Core Viewpoint - Despite the ruling coalition of Japan's Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) losing its majority in the House of Councillors election, both the yen and Japanese stock futures unexpectedly rose, indicating market resilience and investor sentiment towards political stability [1][5]. Group 1: Election Results and Market Reaction - The LDP and Komeito coalition lost its majority in the recent election, marking the first time since its establishment in 1955 that the LDP has not secured a majority in both houses of the National Diet [1]. - Following the election results, the yen initially rose by 0.7% against the dollar, reaching a high of 147.79 before settling around 148.48, and then rebounding to approximately 147.80 [2]. - Market analysts noted that investors had anticipated the coalition's loss, and the actual results were relatively mild, which helped avoid severe political turmoil [5][8]. Group 2: Investor Sentiment and Positioning - Some investors had prepared for a more significant defeat for the coalition and the potential resignation of Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, leading to a short-term rebound in the yen as political risk eased [5]. - Despite the yen's rise, several investment banks remain bearish on the yen, with Bank of America maintaining a short position, suggesting that any short-term rebounds should be viewed as selling opportunities [5][16]. - HSBC issued a warning that the USD/JPY could exceed 152 due to political and Bank of Japan risks, indicating a potential "lira-ization" of the yen [6]. Group 3: Key Variables Influencing Future Trends - The future price movements of the yen will depend on three main factors: whether the LDP retains or loses its coalition majority, whether Ishiba continues as Prime Minister, and the outcome of any leadership elections within the LDP if Ishiba resigns [13]. - If Ishiba resigns, the market may react negatively, leading to further yen depreciation and increased volatility, especially as concerns about fiscal expansion grow [14][16]. - Conversely, if Ishiba remains in power and seeks to expand the coalition with compatible parties, this could alleviate concerns about pro-cyclical fiscal policies, potentially causing the USD/JPY to initially retreat to around 148 [16]. Group 4: Economic Policy Implications - Analysts from Nomura suggested that the loss of majority seats could lead to dual policies of consumption tax cuts and cash subsidies, which might boost the economy in the short term but could result in significant economic pullbacks once these policies expire [17].

Core Viewpoint - Despite the ruling coalition of Japan's Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) losing its majority in the House of Councillors election, the Japanese yen and stock index futures unexpectedly rose [1][4]. Group 1: Election Results and Market Reaction - The LDP and its coalition partner, Komeito, lost their majority in the House of Councillors for the first time since the LDP's establishment in 1955 [1]. - Following the election results, Japanese stock index futures rose unexpectedly, and the yen appreciated by 0.7% against the US dollar before narrowing its gains [1]. - Market analysts noted that investors had anticipated the LDP's loss but the actual results were milder than expected, alleviating fears of severe political turmoil [4]. Group 2: Investor Sentiment and Positioning - Prior to the election, the yen had declined for two consecutive weeks, and even risk-tolerant hedge funds paused their bets on Japanese assets [4]. - The Commodity Futures Trading Commission reported that as of July 11, commodity trading advisors still held significant long positions in the yen, indicating that market positioning did not fully reflect the anticipated election outcome [4]. - Bank of America noted that hedge funds bought yen against the euro between July 14-16, suggesting profit-taking actions [6]. Group 3: Key Variables Influencing Future Market Trends - The future price movements will depend on three factors: whether the LDP retains or loses its coalition majority, whether Prime Minister Kishida remains in office, and the outcome of any leadership elections if Kishida resigns [9]. - If Kishida resigns, the market may consider the risks associated with the subsequent leadership election, potentially leading to further yen depreciation and increased volatility [9]. - Conversely, if Kishida remains and seeks to expand the coalition with compatible parties, it may alleviate concerns over pro-cyclical fiscal policies, initially pushing the USD/JPY rate down to around 148 [9]. Group 4: Long-term Political Uncertainty - Analysts from Bank of America maintain a bearish outlook on the yen, suggesting that any short-term rebounds should be viewed as opportunities to sell [9]. - Even if the LDP retains a majority, any rebound in the yen may be temporary due to ongoing political uncertainties, especially during the upcoming autumn parliamentary session [9]. - Nomura previously indicated that the loss of majority seats could lead to a dual policy of consumption tax cuts and cash subsidies, which might boost the economy in the short term but could result in a significant economic downturn once these policies expire [9].

Core Viewpoint - The new governor of the Bulgarian National Bank, Dimitar Radev, emphasizes that the European Central Bank (ECB) should pay more attention to political risks in its decision-making process [1] Group 1: Political Risks - Radev highlights that political developments are increasingly becoming sources of volatility, uncertainty, and systemic risk, which must be considered by central banks [1] - He references historical events, such as the sudden closure of the Bulgarian Ministry of Finance in the 1980s, to illustrate the importance of political stability [1] - Recent events, including France's efforts to repair public finances and Trump's criticisms of Powell, further underscore the political pressures faced by governments [1] Group 2: Monetary Policy - Radev believes that the ECB's current deposit rate of 2% is at or very close to a neutral level, suggesting that any further adjustments will be cautious and data-dependent [1] - He will begin participating in ECB meetings as an observer starting in September [1]

Core Viewpoint - Tesla's stock price dropped by 6.8% following CEO Elon Musk's announcement of forming a "American Party," escalating tensions with President Trump [1][3]. Group 1: Market Reaction - Analysts indicate that Musk's political involvement may raise investor concerns regarding Tesla's future prospects [2]. - Tesla's stock market value has decreased by approximately 40% since reaching a historical high in December of the previous year [7]. - On a single day, Tesla's market value evaporated by over $150 billion due to concerns over Musk's political disputes with Trump [6]. Group 2: Political Tensions - Musk's public dispute with Trump over tax and spending policies has intensified, with Trump criticizing Musk's third-party initiative as unfeasible [3]. - Musk's previous role as head of the "Government Efficiency Department" under Trump negatively impacted Tesla, leading to dissatisfaction among investors [6]. Group 3: Operational Challenges - Tesla has experienced a decline in delivery volumes for two consecutive quarters, contributing to ongoing pressure on its stock price [7]. - The U.S. Air Force has suspended a cargo rocket test project associated with Musk's SpaceX due to potential environmental impacts, further complicating Musk's business ventures [8].

Core Viewpoint - Elon Musk's announcement of a $20 billion investment (approximately 5% of his net worth) to launch the "American Party" raises concerns about its impact on Tesla's stock price, necessitating a multi-dimensional analysis of market reactions, funding nature, and potential political risks [1]. Short-term Stock Price Pressure - Concerns over fund withdrawal: Although $20 billion represents only 5% of Musk's net worth, there are fears he may sell Tesla shares to raise funds, which could lead to a significant stock price drop. For instance, Tesla's stock fell 14.3% on July 3, resulting in a $150 billion market cap loss, reflecting market panic over potential cashing out due to political actions [1][3]. - Escalating policy retaliation risks: Trump has threatened to review contracts of Musk's companies (e.g., NASA contracts for SpaceX, subsidies for Tesla). If the "American Party" continues to challenge the Republican Party, it may lead to targeted policy crackdowns, such as the cancellation of electric vehicle tax credits (costing Tesla $1.2 billion annually) and termination of SpaceX's government contracts (valued at $22 billion) [1][3]. Investor Confidence Erosion - Musk's involvement in high-risk political ventures raises concerns about his divided focus, especially as Tesla is at a critical juncture in developing autonomous driving technology. A decrease in his attention could hinder technological progress [3]. Potential Upsides and Buffer Mechanisms - Flexible funding sources: Musk can leverage stock pledges or dividends from SpaceX to secure funds without directly selling Tesla shares. With approximately $390 billion in assets, he has considerable liquidity management options [4]. - Social media leverage: The X platform (with 540 million monthly active users) can mobilize voters at a low cost, potentially enhancing Tesla's brand recognition among tech-savvy demographics if the "American Party" gains public support quickly [5]. - Feasibility of a "key minority" strategy: The party aims to secure "2-3 Senate seats and 8-10 House seats," focusing on veto power over key legislation. Success could lead to favorable policies for Tesla, such as relaxed AI regulations and deregulation of energy, mitigating some risks [5]. Medium to Long-term Balance Point - Political risk pricing completion: If Musk clarifies his funding methods (e.g., not selling stock) and both parties do not impose substantial sanctions, Tesla's stock price may recover [6]. - Industry synergy opportunities: The "American Party's" advocacy for military AI and space exploration aligns with Tesla's robotics and Starlink technologies, potentially attracting strategic investors [6]. - Systemic barriers: The U.S. electoral system limits third-party influence. If the "American Party" fails to secure significant congressional seats, its political impact may diminish, allowing Tesla's fundamentals to regain dominance over stock price [6]. Conclusion - Increased volatility but not necessarily long-term bearish: Tesla's stock faces short-term pressure from cash-out concerns and policy uncertainties, but Musk's financial maneuverability and the advantages of the X platform may partially offset risks. The medium to long-term impact hinges on three key factors: 1. Funding chain: whether Tesla stock sales are triggered; 2. Political retaliation: whether both parties escalate sanctions; 3. Policy returns: whether the "American Party" can secure benefits for the tech industry in key legislation [7].

Group 1 - The long-term bond market is experiencing significant volatility due to rising government borrowing demands and expanding deficits, leading to higher yield requirements from investors [1][4] - The UK has become a focal point of this turmoil, with the Chancellor's proposed £50 billion welfare cuts being rejected, raising concerns about the government's fiscal discipline and resulting in a sharp increase in 30-year UK bond yields [1][4] - The sensitivity of long-term bonds to fiscal risks is attributed to their illiquid market, where even minor sell-offs can lead to substantial price drops and yield spikes [3][4] Group 2 - Various governments, including the US, Japan, and Australia, are reconsidering their issuance strategies for long-term bonds in light of high interest rates and fiscal concerns [4][6] - Japan's recent announcement to reduce the issuance of long-term bonds has led to a temporary stabilization in demand for its 30-year bonds, although yields still rose due to global market pressures [6][7] - Investors are increasingly favoring short-term bonds over long-term ones due to the heightened sensitivity of the latter to fiscal and political risks, as well as the demand for higher yields as compensation for these risks [7]

野村在最新研报中表示，日本政府最初设定的“完全取消美国关税”的目标已经无法实现，在谈判中难以获得政治上的完胜。考虑到美国并无意完全取消对特定国家的关税，且其要求包含了进口美国大米等政治敏感项目，任何协议的达成都很可能推迟到日本参议院选举（7月20日）之后。最终的解决方案可能是双方在互相升级（例如美国加征关税）后，再做出妥协并各自宣布胜利。需要警惕日本面临的两大核心政治风险，一是日本显著增加其国防预算作为对美国的让步，二是日本政府谈判失利导致执政党自民党在参议院选举受挫。野村预测日本股市将继续承压，而债券市场可能获得支撑。 ...

花旗：泰国的政治风险可能已经见顶。投资者应将佩通坦的停职视为减少了联合政党内部摩擦造成的政治僵局，并降低了街头抗议的压力。佩通坦的停职出乎花旗的基本预期，但政府在临时总理的领导下理论上仍在运转。假设联合政府组成没有变动，临时总理和内阁应该能够通过年度预算。外汇交易员 (@myfxtrader):泰国宪法法院7月1日宣布，受理有关调查总理佩通坦是否存在违宪行为的请愿书，并决定暂停佩通坦行使总理职权，直至法院作出最终裁决，并要求佩通坦在15天内提交声明。 ...

在特朗普开启第二个总统任期后，马斯克成为其政府中最引人瞩目的人物之一。但随着美国政府效率部 工作和特朗普关税政策的推进，他和特朗普阁僚之间的矛盾不断升级。 6月初，马斯克公开抨击特朗普的"大而美"税改法案，两人的矛盾被摆上台面。马斯克随后曝出关于特 朗普的"猛料"，特朗普则一度威胁要取消特斯拉的政府补贴与合同。 【文/观察者网 王恺雯】美国总统特朗普和特斯拉首席执行官马斯克近期因美国税改法案公开撕破脸。 香港《南华早报》6月17日刊文，指出特朗普对待昔日盟友马斯克的方式凸显了他的不可预测性，这会 加深中国对他的怀疑，从而在同美国打交道时更为谨慎。 马斯克是特朗普2024年总统竞选的最大的政治捐助者，两人的关系在特朗普第二次竞选总统时进入了一 段"蜜月期"，马斯克曾称自己是特朗普的"第一拍档"（first buddy）。 虽然双方的争执后来有所缓和，马斯克也主动"示好"，但《南华早报》指出，此事可能加深了中国人对 特朗普是一个反复无常、出尔反尔政客的印象。外交观察人士认为，这意味着中国在和特朗普打交道时 会保持警惕和谨慎。 特朗普去年胜选后，他多次与马斯克一起接见来访的外国领导人。 社交媒体 清华大学战略与安全 ...

政治风暴中的科技巨头 美联储政策与科技股狂欢 在更宏观的层面上，科技股整体受到美联储降息预期的提振。然而，特斯拉的表现尤为引人注目，其市 值单周跌幅曾达15%的剧烈波动，凸显了这家公司独特的市场定位和投资者情绪对其的特殊反应。 上周，一场由推特引发的政治风暴席卷华尔街。埃隆·马斯克公开批评特朗普政策的言论，如同一颗重 磅炸弹投入资本市场，导致特斯拉市值在短短几天内蒸发1500亿美元。这场冲突揭示了现代企业面临的 新挑战：在政治立场与商业利益之间寻找平衡变得前所未有的困难。 当科技巨头的掌舵人涉足政治领域，其言论的影响力已远超个人范畴。马斯克的批评不仅代表个人观 点，更被市场解读为特斯拉公司可能面临政策风险的信号。投资者用脚投票的反应，展示了资本市场对 政治风险的极度敏感。 冲突降温与市场修复 戏剧性的是，本周特朗普表态"愿与马斯克对话"后，这场政治冲突迅速降温。市场情绪随之回暖，特斯 拉股价开始收复失地。这一现象揭示了资本市场对政治不确定性的厌恶程度，以及对企业领袖政治立场 稳定性的强烈需求。 与此同时，特斯拉在技术领域的突破性进展——Robotaxi项目的实质性推进，为股价反弹提供了双重动 力。技术利好成功 ...