文 | 赵伟、贾东旭、侯倩楠 联系人 | 贾东旭 摘要 中央财经委会议提出"统一政府行为尺度"，为"反内卷"赋予新内涵。相比过往，本轮 "内卷" 中地方政府 为何成为主要驱动因素，其行为逻辑具体表现在哪些制度性层面？系统分析，供参考。 一、本轮"反内卷"，有何不同？政策更聚焦地方政府行为规范。 相较于 2015 年中央财经领导小组第十一次会议，2025 年中央财经委尤其强调对地方政府行为的规范。 对比两份通稿，后者更侧重规范地方政府行为，提出 "规范地方招商引资" 等具体举措。同时，会议将 "五统一、一破除" 调整为 "五统一、一开放"，核心变化体现在地方政府行为规范尺度与对外开放维度。 上述差异的形成，一方面源于 2015 年产能过剩的全局性特征，另一方面与本轮 "内卷式" 竞争中地方政 府的深度参与直接相关。 2015 年问题源于 "四万亿" 刺激后上游产业过度投资及当时的房地产下行压 力；《求是》文章指出，本轮地方政府的行为表现为打造政策洼地、盲目上马项目、设置市场壁垒。 具体来看，本轮 "内卷式" 竞争涉及的行业中，绝大多数需求呈改善或稳定态势，而非恶化趋势。 电气 机械等行业 2021-2024 年 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need to enhance the effectiveness of macroeconomic policies while addressing the declining marginal efficiency of these policies [2][3] - The importance of ensuring consistency between economic and non-economic policies to avoid "composite fallacy" is highlighted, as conflicting policies can lead to suboptimal outcomes [2][3] - The necessity of improving the transmission mechanism of macroeconomic policies to achieve intended policy goals is discussed, indicating that a blockage in these mechanisms can hinder effectiveness [3][4] Group 2 - The role of automatic stabilizers and fiscal policy transmission mechanisms is crucial, with income distribution, money supply, and prices being key mediators [4][5] - The need for a robust expectation management mechanism is outlined, emphasizing that market participants' expectations can significantly influence policy effectiveness [6][7] - The importance of matching policy goals with appropriate tools is stressed, referencing Tinbergen's principle that the number of policy instruments should at least equal the number of targets [9] Group 3 - The coordination between short-term and long-term policies is essential for stabilizing economic growth, with short-term counter-cyclical policies needing to align with structural reforms [10][11] - The current economic environment necessitates stronger macroeconomic stimulus policies to break negative cycles and restore confidence among businesses and households [8][11] - The potential negative impacts of short-term policies on long-term structural reforms must be carefully managed to ensure overall policy effectiveness [11]

以下文章来源于晚点对话 ，作者龚方毅 黄俊杰 中金公司首席经济学家 彭文生 " 建立消费大市场需要回归常识，让发展成果更公平惠及全体人民" 晚点对话 . 最一手的商业访谈，最真实的企业家思考。 对等关税从 34% 涨到 125%，已经足以说明买方与卖方的简单权力关系。 7 年前，特朗普第一次对中国发起贸易冲突时，中金公司首席经济学家彭文生提出短期可以用货币、 财政政策应对，但长期需要给中国的消费者减负。 这也是他长期以来的政策主张之一。在 2013 年出版的《渐行渐远的红利》一书中，彭文生就建议随 着政府财力和整体经济实力的增长，中国应当扩大和增强社会保障体系，再结合其他制度调整，缩小 贫富差距，提高全民的消费意愿。 现在，中国如何让自己的国民更有能力消费被更多提及。今年初，中央经济工作会议将 "大力提振消 费、提高投资效益，全方位扩大国内需求" 作为经济工作的首要重点任务。在诸多问题上有分歧的国 内学者们普遍呼吁公平分配、促进消费。 既然 3.5 亿人能成为消费的 "甲方"，14 亿人的统一大市场应该诞生更多的富足的消费者，而不只是全 世界最高效率的工厂。 4 月 13 日，我们再度拜访彭文生，谈论美国成为 ...

以下文章来源于晚点对话 ，作者龚方毅 黄俊杰 晚点对话 . 最一手的商业访谈，最真实的企业家思考。 对等关税从 34% 涨到 125%，已经足以说明买方与卖方的简单权力关系。 7 年前，特朗普第一次对中国发起贸易冲突时，中金公司首席经济学家彭文生提出短期可以用货币、 财政政策应对，但长期需要给中国的消费者减负。 这也是他长期以来的政策主张之一。在 2013 年出版的《渐行渐远的红利》一书中，彭文生就建议随 着政府财力和整体经济实力的增长，中国应当扩大和增强社会保障体系，再结合其他制度调整，缩小 贫富差距，提高全民的消费意愿。 中金公司首席经济学家 彭文生 " 建立消费大市场需要回归常识，让发展成果更公平惠及全体人民" 文 丨 龚方毅 黄俊杰 制图 丨 黄帧昕 编辑 丨 黄俊杰 这一轮贸易战开始的第一周，中文社交网络上流行起来一个容易理解的类比：甲方要逼乙方重签合 同。极其复杂的地缘政治、货币财政、金融历史被简化为交易中的权力关系。 有人觉得美国是甲方，因为 4.2% 的人口每年的消费额占全球的 1/3。白宫似乎也是这么想的，特朗普 的新闻发言人最近断言，每个国家都会寻求和解，因为所有人都想要美国的消费者。 但 ...

Core Viewpoint - Since 2022, the phenomenon of negative excess returns in actively managed equity funds has become increasingly common and severe, with most products underperforming the Shanghai Composite Index for three consecutive years [2][3] Group 1: Performance Comparison - The excess returns of actively managed equity funds turned negative after 2022, with a significant number of products underperforming the Shanghai Composite Index [2] - In 2024, the proportion of actively managed funds outperforming major indices like the Shanghai Composite, CSI 300, and others is very low, at only 19%, 14%, 18%, and 20% respectively, with average excess returns of -7.4%, -9.7%, -8.9%, and -8.0% [2] - Compared to index funds, actively managed equity funds have consistently shown lower performance, with average excess returns being negative from 2022 to 2024, while index funds maintained stable positive excess returns [2] Group 2: Market Volatility Impact - Significant negative excess returns in actively managed equity funds are concentrated around specific market windows, including periods of tightened COVID-19 control and liquidity crises in small-cap stocks [3] - The inability of actively managed funds to capitalize on key market turning points has left them in a passive position during major fluctuations in the A-share market [3] Group 3: Correlation Among Funds - Actively managed funds with significant negative excess returns exhibit higher correlation, with historical net value trends showing a cosine similarity of 0.72 for frequently underperforming products compared to 0.60 for others [4] - The similarity in holdings among all actively managed equity funds has remained high since 2022, with those showing significant negative excess returns having even higher similarity than other funds [4][5] Group 4: Systemic Issues - The worsening negative excess returns in actively managed equity funds may reflect a phenomenon of synthetic fallacy, where individual rational decisions lead to collective irrational outcomes [6] - Systemic flaws in industry assessment mechanisms and risk management models contribute to this issue, as the cost of deviating from mainstream holdings often outweighs the risks of following erroneous trends [6] - By the end of 2024, the concentration of top ten holdings in actively managed equity funds reached 58%, an increase of 22 percentage points since 2018, indicating a trend of "herding" behavior that exacerbates the decline in excess returns [6]

Group 1: Snack Industry - The snack industry is undergoing a transformation driven by channel changes, moving from offline to online, and from traditional retail to membership supermarkets and live-streaming e-commerce [1] - Strong listed snack companies have capitalized on the channel opportunities over the past three years, and this trend is expected to continue into 2025, making snacks one of the most certain growth segments in the food and beverage sector [1] - New channels such as WeChat stores, traditional supermarket adjustments, and instant retail are developing steadily, providing new growth points for listed snack companies [1] Group 2: Storage Industry - The mainstream storage market is stabilizing, with NAND Flash prices expected to rise starting Q2 2025 due to production control by manufacturers and increased demand driven by AI [2] - The DRAM prices are anticipated to stabilize and improve in the second half of 2025, with storage module prices likely to increase ahead of wafer prices, presenting investment opportunities in the module segment [2] Group 3: Analog Chip Industry - The analog chip industry is entering a phase of accelerated consolidation, with domestic leading companies expected to enhance their platforms through both organic growth and acquisitions [4] - The report highlights the importance of observing the integration trends in the domestic analog chip market, drawing parallels with historical overseas mergers and acquisitions [4] Group 4: Asset Allocation - The demand for multi-asset ETFs in China is expected to grow, driven by the need for stable returns and a rich supply of underlying tools [5] - The development of multi-asset ETFs will progress through different stages, starting with simple performance-linked indices and evolving towards more complex models catering to specific needs [5] Group 5: Aviation Industry - The recovery of business travel demand post-Lantern Festival is supporting the recent increase in domestic ticket prices, with passenger flow on key routes recovering significantly [15] - The expectation of increased demand for travel due to economic recovery and the potential for improved utilization of wide-body aircraft on North American routes are positive indicators for airline profitability [15]