述行为违反了《中华人民共和国认证认可条例》《强制性产品认证管理规定》以及《中华人 民共和国反不正当竞争法》相关规定，属地市场监管部门依法对其作出行政处罚。 调查发现，罗马仕为压缩生产成本，未经强制性认证即从事生产销售活动，质量投入不足，源头质量管控流于形式。同时，企业法律意识、质量安全意识淡 薄，弄虚作假、夸大宣传，漠视消费者合法权益，反映出企业质量管控不严、主体责任落实不力的突出问题，一定程度上也反映出行业存在的重销量、轻质 量以及低质低价"内卷式"竞争的问题。 2026年1月27日，国家市场监管总局公布2025年综合整治"内卷式"竞争十大重大案件，其中包括查处 ...

今天(28日)，最高人民法院知识产权法庭副庭长朱理在新闻发布会上说，法庭将进一步探索深化综合整 治"内卷式"竞争的司法路径。 朱理表示，下一步，法庭将进一步探索深化综合整治"内卷式"竞争的司法路径，持续强化对垄断和不正 当竞争行为的规制。严格依法规制头部企业掠夺性定价和其他排他性滥用市场支配地位行为，防止"赢 家通吃"挤压中小企业利润空间；重点规制固定价格、分割市场等典型横向垄断协议行为，恢复良性竞 争生态；纠正滥用行政权力排除、限制竞争行为，打破地方保护和行业壁垒；加大对关键前沿领域科技 创新和商业秘密的司法保护，提升创新创造创业活力。 （文章来源：中国新闻网） 近年来，最高人民法院知识产权法庭立足激励科技创新和维护市场公平竞争两大职能，整治"内卷式"竞 争，加大司法反垄断力度，严格规制垄断行为。建庭以来，法庭在66案中认定构成垄断。 当前，"内卷式"竞争是全国统一大市场建设中的一大突出问题。朱理分析说，"内卷式"竞争成因复杂， 从知识产权司法角度来看，至少有三个因素值得重点关注：一是垄断行为滋生"内卷"；二是创新不足助 长"内卷"；三是不正当竞争行为加剧"内卷"。 ...

1月27日，市场监管总局发布了2025年综合整治"内卷式"竞争十大重大案件： 一是查处"莆田来啦"连锁企业侵犯注册商标专用权案。通过组织全国性、跨区域集中执法行动，成功摧 毁隐蔽性强、规模庞大的体系化制售假网络，有效遏制相关行业通过侵权假冒进行低价恶性竞争的"内 卷"问题，推动建立以尊重知识产权和鼓励创新为基础的良性竞争生态。 五是查处山西老葛商贸有限公司虚假宣传、价格欺诈系列案。依法查处当事人通过直播平台为合作方不 当推广营销商品等违法行为，累计罚款560万元，有力遏制利用直播营销进行不正当竞争的行业乱象。 六是查处苗古金贴（厦门）大药房有限公司发布违法广告案。依法查处当事人利用AI技术虚构"非遗传 承人"形象进行虚假宣传，并伴有"刷单炒信"等违法行为，有力打击了技术手段新、社会危害面广的新 型违法广告，遏制了利用违法广告进行"内卷式"竞争的市场乱象。 七是查处海南环城电线电缆有限公司销售不符合国家标准的电力电缆产品案。依法查处企业销售不合格 产品的违法行为，严厉打击通过降低质量、以次充好换取市场份额的恶性竞争，严守重点工业产品质量 安全底线。 八是查处何某某虚假宣传案。依法对当事人通过私域营销实施食品违法 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is that the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) is focusing on addressing "involution" competition through regulatory measures, particularly in key sectors like automotive, photovoltaic, and lithium batteries, by facilitating mergers and acquisitions to enhance operational efficiency and resource integration [1][2] - In 2025, SAMR concluded 129 cases related to operator concentration, which included various types aimed at promoting technological collaboration, optimizing capacity layout, and revitalizing idle capacity [2] - A notable case highlighted is the establishment of a joint venture between China National Petroleum Corporation and Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd., which focuses on lithium battery energy storage systems, demonstrating a shift away from "involution" competition [2] Group 2 - SAMR is intensifying efforts to combat unfair competition in the online market, particularly in sectors such as live e-commerce, pharmaceuticals for the elderly, and automotive platforms, with a focus on illegal activities like data theft and false advertising [3] - In 2025, a total of 1,932 cases of unfair competition were investigated, resulting in fines totaling 71.5294 million yuan [3] - The regulatory approach includes leveraging digital platforms for monitoring and enforcement, encouraging local market regulators to utilize big data analytics to enhance the detection of illegal activities [3][4]

Group 1 - The State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) emphasizes the importance of mergers and acquisitions as a means for operators to achieve resource integration and market clearing, particularly in sectors facing "involution" competition such as automotive, photovoltaic, and lithium battery industries [1] - In 2025, SAMR concluded 129 cases related to operator concentration, focusing on promoting technological collaboration, optimizing capacity layout, and revitalizing idle capacity [2] - A notable case involved China National Petroleum Corporation and Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd. establishing a joint venture for lithium battery energy storage systems, which was approved without conditions, highlighting the potential for industry collaboration to escape homogeneous competition [2] Group 2 - SAMR is committed to addressing unfair competition in the online market, with a focus on sectors like live e-commerce, pharmaceuticals for the elderly, and automotive platforms, and has initiated a special action to combat various forms of online unfair competition [3] - In 2025, a total of 1,932 cases of online unfair competition were investigated, resulting in fines totaling 71.5294 million yuan [3] - The regulatory body is enhancing monitoring of online unfair competition through digital platforms and encouraging local departments to utilize big data for more effective enforcement [3] Group 3 - SAMR plans to implement the new Anti-Unfair Competition Law rigorously, aiming to combat various forms of unfair competition and maintain consumer rights while fostering a fair market environment [4]

本报北京1月27日电 （记者林丽鹂）1月27日，记者从市场监管总局召开的2025年综合整治"内卷式"竞 争十大重大案件专题新闻发布会上获悉：针对前期充电宝安全事件多发、频发，威胁人民群众生命财产 安全和社会公共安全的问题，市场监管总局在国务院安委办有力指导下，部署开展了充电宝质量安全集 中整治行动。全国市场监管部门共查处充电宝相关违法案件1169件，守牢产品质量安全底线。 （文章来源：人民日报） 其中，深圳罗马仕科技有限公司违反强制性认证规定及虚假宣传等问题较为突出。深圳罗马仕科技有限 公司在未取得相关型号充电宝强制性认证证书情况下，擅自委托生产和销售充电宝产品，同时，明知部 分充电宝电芯容量衰减，实际电池容量已达不到10000毫安时，仍在产品显著位置进行虚假标注。属地 市场监管部门依法对该公司作出行政处罚，有力警示和震慑了行业内相关经营主体，同时也彰显了市场 监管部门综合治理"内卷式"竞争、维护良好市场竞争秩序的鲜明态度和坚定决心。会上，还发布了其他 2025年综合整治"内卷式"竞争重大案件。 ...

1月27日，市场监管总局召开2025年综合整治"内卷式"竞争十大重大案件专题新闻发布会。市场监管总 局反垄断二司副司长谢方在会上表示，投资并购是经营者通过市场化机制实现资源整合、优势互补及市 场出清的重要方式。市场监管总局坚持"快审不降质、严审不增负"，加强汽车、光伏、锂电池等"内卷 式"竞争重要领域经营者集中审查，有效支持企业依法通过并购盘活闲置资产、提升经营效率，支持企 业通过并购重组走出"内卷式"竞争。 完善经营者集中审查制度规则 谢方表示，2025年共审结相关领域案件129起，所涉案件包括促进技术协同、实现优势互补，优化产能 布局、整合区域资源，盘活闲置产能、促进转型升级等多种类型。 ● 本报记者 董添 市场监管总局价监竞争局一级巡视员杨洪丰在会上表示，市场监管总局始终高度重视网络不正当竞争行 为监管工作，坚决贯彻党中央、国务院决策部署，切实强化反不正当竞争，持续规范网络市场竞争秩 序，推动平台经济规范健康发展。 在加强执法力度方面，市场监管总局部署开展2025年整治网络不正当竞争行为专项行动。聚焦党中央关 心、人民群众关注、违法行为高发的直播电商、老年人药品、保健品、光伏、汽车平台等重点领域、行 业 ...